BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    mid-rise construction expert witness Valley Farms Arizona custom home expert witness Valley Farms Arizona condominium expert witness Valley Farms Arizona landscaping construction expert witness Valley Farms Arizona high-rise construction expert witness Valley Farms Arizona Medical building expert witness Valley Farms Arizona custom homes expert witness Valley Farms Arizona parking structure expert witness Valley Farms Arizona concrete tilt-up expert witness Valley Farms Arizona institutional building expert witness Valley Farms Arizona Subterranean parking expert witness Valley Farms Arizona condominiums expert witness Valley Farms Arizona retail construction expert witness Valley Farms Arizona structural steel construction expert witness Valley Farms Arizona multi family housing expert witness Valley Farms Arizona casino resort expert witness Valley Farms Arizona tract home expert witness Valley Farms Arizona hospital construction expert witness Valley Farms Arizona office building expert witness Valley Farms Arizona townhome construction expert witness Valley Farms Arizona low-income housing expert witness Valley Farms Arizona industrial building expert witness Valley Farms Arizona
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Valley Farms, Arizona

    Arizona Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB 2620; ARS §12-1363, 1361, 1364) Current laws on the books require a purchaser of a home to provide written notice at least 90 days before commencing legal action. This gives the homebuilder time to inspect, repair or replace the defect if it falls within the specifications of the warranty. Homebuilder has 60 days to respond to written notice which may include offer to replace, repair or offer monetary compensationSB 1311 is a similar statute that covers multi-family dwellings. If no resolution is met through alternative dispute resolution procedures and a civil lawsuit is filed, the seller’s insurance company must treat a notice of a dwelling action as a notice of a claim subject to the insurance policy without affecting available coverage under the policy


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Valley Farms Arizona

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License required to bid or contract.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Southern Arizona Home Builders Association
    Local # 0335
    2840 N Country Club Rd Ste 100
    Tucson, AZ 85716
    http://www.sahba.org

    Home Builders Association of Central Arizona
    Local # 0310
    16430 N Scottsdale Road Suite 150
    Scottsdale, AZ 85254
    http://www.hbaca.org

    Northern Arizona Builders Association
    Local # 0315
    1500 E Cedar Ave Suite 86
    Flagstaff, AZ 86004
    http://www.nazba.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Valley Farms Arizona

    Pennsylvania Reconstruction Project Beset by Problems

    Reservation of Rights Letter Merely Citing Policy Provisions Inadequate

    Sanctions Award Against Pro Se Plaintiff Upheld

    Illinois Favors Finding Construction Defects as an Occurrence

    Is Drone Aerial Photography Really Best for Your Construction Projects?

    Specific Source of Water Not Relevant in Construction Defect Claim

    New Florida Bill Shortens Time for Construction-Defect Lawsuits

    Recycling Our Cities, One Building at a Time

    Carroll Brock of Larchmont Homes Dies at Age 88

    UK Agency Seeks Stricter Punishments for Illegal Wastewater Discharges

    New-Home Sales in U.S. Unexpectedly Fall to Four-Month Low

    Sales of Existing U.S. Homes Decrease on Fewer Investors

    Owners and Contractors Beware: Pennsylvania (Significantly) Strengthens Contractor Payment Act

    NTSB Outlines Pittsburgh Bridge Structure Specifics, Finding Collapse Cause Will Take Months

    Housing-Related Spending Made Up Significant Portion of GDP in Fourth Quarter 2013

    Bert L. Howe & Associates Returns as a Sponsor at the 30th Annual Construction Law Conference in San Antonio

    Wilke Fleury Secures Bid Protest Denial

    Colorado Court of Appeals Finds Damages to Non-Defective Property Arising From Defective Construction Covered Under Commercial General Liability Policy

    How California’s Construction Industry has dealt with the New Indemnity Law

    “Don’t Coblentz - You Might Miss It!”

    The “Up” House is “Up” for Sale

    ISO Proposes New Designated Premises Endorsement in Response to Hawaii Decision

    Delaware Strengthens Jurisdictional Defenses for Foreign Corporations Registered to Do Business in Delaware

    Construction Costs Absorb Two Big Hits This Quarter

    Study May Come Too Late for Construction Defect Bill

    Rhode Island Finds Pollution Exclusion Ambiguous, Orders Coverage for Home Heating Oil Leak

    Be Strategic When Suing a Manufacturer Under a Warranty with an Arbitration Provision

    Summary Judgment for Insurer Reversed Based on Expert Opinion

    Housing Starts Plunge by the Most in Four Years

    Insurer Prohibited from Bringing Separate Contribution Action in Subrogation to Rights of Suspended Insured

    California Court Forces Insurer to Play Ball in COVID-19 Insurance Coverage Suit

    Georgia HB 676: A Bill Property Owners and Contractors Should Watch

    Florida “get to” costs do not constitute damages because of “property damage”

    Creeping Incrementalism in Downstream Insurance: Carriers are Stretching Standard CGL Concepts to Untenable Limits

    St. Mary & St. John Coptic Orthodox Church v. SBS Insurance Services, Inc.

