BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    custom home expert witness Butler County Alabama institutional building expert witness Butler County Alabama parking structure expert witness Butler County Alabama concrete tilt-up expert witness Butler County Alabama multi family housing expert witness Butler County Alabama tract home expert witness Butler County Alabama retail construction expert witness Butler County Alabama housing expert witness Butler County Alabama condominiums expert witness Butler County Alabama condominium expert witness Butler County Alabama structural steel construction expert witness Butler County Alabama townhome construction expert witness Butler County Alabama Medical building expert witness Butler County Alabama low-income housing expert witness Butler County Alabama office building expert witness Butler County Alabama hospital construction expert witness Butler County Alabama mid-rise construction expert witness Butler County Alabama production housing expert witness Butler County Alabama landscaping construction expert witness Butler County Alabama industrial building expert witness Butler County Alabama high-rise construction expert witness Butler County Alabama custom homes expert witness Butler County Alabama
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Butler County, Alabama

    Alabama Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Although there is case law precedent for right to repair, Title 6 Article 13A states action must be commenced within 2 years after cause and not more than 13 years after completion of construction.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Butler County Alabama

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    South Alabama Home Builders Association
    Local # 0102
    PO Box 190
    Greenville, AL 36037


    Enterprise Home Builders Association
    Local # 0133
    PO Box 310861
    Enterprise, AL 36331


    Home Builders Association of Dothan & Wiregrass Area
    Local # 0132
    PO Box 9791
    Dothan, AL 36304


    Home Builders Association of Alabama
    Local # 0100
    PO Box 241305
    Montgomery, AL 36124
    http://www.hbaa.org

    Greater Montgomery Home Builders Association
    Local # 0164
    6336 Woodmere Blvd
    Montgomery, AL 36117
    http://www.gmhba.org

    Home Builders Association of Phenix City
    Local # 0172
    1808 Opelika Road
    Phenix City, AL 36867


    Lee Co Home Builders Association
    Local # 0136
    528 Lafayette Pl
    Auburn, AL 36830



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Butler County Alabama

    25 Years of West Coast Casualty’s Construction Defect Seminar

    GRSM New York Founding Partner Mercedes Colwin Honored with 2025 Excellence in Diversity Award by PLUS Foundation

    Quick Note: Mitigation of Damages in Contract Cases

    Property Owner Found Liable for Injuries to Worker of Unlicensed Contractor, Again

    Administration Launches 'Buy Clean' Construction Materials Push

    Colombia's $15 Billion Road Plan Bounces Back From Bribe Scandal

    MDL Panel Grants Consolidation for One Group of COVID-19 Claims

    Stair Collapse Points to Need for Structural Inspections

    New York’s Comprehensive Insurance Disclosure Act Imposes Increased Disclosure Requirements On Defendants at the Beginning of Lawsuits

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (6/24/26) – HUD to Fund AI Grants, Luxury Hotel Deal Investment Activity to Surge, ESPCs to Fund Energy and Infrastructure Improvements

    First Trump Agenda Nuggets Hit Construction

    Liability Policy’s Arbitration Endorsement Applies to Third Party Beneficiaries, Including Additional Insureds

    Amendments to California Insurance Code to Require Enhanced Claims Handling Requirements for Claims Arising Out Of Catastrophic Events

    Why Being Climate ‘Positive’ Is the Buzzy New Goal of Green Building

    Construction Defects Uncertain Role in Coverage in Pennsylvania

    Pennsylvania Civil Engineers Give the State's Infrastructure a "C-" Grade

    Angela Cooner Receives Prestigious ASA State Advocate Award

    Burden Supporting Termination for Default

    Best Lawyers Recognizes Twelve White and Williams Lawyers

    Near-Zero Carbon Cement Powers Sustainable 3D-Printed Homes

    Potential Problems with Cases Involving One Owner and Multiple Contractors

    Jobsite Safety, Workforce Shortage Drive Innovation in Machine Automation

    Missouri Protects Subrogation Rights

    Waiving The Right to Arbitrate Under Federal Law

    Georgia Court Reaffirms Construction Defect Decision

    HOA Group Speaking Out Against Draft of Colorado’s Construction Defects Bill

    Employer’s Liability Exclusion Bars Coverage

    Introducing Nomos LLP!

