BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    concrete tilt-up expert witness Union Grove Alabama condominium expert witness Union Grove Alabama parking structure expert witness Union Grove Alabama multi family housing expert witness Union Grove Alabama condominiums expert witness Union Grove Alabama structural steel construction expert witness Union Grove Alabama custom homes expert witness Union Grove Alabama Medical building expert witness Union Grove Alabama low-income housing expert witness Union Grove Alabama institutional building expert witness Union Grove Alabama industrial building expert witness Union Grove Alabama production housing expert witness Union Grove Alabama Subterranean parking expert witness Union Grove Alabama office building expert witness Union Grove Alabama hospital construction expert witness Union Grove Alabama casino resort expert witness Union Grove Alabama retail construction expert witness Union Grove Alabama mid-rise construction expert witness Union Grove Alabama housing expert witness Union Grove Alabama high-rise construction expert witness Union Grove Alabama townhome construction expert witness Union Grove Alabama landscaping construction expert witness Union Grove Alabama
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Union Grove, Alabama

    Alabama Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Although there is case law precedent for right to repair, Title 6 Article 13A states action must be commenced within 2 years after cause and not more than 13 years after completion of construction.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Union Grove Alabama

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Dekalb Chapter
    Local # 0123
    213 Grand Ave SW
    Fort Payne, AL 35967


    The Greater Morgan County Builders Association
    Local # 0124
    PO Box 2623
    Decatur, AL 35602
    http://www.gmcba.org

    Home Builders Association of Marshall County
    Local # 0152
    428 E N Carlisle St
    Albertville, AL 35950
    http://www.MarshallCountyhba.com

    Huntsville/Madison County Builders Association
    Local # 0148
    2804 Bob Wallace Ave SW
    Huntsville, AL 35805
    http://www.buildersassn.org

    Cullman County Home Builders Association
    Local # 0121
    PO Box 1033
    Cullman, AL 35056
    http://www.cullmancountyhba.org

    Jackson County Chapter
    Local # 0150
    PO Box 130
    Scottsboro, AL 35768


    Home Builders Association of The Muscle Shoals Area
    Local # 0140
    PO Box 419
    Florence, AL 35631
    http://www.shoalshomebuilders.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Union Grove Alabama

    N.J. Voters Approve $116 Million in School Construction

    Manhattan to Get Tall, Skinny Tower

    Brenner Base Tunnelers Conquer Peaks and Valleys in the Alps

    OSHA Releases COVID-19 Guidance

    Basement Foundation Systems’ Getting an Overhaul

    Fifth Circuit Decision on Number of Occurrences Underscores Need to Carefully Tailor Your Insurance Program

    Insured's Jury Verdict Reversed After Improper Trial Tactics

    There is No Claims File Privilege in Florida, Despite What Insurers Want You to Think

    California Appellate Court Rules That Mistakenly Grading the Wrong Land Is Not an Accident

    Federal District Court Dismisses Property Claim After Insured Allows Loss Location to Be Destroyed Prior to Inspection

    Extreme Rainfall Is Becoming More Frequent and Deadly

    Living With a Millennial. Or Grandma.

    Client Alert: Design Immunity Affirmative Defense Not Available to Public Entities Absent Evidence of Pre-Accident Discretionary Approval of the Plan or Design

    West Coast Casualty’s Quarter Century of Service

    Practical Advice: Indemnification and Additional Insured Issues Revisited

    Client Alert: Michigan Insurance Company Not Subject to Personal Jurisdiction in California for Losses Suffered in Arkansas

    The Irresistible Urge to Build Cities From Scratch

    Haight’s John Arbucci and Kristian Moriarty Selected for Super Lawyers’ 2020 Southern California Rising Stars

    Jurisdiction Over Foreign Manufacturers in Construction Litigation

    Builder’s Be Wary of Insurance Policies that Provide No Coverage for Building: Mt. Hawley Ins. Co v. Creek Side at Parker HOA

    Las Vegas Partner Jeffrey Saab and Team Leader D. Ryan Efros Secure a $0.00 Settlement on a Multimillion-Dollar Construction Defect Case!

    The Real Estate Crisis in North Dakota's Man Camps

    Ten-Year Statute Of Repose To Sue For Latent Construction Defects

    Another Reason to Always Respond (or Hensel Phelps Wins One!)

    Pre-Judgment Interest Not Awarded Under Flood Policy

    To Require Arbitration or Not To Require Arbitration

    Beyond Inverse Condemnation in Wildfire Litigation: An Oregon Jury Finds Utility Liable for Negligence, Trespass and Nuisance

    Mediation in the Zero Sum World of Construction

    Condo Board Goes after Insurer for Construction Defect Settlement

    Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment to Reject Collapse Coverage Denied

    Will Millennial’s Desire for Efficient Spaces Kill the McMansion?

