BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    concrete tilt-up expert witness Glen Allen Alabama townhome construction expert witness Glen Allen Alabama condominium expert witness Glen Allen Alabama multi family housing expert witness Glen Allen Alabama high-rise construction expert witness Glen Allen Alabama low-income housing expert witness Glen Allen Alabama mid-rise construction expert witness Glen Allen Alabama tract home expert witness Glen Allen Alabama office building expert witness Glen Allen Alabama housing expert witness Glen Allen Alabama Medical building expert witness Glen Allen Alabama retail construction expert witness Glen Allen Alabama hospital construction expert witness Glen Allen Alabama custom homes expert witness Glen Allen Alabama Subterranean parking expert witness Glen Allen Alabama industrial building expert witness Glen Allen Alabama casino resort expert witness Glen Allen Alabama institutional building expert witness Glen Allen Alabama condominiums expert witness Glen Allen Alabama custom home expert witness Glen Allen Alabama parking structure expert witness Glen Allen Alabama production housing expert witness Glen Allen Alabama
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Glen Allen, Alabama

    Alabama Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Although there is case law precedent for right to repair, Title 6 Article 13A states action must be commenced within 2 years after cause and not more than 13 years after completion of construction.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Glen Allen Alabama

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Blount County Home Builders Association
    Local # 0104
    PO Box 571
    Oneonta, AL 35121


    Home Builders Association of Northwest Alabama
    Local # 0168
    PO Box 308
    Winfield, AL 35594


    Walker County Home Builders Association
    Local # 0190
    PO Box 3101 200 18th Street East
    Jasper, AL 35502
    http://www.walkercountyhomebuilders.org

    Greater Gadsden Home Builders Association
    Local # 0144
    524 Broad St Ste 1
    Gadsden, AL 35901
    http://www.gghba.com

    Home Builders Association of Gr Calhoun Cty
    Local # 0108
    PO Box 2549
    Anniston, AL 36202


    Home Builders Association of St Clair Co
    Local # 0195
    PO Box 543
    Pell City, AL 35125


    Cullman County Home Builders Association
    Local # 0121
    PO Box 1033
    Cullman, AL 35056
    http://www.cullmancountyhba.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Glen Allen Alabama

    Commercial Construction Heating Up

    Apartment Investors Turn to Suburbs After Crowding Cities

    Law Firm Fails to Survive Insurer's and Agent's Motions to Dismiss

    Colorado House Bill 17-1279 – A Misguided Attempt at Construction Defect Reform

    Nuclear Fusion Pushes to Reach Commercial Power Plant Stage

    Henderson Land to Spend $839 Million on Hong Kong Retail Complex

    Cape Town Seeks World Cup Stadium Construction Collusion Damages

    Wake County Justice Center- a LEED Silver Project done right!

    Topic 606: A Retrospective Review of Revenue from Contracts with Customers

    If You Purchase a House at an HOA Lien Foreclosure, Are You Entitled to Excess Sale Proceeds?

    U.S. Government Bans Use of Mandatory Arbitration Agreements between Nursing Homes and Residents, Effective November 28, 2016

    Policy Lanuage Expressly Prohibits Replacement of Undamaged Material to Match Damaged Material

    A Homeowner’s Guide to Recovering After the Palisades Fire

    Construction Defects Lead to Demolition

    Wendel Rosen’s Construction Practice Group Welcomes Quinlan Tom

    Endorsements Do Not Exclude Coverage for Wrongful Death Claim

    Insurer's Attempt to Challenge Appraisal Award Rejected

    Construction Contract Language and Insurance Coverage Must Be Consistent

    Wadsworth v. Regional Rail Partners — Verified Statements of Claim Under the Colorado Public Works Act

    Insurer Unable to Declare its Coverage Excess In Construction Defect Case

    How the Jury Divided $112M in Seattle Crane Collapse Damages

    NY Appellate Court Holds Common Interest Privilege Applies to Parties to a Merger

    Sioux City Building Owners Sue Architect over Renovation Costs

    Do You Have an Innovation Strategy?

    $356 Million Judgement Against Developer for Defective Construction of DC Condominium

    Toolbox Talk Series: International Arbitration for the "Domestic" Construction Lawyer

    Texas Plans a Texas-Sized Response to Rising Seas

    San Francisco Airport’s Terminal 1 Aims Sky High

    Immigrants' Legal Status Eyed Over Roles in New York Fake Injury Lawsuits

    Attorney Writing Series on Misconceptions over Construction Defects

    Contractual Setoff and Application When Performance Bond Buys Out of its Exposure

    Conn. Appellate Court Overturns Jury Verdict, Holding Plaintiff’s Sole Remedy for Injuries Arising From Open Manhole Was State’s Highway Defect Statute

    Anatomy of a Construction Dispute- An Alternative

    No Jail Time for Disbarred Construction Defect Lawyer

    Milwaukee's 25-Story Ascent Stacks Up as Tall Timber Role Model

    Bad Faith Jury Verdict Upheld After Insurer's Failure to Settle Within Policy Limits

    Court Grants Partial Summary Judgment on Conversion Claim Against Insurer

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Give a Little Extra …”

    DRCOG’s Findings on the Impact of Construction Defect Litigation Have Been Released (And the Results Should Not Surprise You)

    Mind The Gap!

    NYC Shuts 9 Pre-Kindergartens for Health, Safety Issues

    Providence Partner Monica R. Nelson Helps Union Carbide Secure Defense Verdict in 1st Rhode Island Asbestos Trial in Nearly 40 Years

    Best Practices After Receiving Notice of a Construction Claim

    Illinois Supreme Court Announces Time Standards for Closing Out Cases

    China Home Glut May Worsen as Developers Avoid Price Drop

    New Jersey Supreme Court Upholds $400 Million Award for Superstorm Sandy Damages

    AB 1701 – General Contractor Liability for Subcontractors’ Unpaid Wages

    Stacking of Service Interruption and Contingent Business Interruption Coverages Permitted

    Firm Claims Construction Defects in Hawaiian Homes

    Gatluak Ramdiet Named to The National Black Lawyers’ “Top 40 Under 40” List
    Corporate Profile

    GLEN ALLEN ALABAMA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through over 4500 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Glen Allen, Alabama Construction Expert Directory provides a wide range of trial support and construction consulting services to attorneys and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction related trial support and expert consulting services to the industry's leading construction attorneys, Fortune 500 builders, insurers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing captive assets which comprise testifying architects, design engineers, construction cost and standard of care experts, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Glen Allen and the surrounding areas.

    Glen Allen Alabama construction expertsGlen Allen Alabama testifying construction expert witnessGlen Allen Alabama soil failure expert witnessGlen Allen Alabama construction project management expert witnessGlen Allen Alabama expert witness windowsGlen Allen Alabama multi family design expert witnessGlen Allen Alabama consulting engineers
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Glen Allen, Alabama

    Insured’s Failure to Determine Depreciation When Presenting Claim for Replacement Cost Value

    August 16, 2026 —
    The Third Circuit affirmed the district court’s granting of summary judgment to the insurer when the insured submitted replacement cost value of the loss but did not include a determination of depreciation. Kimmel v. Massachusetts Bay Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 16569 (3d Cir. June 9, 2026). A lightning strike downed a tree on the insured’s property, causing extensive damage to the home. The insured had a homeowner’s policy with Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company (MBIC). MBIC denied the claim, determining that much of the claimed damage already existed and that several policy exclusions otherwise barred coverage. The insured filed suit for breach of contract and bad faith. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    The Grenfell & Champlain Towers: Risk Management Considerations in the Wake of Catastrophic Loss — A UK/US Comparison

    June 02, 2026 —
    1. Introduction As part of the multinational collaborative relationship between Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. and Fenchurch Law, we continually find ourselves in conversations about the sometimes subtle but sometimes drastic differences between risk management and coverage considerations from one country to the next. These differences are often highlighted by the fallout from large catastrophic losses that are widely publicized and illuminate sometimes widespread risks and perils that many others may be facing in the coming years. The response of governments and their subdivisions to the needs of victims and/or commercial parties, and insurance markets’ evaluation of and reactions to catastrophic losses vary widely from country to country and jurisdiction. In this article, we discuss these responses and reactions in the cases of the Grenfell Tower Fire in London, England, and the Champlain Tower collapse in Surfside, Florida, within the United States. These two widely publicized losses involved different risk management and insurance considerations based on where they occurred. They also saw substantially different government responses and raised varied questions about what the next steps are for their respective commercial and insurance markets. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Eric M. Clarkson, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.
    Mr. Clarkson may be contacted at EClarkson@sdvlaw.com

    Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Practice Earns Prestigious Band One Ranking in the Chambers USA 2026 Guide

    June 22, 2026 —
    White and Williams LLP's Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Practice Group is pleased to share that it has received a Band One ranking in the Chambers USA 2026 Guide for Insurance, Pennsylvania. Additionally, Patricia B. Santelle, Chair Emeritus, Randy Maniloff, Partner, and Robert Walsh, Partner have all been individually ranked on the Chambers USA 2026 Guide in Insurance in Pennsylvania. The Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Practice's consistent focus on their clients and handling of complex claims were just two of the attributes contributing to their elite Band One ranking, after 11 years on the Chambers USA list. When asked about their experience working with White and Williams’ Pennsylvania Insurance Practice, one client stated, “What distinguishes White and Williams is the high level of service and accountability. The team is responsive, organized and reliable, which allows our internal teams to move quickly and make informed decisions with confidence.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of White and Williams LLP

    Sixth Circuit Revives Builder’s Risk Coverage, Refusing to Let Insurer Escape on a Technicality

    July 27, 2026 —
    In 3371 Reading, LLC v. Liberty Mutual Group, the Sixth Circuit did something courts do not always do in coverage disputes: it refused to let an insurer avoid liability based on a technical policy condition that could never actually be satisfied. The decision is a straightforward reminder of two core principles. First, policies must be interpreted from the standpoint of a reasonably prudent insured. Second, hyper-technical conditions cannot be used to deny coverage where compliance is never possible. Reprinted courtesy of Kevin V. Small, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Adriana A. Perez, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Mr. Small may be contacted at ksmall@hunton.com Ms. Perez may be contacted at pereza@hunton.com Read the full story...

    $356 Million Judgement Against Developer for Defective Construction of DC Condominium

    August 16, 2026 —
    On July 31, 2026, the Superior Court of the District of Columbia entered a $356,085,513.00 judgment against developers JBG Smith for defective construction and renovation of the Wardman Tower Residential Condominium in Washington, D.C. The case is Wardman Tower Residential Condominium Unit Owners Association v. JBG Smith Properties, et al., No. 2020 CA 004807 B (D.C. Super. Ct.). In a 148-page Trial Order, the D.C. Superior Court awarded $118,695,171.00 in damages in favor of the condominium association and against the condominium developers, including JBG Smith. The Court trebled those damages pursuant to the District of Columbia Consumer Protection Procedures Act (“CPPA”) to reach an ultimate judgment of $356,085,513.00. See Cowie Law Group: DC Condominium Construction Defects: Recovering Attorney’s Fees, Litigation Expenses & Treble Damages Under the Consumer Protection Procedures Act. Cowie Law Group, P.C. filed the lawsuit on behalf of the Association in 2020. The firm represented the Association throughout years of pretrial discovery and ultimately served as trial counsel with Williams & Connolly LLP during a lengthy bench trial before the Honorable Yvonne Williams. The Cowie Law Group team included attorneys, George A. Bealefeld, III, Albert G. McCarraher, Stanford L. Kimmel, III and Nicholas D. Cowie. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Nicholas D. Cowie, Cowie Law Group
    Mr. Cowie may be contacted at ndc@cowielawgroup.com

    Trend Continues Where Unlicensed Contractors Have No Recourse

    July 13, 2026 —
    There’s been a recent trend in Florida case law that has figuratively “killed” unlicensed contractors. Here’s another one. The moral to this trend and case is simple: make sure you have the proper licenses prior to serving as a contractor under Florida law. Trying to be cute, as seemed to be the situation in this case with a creative argument, is not an argument that will carry the day and your resources will be devoted to being creative versus the ultimate merits of the dispute. In Ramindesign, LLC v. Skarzynski, 2026 WL 1649571 (S.D.Fla. 2026) an owner of real property hired a company to design and construct a spec home on the property. The company and its owner were NOT licensed contractors. The contract stated the company was serving as a “spec developer” and referred to it as the contractor throughout the contract. Other than this, the contract was set up as a cost plus a fee. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (8/19/26) – Single-Family Housing Investors Worry, Confidence in Multifamily REITs and Construction Backlog Falls

    September 08, 2026 —
    In our latest roundup, U.S. Chamber of Commerce creates Housing Advisory Council, a legal battle develops over new federal rules related to mortgage escrow accounts, hospitality dealmakers pursue ‘bigger, higher-conviction’ M&A, and more!
    • In the wake of the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act becoming law, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has created a Housing Advisory Council with the goal of advancing market-driven policies that help increase housing supply and promote affordability. (Julie Strupp, Multifamily Dive)
    • Investors in the single-family housing market are increasingly concerned about interest rates, rising insurance and home costs, and the ongoing war with Iran. (Diana Olick, CNBC)
    • A legal battle is brewing over new federal rules related to accounts that hold money to pay homeowners’ property taxes and insurance payments. (Sarah Agostino, CNBC)
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team

    Twenty Peckar & Abramson Attorneys Recognized by 2026 New York and Massachusetts Super Lawyers® and Rising Stars Lists

    November 09, 2026 —
    Peckar & Abramson, P.C. (P&A) is pleased to announce that 20 attorneys from the firm’s New York and Boston offices have been selected for inclusion on the 2026 New York Metro and Massachusetts Super Lawyers® and Rising Stars lists. According to Super Lawyers, no more than five percent of attorneys in each jurisdiction are selected to the Super Lawyers list, while no more than 2.5 percent are recognized as Rising Stars. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Peckar & Abramson, P.C.