    Construction Defects in Roof May Close School

    California’s SB 61: New Limits on Retention Payments in Private Construction Contracts

    Failing to Adopt a Comprehensive Cyber Plan Can Lead to Disaster

    Arbitration Provision Must Be Incorporated into a Bond for Surety to Elect Arbitration

    NY Project Produces America's First Utility Scale Wind Power

    What to Expect From the New Self-Retracting Devices Standard

    Lender Seeks Millions From Lendlease for LA 'Graffiti Building' Suit Costs

    Contractor Sentenced to 7 Years for “Hail Damage” Fraud

    Construction Defects Are Occurrences, Says South Carolina High Court

    Jinx: Third Circuit Rules in Favor of Teamsters in Withdrawal Case

    San Francisco Airport’s Terminal 1 Aims Sky High

    Colorado “occurrence”

    Brown Orders Mandatory Water Curbs for California Drought

    Quick Note: Termination for Convenience Provisions Give a Party Broad Discretion to End a Contractual Relationship

    Five Reasons to Hire Older Workers—and How to Keep Them

    Five-Year Peak for Available Construction Jobs

    SFAA and Coalition of Partners Encourage Lawmakers to Require Essential Surety Bonding Protections on All Federally-Financed Projects Receiving WIFIA Funds

    California Supreme Court Rights the “Occurrence” Ship: Unintended Harm Resulting from Intentional Conduct Triggers Coverage Under Liability Insurance Policy

    Environmental Law Violations: When you Should Hire a Lawyer

    Toll Brothers Honored at the Shore Builders Association of Central New Jersey Awards

    Contractor’s Claim for Interest on Subcontractor’s Defective Work Claim Gains Mixed Results

    2021 2Q Cost Report: Industry Execs Believe Recovery Is in Full Swing
    Corporate Profile

    BUTLER COUNTY ALABAMA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from approximately 5000 construction defect and claims related expert designations, the Butler County, Alabama Construction Expert Directory provides a single point of reference for construction defect and claims related support to construction claims professionals seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction related consulting and expert witness support services to the nation's most recognized construction practice groups, public builders, risk managers, owners, state and local government agencies. Employing in house assets which comprise testifying architects, design engineers, construction cost and standard of care experts, licensed general and specialty contractors, the firm brings regional experience and local capabilities to Butler County and the surrounding areas.

    Butler County Alabama OSHA expert witness constructionButler County Alabama soil failure expert witnessButler County Alabama architecture expert witnessButler County Alabama consulting architect expert witnessButler County Alabama civil engineer expert witnessButler County Alabama roofing and waterproofing expert witnessButler County Alabama architectural expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Butler County, Alabama

    Texas Supreme Court Rules for Road Contractors in Critical Legal Immunity Test

    January 26, 2026 —
    The Texas Supreme Court overturned an earlier ruling by appeals court judges clarifying who is protected by the Texas Dept. of Transportation's legal immunity shield. It is a state law barring lawsuits against contractors for auto accidents as long as the contractors build according to the design. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Elaine Silver, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Practice Earns Prestigious Band One Ranking in the Chambers USA 2026 Guide

    June 22, 2026 —
    White and Williams LLP's Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Practice Group is pleased to share that it has received a Band One ranking in the Chambers USA 2026 Guide for Insurance, Pennsylvania. Additionally, Patricia B. Santelle, Chair Emeritus, Randy Maniloff, Partner, and Robert Walsh, Partner have all been individually ranked on the Chambers USA 2026 Guide in Insurance in Pennsylvania. The Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Practice's consistent focus on their clients and handling of complex claims were just two of the attributes contributing to their elite Band One ranking, after 11 years on the Chambers USA list. When asked about their experience working with White and Williams’ Pennsylvania Insurance Practice, one client stated, “What distinguishes White and Williams is the high level of service and accountability. The team is responsive, organized and reliable, which allows our internal teams to move quickly and make informed decisions with confidence.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of White and Williams LLP

    Your AEC Firm Has a Memory Problem. Here Is How to Fix It

    June 01, 2026 —
    AEC companies trying to operationalize AI often find they lack the data foundation on which to build. There may be an abundance of data hidden in documents, but you can’t reliably use it for AI. The lack of data quality was a key topic discussed at the AI in AEC 2026 conference. During the event, I met many experts working to solve this problem, including Pavlina Nikolova, Egnyte‘s EMEA AEC Practice Lead. The chat and her presentation highlighted the challenges and ways to overcome them. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    U.S. Supreme Court Decision May Negate State Law Requirement to File a Certificate of Merit with the Complaint in a Federal Action Against a Design Professional