    Denver Passed the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance

    Town Concerned Over Sinkhole at Condo Complex

    The Legal Landscape

    No Coverage for Collapse of Building

    Washington School District Sues Construction Company Over Water Pipe Damage

    How Will Today’s Pandemic Impact Tomorrow’s Construction Contracts?

    California Precludes Surety from Asserting Pay-When-Paid Provision as Defense to Payment Bond Claim

    The Non-Imputation Affidavit in Real Estate Title Insurance

    Pa. Contractor Pleads No Contest to Prevailing-Wage Charges, Pays Workers $20.7M

    Catching Killer Clauses in Contract Negotiations

    Sobering Facts for Construction Safety Day

    No Indemnity After Insured Settles Breach of Implied Warranty of Habitability Claims

    Rhode Island Sues 13 Industry Firms Over Flawed Interstate Bridge

    Colorado’s Need for Condos May Spark Construction Defect Law Reform

    Electronic Signatures On Contracts: Are They Truly Compliant?
    Corporate Profile

    VALLEY FARMS ARIZONA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from approximately five thousand construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Valley Farms, Arizona Construction Expert Directory delivers a streamlined multi-disciplinary expert retention and support solution to builders and construction claims professionals concerned with construction defect, scheduling, and delay matters. BHA provides construction related litigation support and expert witness services to the construction industry's most recognized companies, legal professionals, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, owners, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies. Employing in house assets which include licensed general and specialty contractors, consulting civil engineers, NCARB certified architects, roofing, and building envelope experts, the organization brings national experience and local capabilities to Valley Farms and the surrounding areas.

    Valley Farms Arizona hospital construction expert witnessValley Farms Arizona building expertValley Farms Arizona structural concrete expertValley Farms Arizona engineering consultantValley Farms Arizona construction scheduling expert witnessValley Farms Arizona construction expertsValley Farms Arizona expert witness structural engineer
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Valley Farms, Arizona

    AI & Digital Tools on Construction Projects: Contract Risks to Address Before Peak Season

    April 08, 2026 —
    Artificial intelligence and advanced digital tools are no longer experimental on construction projects. In Q1 of 2026, we can already see how they are already influencing schedules, estimates, submittals, safety reporting, and day‑to‑day project documentation. As peak construction season approaches, many teams are accelerating adoption of AI to gain efficiency. What often lags behind, however, is the contract framework governing how those tools are used—and how their outputs are treated when something goes wrong. On sophisticated construction projects, that gap can quickly become a dispute driver. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Meghan Douris, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Ms. Douris may be contacted at mdouris@seyfarth.com

    New York Enacts First-in-the-Nation Statewide Data Center Moratorium

    August 03, 2026 —
    As of May 2026, nearly 12 gigawatts of data center load requests were in the New York Independent System Operator interconnection queue, with more than two-thirds of capacity requests entering the queue in 2025 alone. On July 14, 2026, in response to concerns over this rapid growth, Governor Kathy Hochul issued Executive Order No. 62 (the “Order”) imposing a temporary moratorium on data centers in New York State. Among the concerns cited in the Order are the cost burden on ratepayers associated with transmission upgrades required to accommodate large loads, potential environmental impacts, and large-scale water use. The moratorium is intended to halt activities while the state government develops a comprehensive legal framework for data center development. While dozens of municipal and county-level moratoriums are in place throughout the U.S., and while the legislatures of several states, including Maine, have proposed moratoriums, the Order is the first statewide moratorium to be enacted nationally. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Joshua L. Sturtevant, Sheppard
    Mr. Sturtevant may be contacted at jsturtevant@sheppard.com

    Bona Fide Dispute Defeats Violation of Prompt Payment Act

    June 15, 2026 —
    Most, if not all, jurisdictions, including the federal government, have what is known as a “Prompt Payment Act.” The objective is to ensure prompt payment. If prompt payment is not made, the Prompt Payment Act provides for interest penalties, as well as potentially other costs such as attorney’s fees. But the thing is, it’s not as simple as untimely payment to support the recourse and interest penalties the applicable Prompt Payment Act affords. And the teeth associated with the applicable Prompt Payment Act are not as sharp as perhaps the party claiming untimely payment prefers. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Colorado Legislature Considers Series of Bills Aimed at Boosting Affordable Housing Construction in Colorado — What Homebuilders Need to Know