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Lisa Rolle and Christopher Acosta Win Motion to Dismiss in Bronx County Trip and Fall

    A Vision and Strategy for the Adoption of Open International Standards

    Contractors Board May Discipline Over Workers’ Comp Reporting

    GRSM Ranks Among World’s 70 Largest Law Firms in 2025 Global 200 Rankings

    No Duty to Defend Faulty Workmanship Under Hawaii Law, but All is not Lost for Insured Contractor

    Welcome to SubTropolis: The Massive Business Complex Buried Under Kansas City

    Bel Air Mansion Construction Draws Community Backlash

    Nevada Assembly Bill Proposes Changes to Construction Defect Litigation

    Does Your 998 Offer to Compromise Include Attorneys’ Fees and Costs?

    US Supreme Court Backs Panama Canal Owner in Dispute with Builders

    Insurers Must Defend Allegations of Faulty Workmanship

    FEMA Offers Recovery Tips for California Wildfire Survivors

    Construction Law Advisory: Mechanical Contractor Scores Victory in Prevailing Wage Dispute

    ACS Super Lawyers and Rising Stars Recognized

    Will a Notice of Non-Responsibility Prevent Enforcement of a California Mechanics Lien?

    Federal Court of Appeals Signals an End to Project Labor Agreement Requirements Linked to Development Tax Credits

    One Word Makes All The Difference – The Distinction Between “Pay If Paid” and “Pay When Paid” Clauses

    Housing Sales Hurt as Fewer Immigrants Chase Owner Dream

    EPA and the Corps of Engineers Repeal the 2015 “Waters of the United States” Rule
    Corporate Profile

    UNION GROVE ALABAMA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from approximately five thousand construction and design related expert designations, the Union Grove, Alabama Construction Expert Directory offers a wide range of trial support and construction consulting services to construction claims professionals seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides building claims investigation, testimony, and support services to the nation's most recognized builders, risk managers, legal professionals, owners, state and local government agencies. In connection with in house personnel which comprise building envelope and design experts, forensic engineers, forensic architects, and construction cost and scheduling consultants, the organization brings national experience and local capabilities to Union Grove and the surrounding areas.

    Union Grove Alabama expert witness windowsUnion Grove Alabama construction expertsUnion Grove Alabama engineering expert witnessUnion Grove Alabama construction defect expert witnessUnion Grove Alabama reconstruction expert witnessUnion Grove Alabama building code expert witnessUnion Grove Alabama construction safety expert
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Union Grove, Alabama

    Insureds’ Altering Dates for Hailstorm Damage Justifies Denial of Claim

    June 02, 2026 —
    The Firth Circuit affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the insurer due to the insureds’ failure to establish the date of loss after a hailstorm. Cutchall v. Chubb Lloyds Ins. Co. of Texas, 2026 WL 625633 (5th Cir. March 5, 2026). In September 2021, the Cutchalls made a claim on their policy for interior water damage due to a hailstorm that breached their roof. Chubb retained two engineers to inspect the home, but neither found evidence that a hailstorm caused the damage. Instead, the engineers concluded a variety of other causes, such as poor ventilation and as-built defects, caused the damage. Because Chubb concluded that some of these other causes were covered by the policy, it paid only for the covered portions. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Data Center Construction: Contractors Must Step Up

    May 26, 2026 —
    I attended the Datacenter Forum 2026 in Helsinki last week. Over 400 people packed the room. Walking out, I had one overriding thought: Is construction operating in a different century from the technology it is being asked to house? Is Our Industry on Par? Ciarán Forde, Senior Vice President at CTS Nordics, opened the forum with a statement that set the tone for everything that followed: data centers are no longer just a technical challenge; they are a national strategy. Before AI, Ciarán had worked in telecoms, where data centers were already complex. But now, he said flatly, everything has changed, and the industry must rethink everything. The numbers behind the claim are staggering. Current AI data center racks run at 40 to 100 kW. In three years, 800 kW per rack is on the roadmap. And the development cycle for a new chip is roughly one year, which means deployments begin aging out almost as soon as they are commissioned. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Arizona Court Enters $323 Million Judgment Against ZOM Living Following Unanimous Jury Verdict

    May 26, 2026 —
    PHOENIX, May 19, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- A Maricopa County court has entered a $323 million compensatory damages judgment in favor of Gray Development Group against ZOM Holding Inc., doing business as ZOM Living, following a 12-day trial, a unanimous jury verdict and post-trial proceedings related to a proposed business transaction. The jury found ZOM liable on claims of breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing stemming from a proposed joint venture tied to a planned pipeline of luxury multifamily and commercial projects in Phoenix and Scottsdale. The lawsuit centered on a 13-project, $1.4 billion development pipeline originated and planned by Gray Development Group over more than a decade. In 2019, Gray invited Florida-based ZOM to participate in a joint venture involving the completion of five projects, which would have marked ZOM's entry into the Arizona market. According to court findings presented at trial, the companies entered into a mutual confidentiality and non-circumvention agreement before Gray shared extensive sensitive and proprietary information related to the projects, including planning, market analysis, costs, financial data, local business relationships and operational strategies developed by Gray over decades in Arizona. Evidence presented during trial showed that over a 10-month period while under contract, ZOM made hundreds of requests for confidential project and market information before circumventing Gray and pursuing the projects independently, ultimately displacing Gray from projects it spent years planning and developing. ZOM Living, headquartered in Orlando, develops multifamily and senior housing communities across the United States and operates regional offices in Boston, Dallas, Fort Lauderdale, Nashville, Phoenix, and Raleigh. ZOM is owned by Timeless Investments, the Amsterdam-based family office of Dutch businessman Hans van Veggel, which acquired the company in 1997. About Gray Development Group Gray Development Group was founded by architect Bruce Gray in 1991. The Phoenix-based company was the top-ranked multifamily developer in Arizona for more than a decade. The company designed and developed more than 15,000 apartment and condominium units throughout metropolitan Phoenix. Two Gray-designed developments — a Tempe midrise and a San Diego high-rise — received National Apartment Community of the Year awards.

    Newmeyer Dillion Partner Jeff Masters Recognized by Chambers USA for Representation of Insurance Policyholders

    June 08, 2026 —
    NEWPORT BEACH, Calif. – June 4, 2026 – Newmeyer Dillion is proud to announce that litigation partner Jeffrey D. Masters has been ranked among a select group of California lawyers representing insurance policyholders in the 2026 edition of Chambers USA. This marks two consecutive years of recognition for Masters by this prestigious international attorney rating resource. "This recognition by Chambers and Partners is a testament to Jeff’s dedication to our clients," said Managing Partner, Paul Tetzloff. "We are thrilled to see his hard work acknowledged and the level of passion and care that he delivers to clients fully recognized." Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Newmeyer Dillion

    Samuel Alhadeff Represents LGI Homes in Acquisition and Re-Entitlement of Maravilla Estates

    July 06, 2026 —
    Temecula Partner Samuel Alhadeff recently represented LGI Homes in its acquisition and re-entitlement of Maravilla Estates, a 169-lot active adult community located in San Jacinto, California. The acquisition and re-entitlement of the project provide LGI Homes with the opportunity to deliver much-needed age-qualified housing in one of Riverside County's growing residential markets. The community includes a recorded final map and finished lots, as well as future development inventory and planned amenities, positioning the project for continued development and completion. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    2026 Southern California Super Lawyers Recognizes 14 Snell & Wilmer Attorneys

    March 03, 2026 —
    LOS ANGELES AND ORANGE COUNTY – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that 14 attorneys in its Los Angeles and Orange County offices have been selected for inclusion in the 2026 Southern California Super Lawyers publication. Of those 15, six were recognized as Rising Stars. Super Lawyers is a listing of lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement. The selection process is multi-phased and includes independent research, peer nominations, and peer evaluations. The final published list represents no more than 5 percent of the lawyers in the state. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer

    Scope of Products Requiring Proposition 65 Warnings in California Poised to Grow

    February 23, 2026 —
    The scope of products to be drawn into the warning requirements under California’s Proposition 65 law may soon be growing. California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) requested information from the public on the reproductive toxicity of p,p’-bisphenol chemicals. OEHHA is the lead agency for the implementation of Proposition 65, formerly known as the Safe Drinking Water and Toxicity Enforcement Act of 1986. OEHHA’s request for information is a step toward regulators classifying all p,p’-bisphenol chemicals as reproductive toxicants under Proposition 65. California’s Proposition 65 Under Proposition 65, businesses are required to post clear and reasonable warnings before individuals are exposed to chemicals listed by the state of California as carcinogens or reproductive toxicants. To date, California has listed approximately 900 chemicals that fall under Proposition 65 regulation. Businesses may be held liable for up to $2,500 per violation per day. Proposition 65 can be enforced by public prosecutors (e.g., the California attorney general or district attorneys) or by private enforcers (known as “bounty hunters”). Reprinted courtesy of Brian M. Ledger, Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani and Chassen B. Palmer, Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Mr. Ledger may be contacted at bledger@grsm.com Mr. Palmer may be contacted at cbpalmer@grsm.com Read the full story...

    Congratulations to BWB&O’s Orange County Team for Securing a Strong MSJ Result in a Residential Gas Explosion Matter!

    May 14, 2026 —
    Huge Congratulations to Partner Kevin Wheeler and Associate Lindsey Wells for securing a strong result on a Motion for Summary Judgment / Summary Adjudication filed on behalf of their client, the City of Murrieta. This was a complex, multi-party matter arising from a residential gas leak and explosion, where Plaintiffs alleged the City and MFPD failed to properly respond to the incident. After multiple complaints were consolidated and extensive defense work narrowed the case, eighteen plaintiffs remained asserting five causes of action against the City, prompting a comprehensive MSJ/MSA targeting liability, causation, and damages. The Court’s ruling reflects a significant win, particularly on the immunity framework. The Court eliminated the core negligence and assumed-duty claims arising from fire protection and emergency response activities. It further disposed of the misrepresentation and public nuisance claims. At the end of the day, three plaintiffs were dismissed entirely for failure to comply with Government Claims Act requirements, further reducing the scope of the case. While the dangerous condition claim remains, it does so in a very limited posture. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP