BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    townhome construction expert witness Skagway Alaska multi family housing expert witness Skagway Alaska parking structure expert witness Skagway Alaska institutional building expert witness Skagway Alaska low-income housing expert witness Skagway Alaska Subterranean parking expert witness Skagway Alaska office building expert witness Skagway Alaska Medical building expert witness Skagway Alaska casino resort expert witness Skagway Alaska mid-rise construction expert witness Skagway Alaska industrial building expert witness Skagway Alaska tract home expert witness Skagway Alaska hospital construction expert witness Skagway Alaska condominium expert witness Skagway Alaska retail construction expert witness Skagway Alaska landscaping construction expert witness Skagway Alaska concrete tilt-up expert witness Skagway Alaska custom homes expert witness Skagway Alaska condominiums expert witness Skagway Alaska custom home expert witness Skagway Alaska high-rise construction expert witness Skagway Alaska production housing expert witness Skagway Alaska
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Skagway, Alaska

    Alaska Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB151 limits the damages that can be awarded in a construction defect lawsuit to the actual cost of fixing the defect and other closely related costs such as reasonable temporary housing expenses during the repair of the defect, any reduction in market value cause by the defect, and reasonable and necessary attorney fees.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Skagway Alaska

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Kenai Peninsula Builders Association
    Local # 0233
    PO Box 1753
    Kenai, AK 99611
    http://www.kenaipeninsulabuilders.com

    Northern Southeast Alaska Building Industry Association
    Local # 0225
    9085 Glacier Highway Ste 202
    Juneau, AK 99801
    http://www.seabia.com

    Home Builders Association of Alaska
    Local # 0200
    8301 Schoon St Ste 200
    Anchorage, AK 99518
    http://www.buildersofalaska.com

    Home Builders Association of Anchorage
    Local # 0215
    8301 Schoon St Ste 200
    Anchorage, AK 99518
    http://www.buildersofalaska.com

    Mat-Su Home Builders Association
    Local # 0230
    609 S KNIK GOOSE BAY RD STE G
    Wasilla, AK 99654
    http://www.matsuhomebuilders.com

    Southern Southeast Alaska Building Industry Association
    Local # 0240
    PO Box 6291
    Ketchikan, AK 99901
    http://www.sealaskabuilders.com

    Interior Alaska Builders Association
    Local # 0235
    938 Aspen Street
    Fairbanks, AK 99709
    http://www.InteriorABA.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Skagway Alaska

    David M. McLain named Law Week Colorado’s 2015 Barrister’s Best Construction Defects Lawyer for Defendants

    White House Proposal Returns to 1978 NEPA Review Procedures

    New Case Alert: Oregon Supreme Court Prohibits Insurer’s Attempt to Relitigate Insured’s Liability

    Viewpoint: Firms Should Begin to Analyze Lessons Learned in 2020

    Third Circuit Holds No Coverage for Faulty Workmanship Despite Insured’s Expectations

    Boyfriend Pleads Guilty in Las Vegas Construction Defect Scam Suicide

    BHA at The Basic Course in Texas Construction Law

    Insurers Must Defend Allegations of Faulty Workmanship

    Construction Defect Litigation in Nevada Called "Out of Control"

    Court Adopts Magistrate's Recommendation to Deny Insurer's Summary Judgment Motion in Collapse Case

    Research Project Underway to Prepare Water Utilities for Wildfire Events

    Hunton’s Geoffrey Fehling Confirmed to DC Bar Foundation’s Young Lawyers Network Leadership Council

    Rio Olympics Work Was a Mess and Then Something Curious Happened

    New York’s Second Department Holds That Carrier Must Pay Judgment Obtained by Plaintiff as Carrier Did Not Meet Burden to Prove Willful Non-Cooperation

    Summary Judgment in Favor of General Contractor Under Privette Doctrine Overturned: Lessons Learned

    U.S. Supreme Court Weighs in on Construction Case

    Coverage Denied Where Occurrence Takes Place Outside Coverage Territory

    Court’s Ruling on SB800 “Surprising to Some”

    Black & Veatch Appeals After Judge Upholds Jury's Surprise $1 Damage Award From Boldt

    Biden Unveils $2.3 Trillion American Jobs Plan

    Transition Study a Condo Board’s First Defense against Construction Defects

    Wilke Fleury Welcomes New Civil Litigation Attorney

    Broker Not Liable for Failure to Reveal Insurer's Insolvency After Policy Issued

    Newmeyer Dillion Named 2020 Best Law Firm in Multiple Practice Areas by U.S. News-Best Lawyers

    SEC Climate Change Disclosure Letter Foreshadows Anticipated Regulatory Changes

    6 Ways to Reduce Fire Safety Hazards in BESS

    Don’t Conspire to Build a Home…Wait…What?

