• Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    production housing expert witness Clayhatchee Alabama custom home expert witness Clayhatchee Alabama Medical building expert witness Clayhatchee Alabama housing expert witness Clayhatchee Alabama retail construction expert witness Clayhatchee Alabama hospital construction expert witness Clayhatchee Alabama industrial building expert witness Clayhatchee Alabama townhome construction expert witness Clayhatchee Alabama multi family housing expert witness Clayhatchee Alabama structural steel construction expert witness Clayhatchee Alabama office building expert witness Clayhatchee Alabama mid-rise construction expert witness Clayhatchee Alabama Subterranean parking expert witness Clayhatchee Alabama high-rise construction expert witness Clayhatchee Alabama casino resort expert witness Clayhatchee Alabama custom homes expert witness Clayhatchee Alabama concrete tilt-up expert witness Clayhatchee Alabama tract home expert witness Clayhatchee Alabama condominiums expert witness Clayhatchee Alabama condominium expert witness Clayhatchee Alabama low-income housing expert witness Clayhatchee Alabama landscaping construction expert witness Clayhatchee Alabama
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Clayhatchee, Alabama

    Alabama Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Although there is case law precedent for right to repair, Title 6 Article 13A states action must be commenced within 2 years after cause and not more than 13 years after completion of construction.

    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Clayhatchee Alabama

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.

    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Tallapoosa Co Home Builders Association
    Local # 0186
    714 Commerce Drive
    Alexander City, AL 35010

    Home Builders Association of Tuscaloosa
    Local # 0188
    2009 Paul W Bryant Dr
    Tuscaloosa, AL 35401

    Chilton County Home Builders Association
    Local # 0117
    209 Parliament Parkway
    Maylene, AL 35114

    Lee Co Home Builders Association
    Local # 0136
    528 Lafayette Pl
    Auburn, AL 36830

    Home Builders Association of Phenix City
    Local # 0172
    1808 Opelika Road
    Phenix City, AL 36867

    Associated Home Builders of Greater Birmingham
    Local # 0116
    5000 Grantswood Road Ste 240
    Irondale, AL 35210

    Greater Montgomery Home Builders Association
    Local # 0164
    6336 Woodmere Blvd
    Montgomery, AL 36117

    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Clayhatchee Alabama

    Defective Panels Threatening Profit at China Solar Farms: Energy

    Is Your Design Professional Construction Contract too Friendly? (Law Note)

    Construction of New U.S. Homes Declines on Plunge in South

    2017 Construction Outlook: Slow, Mature Growth, but No Decline, Expected

    Architect Blamed for Crumbling Public School Playground

    Partner Jonathan R. Harwood Obtained Summary Judgment in a Coverage Action Arising out of a Claim for Personal Injury

    New York’s Lawsky Proposes Changes to Reduce Home Foreclosures

    Sometimes It’s Okay to Destroy Evidence

    Reminder: Pay if Paid Not All Encompassing (but Could it be?)

    Suing the Lowest Bidder on Public Construction Projects

    He's the Top U.S. Mortgage Salesman. His Daughter Isn't Buying It

    KF-103 v. American Family Mutual Insurance: Tenth Circuit Upholds the “Complaint Rule”

    Defeating the Ten-Year Statute of Repose For Latent Construction Defects

    Washington Supreme Court Sides with Lien Claimants in Williams v. Athletic Field

    Turmoil Slows Rebuilding of Puerto Rico's Power Grid

    Arizona Court of Appeals Awards Attorneys’ Fees in Quiet-Title Action

    Are Contracting Parties Treated the Same When it Comes to Notice Obligations?

    Pinnacle Controls in Verano

    Architectural Firm Disputes Claim of Fault

    Pennsylvania Supreme Court Adopts New Rule in Breach-of-the-Consent-to-Settle-Clause Cases

    California Case Adds Difficulties for Contractors & Material Suppliers

    Harrisburg Sought Support Before Ruinous Incinerator Retrofit

    Changes to Pennsylvania Mechanic’s Lien Code

    Texas Supreme Court Holds that Invoking Appraisal Provision and Paying Appraisal Amount Does Not Insulate an Insurer from Damages Under the Texas Prompt Payment of Claims Act

    Lack of Flood Insurance for New York’s Poorest Residents

    EPA and the Corps of Engineers Repeal the 2015 “Waters of the United States” Rule

    The Relevance and Reasonableness of Destructive Testing

    "My Bad, I Thought It Was in Good Faith" is Not Good Enough - Contractor Ordered to Pay Prompt Payment Penalties

    Alabama Supreme Court Reverses Determination of Coverage for Faulty Workmanship

    Flow-Down Clauses Can Drown Your Project

    Las Vegas Harmon Hotel to be Demolished without Opening

    Homebuilders Call for Housing Tax Incentives

    Bad News for Buyers: U.S. Mortgage Rates Hit Highest Since 2014

    Millennials Want Houses, Just Like Everybody Else

    White and Williams Earns Tier 1 Rankings from U.S. News "Best Law Firms" 2020

    BHA Attending the Construction Law Conference in San Antonio, TX

    Home Prices in 20 U.S. Cities Rose at Slower Pace in May

    Performance Bond Surety Takeover – Using Terminated Contractor To Complete The Work

