• Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    retail construction expert witness Westmont Illinois concrete tilt-up expert witness Westmont Illinois custom homes expert witness Westmont Illinois production housing expert witness Westmont Illinois landscaping construction expert witness Westmont Illinois high-rise construction expert witness Westmont Illinois institutional building expert witness Westmont Illinois housing expert witness Westmont Illinois hospital construction expert witness Westmont Illinois multi family housing expert witness Westmont Illinois low-income housing expert witness Westmont Illinois Medical building expert witness Westmont Illinois condominium expert witness Westmont Illinois tract home expert witness Westmont Illinois townhome construction expert witness Westmont Illinois casino resort expert witness Westmont Illinois mid-rise construction expert witness Westmont Illinois structural steel construction expert witness Westmont Illinois office building expert witness Westmont Illinois Subterranean parking expert witness Westmont Illinois industrial building expert witness Westmont Illinois condominiums expert witness Westmont Illinois
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Westmont, Illinois

    Illinois Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB4873 Pending: The Notice and Opportunity to Repair Act provides that a construction professional shall be liable to a homeowner for damages caused by the acts or omissions of the professional and his or her agents, employees, or subcontractors. This bill requires the service of notice to the professional of the complained-of defect in the construction by the homeowner prior to commencement of a lawsuit. Allows the professional to make an offer of repair or settlement and to rescind this offer if the claimant fails to respond within 30 days.

    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Westmont Illinois

    No state license required for general contracting. License required for roofing.

    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Northern Illinois Home Builders Association Inc
    Local # 1434
    3695 Darlene Ct Ste 102
    Aurora, IL 60504

    Home Builders Association of Greater Fox Valley
    Local # 1431
    PO Box 1146
    Saint Charles, IL 60174

    SouthWest Suburban Home Builders Association
    Local # 1432
    10767 W 163rd Pl
    Orland Park, IL 60467

    Home Builders Association of Greater Chicago
    Local # 1425
    5999 S. New Wilke Rd Ste 104
    Rolling Meadows, IL 60008

    Home Builders Association of the Greater Rockford Area
    Local # 1465
    631 N Longwood St Suite 102
    Rockford, IL 61107

    Home Builders Association of Kankakee
    Local # 1445
    221 S Schuyler Ave Ste B
    Kankakee, IL 60901

    Home Builders Association of Greater Peoria
    Local # 1455
    1599 N Main Street
    East Peoria, IL 61611

    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Westmont Illinois

    Federal Court Finds Occurrence for Faulty Workmanship Under Virginia Law

    Not So Universal Design Fails (guest post)

    Occurrence-Based Insurance Policies and Claims-Made Insurance Policies – There’s a Crucial Difference

    Travelers v. Larimer County and the Concept of Covered Cause of Loss

    Properly Trigger the Performance Bond

    U.S. Codes for Deck Attachment

    New Jersey Judge Declared Arbitrator had no Duty to Disclose Past Contact with Lawyer

    Florida Extends Filing Time for Claims Subject to the Statute of Repose

    Business Risk Exclusions Do Not Preclude Coverage

    Failure to Comply with Contract Leaves No Additional Insured Coverage

    Denver Court Rules that Condo Owners Must Follow Arbitration Agreement

    Mediation v. Arbitration, Both Private Dispute Resolution but Very Different Sorts

    No Coverage for Hurricane Sandy Damage

    Pollution Exclusion Bars Coverage for Damage Caused by Tar Escaping From Roof

    No Coverage for Property Damage That is Limited to Work Completed by Subcontractor

    When is a Residential Subcontractor not Subject to the VCPA? Read to Find Out

    Feds Move To Indict NY Contractor Execs, Developer, Ex-Cuomo Aide

    Georgia Coal-to-Solar Pivot Shows the Way on Climate Regs

    New Jersey Appeals Court Ruled Suits Stand Despite HOA Bypassing Bylaw

    Maryland Contractor Documents its Illegal Deal and Pays $2.15 Million to Settle Fraud Claims

    Coverage Denied for Insured's Defective Product

    Corvette museum likely to keep part of sinkhole

    Between Scylla and Charybids: The Mediation Privilege and Legal Malpractice Claims

    Save a Legal Fee: Prevent Costly Lawsuits With Claim Limitation Clauses

    Purse Tycoon Aims at Ultra-Rich With $85 Million Home

    Cable-Free Elevators Will Soar to New Heights, and Move Sideways

    Factories Boost U.S. Output as Builders Gain Confidence: Economy

    Subcontractor Not Estopped from Enforcing Lien Not Listed In Bankruptcy Petition

    Chinese Brooklyn-to-Los Angeles Plans Surge: Real Estate

    In Oregon Construction Defect Claims, “Contract Is (Still) King”

    How Small Mistakes Can Have Serious Consequences Under California's Contractor Licensing Laws.

    Hotel Claims Construction Defect Could Have Caused Collapse

    How to Determine the Deadline for Recording a California Mechanics Lien

    Addenda to Construction Contracts Can Be an Issue

    Previously Owned U.S. Home Sales Rise to Eight-Month High

    City of Sacramento Approves Kings NBA Financing Plan

    Terminating A Subcontractor Or Sub-Tier Contractor—Not So Fast—Read Your Contract!

    Toll Brothers Shows how the Affluent Buyer is Driving Up Prices

    Don’t Forget to Mediate the Small Stuff

    24/7 Wall Street Reported on Eight Housing Markets at All-Time Highs

    Another (Insurer) Bites The Dust: Virginia District Court Rejects Narrow Reading of Pollution Exclusion

    Avoiding Construction Defect “Nightmares” in Florida

    Structural Defects Lead Schools to Close off Areas

    Colorado Drillers Show Sensitive Side to Woo Fracking Foes

    Living With a Millennial. Or Grandma.

    Insurer Must Defend Contractor Against Claims of Faulty Workmanship

    Homeowner Protection Act of 2007 Not Just for Individual Homeowners Anymore?

    Testing Your Nail Knowledge

    Washington School District Sues Construction Company Over Water Pipe Damage

    Ahlers & Cressman’s Top 10 Construction Industry Contract Provisions
    Corporate Profile


    Drawing from more than four thousand construction and design related expert witness designations, the Westmont, Illinois Construction Expert Directory provides a single point of reference for construction defect and claims related support to lawyers and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect and claims litigation. BHA provides building related trial support and expert consulting services to the nation's most recognized construction practice groups, public builders, risk managers, owners, state and local government agencies. Utilizing in house assets which include construction delay claims experts, registered design professionals, professional engineers, and credentailed construction consultants, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Westmont and the surrounding areas.

    Westmont Illinois building consultant expertWestmont Illinois construction expert witnessWestmont Illinois building expertWestmont Illinois construction claims expert witnessWestmont Illinois construction forensic expert witnessWestmont Illinois roofing and waterproofing expert witnessWestmont Illinois engineering consultant
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Westmont, Illinois

    Hunton Insurance Head Interviewed Concerning the Benefits and Hidden Dangers of Cyber Insurance

    December 04, 2018 —
    The head of Hunton Andrews Kurth’s insurance practice, Walter Andrews, was interviewed earlier this week by ABC 7 (WJLA) concerning the need for cyber insurance and the benefits that it can provide to government contractors and other businesses that are impacted by a cyber event. Andrews explains the diverse spectrum of benefits that are available through cyber insurance products, but cautions that a serious lack of uniformity exists among today’s cyber insurance products, making it crucial that policyholders carefully analyze their cyber insurance to ensure it provides the scope and amount of insurance they desire. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Michael S. Levine, Hunton Andrews Kurth
    Mr. Levine may be contacted at

    Court Upholds Denial of Collapse Coverage Where Building Still Stands

    October 02, 2018 —
    The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's decision finding the policy's collapse coverage did not apply. Cmty. Garage v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co., 2018 Mich. App. LEXIS 2680 (Mich. Ct. App. June 19, 2018). The insured operated a truck repair business. In June 2016, the insured's place of business sustained damage due to failure of several trusses providing structural support to the building's roof. The failure was due to latent construction defects leading to an insufficient load bearing capacity. The roof began to sag while one of the walls bulged outward due to the sudden pressure overload. The insured hired a construction firm to install temporary shoring to support the roof and prevent further damage. All of the building's walls remained standing and, although the roof sagged, it also remained intact. However, the building could not be safely occupied until repairs were completed. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at

    Janus v. AFSCME

    July 18, 2018 —
    On June 27, 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its decision in Janus v. AFSCME1. By a 5-4 vote, SCOTUS ruled that public employee unions cannot require non-members to pay union dues, even if those employees are benefiting from the services provided by the union. 28 states already had “right-to-work” laws on the books, meaning that unions in those states were already precluded from collecting fees from non-union members. This ruling makes that ban a national standard. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Ryan Foltz, Gordon & Rees Scully Mansukhani
    Mr. Foltz may be contacted at

    White and Williams Earns Tier 1 Rankings from U.S. News "Best Law Firms" 2019

    November 14, 2018 —
    White and Williams has achieved national recognition from U.S. News and World Report as a "Best Law Firm" in the practice areas of Insurance Law, Media Law and Tax Law. Our Boston, New York and Philadelphia offices have also been recognized in their respective metropolitan regions in several practice areas. Firms included in the “Best Law Firms” list are recognized for professional excellence with persistently impressive ratings from clients and peers. Achieving a tiered ranking signals a unique combination of quality law practice and breadth of legal experience. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of White and Williams LLP

    9th Circuit Closes the Door on “Open Shop” Contractor

    September 04, 2018 —
    At the height of the Great Depression nearly one-quarter of Americans were unemployed. In response, Congress enacted a series of laws including the Smoot-Hawley Tariffs Act, which raised tariffs on foreign goods in an effort to spur domestic investment and to increase the number of jobs. Sound familiar? Background The Davis-Bacon Act Among the new laws enacted by Congress was the Davis-Bacon Act which required contractors on federal works projects to pay their workers the wages prevailing in the area where a project was located, also known as “prevailing wages,” in an effort to stem the practice of employers bringing in lower-wage workers from outside the area. The same year that the Davis-Bacon Act was enacted, California enacted its own prevailing wage law modeled after the Davis-Bacon Act and applicable to state and local public works projects. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret Murai, Wendel, Rosen, Black & Dean LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at

    Public-Private Partnerships: When Will Reality Meet the Promise?

    October 09, 2018 —
    The promise of public-private partnerships (P3s) seems irresistible. The $4.5-trillion that the American Society of Civil Engineers says the U.S. must spend on at-risk infrastructure by 2025 is a backlog beyond the collective means of local, state and federal governments to fund and deliver. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Fechner, GHD, ENR
    ENR may be contacted at

    Recent Bad Faith Decisions in Florida Raise Concerns

    November 06, 2018 —
    The State of Florida has long been known as one of the most challenging jurisdictions for insurance carriers in the context of bad faith – to say the least. Two recent appellate decisions have taken an already difficult environment and seemingly “upped the ante” in what constitutes good faith claims handling in the context of third-party liability claims. Set forth below is an analysis of the Bannon v. Geico Gen. Ins. Co. and Harvey v. Geico Gen. Ins. Co. decisions. Reprinted courtesy of Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP attorneys Michael Kiernan, Lauren Curtis and Ashley Kellgren Mr. Kiernan may be contacted at Ms. Curtis may be contacted at Ms. Kellgren may be contacted at Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Intentional Mining Neighbor's Property is Not an Occurrence

    October 30, 2018 —
    The Kentucky Supreme Court determined there was no coverage when the insured was sued for mineral trespass. Am. Mining Ins. Co. v. Peters Farms, LLC, 2018 Ky. LEXIS 287 (Ky. Aug. 16, 2018). Beginning in 2007, Ikerd Mining. LLC removed 20,212 toms of coal from land belonging to Peters Farms, LLC. Of that amount, 10,012 tons were wrongfully mined under Ikerd's alleged mistaken belief as to the correct location of Peters' boundaries. The other 1,200 tons were mined by Ikerd knowing that the land thereunder belonged to Peters, but pursuant to a disputed oral lease agreement between the two. Peters claimed that the lease was an ongoing negotiation that was never finalized. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at