    Powering Goal Congruence in Construction Through Smart Contracts

    Bank of America’s Countrywide Ordered to Pay $1.3 Billion

    Federal Judge Refuses to Limit Coverage and Moves Forward with Policyholder’s Claims Against Insurer and Broker

    Broker for Homeowners Policy Has No Duty to Advise Insureds on Excess Flood Coverage

    New Report Reveals Heavy Civil Construction Less Impacted by COVID-19 Than Commercial Construction

    Investigators Eye Fiber Optic Work in Deadly Wisconsin Explosion

    Pennsylvania Superior Court Fires up a Case-By-Case Analysis for Landlord-Tenant, Implied Co-Insured Questions

    Jury's Verdict for Loss Caused by Collapse Overturned

    Texas Considers a Quartet of Construction Bills

    Firm Pays $8.4M to Settle Hurricane Restoration Contract Case

    Suit Limitation Provisions in New York

    Playing Hot Potato: Indemnity Strikes Again

    Florida Law: Interplay of SIR and the Made-Whole Doctrine

    The Activist Group Suing the Suburbs for Bigger Buildings

    Decaying U.S. Roads Attract Funds From KKR to DoubleLine

    Being the Bearer of Bad News (Sounding the Alarm on Construction Issues Early and Often) (Law Note)

    From Dark Data to Building Intelligence

    While Construction Permits Slowly Rise, Construction Starts and Completions in California Are Stagnant

    Forget the Apple Watch. Apple’s Next Biggest Thing Isn’t for Sale

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “It’s None of Your Business.”

    Florida Adopts Daubert Standard for Expert Testimony

    PSA: Getting the First Mechanic’s Lien on a Project is a Plus

    Defects, Delays and Change Orders
    Corporate Profile

    SKAGWAY ALASKA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from approximately five thousand building and construction related expert designations, the Skagway, Alaska Construction Expert Directory delivers a wide range of trial support and consulting services to legal professionals and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction claims evaluation, testimony, and support services to the industry's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, insurers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. In connection with regional assets which comprise construction cost and scheduling experts, registered design professionals, forensic engineers, certified professional estimators, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Skagway and the surrounding areas.

    Skagway Alaska forensic architectSkagway Alaska construction forensic expert witnessSkagway Alaska construction expert witness consultantSkagway Alaska civil engineer expert witnessSkagway Alaska OSHA expert witness constructionSkagway Alaska testifying construction expert witnessSkagway Alaska construction defect expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Skagway, Alaska

    Modular Construction’s Hidden Risk: Where Things Go Wrong Between the Factory and the Field

    June 15, 2026 —
    Introduction As modular and prefabricated construction methods are increasingly adopted, so too are the potential challenges that come with them. The appeal is straightforward: faster timelines, controlled fabrication environments, and reduced on-site labor demands. But the risks that accompany these benefits are often less clear—and, in many cases, poorly defined. For example, what happens when a prefabricated component is delayed past its installation window? Who is responsible for a defect discovered inside a sealed, installed module? What happens to warranty obligations when a prefabricated component must be modified on site? Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jack Mayo, Jones Walker LLP
    Mr. Mayo may be contacted at jmayo@joneswalker.com

    Endorsement is Void Where Compliance is Impossible

    September 21, 2026 —
    The Sixth Circuit found that the insured’s loss of property due to fire was covered despite noncompliance with an endorsement requiring encompassing the property. 3371 Reading, LLC v. Liberty Mut Group, Inc., et al., 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 19156 (6th Cir. June 29, 2026). The insured, 3371 Reading, owned a building undergoing renovation. After the structure burned down, 3371 Reading made a claim under its policy with Ohio Casualty Insurance Company. Ohio Casualty relied on an endorsement requiring fencing round the jobsite. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Beyond the Forecast: Managing Extreme Weather Risks on Construction Sites

    November 02, 2026 —
    Construction leaders would never downplay or dismiss a fall, struck-by incident or equipment failure as “just part of the job.” Yet, some temperature-related conditions, such as heat exhaustion, frostbite and hypothermia, are often accepted as unavoidable consequences of working conditions. Temperature-related incidents likely won’t command the same attention as a crane collapse, but understating their seriousness can be a costly mistake. As extreme weather becomes more frequent and unpredictable, that mindset is becoming increasingly difficult to defend. Extreme weather is not simply a seasonal inconvenience; it’s a serious occupational hazard. Heat waves, cold snaps and rapid temperature swings can contribute to serious injuries and fatalities—or SIFs—productivity losses and costly project disruptions. A single temperature-related incident can quickly become an OSHA recordable and project management challenge. Reduced physical and impaired cognitive performance from heat or cold stress can increase the risk of workplace incidents long before a medical emergency occurs. Reprinted courtesy of Jordan Graustark, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Kamran Salour Named to Los Angeles Times' 2026 Legal Visionaries List

