BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    concrete tilt-up expert witness Yakutat Alaska tract home expert witness Yakutat Alaska custom home expert witness Yakutat Alaska institutional building expert witness Yakutat Alaska condominiums expert witness Yakutat Alaska mid-rise construction expert witness Yakutat Alaska housing expert witness Yakutat Alaska office building expert witness Yakutat Alaska production housing expert witness Yakutat Alaska low-income housing expert witness Yakutat Alaska custom homes expert witness Yakutat Alaska parking structure expert witness Yakutat Alaska structural steel construction expert witness Yakutat Alaska retail construction expert witness Yakutat Alaska industrial building expert witness Yakutat Alaska landscaping construction expert witness Yakutat Alaska casino resort expert witness Yakutat Alaska condominium expert witness Yakutat Alaska multi family housing expert witness Yakutat Alaska hospital construction expert witness Yakutat Alaska Subterranean parking expert witness Yakutat Alaska Medical building expert witness Yakutat Alaska
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Yakutat, Alaska

    Alaska Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB151 limits the damages that can be awarded in a construction defect lawsuit to the actual cost of fixing the defect and other closely related costs such as reasonable temporary housing expenses during the repair of the defect, any reduction in market value cause by the defect, and reasonable and necessary attorney fees.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Yakutat Alaska

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Kenai Peninsula Builders Association
    Local # 0233
    PO Box 1753
    Kenai, AK 99611
    http://www.kenaipeninsulabuilders.com

    Northern Southeast Alaska Building Industry Association
    Local # 0225
    9085 Glacier Highway Ste 202
    Juneau, AK 99801
    http://www.seabia.com

    Home Builders Association of Alaska
    Local # 0200
    8301 Schoon St Ste 200
    Anchorage, AK 99518
    http://www.buildersofalaska.com

    Home Builders Association of Anchorage
    Local # 0215
    8301 Schoon St Ste 200
    Anchorage, AK 99518
    http://www.buildersofalaska.com

    Mat-Su Home Builders Association
    Local # 0230
    609 S KNIK GOOSE BAY RD STE G
    Wasilla, AK 99654
    http://www.matsuhomebuilders.com

    Southern Southeast Alaska Building Industry Association
    Local # 0240
    PO Box 6291
    Ketchikan, AK 99901
    http://www.sealaskabuilders.com

    Interior Alaska Builders Association
    Local # 0235
    938 Aspen Street
    Fairbanks, AK 99709
    http://www.InteriorABA.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Yakutat Alaska

    Another Guilty Plea In Nevada Construction Defect Fraud Case

    AI – A Designer’s Assistant or a Replacement?

    Three Kahana Feld Attorneys Recognized in The Best Lawyers in America® 2025

    How Mushrooms Can Be Used To Make Particle Board Less Toxic

    Suffolk Construction Drywall Suits Involve Claim for $3 Million in Court Costs

    First Suit Filed for Losses Caused by COVID-19

    Maritime Law: An Albatross for Contractors Navigating Marine Construction

    Nebraska Joins the Ranks—No CGL Coverage for Faulty Work

    Mitsui Fudosan Said to Consider Rebuilding Tilted Apartments

    ‘The Ground Just Gave Out’: How a Storm’s Fury Ravaged Asheville

    Doing Construction Lead Programs the Right Way

    Best U.S. Home Sales Since 2007 Show Momentum in Housing Market

    NYC Design Firm Executives Plead Guilty in Pay-to-Play Scheme

    DIR Reminds Public Works Contractors to Renew Registrations Before January 1, 2016 to Avoid Hefty Penalty

    Hawaii Supreme Court Tackles "Other Insurance" Issues

    Ownership and Licensing in Design Agreements

    No Coverage for Foundation Collapse

    How the New Dropped Object Standard Is Changing Jobsite Safety

    NY Appellate Team Obtains Affirmance of Summary Judgment to Landlord in Tenant’s Lawsuit Alleging Catastrophic Injuries

    Expansion of Statutes of Limitations and Repose in K-12 and Municipal Construction Contracts

    Denver Condo Development Increasing, with Caution

    When it Comes to Trials, it’s Like a Box of Chocolates. Sometimes You Get the Icky Cream Filled One

    7 Ways Technology is Changing Construction (guest post)

    2016 California Construction Law Upate

    Recovering Attorney’s Fees and Treble Damages in Washington DC Condominium Construction Defect Cases

    Structural Failure of Precast-Concrete Span Sets Back Sydney Metro Job

    Todd Ehrenreich Joins International Academy of Trial Lawyers

    Condo Board Goes after Insurer for Construction Defect Settlement

    Last Call: Tokyo Iconic Okura Hotel Meets the Wrecking Ball

    LAX Runway Lawsuit a Year Too Late?

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (08/30/23) – AI Predicts Home Prices, Construction’s Effect on the Economy, and Could Streamline Communications for Developers

    Northern District of Mississippi Finds That Non-Work Property Damages Are Not Subject to AIA’s Waiver of Subrogation Clause

    Introducing Nomos LLP!

    New York Considering Legislation That Would Create Statute of Repose For Construction

    A Homeowner’s Guide to Recovering After the Palisades Fire

    The Deadline to File Suit on a Public Works Payment Payment Bond is Triggered by a Claimant’s Work on a Project Not by a Claimant’s Work Under a Contract

    Homebuilding in Las Vegas Slows but Doesn’t Fall

    Exploring Architects’ Perspectives on AI: A Survey of Fears and Hopes

    White and Williams Announces the Election of Five Lawyers to the Partnership and the Promotion of Five Associates to Counsel

    We’re Burning Tokens to Clean Up Bad PDFs

    Sales of New U.S. Homes Rose More Than Forecast to End 2014

    Where There's Smoke...California's New Emergency Wildfire Smoke Protection Regulation And What Employers Are Required To Do

    Federal Miller Act Payment Bond Claim: Who Gets Paid and Who Does Not? What Are the Deadlines?

    Cape Town Seeks World Cup Stadium Construction Collusion Damages

    The Unwavering Un-waivable Implied Warranty of Workmanship and Habitability in Arizona

    Homebuilding Design Goes 3D

    How Berlin’s Futuristic Airport Became a $6 Billion Embarrassment

    Additional Insured Not Entitled to Reimbursement of Defense Costs Paid by Other Insurers

    Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell Attorneys Recognized in the 2026 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America®

    Golden Gate Bridge's $76 Million Suicide Nets Near Approval
    Corporate Profile

    YAKUTAT ALASKA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    With over 4500 construction defect and claims related expert designations, the Yakutat, Alaska Construction Expert Directory delivers a comprehensive construction and design expert support solution to lawyers and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect and claims litigation. BHA provides construction claims investigation and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction practice groups, public builders, risk managers, owners, state and local government agencies. Employing in house assets which comprise construction cost, scheduling, and delay experts, professional engineers, ASPE certified professional estimators, and construction safety professionals, the organization brings national experience and local capabilities to Yakutat and the surrounding areas.

    Yakutat Alaska civil engineer expert witnessYakutat Alaska building envelope expert witnessYakutat Alaska expert witness roofingYakutat Alaska construction safety expertYakutat Alaska consulting general contractorYakutat Alaska soil failure expert witnessYakutat Alaska roofing construction expert
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Yakutat, Alaska

    Italian Court Convicts 32 in Morandi Bridge Collapse Case

    August 25, 2026 —
    Former Autostrade per l'Italia CEO Giovanni Castellucci was sentenced to 12 years in prison July 16 after an Italian court handed down the first criminal verdicts stemming from the 2018 Morandi Bridge collapse in Genoa that killed 43 people. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    Executive Insights 2026: Leaders in Construction Law

    October 06, 2026 —
    What advice would you give contractors regarding documentation and recordkeeping to better protect themselves during disputes? Jim Archibald Partner Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP Disputes over payment, scope and delays are among the biggest risks contractors face. Thorough documentation doesn’t just help win these disputes; it may prevent them from happening at all. Start with the contract: Every project should begin with a written agreement that clearly defines scope, schedule, payment terms and change-order procedures. Verbal understandings are difficult to enforce. Track changes in real time: Change orders, change directives, RFIs and scope clarifications should always be documented in writing. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    FERC Issues Show-Cause Orders: Impacts on California and Other Regional Power Markets

    July 13, 2026 —
    At an open meeting on June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued show-cause orders under Section 206 of the Federal Power Act to the six FERC-jurisdictional RTOs/ISOs—PJM Interconnection, ISO New England, Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Southwest Power Pool, New York Independent System Operator and California Independent System Operator—along with their transmission owners (TOs), directing each region and the TOs to justify or revise tariff provisions governing how data centers and other large loads connect to and receive transmission service from the grid. These show-cause orders will impact several power markets across the country, including California. Reprinted courtesy of Stephen J. Humes, Pillsbury, Alicia M. McKnight, Pillsbury and Jason Drogin Atwood, Pillsbury Mr. Humes may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com Ms. McKnight may be contacted at alicia.mcknight@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Atwood may be contacted at jason.atwood@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Insureds’ Altering Dates for Hailstorm Damage Justifies Denial of Claim

    June 02, 2026 —
    The Firth Circuit affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the insurer due to the insureds’ failure to establish the date of loss after a hailstorm. Cutchall v. Chubb Lloyds Ins. Co. of Texas, 2026 WL 625633 (5th Cir. March 5, 2026). In September 2021, the Cutchalls made a claim on their policy for interior water damage due to a hailstorm that breached their roof. Chubb retained two engineers to inspect the home, but neither found evidence that a hailstorm caused the damage. Instead, the engineers concluded a variety of other causes, such as poor ventilation and as-built defects, caused the damage. Because Chubb concluded that some of these other causes were covered by the policy, it paid only for the covered portions. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Insured General Contractor Prevails on Motion for Summary Judgment to Establish Builder’s Risk Coverage

    July 06, 2026 —
    The general contractor’s motion for partial summary judgment successfully established that damage to footings in place before the policy period was covered after the collapse of a building. Big D Builders, Inc. v. Am Zurich Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72012 (D. Idaho March 31, 2026). Big D was the general contractor for building a new airplane hangar by erecting a 38,000 square foot structure. Before Big D began construction, the site of the hangar did not contain any pre-existing structures or buildings. Before completion of the hangar, it collapsed and caused extensive property damage. The builder’s risk policy issued by Zurich covered certain aspects of the construction project for the policy period December 28, 2023, to December 28, 2024. Zurich accepted coverage for most of the damage but not for damage to footings and columns installed prior to the start date of the policy. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Bona Fide Dispute Defeats Violation of Prompt Payment Act

    June 15, 2026 —
    Most, if not all, jurisdictions, including the federal government, have what is known as a “Prompt Payment Act.” The objective is to ensure prompt payment. If prompt payment is not made, the Prompt Payment Act provides for interest penalties, as well as potentially other costs such as attorney’s fees. But the thing is, it’s not as simple as untimely payment to support the recourse and interest penalties the applicable Prompt Payment Act affords. And the teeth associated with the applicable Prompt Payment Act are not as sharp as perhaps the party claiming untimely payment prefers. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Insured is Third Party Beneficiary of Forced-Place Policy

    October 26, 2026 —
    The court denied the insurer’s motion to dismiss the insured’s fire damage claims under a forced-place policy because the insured was a third-party beneficiary of the policy. Fredericks v. Assurant Specialty, et al., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 179779 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 12, 2026). The insureds’ home burned down on the same day their homeowner’s policy expired. The expiration automatically triggered a forced-placed policy issued by American Security Insurance Company (ASIC) to the insureds’ mortgage company, Rocket Mortgage Company, LLC. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Perennial Question, Perennial Answer? EPA and Army Corps Propose Year-Round Standard for WOTUS that Could Reshape Clean Water Act Jurisdiction

    October 12, 2026 —
    Federal Clean Water Act jurisdiction may be about to get considerably narrower. On September 4, 2026, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) announced a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking that would limit federal authority over streams and wetlands to those containing water year-round—a “perennial” standard that would go beyond even what the Supreme Court required in Sackett v. EPA, 598 U.S. 651 (2023). The supplemental notice offers two options for revising the definition of “waters of the United States” (WOTUS) under the Clean Water Act (CWA): One would define “relatively permanent” waters as perennial, and the other would require perennial surface water to establish a wetland’s continuous surface connection to a jurisdictional water. If adopted, either option would substantially reduce the number of streams, wetlands and other water features subject to federal permitting, with the sharpest effects in arid and semi-arid regions where rainfall patterns leave many waterways dry for portions of the year. Reprinted courtesy of Ashleigh K. Myers, Pillsbury and Jillian Marullo, Pillsbury Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Marullo may be contacted at jillian.marullo@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...