BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    tract home expert witness Fort Rucker Alabama concrete tilt-up expert witness Fort Rucker Alabama housing expert witness Fort Rucker Alabama casino resort expert witness Fort Rucker Alabama landscaping construction expert witness Fort Rucker Alabama townhome construction expert witness Fort Rucker Alabama production housing expert witness Fort Rucker Alabama institutional building expert witness Fort Rucker Alabama condominiums expert witness Fort Rucker Alabama office building expert witness Fort Rucker Alabama industrial building expert witness Fort Rucker Alabama Medical building expert witness Fort Rucker Alabama parking structure expert witness Fort Rucker Alabama hospital construction expert witness Fort Rucker Alabama Subterranean parking expert witness Fort Rucker Alabama condominium expert witness Fort Rucker Alabama retail construction expert witness Fort Rucker Alabama structural steel construction expert witness Fort Rucker Alabama low-income housing expert witness Fort Rucker Alabama mid-rise construction expert witness Fort Rucker Alabama high-rise construction expert witness Fort Rucker Alabama multi family housing expert witness Fort Rucker Alabama
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Fort Rucker, Alabama

    Alabama Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Although there is case law precedent for right to repair, Title 6 Article 13A states action must be commenced within 2 years after cause and not more than 13 years after completion of construction.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Fort Rucker Alabama

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Enterprise Home Builders Association
    Local # 0133
    PO Box 310861
    Enterprise, AL 36331


    Home Builders Association of Dothan & Wiregrass Area
    Local # 0132
    PO Box 9791
    Dothan, AL 36304


    South Alabama Home Builders Association
    Local # 0102
    PO Box 190
    Greenville, AL 36037


    Home Builders Association of Metro Mobile Inc
    Local # 0156
    1613 University Blvd S
    Mobile, AL 36609
    http://www.hbamm.com

    Baldwin County Home Builders Association
    Local # 0184
    916 PLantation Blvd
    Fairhope, AL 36532
    http://www.BCHBA.com

    Home Builders Association of Alabama
    Local # 0100
    PO Box 241305
    Montgomery, AL 36124
    http://www.hbaa.org

    Greater Montgomery Home Builders Association
    Local # 0164
    6336 Woodmere Blvd
    Montgomery, AL 36117
    http://www.gmhba.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Fort Rucker Alabama

    California Case That Reads Like Russian Novel Results in Less Than Satisfying Result for Both Project Owner and Contractors

    New York Establishes a Registration Requirement for Contractors and Subcontractors Performing Public Works and Covered Private Projects

    Construction Warranties: Have You Seen Me Lately?

    Ontario Court of Appeal Clarifies the Meaning of "Living in the Same Household" for Purposes of Coverage Under a Homeowners Policy

    Sales of New U.S. Homes Surged in August to Six-Year High

    Minimum Wage on Federal Construction Projects is $10.10

    Traub Lieberman Partner Jessica Kull and Associate Jonathan Powell Win Motion to Dismiss in Favor of General Contractor

    Buffett’s $11 Million Beach House Is Still on the Market

    Structural Defects in Thousands of Bridges in America

    Mechanics Lien Release Bond – What Happens Now? What exactly is a Mechanics Lien and Why Might it Need to be Released?

    Remote Trials Can Control Prejudgment Risk

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Sudden Death”

    2016 Hawaii Legislature Enacts Five Insurance-Related Bills

    Ninth Circuit Affirms Duty to Defend CERCLA Section 104 (e) Letter

    Beyond the Disneyland Resort: World Class Shopping Experiences

    The Looming Housing Crisis and Limited Government Relief—An Examination of the CDC Eviction Moratorium Two Months In

    Traub Lieberman Partner Rina Clemens Selected as a 2023 Florida Super Lawyers® Rising Star

    Seller Faces Federal Charges for Lying on Real Estate Disclosure Forms

    It's a Wrap! Enforcing Online Agreements in Light of the CPRA

    Substantial Evidence Standard Upholds Trial Court Findings When There is Documentary Evidence and Testimony, Even if “Thin.”

    When OSHA Cites You

    New York Developers Facing Construction Defect Lawsuit

    Changes to Comprehensive Insurance Disclosure Act in New York Introduced

    Navigating Disruption to Construction Projects Flowing From the America First Trade Policy

    Acceptable Worksite: New City of Seattle Specification Provisions Now In Effect

    Commercial Construction in the Golden State is Looking Pretty Golden

    A Win for Clarity: What a Recent Federal Court Decision Means for Davis-Bacon Compliance

    Why A Jury Found That Contractor 'Retaliated' Against Undocumented Craft Worker

    South Carolina’s New Insurance Data Security Act: Pebbles Before a Landslide?

    Insurance for Defective Construction Now in Third Edition

    Update Coverage for Construction Defect Claims in Colorado

    Noncumulation Clause Limits Coverage to One Occurrence

    Velazquez Framing, LLC v. Cascadia Homes, Inc. (Take 2) – Pre-lien Notice for Labor Unambiguously Not Required

    Not So Universal Design Fails (guest post)

    When Is a Survival Clause Absolutely Necessary?

    Reroof Blamed for $10 Million in Damage

    Construction Litigation Group Listed in U.S. News Top Tier

    The “Program Accessibility” Exception for Public Entities Under the ADA

    Five Haight Attorneys Selected for Best Lawyers in America© 2021

    Navigating Tariffs in Construction Contracts: Creative Strategies for Owners and Contractors

    White and Williams LLP Ranked in the Chambers USA 2026 Guide

    Terminating A Subcontractor Or Sub-Tier Contractor—Not So Fast—Read Your Contract!

    Manhattan Home Sales Rise at Slower Pace as Prices Jump

    Insurers Must Defend Allegations of Faulty Workmanship

    Insured's Expert Qualified, Judgment for Coverage Affirmed

    The “Colorado American Dream Act:” H.B. 25-1272’s Construction Defect Reforms

    Adapting Standard Construction Forms for Use in Overseas Hospitality Renovations

    A Primer on Insurance for Construction Projects

    End of an (Endangerment) Era

    Insured's Failure to Challenge Trial Court's Application of Exclusion Makes Appeal Futile
    Corporate Profile

    FORT RUCKER ALABAMA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 4500 engineering, construction, and builders standard of care related expert designations, the Fort Rucker, Alabama Construction Expert Directory delivers a streamlined multi-disciplinary expert retention and support solution to attorneys and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction claims investigation and expert services to the industry's leading construction attorneys, Fortune 500 builders, insurers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Employing in house assets which comprise testifying architects, design engineers, construction cost and standard of care experts, licensed general and specialty contractors, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Fort Rucker region.

    Fort Rucker Alabama construction code expert witnessFort Rucker Alabama consulting architect expert witnessFort Rucker Alabama building expertFort Rucker Alabama architect expert witnessFort Rucker Alabama building consultant expertFort Rucker Alabama consulting engineersFort Rucker Alabama construction claims expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Fort Rucker, Alabama

    Contractor Entitled to Defense Under Subcontractor’s Policy

    March 10, 2026 —
    The appellate court affirmed the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to the contractor’s insurer finding that the sumcontractor’s insurer had a duty to defend the contractor. Navigators Specialty Ins. Co. v. TBR Construction, LLC, et al., 2025 Ill. App. Unpub. LEXIS 2177 (Ill. Ct. App. Dec. 3, 2025). Greenscape Homes, LLC was the general contractor for a residential development. Greenscape hired TBR Construction, LLC as a carpentry-framing subcontractor pursuant to a “Trade Contractor Agreement.” The Trade Agreement required TBR to name Greenscape as an additional insured. TBR was insured by Utica. Greenscape was insured by Navigators. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (4/1/26) – President Trump’s EO Affects Federal Funding, Fannie Mae Accepts Crypto-Backed Mortgages, Private Sector Construction Weakness Offsets Public Sector Gains

    April 08, 2026 —
    In our latest roundup, California to pursue office-to-housing conversions, hoteliers to increase investment in artificial intelligence, private credit exodus to boost commercial real estate capital, and more!
    • President Donald Trump’s executive order to remove regulatory barriers to affordable home construction could affect federal funding for cities and states that don’t follow what the order calls “regulatory best practices,” including faster permitting, fewer green building mandates and relaxed limits on exurban development. (Robyn Griggs Lawrence, Multifamily Dive)
    • California state policymakers have been pursuing policy changes that remove barriers to converting older commercial buildings into housing. (Keith Loria, Construction Dive)
    • Private sector weakness largely offset modest gains in public construction spending, despite data center gains. (Sebastian Obando, Construction Dive)
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team

    “The Superintendent Told Us to Do It:” Why Verbal Approval May Not Be Enough

    June 02, 2026 —
    In construction defect litigation, one scenario appears repeatedly: a subcontractor installs work in a manner that differs from the plans, specifications, manufacturer instructions, or industry standards after being verbally directed to do so by the general contractor, superintendent, architect, or owner’s representative. At the time, the decision may seem minor. The project is moving quickly, the field team wants to maintain progress, and nobody wants to stop working over what appears to be a small issue. The subcontractor may trust the superintendent or project manager and assume the conversation will be remembered later if questions arise. Years later, however, when the project experiences problems, the people involved may deny the conversation occurred, remember it differently, or simply no longer remember the project. Without written documentation, the subcontractor can find itself defending claims for defective work, even though it performed the installation exactly as directed. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Andrew Lintner, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Mr. Lintner may be contacted at alintner@hhmrlaw.com

    Data Center Construction and the AEC Partner of the Future

    April 14, 2026 —
    During my involvement in designing mobile phone production facilities, the speed of design and construction was critical. Any delay could directly translate into lost revenue. That same logic now applies to data centers, though the stakes are much higher. Instead of optimizing physical production lines, we are constructing infrastructure for digital production. The global data center capacity is expected to nearly double by 2030, and with this level of demand, the traditional project-by-project delivery model begins to show its limitations. Data centers are no longer isolated projects in the traditional sense. They are evolving into repeatable, scalable production systems, making them ideal environments for AEC process and business model innovation. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    ACEC Supports BUILD America 250 Act as Important First Step on Surface Reauthorization

    May 26, 2026 —
    WASHINGTON -- The American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC), the business voice of America’s engineering and design services industry released the following statement on the BUILD America 250 Act: "Chairman Graves and Ranking Member Larsen have taken an important bipartisan step toward reauthorizing the federal surface transportation programs that are critical to economic growth in every state. The BUILD America 250 Act provides five years of stability in funding road and transit projects, raises new revenues to address the solvency of the Highway Trust Fund, and includes meaningful provisions to strengthen project delivery, advance digital infrastructure, and improve the contracting framework that engineering firms rely on every day. ACEC will continue to advocate for investment levels that keep pace with the country's growing infrastructure needs, and we urge the Committee to keep this process moving forward." The American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC) is the business association of America’s engineering industry, representing more than 5,500 independent engineering firms and more than 650,000 professionals throughout the United States engaged in the development of America’s transportation, water, and energy infrastructure, along with environmental, industrial, and other public and private facilities. Founded in 1906 and headquartered in Washington, D.C., ACEC is a national federation of 51 state and regional organizations.

    FERC Issues Show-Cause Orders: Impacts on California and Other Regional Power Markets

    July 13, 2026 —
    At an open meeting on June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued show-cause orders under Section 206 of the Federal Power Act to the six FERC-jurisdictional RTOs/ISOs—PJM Interconnection, ISO New England, Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Southwest Power Pool, New York Independent System Operator and California Independent System Operator—along with their transmission owners (TOs), directing each region and the TOs to justify or revise tariff provisions governing how data centers and other large loads connect to and receive transmission service from the grid. These show-cause orders will impact several power markets across the country, including California. Reprinted courtesy of Stephen J. Humes, Pillsbury, Alicia M. McKnight, Pillsbury and Jason Drogin Atwood, Pillsbury Mr. Humes may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com Ms. McKnight may be contacted at alicia.mcknight@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Atwood may be contacted at jason.atwood@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    $356 Million Judgement Against Developer for Defective Construction of DC Condominium

    August 16, 2026 —
    On July 31, 2026, the Superior Court of the District of Columbia entered a $356,085,513.00 judgment against developers JBG Smith for defective construction and renovation of the Wardman Tower Residential Condominium in Washington, D.C. The case is Wardman Tower Residential Condominium Unit Owners Association v. JBG Smith Properties, et al., No. 2020 CA 004807 B (D.C. Super. Ct.). In a 148-page Trial Order, the D.C. Superior Court awarded $118,695,171.00 in damages in favor of the condominium association and against the condominium developers, including JBG Smith. The Court trebled those damages pursuant to the District of Columbia Consumer Protection Procedures Act (“CPPA”) to reach an ultimate judgment of $356,085,513.00. See Cowie Law Group: DC Condominium Construction Defects: Recovering Attorney’s Fees, Litigation Expenses & Treble Damages Under the Consumer Protection Procedures Act. Cowie Law Group, P.C. filed the lawsuit on behalf of the Association in 2020. The firm represented the Association throughout years of pretrial discovery and ultimately served as trial counsel with Williams & Connolly LLP during a lengthy bench trial before the Honorable Yvonne Williams. The Cowie Law Group team included attorneys, George A. Bealefeld, III, Albert G. McCarraher, Stanford L. Kimmel, III and Nicholas D. Cowie. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Nicholas D. Cowie, Cowie Law Group
    Mr. Cowie may be contacted at ndc@cowielawgroup.com

    The Seventh Circuit Rejects Navigators Insurance Company’s Attempt to Escape Additional Insured Coverage For a Gas Explosion

    March 24, 2026 —
    In a recent Seventh Circuit decision, Atlanta Gas Light Company v. Navigators Insurance Company, the court addressed a theme that policyholders are often confronted with by insurers[1] – insurers disputing additional insured coverage where the named insured is not named in the underlying action. The court aptly rejected this position since it was undisputed that the bodily injuries alleged in the underlying lawsuits were due to a gas explosion that was “caused, in whole or in part, by” the named insured’s acts or omissions. I. Background The additional insureds, Atlanta Gas Light Company and Southern Company Gas (collectively, “AGL”), retained the named insured, United States Infrastructure Corporation (“USIC”), to locate and mark gas lines that AGL owned in Georgia. USIC failed to mark a certain gas line, which was later struck by a boring company, leading to an explosion that injured three people. Reprinted courtesy of Kyle A. Rudolph, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. and Anna M. Perry, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. Mr. Rudolph may be contacted at KRudolph@sdvlaw.com Ms. Perry may be contacted at APerry@sdvlaw.com Read the full story...