    June 02, 2026 —
    Orange County Partner and Data Privacy & Cybersecurity Practice Co-Chair Kamran Salour was named to the Los Angeles Times' 2026 Legal Visionaries list, which honors the most innovative attorneys in Southern California. In announcing this year's Legal Visionaries, the Times said that Mr. Salour and his co-honorees "distinguish themselves not only through skilleand results but through an unwavering commitment to their clients, their craft and the communities they serve." "Their paths – shaped by rigorous education, defining cases and purposeful leadership – offer a deeper perspective on what sets true standouts apart," the Times' announcement stated. "Together, these visionaries exemplify a forward-thinking approach to the law, elevating both their profession and the people who depend on it." Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    New Executive Order on AI Innovation and Security: Key Takeaways for the Construction Industry

    June 15, 2026 —
    On June 2, 2026, President Trump signed an Executive Order titled “Promoting Advanced Artificial Intelligence Innovation and Security.” At its core, the Order is a cybersecurity and national-security measure rather than a broad regulation of how private companies develop or use AI. It directs federal agencies to harden government systems against AI-enabled cyber threats, establishes voluntary frameworks for collaboration between the federal government and the AI and critical-infrastructure sectors, and strengthens criminal enforcement against the malicious use of AI. Notably, the Order expressly disclaims any intent to create a “mandatory governmental licensing, preclearance, or permitting” regime for the “development, publication, release, or distribution of new AI models.” Instead, the Executive Order seeks to “promote AI innovation and security” by working with the private sector to modernize government and private-sector information systems and harden them against external threats, protect intellectual property from exploitation or theft, and cultivate American AI capabilities. Reprinted courtesy of Richard R. Volack, Peckar & Abramson, PC and Denis Serkin, Peckar & Abramson, PC Mr. Volack may be contacted at rvolack@pecklaw.com Mr. Serkin may be contacted at dserkin@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Arizona Supreme Court Clarifies Parties’ Post-Default Conduct Cannot Validate Void Default Orders

    August 24, 2026 —
    After filing a lawsuit, the first step is always serving process on the opposing party. While that preliminary step sounds basic enough, in McMahan v. Grasshopper, the Arizona Supreme Court recently provided a helpful refresher on the nuances of the service requirement and its importance in litigation for plaintiffs and defendants alike.1 Background McMahan arose from a hit-and-run where a tractor-trailer collided with safety barricades and injured a construction worker. The construction worker sued the tractor-trailer company, and he attempted to serve the company by leaving a copy of the complaint with the assistant to the company’s statutory agent who forwarded the complaint to the company. The assistant, however, was not authorized to accept service on the company’s behalf. Before the company appeared in the action, the construction worker successfully obtained an entry of default. Reprinted courtesy of Joseph Kanefield, Snell & Wilmer, Ryan P. Hogan, Snell & Wilmer and Lilly M. Geiler, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Kanefield may be contacted at jkanefield@swlaw.com Mr. Hogan may be contacted at rhogan@swlaw.com Ms. Geiler may be contacted at lgeiler@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Louisiana Legislature Enacts Act 932 – Significant Changes to Insurer Bad-Faith Exposure for Failure to Settle

    July 13, 2026 —
    The Louisiana Legislature has enacted Act 932 (formerly House Bill 1162), which became law this week without the Governor's signature pursuant to the Louisiana Constitution, after expiration of the applicable constitutional review period. Act 932 makes several important amendments to Louisiana's insurer bad-faith statute and appears intended, at least in part, to address issues arising from the Louisiana Supreme Court's decision in Kelly v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 169 So.3d 328 (La. 2015). The Act also makes changes regarding claim payments involving licensed contractors. The Act takes effect on August 1, 2026. Key Takeaways Act 932:
    • Limits certain bad-faith causes of action (bad faith failure to settle) involving personal injury and bodily injury claims where good-faith disputes exist or where an insurer has not been afforded sufficient opportunity to respond to a settlement demand.
    • Requires insurers and adjusters to verify a contractor's Louisiana license status before issuing claim payments when a contractor is named as a payee on a check for repair or restoration of immovable property.
    • Creates a statutory safe harbor protecting insurers from bad-faith penalties and attorney fees when payment delays result from an inability to verify a contractor's license, provided specified documentation and notice requirements are met.
    Reprinted courtesy of Tabitha R. Durbin, Lewis Brisbois and Jennifer E. Michel, Lewis Brisbois Ms. Durbin may be contacted at Tabitha.Durbin@lewisbrisbois.com Ms. Michel may be contacted at Jenny.Michel@lewisbrisbois.com Read the full story...

    Judge's Order Halts Google Data Center Project in Minnesota

    July 27, 2026 —
    Construction of a $1-billion Google data center planned by Ryan Cos. on 485 acres in southeastern Minnesota was expected to start in July but is now halted under a judge’s order. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Annemarie Mannion, Engineering News-Record
    Ms. Mannion may be contacted at manniona@enr.com