BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    casino resort expert witness London Ohio custom homes expert witness London Ohio tract home expert witness London Ohio condominiums expert witness London Ohio housing expert witness London Ohio retail construction expert witness London Ohio hospital construction expert witness London Ohio landscaping construction expert witness London Ohio townhome construction expert witness London Ohio high-rise construction expert witness London Ohio institutional building expert witness London Ohio office building expert witness London Ohio custom home expert witness London Ohio industrial building expert witness London Ohio condominium expert witness London Ohio Medical building expert witness London Ohio Subterranean parking expert witness London Ohio concrete tilt-up expert witness London Ohio structural steel construction expert witness London Ohio low-income housing expert witness London Ohio production housing expert witness London Ohio multi family housing expert witness London Ohio
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    London, Ohio

    Ohio Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: According to HB 175, Chptr 1312, for a homebuilder to qualify for right to repair protection, the contractor must notify consumers (in writing) of NOR laws at the time of sale; The law stipulates written notice of defects required itemizing and describing and including documentation prepared by inspector. A contractor has 21 days to respond in writing.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines London Ohio

    Licensing is done at the local level. Licenses required for plumbing, electrical, HVAC, heating, and hydronics trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Clark County Chapter
    Local # 3673
    PO Box 1047
    Springfield, OH 45501
    http://www.biacc.org/

    Ohio Home Builders Association (State)
    Local # 3600
    17 S High Street Ste 700
    Columbus, OH 43215
    http://www.ohiohba.com

    Home Builders Association of Dayton
    Local # 3630
    One Chamber Plaza Ste 100 B
    Dayton, OH 45402
    http://www.hbadayton.com

    Home Builders Association of Miami County
    Local # 3682
    1200 Archer Dr
    Troy, OH 45373
    http://HBAMiamiCounty.com

    Tri-County Home Builders Association
    Local # 3645
    PO Box 643
    Lancaster, OH 43130
    http://www.tricountyhomebuilders.com

    Buckeye Valley Building Industry Association
    Local # 3654
    12 W Main St
    Newark, OH 43055
    http://www.buckeyevalleybia.com

    Building Industry Association of Central Ohio
    Local # 3627
    495 Executive Campus Drive
    Westerville, OH 43082
    http://www.biahomebuilders.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For London Ohio

    Guardrail Maker Defrauded U.S. of $175 Million and Created Hazard, Jury Says

    Be Careful with Mechanic’s Lien Waivers

    Texas City Pulls Plug on Fossil Fuels With Shift to Solar

    New York Court of Appeals Finds a Proximate Cause Standard in Additional Insured Endorsements

    Construction Law Alert: Concrete Supplier Botches Concrete Mix, Gets Thrashed By Court of Appeal for Trying to Blame Third Party

    Hawaii Building Codes to Stay in State Control

    New Jersey Judge Found Mortgage Lender Liable When Borrower Couldn’t Pay

    Quick Note: Notice of Contest of Claim Against Payment Bond

    Florida Property Bill Passes Economic Affairs Committee with Amendments

    ADA Compliance Checklist For Your Business

    BHA Sponsors 28th Annual Construction Law Conference in San Antonio, TX

    Senate Bill 15-091 Passes Out of the Senate State, Veterans & Military Affairs Committee

    Delaware River Interstate Bridge Shut to Assess Truss Fracture

    Insurance Law Alert: Ambiguous Producer Agreement Makes Agent-Broker Status a Jury Question

    New York State Trial Court: Non-Cumulation Provision in Excess Policies Mandates “All Sums” Allocation

    Liability Coverage for Claims of Publishing Secret Data Does Not Require Access by Others

    Best Practices in Construction– What are Yours?

    Defeating the Ten-Year Statute of Repose For Latent Construction Defects

    Growing Optimism Among Home Builders

    Georgia Court Reaffirms Construction Defect Decision

    Home Construction Thriving in Lubbock

    Gut Feeling Does Not Disqualify Expert Opinion

    U.S. Homeowners Are Lingering Longer, and the Wait Is Paying Off

    No Escape: California Court of Appeals Gives a Primary CGL Insurer’s “Other Insurance” Clause Two Thumbs Down

    “But I didn’t know what I was signing….”