    April 27, 2026 —
    To deter frivolous and unfounded claims against design professionals, states throughout the country have enacted statutes which generally require litigants to furnish a formal certification of merit (“COM”) from a qualified expert or face potential dismissal of their lawsuit. These COM statutes can impose a significant front-end burden on claimants who must pay an expert to review project records, interview the project team, and prepare a formal report before the lawsuit can be filed—often regardless of the amount in controversy. However, in light of a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in a medical malpractice case, most, if not all of these statutes, may no longer be enforceable in federal court. This article examines the recent decision in Berk v. Choy, 146 S. Ct. 546 (2026), the decisions thus far which have applied Berk to invalidate COM statutes, and other categories of statutes applicable to the construction industry which may face a similar fate. The U.S. Supreme Court Decision (Berk v. Choy) In Berk, the plaintiff, Harold Berk, sued a doctor for medical malpractice under Delaware law in Delaware federal court. 146 S. Ct. at 551. Under Del. Code, Tit. 18, § 6853(a)(1), an affidavit of merit (like a COM) must accompany a complaint alleging medical malpractice. Id. Berk failed to include an affidavit of merit with his complaint. Id. at 552. Applying Delaware state law, the federal court dismissed Berk’s medical malpractice claim. Berk appealed to the Third Circuit, arguing that the affidavit of merit required by § 6853(a)(1) is unenforceable in federal court because it is more onerous than the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Third Circuit affirmed the District Court’s ruling, finding § 6853(a)(1) enforceable in federal court. Reprinted courtesy of Christopher Olsen, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Phillip Boldt, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Olsen may be contacted at colsen@pecklaw.com Mr. Boldt may be contacted at pboldt@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Pursuing Claims for Loss Caused by Recent Kona Low Storms for Homeowners and Businesses

    May 12, 2026 —
    The recent Kona Low storms that hit all islands were devastating, causing significant property damage. Homeowners and businesses will be seeking coverage under their insurance policies to recover for their losses. Here is a brief look at what may be covered and which exclusions may be troublesome in homeowners’ and commercial property policies. Typically, both a homeowners’ policy and a commercial property policy include a grant of coverage for “direct physical loss of or damage to Covered Property.” Covered perils are listed, including such events as fire, lightning, or windstorm. Covered Property includes dwellings, other structures on the property and personal property. Additional coverages are usually provided. This includes debris removal after a peril insured against or collapse of a structure. In a homeowners’ policy, additional living expenses are likely covered when the damaged home is not fit to live in. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    FERC Issues Show-Cause Orders: Impacts on California and Other Regional Power Markets

    July 13, 2026 —
    At an open meeting on June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued show-cause orders under Section 206 of the Federal Power Act to the six FERC-jurisdictional RTOs/ISOs—PJM Interconnection, ISO New England, Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Southwest Power Pool, New York Independent System Operator and California Independent System Operator—along with their transmission owners (TOs), directing each region and the TOs to justify or revise tariff provisions governing how data centers and other large loads connect to and receive transmission service from the grid. These show-cause orders will impact several power markets across the country, including California. Reprinted courtesy of Stephen J. Humes, Pillsbury, Alicia M. McKnight, Pillsbury and Jason Drogin Atwood, Pillsbury Mr. Humes may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com Ms. McKnight may be contacted at alicia.mcknight@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Atwood may be contacted at jason.atwood@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    For Urban Walkers, a Patchy Dilemma: Who Owns the Sidewalk?

    July 06, 2026 —
    In 2007, New York City’s sanitation department threatened Natalie Shea with a $300 fine for defacing public property with graffiti. Her crime: drawing a blue flower in front of her family’s Park Slope home with sidewalk chalk. She was six years old. The incident, which made local and national news at the time, captures the fraught role that sidewalks often play in US cities. These patches of pavement do more than carry pedestrians to their destinations: They’re also places for commerce, social interaction and childhood play, from chalking to learning how to ride a bike. Urbanist Jane Jacobs once likened the range of activities that city sidewalks attract to an “intricate ballet.” In the new book Sidewalk Nation: The Life and Law of America’s Most Overlooked Resource (Harvard University Press), author Michael Pollack explores the “tangled web of state and local regulation” that governs sidewalks, with cities often passing along responsibilities for tasks like clearing snow and keeping walkways safe. He paints a portrait of the American sidewalk a disorderly and often neglected network, filled with literal and metaphorical cracks that give rise to all sorts of conflict, from mundane clashes over maintenance to more consequential fights over accessibility and inequality. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Linda Poon, Bloomberg

    Location, Location, Location — But Which One? The Few Words in Your Construction Contract that Pick Where You Fight

    June 29, 2026 —
    Most professionals know the old real estate line: location, location, location. It turns out to be just as true for construction contracts as it is for property. Consider a recent case involving a project owner that hired two design firms for a project. When issues arose during construction, the owner sued the design firms in state court in Brazoria County, Texas, pursuant to the forum selection clause in the parties’ contracts. The defendants then removed the case to the federal district court in Galveston, a courthouse in a different county. But the owner wanted the case back in Brazoria County state court. Whether it got its wish came down to two words in the contract: “situated in.” This article is about words like those. A construction contract’s forum selection clause names the place for the fight nobody plans to have, and where that fight happens can shape how it goes. This article explains why the wording in your forum selection clause deserves careful reading before you sign a construction contract. It is not a deep dive into the mechanics of federal removal jurisdiction, and it is not an academic comparison of the terms “forum” and “venue.” Instead, it is a practical look at how courts actually read these clauses, so the location of a future fight is the one you intended. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Brad Sands, Jones Walker, LLP
    Mr. Sands may be contacted at bsands@joneswalker.com