    Homebuilding in Las Vegas Slows but Doesn’t Fall

    California Builders’ Right To Repair Is Alive

    2015 California Construction Law Update

    Not So Unambiguous: California Court of Appeal Finds Coverage for Additional Insured

    Texas Construction Firm Officials Sentenced in Contract-Fraud Case

    Developer Sues TVA After It Halts Nuke Site Sale

    University of California Earthquake Report Provides List of Old Concrete Buildings in LA

    Brown Paint Doesn’t Cover Up Construction Defects

    Defense Owed to Directors and Officers Despite Insured vs. Insured Exclusion

    Ensuing Loss Provision Does Not Salvage Coverage

    Residential Construction Surges in Durham

    How Tech Is Transforming the Construction Industry in 2019
    Corporate Profile


    With over four thousand construction and design related expert designations, the Clayhatchee, Alabama Construction Expert Directory provides a streamlined multi-disciplinary expert retention and support solution to legal professionals and construction practice groups seeking meaningful resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the industry's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, real estate investment trusts, risk managers, owners, as well as a variety of municipalities and government offices. Utilizing in house assets which comprise licensed architects, civil engineers, building envelope experts, general and specialty contractors focused on the evaluation of construction claims, the construction experts group brings specialized experience and local capabilities to Clayhatchee and the surrounding areas.

    Clayhatchee Alabama construction defect expert witnessClayhatchee Alabama construction expert witnessesClayhatchee Alabama construction defect expert witnessClayhatchee Alabama multi family design expert witnessClayhatchee Alabama forensic architectClayhatchee Alabama construction claims expert witnessClayhatchee Alabama architectural expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Clayhatchee, Alabama

    Dispute Waged Over Design of San Francisco Subway Job

    July 30, 2019 —
    Contractor Tutor Perini Corp. is clashing with the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency over what the firm says are alleged design flaws that may push past December the completion of the already-delayed $1.6-billion Central Subway Project. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Erica Berardi, ENR
    Ms. Berardi may be contacted at

    Five LEED and Green Construction Trends to Watch in 2020

    January 27, 2020 —
    To succeed in any field, you can never stop learning—especially in the green construction industry where standards and technology are always growing and changing. Here are a few of the exciting trends in LEED certification and green construction learned about during this year’s Greenbuild International Conference and Expo, which is the largest annual event for green building professionals in the world. 1. More Transparency About Products In 2020, the product sustainability information provided by manufacturers will continue becoming more transparent and accessible. Manufacturers are coming to the table and presenting more useful information on environmental and health impacts, conducting life cycle analyses and making the information available for the design and construction marketplace. Although this means even more information for construction and design teams to take into account when planning green construction projects, it’s a definite positive. We’re starting to see the actual environmental performance getting taken into account in product specification. Reprinted courtesy of Tommy Linstroth, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    2019’s Biggest Labor and Employment Moves Affecting Construction

    January 27, 2020 —
    The construction industry is fueled by change, which is the only constant in life and construction. Still, continuous change makes compliance with state and federal laws and regulations more difficult. While contractors may thrive on the frantic pace, sometimes it is good to look back and ensure they have an understanding of, and are complying with, the newest regulations and laws. Top 10 Stories Dominating Employment Law in Construction 1. Trio of Federal Joint Employment Rules Expected in December 2019 Joint employment took center stage during the November 20, 2019 release of the Fall Regulatory Agenda, as three separate federal agencies announced plans to move forward with revised joint employment rules in December. While the Department of Labor and the National Labor Relations Board had already released versions of their draft rules, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission also announced that it would weigh in on the topic before the end of 2019. As of January 10, 2020, the EEOC had not done so. 2. NLRB Tightens Union Access to Employer Property In a ruling that levels the labor relations playing field, the NLRB ruled that employers could rightfully eject outside union representatives soliciting petition signatures from a shared shopping center parking area. When read in conjunction with an earlier 2019 decision conferring greater rights to limit on-premises union activity by abolishing the “public space” exception, the NLRB has significantly restricted union access to private employer property. Reprinted courtesy of Micah Dawson, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of
    Mr. Dawson may be contacted at

    As the Term Winds Down, Several Important Regulatory Cases Await the U.S. Supreme Court

    September 03, 2019 —
    The Supreme Court will be deciding some very important regulatory law cases in the new few weeks as the term winds down. CERCLA Circled Last week, the Court granted a petition to review a significant CERCLA case, Atlantic Richfield Company v. Christian, et al., decided by the Supreme Court of Montana on state law grounds. This case involves state litigation which could result in a cleanup whose scope is allegedly inconsistent with an ongoing and expensive federal CERCLA cleanup at the Anaconda Smelter site. CERCLA basically provides that no one may challenge an ongoing Superfund cleanup, yet this state common law proceeding seeking a cleanup of the plaintiff’s homes and properties arguably threatens the EPA-approved cleanup remedy. ARCO filed a petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court, which the Court has now granted despite the Solicitor General’s brief which argued that the Court should wait to see the results of the Montana trial. (It is unusual for the Court to reject the advice of the Solicitor General.) Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Anthony B. Cavender, Pillsbury
    Mr. Cavender may be contacted at

    General Indemnity Agreement Can Come Back to Bite You

    October 21, 2019 —
    I talk about payment bonds often here at Construction Law Musings. I talk a bit less about performance bonds and even less about the General Indemnity Agreements (GIA) that are signed by companies and their principals as part of the agreement between a construction company and its bonding company for the provision of these bonds. However, this does not mean that these GIA’s are not important. In fact, these are the agreements that allow a bonding provider to recoup any money paid out pursuant to either a payment or performance bond. A 2018 case illustrates their importance. In Allegheny Cas. Co. v. River City Roofing, LLC, the Court considered a claim by Allegheny seeking both specific performance of the collateral agreement and reimbursement of certain expenses and investigative costs expended by Allegheny pursuant to its performance bond. Allegheny sought to be reimbursed for certain payments for siding work, investigative costs, and costs spent enforcing the GIA. Allegheny further sought to force the defendants to post sufficient collateral. To do so, Allegheny sued in the Eastern District of Virginia and then moved for summary judgment stating that the GAI uneuivocally required such a result due to the good faith payment for the siding work and the plain language of the GIA. In response, the Defendants, River City Roofing and its principals that had personally guaranteed the indemnity, argued that the GIA did not apply to the siding work because only the roofing contract was subject to the performance bond and that any bond claims for which collateral was demanded were inchoate and therefore not proper for specific performance. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at

    Three lawyers from Haight were recognized in The Best Lawyers in America© 2020 Edition

    September 30, 2019 —
    Congratulations to Haight’s attorneys who were recognized in The Best Lawyers in America© 2020 Edition Los Angeles, California William G. Baumgaertner for personal injury and product liability litigation for plaintiffs and defendants Michael Leahy for insurance law Denis Moriarty for insurance law Reprinted courtesy of Haight Brown & Bonesteel attorneys William G. Baumgaertner, Michael Leahy and Denis J. Moriarty Mr. Baumgaertner may be contacted at Mr. Leahy may be contacted at Mr. Moriarty may be contacted at Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Hunton Insurance Partner Syed Ahmad Named to Benchmark Litigation’s 2019 40 & Under Hot List

    October 14, 2019 —
    Benchmark Litigation has named Syed Ahmad, a partner in Hunton Andrews Kurth’s Insurance Coverage practice, to the publication’s 40 & Under Hot List. Benchmark Litigation is the definitive guide to America’s leading litigation firms and attorneys. The 40 & Under Hot List honors the most notable up-and-coming litigation attorneys in the United States. Those named to the list have proven their eligibility as individuals at the partner level of their respective firms who are 40 years of age or younger. Reprinted courtesy of Michael S. Levine, Hunton Andrews Kurth and David Costello, Hunton Andrews Kurth Mr. Levine may be contacted at Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Indiana Federal Court Holds No Coverage for $50M Default Judgment for Lack of Timely Notice of Class Action

    August 26, 2019 —
    In Greene v. Kenneth R. Will, a CGL insurer recently prevailed in a declaratory judgment action arising from an underlying class action alleging pollution and nuisance claims against the insured, VIM Recycling LLC, an Indiana-based waste-recycling facility.[1] “[T]his case has some whiskers on it,” the Indiana federal district court recounted in its exhaustive decision granting the insurer relief. The court relieved the insurer of indemnifying a $50 million default judgment against the insured, which, the court observed, “proved to be a bad neighbor” and “nuisance in both the legal and colloquial sense.” The court held that the insured failed to provide timely notice of the class action. “The judgment against the [insured] came about when a group of nearby homeowners decided that they had had enough of VIM’s polluting behavior and brought this class action to recover damages for environmental violations, nuisance and negligence based on the impact of the waste facility on their homes and property,” the court explained. Eventually, the court entered a default judgment against the insured for $50,568,750, plus an award of $273,339.85 in attorney’s fees. Because the insured was “judgment-proof,” the class action plaintiffs “aligned” with the insured “hoping to collect on their monumental judgment” from the insured’s CGL insurer. Within a few weeks’ time, the class action plaintiffs sued the insurer seeking a declaration of coverage for the default judgment against the insured. Reprinted courtesy of Anthony L. Miscioscia, White and Williams LLP and Timothy A. Carroll, White and Williams LLP Mr. Miscioscia may be contacted at Mr. Carroll may be contacted at Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of