BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    mid-rise construction expert witness Scottsdale Arizona concrete tilt-up expert witness Scottsdale Arizona casino resort expert witness Scottsdale Arizona industrial building expert witness Scottsdale Arizona hospital construction expert witness Scottsdale Arizona parking structure expert witness Scottsdale Arizona condominiums expert witness Scottsdale Arizona low-income housing expert witness Scottsdale Arizona retail construction expert witness Scottsdale Arizona custom home expert witness Scottsdale Arizona office building expert witness Scottsdale Arizona high-rise construction expert witness Scottsdale Arizona Subterranean parking expert witness Scottsdale Arizona structural steel construction expert witness Scottsdale Arizona landscaping construction expert witness Scottsdale Arizona multi family housing expert witness Scottsdale Arizona townhome construction expert witness Scottsdale Arizona custom homes expert witness Scottsdale Arizona condominium expert witness Scottsdale Arizona tract home expert witness Scottsdale Arizona Medical building expert witness Scottsdale Arizona housing expert witness Scottsdale Arizona
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Scottsdale, Arizona

    Arizona Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB 2620; ARS §12-1363, 1361, 1364) Current laws on the books require a purchaser of a home to provide written notice at least 90 days before commencing legal action. This gives the homebuilder time to inspect, repair or replace the defect if it falls within the specifications of the warranty. Homebuilder has 60 days to respond to written notice which may include offer to replace, repair or offer monetary compensationSB 1311 is a similar statute that covers multi-family dwellings. If no resolution is met through alternative dispute resolution procedures and a civil lawsuit is filed, the seller’s insurance company must treat a notice of a dwelling action as a notice of a claim subject to the insurance policy without affecting available coverage under the policy


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Scottsdale Arizona

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License required to bid or contract.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Central Arizona
    Local # 0310
    16430 N Scottsdale Road Suite 150
    Scottsdale, AZ 85254
    http://www.hbaca.org

    Southern Arizona Home Builders Association
    Local # 0335
    2840 N Country Club Rd Ste 100
    Tucson, AZ 85716
    http://www.sahba.org

    Northern Arizona Builders Association
    Local # 0315
    1500 E Cedar Ave Suite 86
    Flagstaff, AZ 86004
    http://www.nazba.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Scottsdale Arizona

    I’m Sorry, So Sorry: Legal Implications of Apologies and Admissions of Fault for Delaware Healthcare Professionals

    Hunton Insurance Partner, Larry Bracken, Elected to the American College of Coverage Counsel

    Insurance Lawyers Recognized by JD Supra 2020 Readers' Choice Awards

    City Drops Impact Fees to Encourage Commercial Development

    What is Toxic Mold Litigation?

    Zurich American Insurance Company v. Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company

    Reminder: Your Accounting and Other Records Matter

    NCDOT Aims to Reopen Helene-damaged Interstate 40 by New Year's Day

    Questions of Fact Regarding Collapse of Basement Walls Prevent Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment

    The Risk of A Fixed Price Contract Is The Market

    Steven L. Heisdorffer Joins Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell

    Top 10 Construction Contract Provisions – Changes and Claims

    How to Properly Fill Out and Use the Conditional Waiver and Release on Progress Payment Form Used in California Construction

    Kumagai Drops Most in 4 Months on Building Defect: Tokyo Mover

    Halliburton to Pay $1.1 Billion to Settle Spill Lawsuits

    Waiver Of Arbitration by Not Submitting Claim to Initial Decision Maker…Really!

    From Ashes to Action: LA Fire Recovery Enters New Phase

    Surety Bond Now a Valid Performance Guarantee for NC Developers (guest post)

    Insured's Claim for Replacement Cost Denied

    ASCE Statement on Biden Administration Permitting Action Plan

    Recent Amendments and Caselaw Affecting the Construction Industry in Texas

    Texas Considers a Quartet of Construction Bills

    Traub Lieberman Elects New Partners for 2020

    Contract Change #9: Owner’s Right to Carry Out the Work (law note)

    Seattle’s Newest Residential Developer

    Seventh Circuit Confirms Additional Insured's Coverage for Alleged Construction Defects

    Bad Faith and a Partial Summary Judgment in Seattle Construction Defect Case

    Performing Work with a Suspended CSLB License Costs Big: Subcontractor Faces $18,000,000 Disgorgement

    Georgia Law: “An Occurrence Can Arise Where Faulty Workmanship Causes Unforeseen or Unexpected Damage to Other Property”

    How Small Mistakes Can Have Serious Consequences Under California's Contractor Licensing Laws.

    Differing Rulings On Construction Defect Claims Leave Unanswered Questions For Builders, and Construction Practice Groups. Impact to CGL Carriers, General Contractors, Builders Remains Unclear

    Good Signs for Housing Market in 2013

    Competent, Substantial Evidence Carries Day in Bench Trial

    Bound by Group Builders, Federal District Court Finds No Occurrence

    Burg Simpson to Create Construction Defect Group

    Mark Van Wonterghem To Serve as Senior Forensic Consultant in the Sacramento Offices of Bert L. Howe & Associates, Inc.

    Does Your U.S. Company Pull Data From European Citizens? Fall In Line With GDPR by May 2018 or Suffer Substantial Fines

    New York Supreme Court Building Opening Delayed Again

    Michigan Claims Engineers’ Errors Prolonged Corrosion

    New York Appellate Division: Second Department Contradicts First Department, Denying Insurer's Recoupment of Defense Costs for Uncovered Claims

    Congratulations to Wilke Fleury’s 2024 Super Lawyers and Rising Stars!!

    Where Parched California Is Finding New Water Sources

    Governor Signs AB5 Into Law — Reshaping California's Independent Contractor Classification Landscape

    Haight Brown & Bonesteel Attorneys Named Super Lawyers in 2016

    Tenants Underwater: Indiana Court of Appeals Upholds Privity Requirement for Property Damage Claims Against Contractors

    Singapore Unveils Changes to Make Public Housing More Affordable

    Exclusion for Construction of Condominiums Includes Faulty Construction of Retaining Wall

    US-Mexico Border Wall Bids Include Tourist Attraction, Solar Panels

    School for Building Trades Helps Fill Need for Skilled Workers

    Just Decided – New Jersey Supreme Court: Insurers Can Look To Extrinsic Evidence To Deny a Defense
    Corporate Profile

    SCOTTSDALE ARIZONA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 4500 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Scottsdale, Arizona Construction Expert Directory provides a streamlined multi-disciplinary expert retention and support solution to attorneys and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction related litigation support and expert consulting services to the building industry's most recognized companies, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, risk managers, and a variety of municipalities. Employing in house resources which include licensed architects, registered professional engineers, ASPE certified professional estimators, ICC Certified inspection and testing professionals, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Scottsdale and the surrounding areas.

    Scottsdale Arizona expert witness windowsScottsdale Arizona building code expert witnessScottsdale Arizona construction expert witness consultantScottsdale Arizona construction scheduling expert witnessScottsdale Arizona architecture expert witnessScottsdale Arizona expert witness structural engineerScottsdale Arizona construction forensic expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Scottsdale, Arizona

    Pulling the Plug, Preserving the Product: Protecting Rights to a Modular Subcontractor’s Work Post-Termination

    June 08, 2026 —
    Volumetric Modular Construction (VMC) is a building method where a structure is divided into large components or modules, fabricated in an offsite factory and then transported to a construction site for assembly.[1] Proponents of VMC hail it as a cost-efficient alternative to traditional building methods that leads to more consistent quality and shorter construction duration.[2] Due to a growing labor shortage, high demand for compressed project schedules, and stagnant construction productivity rates, the construction industry is embracing VMC.[3] A recent report on the market size of prefabricated construction estimates that from 2026 to 2031, VMC will grow at a compound annual growth rate of 7.16% and become a 413.11-billion-dollar industry.[4] As VMC becomes more prevalent, owners, general contractors, and subcontractors must consider how to effectively contract for modular construction. One important consideration, which this article focuses on, is navigating termination of a modular subcontractor. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Paul Williamson, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.
    Mr. Williamson may be contacted at pwilliamson@pecklaw.com

    Texas Adopts New Procedural Rules for Summary Judgment Motions: What You Need To Know

    July 13, 2026 —
    On March 1, 2026, sweeping amendments to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 166a took effect, fundamentally changing how Texas courts handle summary judgment motions — from filing and briefing through disposition. Whether representing a plaintiff or defendant, Texas litigants and attorneys must understand these new rules and their impact on case strategy and timelines. These procedural changes carry particular significance for construction litigants. Background: The Prior Rule Texas summary judgment practice has long diverged from the federal model. The Texas Rules of Civil Procedure recognize two types of summary judgment motions: (1) the traditional motion for summary judgment, and (2) the “no-evidence” motion for summary judgment. The no-evidence motion — unique to Texas — may be filed only after adequate time for discovery has passed. No bright-line rule governs that determination; it depends on the unique circumstances of each case. Reprinted courtesy of Conor G. Bateman, Snell & Wilmer and Marsha Cotton, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Bateman may be contacted at cbateman@swlaw.com Ms. Cotton may be contacted at mcotton@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    GRSM Team Obtains Defense Verdict for Homeowners’ Association in Orange County Superior Court

