BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    multi family housing expert witness Fort Rucker Alabama Medical building expert witness Fort Rucker Alabama housing expert witness Fort Rucker Alabama retail construction expert witness Fort Rucker Alabama low-income housing expert witness Fort Rucker Alabama office building expert witness Fort Rucker Alabama custom homes expert witness Fort Rucker Alabama casino resort expert witness Fort Rucker Alabama condominium expert witness Fort Rucker Alabama institutional building expert witness Fort Rucker Alabama industrial building expert witness Fort Rucker Alabama condominiums expert witness Fort Rucker Alabama tract home expert witness Fort Rucker Alabama concrete tilt-up expert witness Fort Rucker Alabama structural steel construction expert witness Fort Rucker Alabama hospital construction expert witness Fort Rucker Alabama custom home expert witness Fort Rucker Alabama Subterranean parking expert witness Fort Rucker Alabama production housing expert witness Fort Rucker Alabama townhome construction expert witness Fort Rucker Alabama parking structure expert witness Fort Rucker Alabama high-rise construction expert witness Fort Rucker Alabama
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Fort Rucker, Alabama

    Alabama Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Although there is case law precedent for right to repair, Title 6 Article 13A states action must be commenced within 2 years after cause and not more than 13 years after completion of construction.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Fort Rucker Alabama

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Enterprise Home Builders Association
    Local # 0133
    PO Box 310861
    Enterprise, AL 36331


    Home Builders Association of Dothan & Wiregrass Area
    Local # 0132
    PO Box 9791
    Dothan, AL 36304


    South Alabama Home Builders Association
    Local # 0102
    PO Box 190
    Greenville, AL 36037


    Home Builders Association of Metro Mobile Inc
    Local # 0156
    1613 University Blvd S
    Mobile, AL 36609
    http://www.hbamm.com

    Baldwin County Home Builders Association
    Local # 0184
    916 PLantation Blvd
    Fairhope, AL 36532
    http://www.BCHBA.com

    Home Builders Association of Alabama
    Local # 0100
    PO Box 241305
    Montgomery, AL 36124
    http://www.hbaa.org

    Greater Montgomery Home Builders Association
    Local # 0164
    6336 Woodmere Blvd
    Montgomery, AL 36117
    http://www.gmhba.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Fort Rucker Alabama

    Rights Afforded to Employees and Employers During Strikes

    Colorado Trench Collapse Kills Two

    Giving Insurance Carrier Prompt Notice of Claim to Avoid “Untimely Notice” Defense

    Fewer NYC Construction Deaths as Safety Law Awaits Governor's Signature

    Full Extent of Damage From Turkey Quakes Takes Shape

    Texas Jury Finds Presence of SARS-CoV-2 Virus Causes “Physical Loss or Damage” to Property, Awards Over $48 Million to Baylor College of Medicine

    What is Toxic Mold Litigation?

    Agile Project Management in the Construction Industry

    Endra Rethinks MEP Design with AI

    Amendments to California Insurance Code to Require Enhanced Claims Handling Requirements for Claims Arising Out Of Catastrophic Events

    July Sees Big Drop in Home Sales

    Hawaii Federal District Court Denies Title Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment

    The Age of Uncertainty: Monitoring Construction Policy Shifts

    GRSM Secures Illinois Appellate Victory for Architectural Firm in Implied Warranty Dispute

    DHS Awards Contracts for Border Wall Prototypes

    Contract, Breach of Contract, and Material Breach of Contract

    Insureds' Experts Insufficient to Survive Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment

    Architectural Firm, Fired by School District, Launches Lawsuit

    The Multigenerational Housing Trend

    Celebrities Lose Case in Construction Defect Arbitration

    Noteworthy Construction Defect Cases for 1st Qtr 2014

    Welcome to SubTropolis: The Massive Business Complex Buried Under Kansas City

    Court of Appeal Puts the “Equity” in Equitable Subrogation

    Over 70 Lewis Brisbois Attorneys Recognized in 4th Edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America

    Insurer Must Indemnify Additional Insured After Settlement

    Firm Sued for Stopping Construction in Indiana Wants Case Tried in Germany

    Don MacGregor To Speak at 2011 West Coast Casualty Construction Defect Seminar

    Ensuing Loss Provision Does Not Salvage Coverage

    California Statutes Authorizing Public-Private Partnership Contracting

    Construction Defects Checklist

    Changes to Pennsylvania Mechanic’s Lien Code

    Previously Owned U.S. Home Sales Rise to Eight-Month High

    Federal Court Predicts Coverage In Nevada for Damage Caused by Faulty Workmanship

    Hoboken Mayor Admits Defeat as Voters Reject $241 Million School

    Denial of Coverage for Bulge in Wall Upheld

    ASCE Statement on House Passage of Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act

    Home Prices Beat Estimates With 0.8% Gain in November

    Suspend the Work, but Don’t Get Fired

    Construction Demand Unsteady, Gains in Some Regions

    Florida Appellate Court Holds Four-Year Statute of Limitations Applicable Irrespective of Contractor Licensure

    Contractor Allegedly Injured after Slipping on Black Ice Files Suit

    Construction Companies Must Prepare for a Surge of Third-Party Contractors

    Common Construction Contract Provisions: No-Damages-for-Delay Clause

    Expanded Virginia Court of Appeals Leads to Policyholder Relief

    SDOT Issues Construction Moratorium for FIFA 2026: What Contractors Need to Know and How to Prepare

    Gardeners in the City of the Future: An Interview with Eric Baczuk

    Quick Note: Insurer’s Denial of Coverage Waives Right to Enforce Post-Loss Policy Conditions

    Cyber Thieves Phish Away a $735K Payment to a Minnesota Contractor

    Congratulations to Partners Nicole Whyte, Keith Bremer, Peter Brown, Karen Baytosh, and Associate Matthew Cox for Their Inclusion in 2022 Best Lawyers!

    6,500 Bridges in Ohio Allegedly Functionally Obsolete or Structurally Deficient
    Corporate Profile

    FORT RUCKER ALABAMA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 4500 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Fort Rucker, Alabama Construction Expert Directory provides a wide range of trial support and construction consulting services to lawyers and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect and claims litigation. BHA provides building related trial support and expert services to the industry's most recognized construction attorneys, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. In connection with in house assets which include design experts, civil / structural engineers, ICC Certified Inspectors, ASPE certified professional estimators, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Fort Rucker and the surrounding areas.

    Fort Rucker Alabama roofing construction expertFort Rucker Alabama construction expert witnessesFort Rucker Alabama construction expert witnessFort Rucker Alabama construction claims expert witnessFort Rucker Alabama building consultant expertFort Rucker Alabama slope failure expert witnessFort Rucker Alabama defective construction expert
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Fort Rucker, Alabama

    The Deadline to File Suit on a Public Works Payment Payment Bond is Triggered by a Claimant’s Work on a Project Not by a Claimant’s Work Under a Contract

    June 02, 2026 —
    California law requires that prime contractors furnish a payment bond – providing for payment to lower-tiered subcontractors and suppliers – on state and local public works projects with a value in excess of $25,000. There are three conditions that must be satisfied when a claimant makes a claim against a payment bond on a public works project in California:
    1. First, generally, the claimant must have served a preliminary notice, unless the claimant is a first-tier subcontractor or supplier;
    2. The claimant must have “ceased to provide work” on the project; and
    3. The claimant must file suit against the payment bond no later than six (6) months after the period in which a stop payment notice must be given or, in other words, the earlier of 270 days after completion of the public works project or 210 days after a notice of completion or cessation was recorded on a public works project.
    In Tarlton & Sons, Inc. v. Great American Insurance Company, 111 Cal.App.5th 376 (2025), the 2nd District Court of Appeal examined whether a subcontractor timely filed a claim against a payment bond when a prime contractor was terminated and replaced by another prime contractor who the subcontractor continued to perform work for. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Recognized in Hudson Valley Magazine’s 2026 Top Lawyers List

    March 24, 2026 —
    Traub Lieberman is pleased to announce that six Partners from the White Plains, NY office have been included in the 2026 edition of the Hudson Valley Magazine’s Top Lawyers in the Hudson Valley list. This annual guide recognizes more than 270 of the region's leading attorneys. Insurance:
    • Copernicus Gaza
    • Jonathan Harwood
    • Lisa Rolle
    • Lisa Shrewsberry
    Reprinted courtesy of Copernicus T. Gaza, Traub Lieberman, Jonathan R. Harwood, Traub Lieberman, Lisa M. Rolle, Traub Lieberman, Lisa L. Shrewsberry, Traub Lieberman, Christopher Russo, Traub Lieberman and Hillary J. Raimondi, Traub Lieberman Mr. Gaza may be contacted at cgaza@tlsslaw.com Mr. Harwood may be contacted at jharwood@tlsslaw.com Ms. Rolle may be contacted at lrolle@tlsslaw.com Ms. Shrewsberry may be contacted at lshrewsberry@tlsslaw.com Mr. Russo may be contacted at crusso@tlsslaw.com Ms. Raimondi may be contacted at hraimondi@tlsslaw.com Read the full story...

    High-Rise Design and Construction: Then, Now, and Next

    March 16, 2026 —
    The Empire State Building was built in 14 months. Since 2010, the average completion time for a 200-meter-plus building has increased from 4.3 to 5.8 years. Buildings have become more complex, and there's more regulation than in the 1930s. Still, there are ways to make high-rise construction more efficient. An Unlikely Benchmark From 1930 When construction began on the Empire State Building on March 17, 1930, the world was in the midst of the Great Depression. That turned out to be an advantage. Contractors Starrett Brothers & Eken had access to a vast, motivated workforce, peaking at 3,439 workers on a single day in August 1930. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    IEEPA Tariff Refunds: CBP Launches CAPE Process

    April 27, 2026 —
    On April 20, 2026, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) launched the first phase of the Consolidated Administration and Processing of Entries (CAPE) tool in the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) portal to administer refunds of duties imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) through a streamlined electronic filing process. Background In February 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court held that certain tariffs imposed under IEEPA were unlawful. Subsequent proceedings before the U.S. Court of International Trade required CBP to develop a scalable refund process applicable not only to litigants but also to non-plaintiffs. According to CBP and court filings, approximately 330,000 importers paid or deposited an estimated $166 billion in IEEPA duties across more than 53 million entries. In response, CBP developed CAPE as an electronic, consolidated refund mechanism within ACE. Reprinted courtesy of David J. Creagan, White and Williams LLP, Guido Antolini, White and Williams LLP, Bruce W. MacLennan, White and Williams LLP and Gary P. Biehn, White and Williams LLP Mr. Creagan may be contacted at creagand@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. Antolini may be contacted at antolinig@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. MacLennan may be contacted at maclennanb@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. Biehn may be contacted at biehng@whiteandwilliams.com Read the full story...

    Micromobility in Smart Cities: Keeping the Wheels in Motion

    May 26, 2026 —
    Mobility is the lifeblood of any city. How people are able to travel in, out and within a metropolitan area is vital to its citizens, businesses, supply chains and social services. And as U.S. cities have expanded in size and population density, the strategies for addressing mobility have evolved. Many have taken different approaches to public transit, and each city boasts a dense tapestry of roadways, walking paths and various parking options. But as cities continue to reexamine infrastructure strategies through smart city technology, a new field of transportation has emerged—micromobility. Designed for short-distance travel using lightweight vehicles (bikes, e-bikes, e-scooters, etc.), the industry’s global net worth has grown exponentially in recent years to the tune of hundreds of billions, with one forecast predicting it could reach $340 billion by 2030. Micromobility also finds itself at the forefront of various smart city technological improvements. Geofencing has been implemented in U.S. cities to determine where micromobility vehicles can operate, control speed limits, and park utilizing the vehicles’ GPS location. Internet of Things (IoT) technologies (satellite-based location receivers, cloud communication, internet links, etc.) have improved vehicle lifespans by keeping track of when vehicles require service and prevent vandalism and theft. Data collected from vehicles’ location tracking is routinely used for urban planning and smart city development. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of James P. Bobotek, Pillsbury
    Mr. Bobotek may be contacted at james.bobotek@pillsburylaw.com

    Snell & Wilmer’s San Diego Office Ranked #1 “Best Place to Work” by the San Diego Business Journal

    September 01, 2026 —
    SAN DIEGO – Snell & Wilmer is proud to announce that its San Diego office has been named the #1 Best Place to Work in the Large Business category by the San Diego Business Journal as part of its 2026 Best Places to Work awards. The annual recognition honors outstanding employers across the San Diego region that are setting the standard for workplace culture and employee engagement. Rankings are based on confidential employee surveys conducted by Workforce Research Group, which evaluate organizations on leadership, corporate culture, communication, employee engagement, and other key workplace factors. “Being recognized as the #1 Best Place to Work in the Large Business category is an incredible honor because it reflects the experiences and feedback of our own team,” said Bardia Moayedi, managing partner of Snell & Wilmer’s San Diego office. “Our people are the foundation of everything we do, and this recognition speaks to the collaborative, inclusive, and supportive culture they have helped create. I am grateful to every member of our San Diego office for making this an exceptional place to build a career, serve our clients, and give back to our community.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer

    No Bad Faith Despite Insurer’s Appraisal Award Exceeding Initial Payment

    August 03, 2026 —
    The federal district court granted the insurer’s motion for summary judgment, finding no bad faith despite the appraisal award exceeding the amount the insurer initially paid. Jazi Kat 4659 Rockridge LLC, et al. v. Travelers Cas. Ins. Co. of Am., et al., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105634 (D. Ariz. May 13, 2026). Plaintiffs sued Travelers for breach of contract and bad faith, alleging that Travelers failed to pay money plaintiffs were owed under the policy. Plaintiffs held a commercial property policy for two properties. A fire destroyed one of the properties. Travelers adjusted the claim and issued two payments. Plaintiffs disagreed with the amount of the payments and demanded an appraisal. Travelers agreed to the appraisal. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Utah’s Emerging Framework for Responsible Data Center Development

    September 08, 2026 —
    Utah is establishing itself as one of the nation’s most attractive jurisdictions for large-scale data center development, with a structured, defensible regulatory pathway that gives developers and investors the clarity needed to deploy capital at scale. The cornerstone is Executive Order 2026-03, “Establishing a Higher Bar for Data Center Development in Utah,” signed by Governor Spencer J. Cox on May 29, 2026. The Executive Order creates an actionable compliance framework letting developers demonstrate stewardship across water, air quality, energy, wildlife, and community engagement – reducing regulatory and reputational risk. Recent enactments on energy self-supply and water rights operationalize these principles, while a few counties have adopted short-term local moratoria to update zoning; understanding how these interact with the state framework matters for site selection. Reprinted courtesy of Denise A. Dragoo, Snell & Wilmer and Josh Miller, Snell & Wilmer Ms. Dragoo may be contacted at ddragoo@swlaw.com Mr. Miller may be contacted at jmiller@swlaw.com Read the full story...