Supreme Court Strikes Down IEEPA Tariffs: The Refund Process Will Be Messy
March 10, 2026 —
Brett W. Johnson, Derek Flint, T. Troy Galan & Thomas Williams - Snell & WilmerOn February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, and the consolidated case Trump v. V.O.S. Selections, Inc., that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize the President to impose tariffs unilaterally.1 The decision invalidates both the “reciprocal” tariffs and the drug-trafficking tariffs imposed under IEEPA.
For importers, the immediate question is whether, how, and when refunds can actually be obtained. On that issue, the U.S. Supreme Court provided no roadmap. To the contrary, the dissent warned that the United States “may be required to refund billions of dollars,” that the process is likely to be a “mess,” and that the majority opinion “says nothing today about whether, and if so how, the Government should go about returning the billions of dollars that it has collected from importers.”
Reprinted courtesy of
Brett W. Johnson, Snell & Wilmer,
Derek Flint, Snell & Wilmer,
T. Troy Galan, Snell & Wilmer and
Thomas Williams, Snell & Wilmer
Mr. Johnson may be contacted at bwjohnson@swlaw.com
Mr. Flint may be contacted at dflint@swlaw.com
Mr. Galan may be contacted at tgalan@swlaw.com
Mr. Williams may be contacted at twilliams@swlaw.com>
Read the full story...
One Industry, One Goal: Construction Safety Week 2026
May 05, 2026 —
Maggie Murphy - Construction ExecutiveConstruction safety has long been a top priority across the industry. Yet fatality rates have remained stubbornly flat for more than a decade. Steven Carter, global health and safety director at
Gilbane chair company for
Construction Safety Week 2026—believes the industry has reached a pivotal moment. This year’s theme—”
All In Together: Recognize. Respond. Respect.”—is a unified call to action for owners, designers, contractors and craft professionals around a shared, risk-based approach to preventing serious injuries and fatalities.
In a recent interview with Construction Executive, Carter discusses why the industry must move beyond incremental improvements, how technology and AI can support better planning and what it will take to create a true culture of psychological safety on jobsites.
Reprinted courtesy of
Maggie Murphy, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved.
Read the full story...
Don’t Ignore Prejudgment Interest
February 02, 2026 —
David Adelstein - Florida Construction Legal UpdatesWhen it comes to contracts, there may be a clause that provides that untimely payments shall bear interest at a particular rate. Or it may be the statutory rate. That clause will come into play when determining prejudgment interest. In ANY dispute, prejudgment interest can be an important damages component that accrues from the date of the loss. Don’t ignore prejudgment interest.
The Fourth District of Florida, in a construction dispute, maintained:
“[I]f a plaintiff establishes that he sustained out-of-pocket loss, prejudgment interest must be awarded from the date of the loss. The trial court has no discretion regarding awarding prejudgment interest and must do so applying the statutory rate of interest in effect at the time the interest accrues.”
Bensusan v. Design Engineering Group, LLC, 2025 WL 3466367 (Fla. 4th DCA 2025) (citation omitted).
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
David Adelstein, Kirwin NorrisMr. Adelstein may be contacted at
dma@kirwinnorris.com
Moving in Before Substantial Completion? The Risks of Early Owner Occupancy
March 24, 2026 —
Sydney Koby - ConsensusDocsIntroduction
On many construction projects, particularly large projects facing schedule pressure, owners may begin occupying or using portions of the project before the work reaches substantial completion. This is often due to operational needs, phased turnover, or market demands that drive owners to take possession of all or part of a project while construction activities are ongoing. While early occupancy may seem practical, it can blur the lines of responsibility between owner and contractor and can create significant legal and practical complications.
These disputes are especially common on large, complex projects where punch list work, system commissioning, and closeout activities overlap with owner use. Without clear documentation and carefully drafted contract provisions, early occupancy can undermine an owner’s ability to enforce completion requirements while simultaneously exposing the contractor to claims of delay, inefficiency, or interference.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Sydney Koby, Jones WalkerMs. Koby may be contacted at
skoby@joneswalker.com
Va. Contractor Fined for Alleged DC Wage and Classification Violations
January 06, 2026 —
Jim Parsons - Engineering News-RecordA Virginia contractor will pay $725,000 to resolve allegations that it violated the District of Columbia’s wage and hour laws on more than a dozen public housing projects.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Jim Parsons, Engineering News-RecordENR may be contacted at
enr@enr.com
GRSM Marks Seventh Anniversary as First and Only Full-Service Law Firm in All 50 States, Climbs to #70 on Am Law 100
April 20, 2026 —
Gordon Rees Scully MansukhaniGordon Rees Scully Mansukhani proudly celebrates the seventh anniversary of its becoming the first and only full-service law firm with offices and attorneys in all 50 states. Since launching its innovative 50-state platform in April 2019, GRSM has experienced extraordinary growth across markets, practices, and client relationships.
In the past seven years, GRSM has expanded its footprint with 20 new offices in both major and secondary markets and doubled its attorney headcount, growing from 940 to more than 2000 lawyers. This growth has propelled GRSM from the 40th to the 11th largest law firm in the United States, according to Law360, while also driving a significant rise on the Am Law 100 rankings, from #103 in 2019 to #70 in 2026. GRSM has served nearly half of the Fortune 500, a testament to its deep bench of lawyers and national capabilities.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani
To Settle or Not Settle: Factors to Weigh and Practical Considerations
January 13, 2026 —
Gerard J. Onorata - ConsensusDocsDeciding to settle a construction dispute is often wrought with difficulty, requiring the decision maker to evaluate a number of factors. Nevertheless, there are no hard and fast rules that apply when advising a party whether or not they should settle a dispute. Yet the vast majority of construction disputes do settle before going to trial or arbitration. In fact, recent statistics show that approximately 95% of all civil cases, including construction disputes, settle before trial[1]. However, whether settlement is always the best choice depends on several factors to be discussed here.
Merits of Your Case
First and foremost are the merits of your claims and defenses against any claims that are asserted against you. Construction disputes are inherently fact sensitive, and the merits of a case are driven by the facts of the dispute. Simple breach of contract actions for balances of unpaid funds for the work and materials that have been provided and installed on a project make weighing the merits of the affirmative claim relatively simple. However, these types of “collection cases” stand in stark contrast to complex construction delay claims for equitable adjustment where there exist competing and numerous causes of the delays. In addition, there are complicated legal principles applicable to whether there is entitlement to compensation for the delay or simply an extension of time. Construction defect claims where technical engineering issues are involved also present a heightened level of complexity that may make such cases difficult to prove on the merits.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Gerard J. Onorata, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.Mr. Onorata may be contacted at
gonorata@pecklaw.com
When Rule 702 Motions Fail: A Close Look at AECOM v. Flatiron
February 02, 2026 —
Olivia Barden - Colorado Construction Litigation BlogIn AECOM Tech. Servs., Inc. v. Flatiron | AECOM, LLC, 2024 WL 22640 (D. Colo. 2024), the United States District Court for the District of Colorado addressed when expert testimony is not subject to be limited or excluded pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 702.