    August 11, 2026 —
    A Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani multi-state team, including Partners Christine Barker, Sean Ferron, and Keith Cramer, obtained a defense verdict on behalf of a homeowners’ association (HOA) in an Orange County Superior Court bench trial spanning two months. The case began in 2022 when a homeowner sued after the Architectural Review Committee and HOA Board of Directors declined his teardown-and-rebuild plans due to view and aesthetic concerns. After a motion for summary judgment ruling in which the court found that the existing covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) did not protect views, the HOA held a special election to add explicit view protections to the CC&Rs. At the February 2025 trial call, the plaintiff sought leave to file a third amended complaint challenging the validity of that vote, drastically reframing the case from CC&R enforcement to one of election validity. A second plaintiff then filed a parallel action toward the end of the limitations period, and the two cases were consolidated. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Wilke Fleury Attorneys Recognized by 2026 Northern California Super Lawyers and Rising Stars!

    July 20, 2026 —
    Wilke Fleury is pleased to announce that 18 of the firm’s attorneys have been selected for inclusion on the 2026 Northern California Super Lawyers and Rising Stars lists. The annual Super Lawyers and Rising Stars selections recognize attorneys across a wide range of practice areas. This year’s honorees reflect the depth of Wilke Fleury’s litigation, business, healthcare, employment, bankruptcy, appellate, real estate, construction, and estate planning practices. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Wilke Fleury

    Insured’s Bad Faith Claim Survives Summary Judgment

    July 13, 2026 —
    The insurer’s motion for partial summary judgment to dispose of the insured’s bad faith claim was unsuccessful. Page v. State Farm Lloyds, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102293 (E.D. Texas March 18, 2026). Plaintiff insured alleged that hail and a windstorm caused damage to his property. The damage was reported to the defendant insurer. A claims adjuster inspected the property. Defendant then paid plaintiff $24,493.06, which was the total of the estimated damage minus depreciation and the deductible. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Celebrating BWB&O’s 2026 Super Lawyers Rising Stars in San Diego!

    March 31, 2026 —
    Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLP is proud to announce that Partners Jocelyn Russo, Christina Matian, and Associate Angelo Perillo have been named to the Super Lawyers 2026 San Diego Rising Stars list. This recognition highlights their outstanding dedication and distinguished service in Family Law, Civil Litigation, and Personal Injury Litigation.
    SUPER LAWYERS Jocelyn Russo: 2023-2026 Christina Matian: 2024-2026 Angelo Perillo: 2024-2026
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLP

    Your AEC Firm Has a Memory Problem. Here Is How to Fix It

    June 01, 2026 —
    AEC companies trying to operationalize AI often find they lack the data foundation on which to build. There may be an abundance of data hidden in documents, but you can’t reliably use it for AI. The lack of data quality was a key topic discussed at the AI in AEC 2026 conference. During the event, I met many experts working to solve this problem, including Pavlina Nikolova, Egnyte‘s EMEA AEC Practice Lead. The chat and her presentation highlighted the challenges and ways to overcome them. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Alert: Fraudulent Notice of Nonpayment Defense Applies to Payment Bond Claims

    April 27, 2026 —
    Under Florida’s Lien Law, there’s an affirmative defense or affirmative claim known as a “fraudulent lien.” The fraudulent lien defense or claim is set out in Florida Statute s. 713.31. This defense also extends to payment bond claims, whether under a private statutory payment bond (Florida Statute s. 713.23) or a public payment bond (Florida Statute s. 255.05), as it pertains to the notice of nonpayment. A notice of nonpayment needs to be served within 90 days from final furnishing to preserve a claimant’s rights against the bond. However, there really has not been a case, until now, that discusses a “fraudulent notice of nonpayment.” In K&M Electric Supply, Inc. v. Brown Electrical Solutions, LLC, 51 Fla.L.Weekly D672a (Fla. 4th DCA 2026), a prime contractor and surety prevailed at the trial level on their fraudulent notice of nonpayment defense based on a supplier’s notice of nonpayment and action against a public payment bond (under Florida Statute s. 255.05). Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com