    “To Indemnify, or Not to Indemnify, that is the Question: California Court of Appeal Addresses Active Negligence in Indemnity Provisions”

    Keeping Up With Fast-moving FAA Drone Regulations

    Appeals Court Finds Manuscript Additional Insured Endorsements Ambiguous Regarding Completed Operations Coverage for Additional Insured

    The Brexit Effect on the Construction Industry

    Manhattan Vacancies Rise in Epicenter Shift: Real Estate

    Is the Issuance of a City Use Permit Referable? Not When It Is an Administrative Act

    The “Ugly” Property Next Door is Ruining My Property Value

    Texas Court of Appeals Conditionally Grant Petition for Writ of Mandamus to Anderson

    Visual Construction Diaries – Interview with Jeff Sassinsky of Fovea Aero

    Repairs Commencing on Defect-Ridden House from Failed State Supreme Court Case

    Investigators Eye Fiber Optic Work in Deadly Wisconsin Explosion

    BofA Said to Near Mortgage Deal for Up to $17 Billion

    Construction Defect Claim over LAX Runways

    U.K. Construction Resumes Growth Amid Resurgent Housing Activity

    Civil RICO Case Against Johnny Doc Is Challenging

    Hawaii Federal Court Grants Insured's Motion for Remand

    Why Financial Advisers Still Hate Reverse Mortgages

    Who Says You Can’t Choose between Liquidated Damages or Actual Damages?

    SB800 Not the Only Remedy for Construction Defects

    To Bee or Not to Bee - CA Court Finds Denial of Coverage Based on Exclusion was Premature Where Facts had not been Judicially Determined

    Bank Window Lawsuit Settles Quietly

    Second Circuit Court Differentiates the Standard for Determining Evident Partiality for a Neutral Arbitrator and a Party-Appointed Arbitrator

    Showdown Over Landmark Housing Law Looms at U.S. Supreme Court

    Missouri Construction Company Sues Carpenter Union for Threatening Behavior

    Cape Town Seeks World Cup Stadium Construction Collusion Damages
    Corporate Profile

    LONDON OHIO CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from approximately five thousand construction, architectural, and engineering related expert designations, the London, Ohio Construction Expert Directory provides a streamlined multi-disciplinary expert retention and support solution to lawyers and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction claims and trial support services to the building industry's most recognized companies, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, risk managers, and a variety of municipalities. Employing in house resources which include construction cost, scheduling, and delay experts, professional engineers, ASPE certified professional estimators, and construction safety professionals, the firm brings specialized expertise and local capabilities to the London region.

    London Ohio roofing construction expertLondon Ohio hospital construction expert witnessLondon Ohio engineering consultantLondon Ohio multi family design expert witnessLondon Ohio forensic architectLondon Ohio civil engineering expert witnessLondon Ohio construction expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    London, Ohio

    A Word to the Wise: The AIA Revised Contract Documents Could Lead to New and Unanticipated Risks - Part II

    October 16, 2018 —
    Part I addressed general conditions, revised insurance terms, revisions that affect owner’s required insurance and revisions that affect contractor’s required insurance. REVISIONS THAT AFFECT DISPUTE RESOLUTION A seemingly minor but noteworthy change is to the definition of “Claim.” Under Section 15.1 a “Claim” is defined to:
    • include a request for a modification of contract time; and
    • exclude any requirement that an owner must file a claim to impose liquidated damages.
    Notably, any request relating to contract time must be brought within the specified time period for Notice of Claim and in the prescribed manner. There are at least two traps for the unwary. First, even though email is regularly used for communications among the parties, the revised contract documents do not recognize email as an acceptable form of delivery of a Notice of Claim. Second, an unwary contractor may wrongly assume that an owner’s failure to assert a claim for LDs means that LDs will not be imposed. This may lull the contractor into failing to timely assert its own claim for a time extension and thereby waiving its ability to do so. Reprinted courtesy of George Talarico, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of
    Mr. Talarico may be contacted at gtalarico@sillscummis.com

    Governmental Immunity Waived for Independent Contractor - Lopez v. City of Grand Junction

    September 17, 2018 —
    On July 12, 2018, the Colorado Court of Appeals announced its decision in Lopez v. City of Grand Junction, 2018 WL 3384674 (Colo. App. 2018). The Court considered whether immunity is waived under Colorado’s Governmental Immunity Act (“CGIA”), pursuant to section C.R.S. § 24-10-106(1)(f), in situations where the public entity hired an independent contractor to perform the work. The Court held that if the public entity would have been liable under the CGIA for the conduct that caused the injury, had it performed the work itself, then it is liable for the work performed by its independent contractor. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Frank Ingham, Higgins Hopkins McClain & Roswell, LLC
    Mr. Ingham may be contacted at ingham@hhmrlaw.com

    Ex-Construction Firm That Bought a $75m Michelangelo to Delist

    January 08, 2019 —
    A Chinese construction firm-turned-art-collector will be delisted from the Nasdaq effective Friday, following a 260 percent run-up in its stock price this fall. Shares in Yulong Eco-Materials Ltd. soared after the company agreed to buy the “Millennium Sapphire” for $50 million in October and a “Crucifixion” painting for $75 million in November. The firm was formerly a “vertically integrated manufacturer of eco-friendly building products located in the city of Pingdingshan in Henan Province, China," according to a company filing. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Drew Singer, Bloomberg

    Anchorage Building Codes Credited for Limited Damage After Quakes

    January 08, 2019 —
    The magnitudes 7.0 and 5.7 earthquakes that struck Anchorage, Alaska, on Nov. 30 shook buildings and shattered highways, but caused limited structural damage and no reported loss of life, mostly due to the depth and location of the quake’s epicenter, as well as the city and state’s stringent building requirements. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Christine Kilpatrick - ENR
    Ms. Kilpatrick may be contacted at kilpatrickc@enr.com

    Insurer's Judgment on the Pleadings Based Upon Expected Injury Exclusion Reversed

    October 30, 2018 —
    The appellate court reversed the trial court's granting of a judgment on the pleadings based upon the expected injury exclusion in a homeowner's policy. Allstate Indemn. Co. v. Contreras, 2018 Ill. App. LEXIS 170964 (Ill. Ct. App. July 20, 2018). Alejandra Contreras owned Jasmine's Day Care. Her husband, Adan Contreras, was not an employee of the Day Care. Alejandra and Adan had a homeowner's policy which provided day care liability coverage through an endorsement. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Class Actions Under California’s Right to Repair Act. Nope. Well . . . Nope.

    January 15, 2019 —
    It’s the holidays. A time when family and friends, and even neighbors, gather together. And nothing brings neighbors closer together than class action residential construction defect litigation. In Kohler Co. v. Superior Court, Case No. B288935 (November 14, 2018), the Second District Court of Appeal addressed whether neighbors can bring class action lawsuits under the Right to Repair Act. For those who are regular readers of the California Construction Law Blog you’re familiar with the Right to Repair Act codified at Civil Code sections 895 et seq. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret Murai, Wendel Rosen
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@wendel.com

    Illinois Court Addresses Rip-And-Tear Coverage And Existence Of An “Occurrence” In Defective Product Suit

    September 04, 2018 —
    In Lexington Ins. Co. v. Chi. Flameproof & Wood Specialties Corp., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 135871, 2018 WL 3819109 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 10, 2018), the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois found that rip-and-tear costs could qualify as covered “property damage,” but the court rejected coverage for claims that the insured intentionally sold a noncompliant product as the suit did not allege an “occurrence.” Lexington Insurance Company (“Lexington”) issued a CGL policy to Chicago Flameproof & Wood Specialties Corp. (“Flameproof”). During the policy period, a third party ordered fire-retardant-treated lumber from Flameproof for construction in Minnesota. Flameproof instead sent materials that were not tested, certified, or labeled as compliant. The third party installed the materials, discovered the non-compliance, and then removed the materials. Removing the materials allegedly damaged other portions of the building on the project. The third party then sued Flameproof, alleging costs associated with replacing the lumber as well as property damage to the other materials from the removal of the lumber. Flameproof tendered the claim to Lexington seeking a defense. Lexington filed a declaratory action in the Northern District of Illinois. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Brian Bassett, Traub Lieberman Strauss & Shrewsberry LLP
    Mr. Bassett may be contacted at bbassett@tlsslaw.com

    How Your Disgruntled Client Can Turn Into Your Very Own Car Crash! (and How to Avoid It) (Law Tips)

    January 21, 2019 —
    Over the summer, I was involved in a car crash. It was *not* my fault– heck, I wasn’t even driving but riding shotgun. But it wasn’t my husband’s fault either. A guy pulling out of a parking lot was watching the traffic coming up the road, but failed to see our car sitting in the same intersection waiting to turn into the same parking lot. He ran right into us. It may not look like much, but the panels were so damaged it cost almost $9k in damages, over a month of car rental fees, and a LOT of aggravation on our part. The guy who hit us was very nice, apologized, and was concerned if we were injured. His insurance company ultimately paid for all of the damage. However– it wasn’t he who suddenly got a new part time job– that was me. I had to spend lots of time with police, insurance representatives, auto body mechanics, rental car places, you name it. If you’ve ever been in an accident, you know the headache involved. In fact, I have had 2 other accidents over the years (again, neither of which were my fault– I think I’m just a beacon for bad drivers?). One of those accidents was a 4 car accident– a driver hit my car, pushing it into the car ahead, which went into the car ahead of that. In that accident, my car was actually totaled. Fun times! How is this relevant to your life as an architect or engineer? If you stay in the game (that is, the design field) long enough, chances are, you will, at some point, end up dealing with disgruntled clients. One of those clients may even file a lawsuit against you. Or, for that matter, you may end up getting sued by another party involved in your construction projects– one that you don’t even have a contract with. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Melissa Dewey Brumback, Ragsdale Liggett PLLC
    Ms. Brumback may be contacted at mbrumback@rl-law.com