Background
In 2015, AECOM Technical Services, Inc. (“AECOM”) and Flatiron | AECOM, LLC (“Flatiron”) entered into an agreement, in which they agreed to work together to assemble a design/build team for the purposes of submitting a proposal to the Colorado Department of Transportation’s (“CDOT”) construction project known as C-470 Tolled Express Lanes Segment 1 Design-Build Project (the “Project”). AECOM provided the design and engineering services, and Flatiron submitted the proposal to CDOT. On or about June 16, 2016, CDOT awarded Flatiron the Project. Flatiron later claimed that AECOM’s design failed to follow basic engineering and project requirements.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLCFour Companies Sued in Pool Electrocution CaseInsureds Survive Summary Judgment on Coverage for Hurricane LossTexas Supreme Court Holds Stipulated Extrinsic Evidence May Be Considered in Determining Duty to DefendRescission of Policy for Misrepresentation in Application ReversedAdditional Insured Prevails on Summary Judgment For Duty to Defend, IndemnifyAppellate Court of Maryland Construes Notice Conditions of A312 Performance Bond in Favor of SuretyThe Future of Construction Tech Is Decision TechCourthouse Reporter Series: Nebraska Court of Appeals Vacates Arbitration Award for MisconductFeds Used Wire to Crack Las Vegas HOA ScamTraub Lieberman Partner Ryan Jones Provides Testimony Before Florida Senate CommitteesStrict Liability or Negligence? The Proper Legal Standard for Inverse Condemnation caused by Water Damage to PropertyAs Evidence Grows, Regions Prepare for Sea Level RiseNeither Designated Work Exclusion nor Pre-Existing Damage Exclusion Defeat Duty to DefendNewmeyer & Dillion Attorneys Selected to the 2016 Southern California Super Lawyers ListsHigh Court Case Review Frees Jailed Buffalo Billions Contractor CEOJudge Gives Cintra Bid Protest of $9B Md. P3 Project Award New LifeGeneral Partner Is Not Additional Insured For Construction Defect ClaimToolbox Talk Series Recap - Guided Choice MediationAdministrative and Environmental Law Cases Decided During the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2017-2018 TermBuilding Amid the COVID ChallengeSettlement between IOSHA and Mid-America Reached after Stage Collapse FatalitiesWhen Customers Don’t Pay: What Can a Construction Business DoNew EPA Regulation for Phase I Environmental Site AssessmentsConstructive Notice Established as Obstacle to Relation Back DoctrineBlackstone Suffers Court Setback in Irish Real Estate DramaMountain States Super Lawyers Recognizes 19 Nevada Snell & Wilmer Attorneys in 2025 RankingsMiller Act Bond Claims Subject to “Pay If Paid”. . . SometimesHawaii Court Looks at Changes to Construction Defect Coverage after Changes in LawThree-Year Delay Not “Prompt Notice,” But Insurer Not “Appreciably Prejudiced” Either, New Jersey Court HoldsCalifornia Contractors – You Should Know That Section 7141.5 May Be Your Golden TicketSanibel Causeway Repair: Contractors Flooded Site With Crews, ResourcesInsurer Must Defend Faulty Workmanship ClaimsSolar Energy Isn’t Always GreenTimber Prices Likely to Keep RisingOne to Watch: Case Takes on Economic Loss Rule and Professional DutiesMassachusetts Business Court Addresses Defense Cost Allocation and Non-Cumulation Provisions in Long-Tail ContextWhite And Williams Celebrates Chambers USA Guide 2025 RankingsJury Trials and Mediation in Philadelphia County: Virtually in PersonWill Colorado Pass a Construction Defect Reform Bill in 2016?Denial of Motion to Dissolve Lis Pendens Does Not Automatically Create Basis for Certiorari ReliefAsbestos Client Alert: Court’s Exclusive Gatekeeper Role May not be Ignored or Shifted to a Jury140 Days Until The California Consumer Privacy Act Becomes Law - Why Aren't More Businesses Complying?Protect Your Projects By Identifying and Controlling Hidden Contract RisksGene Witkin Celebrates First Anniversary as Member of Ross Hart’s Mediation TeamWSHB Expands into the SoutheastNo Coverage for Hurricane Sandy DamageWill AI Completely Transform Our Use of Computers?GRSM Offices Earn Top Recognitions in 2025 Lists by The Business Journals Regional PublicationsCDJ’s #8 Topic of the Year: California’s Board of Equalization TowerEleven Payne & Fears Attorneys Honored by Best Lawyers