    April 08, 2026 —
    On January 21, 2026, lawmakers introduced a series of bills with the goals of addressing affordable housing issues and incentivizing construction in Colorado. House Bill 26-1001 (known as the “Housing Opportunities Made Easier ‘HOME’ Act”) concerns the promotion for residential developments on “qualifying properties” that do not contain exempt parcels through the bypassing of often time-consuming local planning processes. Under HB26-1001, a “qualifying property is any real property that contains no more than five acres of land and is owned by: (i) a nonprofit organization with a demonstrated history of providing affordable housing; (ii) a nonprofit organization that provides public transit; (iii) a nonprofit organization that has entered into an agreement with another nonprofit organization with a demonstrated history of providing affordable housing, provided that the agreement requires the nonprofit organization with a demonstrated history of providing affordable housing to develop a residential development on the property; (iv) a school district; (v) a state college or university; (vi) a housing authority; or (vii) a local or regional transit district or a regional transportation authority serving one or more counties. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Amanda E. McKinlay, Snell & Wilmer
    Ms. McKinlay may be contacted at amckinlay@swlaw.com

    Structural Engineer Claims Reinforcement Was Never Installed on Troubled NYC Tower

    September 01, 2026 —
    New York City has expanded its investigation into the structural failure at the former Pfizer headquarters tower in Midtown Manhattan as the Dept. of Investigation confirmed a parallel inquiry and the Dept. of Buildings directed the property owner to retain third-party engineering oversight. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    2026 Colorado Super Lawyers Recognizes 11 Snell & Wilmer Attorneys

    May 05, 2026 —
    DENVER – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that eleven attorneys in its Denver office have been selected for inclusion in the 2026 Colorado Super Lawyers publication. Of those eleven, four were recognized as Rising Stars. Super Lawyers is a listing of lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement. The selection process is multi-phased and includes independent research, peer nominations, and peer evaluations. The final published list represents no more than 5 percent of the lawyers in the state. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer

    $356 Million Judgement Against Developer for Defective Construction of DC Condominium

    August 16, 2026 —
    On July 31, 2026, the Superior Court of the District of Columbia entered a $356,085,513.00 judgment against developers JBG Smith for defective construction and renovation of the Wardman Tower Residential Condominium in Washington, D.C. The case is Wardman Tower Residential Condominium Unit Owners Association v. JBG Smith Properties, et al., No. 2020 CA 004807 B (D.C. Super. Ct.). In a 148-page Trial Order, the D.C. Superior Court awarded $118,695,171.00 in damages in favor of the condominium association and against the condominium developers, including JBG Smith. The Court trebled those damages pursuant to the District of Columbia Consumer Protection Procedures Act (“CPPA”) to reach an ultimate judgment of $356,085,513.00. See Cowie Law Group: DC Condominium Construction Defects: Recovering Attorney’s Fees, Litigation Expenses & Treble Damages Under the Consumer Protection Procedures Act. Cowie Law Group, P.C. filed the lawsuit on behalf of the Association in 2020. The firm represented the Association throughout years of pretrial discovery and ultimately served as trial counsel with Williams & Connolly LLP during a lengthy bench trial before the Honorable Yvonne Williams. The Cowie Law Group team included attorneys, George A. Bealefeld, III, Albert G. McCarraher, Stanford L. Kimmel, III and Nicholas D. Cowie. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Nicholas D. Cowie, Cowie Law Group
    Mr. Cowie may be contacted at ndc@cowielawgroup.com

    Ahlers Cressman & Sleight leads in recognized Construction Litigation Attorneys

    September 01, 2026 —
    Ahlers Cressman & Sleight is pleased to announce its leading recognition in the 2026 Washington Super Lawyers magazine. With ten members named, ACS has more recognized Construction Litigation attorneys than any other firm on the 2026 Washington Super Lawyers list, compared to three at the next closest firm. Two ACS members were also recognized on the 2026 Washington Rising Stars list. Super Lawyers selects these recognized lawyers by using a patented multiphase selection process. First, lawyers enter the candidate pool by being nominated by their peers or by being identified by managing partner surveys, third-party feedback, or the Super Lawyersresearch team. Next, Super Lawyersconducts an independently researched evaluation using twelve indicators of professional achievement and peer recognition: verdicts/settlements, transactions, representative clients, experience, honors/awards, special licenses/certifications, position within a law firm, bar and/or professional activity, pro bono and community service, scholarly lectures/writings, education/employment background, and other outstanding achievements. Then, candidates with the highest point totals serve on a Blue Ribbon panel, evaluating other candidates within their primary practice area. Finally, only 5% of attorneys are selected for the Super Lawyers list, and 2.5% of attorneys are selected for the Rising Stars list. More information about the Super Lawyers Selection Process can be found here. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC