BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    office building expert witness Yucca Arizona tract home expert witness Yucca Arizona parking structure expert witness Yucca Arizona Subterranean parking expert witness Yucca Arizona low-income housing expert witness Yucca Arizona industrial building expert witness Yucca Arizona mid-rise construction expert witness Yucca Arizona housing expert witness Yucca Arizona retail construction expert witness Yucca Arizona townhome construction expert witness Yucca Arizona casino resort expert witness Yucca Arizona Medical building expert witness Yucca Arizona hospital construction expert witness Yucca Arizona custom home expert witness Yucca Arizona landscaping construction expert witness Yucca Arizona structural steel construction expert witness Yucca Arizona high-rise construction expert witness Yucca Arizona multi family housing expert witness Yucca Arizona concrete tilt-up expert witness Yucca Arizona custom homes expert witness Yucca Arizona institutional building expert witness Yucca Arizona condominium expert witness Yucca Arizona
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Yucca, Arizona

    Arizona Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB 2620; ARS §12-1363, 1361, 1364) Current laws on the books require a purchaser of a home to provide written notice at least 90 days before commencing legal action. This gives the homebuilder time to inspect, repair or replace the defect if it falls within the specifications of the warranty. Homebuilder has 60 days to respond to written notice which may include offer to replace, repair or offer monetary compensationSB 1311 is a similar statute that covers multi-family dwellings. If no resolution is met through alternative dispute resolution procedures and a civil lawsuit is filed, the seller’s insurance company must treat a notice of a dwelling action as a notice of a claim subject to the insurance policy without affecting available coverage under the policy


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Yucca Arizona

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License required to bid or contract.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Northern Arizona Builders Association
    Local # 0315
    1500 E Cedar Ave Suite 86
    Flagstaff, AZ 86004
    http://www.nazba.org

    Home Builders Association of Central Arizona
    Local # 0310
    16430 N Scottsdale Road Suite 150
    Scottsdale, AZ 85254
    http://www.hbaca.org

    Southern Arizona Home Builders Association
    Local # 0335
    2840 N Country Club Rd Ste 100
    Tucson, AZ 85716
    http://www.sahba.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Yucca Arizona

    Federal Bid Protest Standard of Review and Disparate Treatment with Ratings

    Construction Contract’s Scope of Work Should Be Written With Clarity

    Court Resolves Disagreement on the Amount of the Deductible

    After Fatal House Explosion, Colorado Seeks New Pipeline Regulations

    Quick Note: Charting Your Contractual Rights With Respect To The Coronavirus

    Mixing Concrete, Like Baking a Cake, is Fraught with Problems When the Recipe is Not Followed

    Illinois Town Sues over Construction Defects at Police Station

    Blockbuster Breakwater: Alternative Construction Method Put to the Test in Tampa Bay

    Specified Or Designated Operations Endorsement – Limitation of Insurance Coverage

    Pennsylvania Finds Policy Triggered When Property Damage Reasonably Apparent

    Subcontractor Allowed to Sue Designer for Negligence: California Courts Chip Away at the Economic Loss Doctrine (Independent Duty Rule)

    CSLB Joint Venture Licenses – Providing Contractors With The Means To Expand Their Businesses

    Landmark Contractor Licensing Case Limits Disgorgement Remedy in California

    Navigating Turbulent Waters Ashore: Insurance Lessons from a Navy Project Dispute

    AI and the Optimization of Construction Projects

    No Damage for Delay? No Problem: Exceptions to the Enforceability of No Damage for Delay Clauses

    Tech to Help Contractors Avoid Litigation

    How to Properly Fill Out and Use the Unconditional Waiver and Release on Final Payment Form Used in California Construction

    Don’t Conspire to Build a Home…Wait…What?

    Read Before You Sign: Claim Waivers in Project Documents

    Uniwest Rides Again (or, Are Architects Subject to Va. Code Section 11-4.1?)

    GRSM Secures Illinois Appellate Victory for Architectural Firm in Implied Warranty Dispute

    Four Companies Sued in Pool Electrocution Case

    Required Contract Provisions for Construction Contracts in California

    Real Estate Firms Push to Preserve Carried Interest Tax Break

    Do You Have A Florida’s Deceptive And Unfair Trade Practices Act Claim

    2019 Legislative Session

    Reminder: Your Accounting and Other Records Matter

    Emerging World Needs $1.5 Trillion for Green Buildings, IFC Says

    Georgia State and Local Governments Receive Expanded Authority for Conservation Projects

    Mediation Scheduled for Singer's Construction Defect Claims

    Be a Good Neighbor: Protect Against Claims by an Adjacent Landowner During Construction

    The Ghosts of Tariffs Past May Help Us in the Future

    City Council Authorizes Settlement of Basement Flooding Cases

    Consult with Counsel when Preparing Construction Liens

    Were Quake Standards Illegally Altered for PG&E Nuclear Power Plant?

    Staying Single?

    The Importance of Retrofitting Existing Construction to Meet Sustainability Standards

    Time is Money: Escalating Stalled Termination Cost Negotiations

    Sometimes You Get Away with Default (but don’t count on it)

    The Washington Supreme Court Rules that a Holder of a Certificate of Insurance Is Entitled to Coverage

    Megaproject Savings Opportunities

    Summary Findings of the Fourth National Climate Assessment

    Arizona Court of Appeals Clarifies Homeowners Association Open Meeting Requirements

    Hawaii Federal District Court Denies Title Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment

    The Courts and Changing Views on Construction Defect Coverage

    Revised Cause Identified for London's Wobbling Millennium Bridge After Two Decades

    Harmon Tower Opponents to Try Mediation

    2016 Hawaii Legislature Enacts Five Insurance-Related Bills

    California Homeowners Can Release Future, Unknown Claims Against Builders
    Corporate Profile

    YUCCA ARIZONA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through more than four thousand construction defect and claims related expert designations, the Yucca, Arizona Construction Expert Directory delivers a streamlined multi-disciplinary expert retention and support solution to attorneys and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides building related litigation support and expert witness services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, real estate investment trusts, risk managers, owners, as well as a variety of municipalities and government offices. Utilizing captive assets which comprise credentialed construction consultants, NCARB certified architects, forensic engineers, building envelope and design experts, the firm brings specialized expertise and local capabilities to the Yucca region.

    Yucca Arizona construction claims expert witnessYucca Arizona stucco expert witnessYucca Arizona soil failure expert witnessYucca Arizona reconstruction expert witnessYucca Arizona building code expert witnessYucca Arizona construction safety expertYucca Arizona building code compliance expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Yucca, Arizona

    Samuel Alhadeff Represents LGI Homes in Acquisition and Re-Entitlement of Maravilla Estates

    July 06, 2026 —
    Temecula Partner Samuel Alhadeff recently represented LGI Homes in its acquisition and re-entitlement of Maravilla Estates, a 169-lot active adult community located in San Jacinto, California. The acquisition and re-entitlement of the project provide LGI Homes with the opportunity to deliver much-needed age-qualified housing in one of Riverside County's growing residential markets. The community includes a recorded final map and finished lots, as well as future development inventory and planned amenities, positioning the project for continued development and completion. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Vacant Building Negates Coverage for Broken Pipe

    September 01, 2026 —
    The Michigan Court of Appeals found the insured was not covered for water damage because the commercial space was left vacant. Cherry Hill Recreation Center, Inc. v. Conifer Ins Co., 2026 Mich, App. LEXIS 5099 (Mich Ct. App. June 18, 2026). Alan Abbas purchased a bowling alley. Due to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and executive orders issued by the governor, Abbas was unable to operate the bowling center for several months. During the winter, Abbas allowed the thermostat to drop significantly, with the building expected to be around 43 degrees Fahrenheit. He later admitted the sprinkler system’s pipes were not protected against freezing. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Georgia HB 676: A Bill Property Owners and Contractors Should Watch

    March 24, 2026 —
    Property owners, contractors, and others dealing with mechanics and materialmen’s liens in Georgia should keep an eye on HB 676, which is currently making its way through the Georgia General Assembly. The bill aims to curb misuse of the lien process and provide additional remedies to those challenging a frivolous lien filing. What HB 676 Would Do HB 676 would add a new Code section (O.C.G.A. § 44-14-366.6) to the mechanics and materialmen’s lien statutes. If a lien is filed “without substantial justification or that is not made in good faith or that is made with malice or a wrongful purpose,” this new Code section would impose a fine of $1,500 per lien on the lien claimant, in addition to any attorney’s fees or court costs incurred by the party challenging the lien. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Robert Lafayette, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Mr. Lafayette may be contacted at rlafayette@seyfarth.com

    Quick Note: Don’t Spoil Evidence!!!!

    March 10, 2026 —
    The phrase “spoliation of evidence” is a phrase that gets used, sometimes properly and sometimes improperly. The reason is that if evidence is legitimately spoiled, the opposing party wants an adverse inference jury instruction. There are two potential adverse inference jury instructions dealing with spoliation of evidence, neither of which are good, and one of which you definitely don’t want. A recent case discusses these jury instructions (check here) in a slip and fall personal injury case. The bottom line is that you need to preserve evidence relevant to a claim. Don’t lose it. Don’t intentionally destroy it. Don’t pretend it does not exist. Don’t do all the things that hinder the preservation and ultimate production of the relevant evidence. An adverse inference jury instruction (or an adverse inference implication in a non-jury trial) could be much, much worse. The facts are what the facts are. The best thing you can do is confront the facts. Confront the bad facts just like the good facts. The nature of any dispute is that there will be both good and bad facts. Bad facts can hopefully be explained recognizing there will be bad facts on the other side too. Sometimes, the bad facts warrant major strategic considerations and shifting the focus of how a dispute will be handled and presented. Whatever you do, don’t put yourself in a position where you are spoiling evidence. Once you get an adverse inference instruction, that’s it, as it’s very tough to overcome. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    What Massachusetts Contractors and Developers Can Learn from Cannistraro v. Columbia Construction

    July 13, 2026 —
    Introduction On June 26, 2026 the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court issued its decision in J.C. Cannistraro, LLC v. Columbia Construction Co.—a holding that sits at the intersection of Prompt Pay Act compliance and the Massachusetts Arbitration Act.[1] Most already know that the Massachusetts Prompt Pay Act (PPA) imposes strict timing and certification requirements for rejecting payment applications and proposed change orders on projects valued at $3 million or more. Most notably, the PPA requires the paying party to give the payee written notice of its approval or rejection of progress applications and proposed changes within 15 days of receipt, which notice must include a “factual and contractual basis for the rejection” and must be “certified as made in good faith.”[2] In the absence of a timely certified notice, payment is “deemed to be approved” unless the payor properly rejects payment before it comes due.[3] Reprinted courtesy of Anthony LaPlaca, Seyfarth Shaw LLP and Luke Marston, Seyfarth Shaw LLP Mr. LaPlaca may be contacted at alaplaca@seyfarth.com Mr. Marston may be contacted at lmarston@seyfarth.com Read the full story...

    Thank You All for 10 Years Straight of VA Super Lawyers

    May 05, 2026 —
    It is with humility and a sense of accomplishment that I announce that I have been selected for the tenth straight year to the Virginia Super Lawyers in the Construction Litigation category for 2026. Add this to my recent election to the Virginia Legal Elite in Construction and I’ve had a pretty good year. As always, I am thrilled to be included on these peer-elected lists. Your confidence in my work is very gratifying. So without further ado, thank you to my peers and those on the panel at Virginia Super Lawyers for the great honor. I feel quite proud to be part of the 5% of Virginia attorneys that made this list for 2026. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at chrisghill@constructionlawva.com

    Breaking Ground On New California Public Works Prevailing Wage Requirements

    April 27, 2026 —
    Seyfarth Synopsis: As of January 1, 2026, AB 889 bulldozed California’s Prevailing Wage law, which impacts public works employers—including public agencies, the contractors that work for them, and private owners and developers whose projects may be subject to public works requirements. The amended law reframes the calculation of fringe benefits for individuals who work on public works project and mandates annualization of such benefits, demolishes the practice of frontloading these benefits, and requires employers to maintain inspection-ready records of compliance. This year, AB 889 significantly revised California’s prevailing wage law, codified at Labor Code section 1773.1, to clarify the state’s prevailing wage regulations and streamline enforcement. Accordingly, as of January 1, 2026, California public works employers are required to annualize employees’ fringe benefits and maintain specific documentation demonstrating statutory compliance. These new obligations impact public agencies and their contractors, as well as private owners and developers whose projects may be subject to public works requirements. Continue reading for the blueprint of how to comply with the state’s amended prevailing wage law. Reprinted courtesy of Heather Frisch, Seyfarth Shaw LLP, Christopher Bouquet, Seyfarth Shaw LLP and Ashley Stein, Seyfarth Shaw LLP Ms. Frisch may be contacted at hfrisch@seyfarth.com Mr. Bouquet may be contacted at cbouquet@seyfarth.com Ms. Stein may be contacted at astein@seyfarth.com Read the full story...

    Turning Expert Services into Products

    July 20, 2026 —
    A Finnish engineering, architecture, and project consulting company, AINS Group, recently opened an online store to purchase fixed-price services. The store presents specialist work in a product-like format, with fixed service names, defined scopes, and visible prices, such as a building history report, a zoning plan cost analysis, and a technical preliminary survey for a property transaction. Is this productization a smart move or a sign that expert services are being commoditized? Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi