BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    mid-rise construction expert witness Cecil Arkansas retail construction expert witness Cecil Arkansas hospital construction expert witness Cecil Arkansas parking structure expert witness Cecil Arkansas housing expert witness Cecil Arkansas condominium expert witness Cecil Arkansas office building expert witness Cecil Arkansas concrete tilt-up expert witness Cecil Arkansas low-income housing expert witness Cecil Arkansas industrial building expert witness Cecil Arkansas Subterranean parking expert witness Cecil Arkansas Medical building expert witness Cecil Arkansas tract home expert witness Cecil Arkansas multi family housing expert witness Cecil Arkansas structural steel construction expert witness Cecil Arkansas high-rise construction expert witness Cecil Arkansas production housing expert witness Cecil Arkansas custom home expert witness Cecil Arkansas casino resort expert witness Cecil Arkansas landscaping construction expert witness Cecil Arkansas townhome construction expert witness Cecil Arkansas institutional building expert witness Cecil Arkansas
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Cecil, Arkansas

    Arkansas Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB975: Requires that residential contractors be given notice and an opportunity to repair. Homeowners must provide 20 days notice in writing to builder prior to legal action to address defect and/or repair


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Cecil Arkansas

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Cleburne County Home Builders Association
    Local # 0405
    PO Box 1325
    Heber Springs, AR 72543


    Greater Fort Smith Associated Home Builders
    Local # 0436
    5111 Rogers Ave Ste 531
    Fort Smith, AR 72903
    http://www.greaterfortsmithhomebuilders.com

    White County Home Builders Association
    Local # 0472
    PO Box 1501
    Searcy, AR 72143


    Crittenden County Home Builders Association
    Local # 0415
    PO Box 2204
    West Memphis, AR 72303


    Home Builders Association of Faulkner County
    Local # 0439
    PO Box 1228
    Conway, AR 72033
    http://www.faulknercountyhomebuilders.com

    NE Arkansas Home Builders Association
    Local # 0432
    PO Box 17237
    Jonesboro, AR 72403
    http://www.neahba.org

    Cabot Area Home Builders Association
    Local # 0420
    PO Box 1291
    Cabot, AR 72023
    http://www.cabotareahba.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Cecil Arkansas

    Colorado’s Federal District Court Finds Carriers Have Joint and Several Defense Duties

    Vacation Rentals: Liability of the Owner for Injury Suffered by the Renter

    Insurer's Denial of Coverage to Additional Insured Constitutes Bad Faith

    Florida Enacts Sweeping Tort Reform Legislation, Raising Barriers to Insurance Coverage Claims

    More Details Emerge in Fatal Charlotte, NC, Scaffold Collapse

    With an Eye Already in the Sky, Crane Camera Goes Big Data

    New Law, Old Risks: Why Colorado’s H.B. 25-1272 May Backfire on Builders

    Reduce Suicide Risk Among Employees in Remote Work Areas

    New York Moves to Tighten Third-Party Practice: Key Changes to CPLR 1007

    Hunton’s Alice Weeks Selected to the Miami Dade Bar’s Circle of Excellence for Insurance Litigation

    Governor Signs Permit Extension Bill Extending Permit Deadlines to One Year

    Louisiana Politicians Struggle on Construction Bills, Hospital Redevelopment

    Merger to Create Massive Los Angeles Construction Firm

    Coping with Labor & Install Issues in Green Building

    California Supreme Court Finds that When it Comes to Intentional Interference Claims, Public Works Projects are Just Different, Special Even

    Denial of Claim for Concealment or Fraud Reversed by Sixth Circuit

    Cable-Free Elevators Will Soar to New Heights, and Move Sideways

    Keep it Simple with Nunn-Agreements in Colorado

    Federal Court Predicts Coverage In Utah for Damage Caused By Faulty Workmanship

    Landlord Determined to Not Qualify as Additional Insured

    Anatomy of a Data Center

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (1/10/24) – New Type of Nuclear Reactor, Big Money Surrounding Sports Stadiums, and Positivity from Fannie Mae’s Monthly Consumer Survey

    Federal Magistrate Judge Recommends Rescission of Policies

    Navigating Construction Defect Claims and Statutes of Limitation: Key Lessons from Stoecklein v. Fayette Farms

    Industry News: New Partner at Burdman Law Group

    New Year’s Resolution: Engineering the “Tee-Up Day” for Complex Construction Mediations

    Job Growth Seen as Good News for North Carolina Housing Market

    New York vs. Miami: The $50 Million Penthouse Battle From Zaha Hadid

    New Report Reveals Heavy Civil Construction Less Impacted by COVID-19 Than Commercial Construction

    Insurer Must Pay for Matching Siding of Insured's Buildings

    Insurer's Bad Faith is Actionable Tort for Purposes of Choice of Law Analysis

    Uniform Rules Governing New York’s Supreme and County Courts Get An Overhaul

    Four Ways Student Debt Is Wreaking Havoc on Millennials

    The Ghosts of Tariffs Past May Help Us in the Future

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “D’Oh!”

    Feds OK $9B Houston Highway Project After Two-Year Pause

    I’m Sorry, So Sorry: Legal Implications of Apologies and Admissions of Fault for Delaware Healthcare Professionals

    Two Architecturally Prized Buildings May be Demolished

    What Is the Best Way to Avoid Rezoning Disputes?

    White and Williams LLP Attorneys Recognized as PA and DE Super Lawyers

    Coverage for Named Windstorm Removed by Insured, Terminating Such Coverage

    New York Appellate Team Obtains Affirmance of Dismissal of Would-Be Labor Law Action Against Municipal Entities

    Documentation Important for Defending Construction Defect Claims

    Court Upholds Appraisers' Use of "Increased Cost of Construction" Provision

    Emotional Distress Damages Not Distinct from “Annoyance and Discomfort” Damages in Case Arising from 2007 California Wildfires

    Insured’s Counsel Sanctioned for Filing Pleading with No Legal or Factual Justification

    Mitigating the Consequences of Labor Unrest on Construction Projects

    New Florida Law Adds Licensing Risk to Contractor/Subcontractor Payment Disputes

    California Restricts Principles of “General” Personal Jurisdiction

    A Look at Trending Legislative Changes Impacting Workers' Comp
    Corporate Profile

    CECIL ARKANSAS CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Drawing from more than four thousand construction, architectural, and engineering related expert designations, the Cecil, Arkansas Construction Expert Directory provides a single point of reference for construction defect and claims related support to builders and construction claims professionals concerned with construction defect, scheduling, and delay matters. BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the industry's most recognized construction attorneys, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing captive assets which comprise construction standard of care consultants, registered architects, professional engineers, and credentialed building envelope experts, the firm brings specialized expertise and local capabilities to the Cecil region.

    Cecil Arkansas eifs expert witnessCecil Arkansas construction claims expert witnessCecil Arkansas civil engineering expert witnessCecil Arkansas OSHA expert witness constructionCecil Arkansas architecture expert witnessCecil Arkansas roofing construction expertCecil Arkansas structural engineering expert witnesses
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Cecil, Arkansas

    Wadsworth v. Regional Rail Partners — Verified Statements of Claim Under the Colorado Public Works Act

    August 25, 2026 —
    Editor’s Note: Wadsworth Revisited In August 2024, following the Colorado Court of Appeals’ decision in Ralph L. Wadsworth Construction Company, LLC v. Regional Rail Partners, we published Colorado Court of Appeals’ Ruling Highlights Dangers of Excessive Public Works Claims. At the time, the decision warranted a significant warning to contractors and subcontractors performing public work in Colorado. The Court of Appeals concluded that Wadsworth’s verified statement of claim improperly included unliquidated delay damages and that, because the claim was excessive, Wadsworth forfeited its right to recover the amounts included in the claim. We cautioned contractors to carefully scrutinize verified statements of claim and to avoid including unliquidated damages or amounts that were not yet due and payable. The Colorado Supreme Court has now reversed that decision. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Olivia Barden, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC

    EPA Steps Back, Arizona Moves Forward

    May 12, 2026 —
    In a significant development for Arizona’s business community and environmental policymakers, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has paused its planned reclassification of Maricopa County from “Moderate” to “Serious” ozone nonattainment status pursuant to the Clean Air Act’s National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). This decision marks a shift in federal air policy — one that recognizes the unique challenges faced by regions like metro Phoenix, where environmental conditions beyond local control are often key contributors to air quality readings. The EPA’s move follows a series of meetings between EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, Arizona elected officials, and business and civic leaders, including a recent roundtable in Phoenix convened by U.S. Senator Mark Kelly. In announcing the pause, Zeldin acknowledged the need for flexibility and fairness in the application of Clean Air Act standards, especially when emissions from other states, nations, and natural events significantly influence local air quality. Reprinted courtesy of Patrick J. Paul, Snell & Wilmer, John Habib, Snell & Wilmer and Sukhmani K. Singh, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Paul may be contacted at ppaul@swlaw.com Mr. Habib may be contacted at jhabib@swlaw.com Ms. Singh may be contacted at ssingh@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Properly Taking Judicial Notice of Florida’s Building Code

    October 12, 2026 —
    Many construction defects cases involve Florida’s Building Code. A recent non-construction case, BSREP II PBG Resort, LLC v Ginsburg, 2026 WL 265226 (Fla. 4th DCA 2026), discussed a court taking judicial notice of a provision in the Florida Building Code. This case was a premise liability case where the plaintiff tripped in an asphalt parking lot. The plaintiff, without complying with proper procedural notice protocol, asked the court to take judicial notice of a section of Florida’s Building Code, i.e., admitting this section as relevant evidence in the case. The trial court granted the request for judicial notice and the plaintiff used this as the basis of her cross-examination, the jury instructions, and closing argument that the violation of this section of Florida’s Building Code was evidence of negligence. This was in error. First, Florida’s Building Code is NOT a statute but an administrative rule. Ginsburg, supra. As an administrative rule, a court “may” but is not obligated to take judicial notice of the rule – it is a permissive judicial notice request per Florida Statute s. 90.203 and 90.202(9). This is important because the trial court viewed Florida’s Building Code as a statute it mandatorily had to take judicial notice of per Florida Statute s. 90.201, which was in error. Because it was permissive, the plaintiff needed to comply with statutory procedural notice protocols, which the plaintiff failed to do. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Benchmark Litigation Recognizes Andrea DeField Among Nation’s Top Young Litigators

    September 08, 2026 —
    Hunton’s insurance coverage team is proud to celebrate the recognition of Andrea DeField on Benchmark Litigation’s 2026 40 & Under List, an annual ranking that highlights the nation’s leading litigators age 40 and under. Andrea was one of only six Hunton lawyers selected and was recognized in the South region. Benchmark Litigation’s 40 & Under List honors attorneys who have distinguished themselves through significant case work, client feedback, and peer review. This honor reflects Andrea’s reputation as one of the country’s leading policyholder-side insurance recovery litigators and her standing as a trusted advisor to companies facing some of today’s most complex insurance and risk management challenges. As head of Hunton’s cyber insurance practice, Andrea has built her career helping companies manage risk and maximize insurance recovery. Her practice spans the full spectrum of insurance-related issues, from advising clients on contractual risk transfer and insurance program design to representing policyholders in high-stakes coverage and bad faith disputes. She has guided clients through some of the most complex and widely publicized losses in recent years and helps companies recover under a broad range of insurance products, including D&O, professional liability, crime, property, cyber, and general liability policies. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP

    The ROI of Estimating Accuracy in Preconstruction

    September 15, 2026 —
    Precision is the foundation of profitability in construction. Even minor quantity or pricing mistakes can swing bids anywhere from 5-15%, leading to project delays, unprofitable jobs or margin erosion through change orders. And worse, these losses can damage client trust and jeopardize long-term relationships that drive repeat business and future bids. Consistently estimating accurately builds confidence, speeds up bidding and positions your company to win more profitable projects. Estimating accuracy is where profit is either protected or lost. In construction, you make your biggest financial decisions before a project ever starts. Once a bid is won, most of the project’s cost structure is locked in. If the estimate is wrong, no amount of execution can fully fix those mistakes. That makes estimating accuracy a business issue, not just an operations issue. Reprinted courtesy of Aaron Kivett, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    No Ink, No Problem: When Employees and Agents Can Enforce Arbitration Agreements

    August 11, 2026 —
    Arbitration is a fundamental component of modern construction contracting. Many in the industry recognize the potential benefits and protections arbitration can provide to the business in the event of a dispute. But an important question many contracts do not address is: who does the arbitration agreement cover? Does it include the business entity only, or the individuals acting on behalf of the entity? As courts have long recognized, entities can generally only act through their employees, representatives, or agents.[1] This article discusses the circumstances in which an agent may rely on an arbitration provision entered by its employer. This is known as the agency doctrine. Reprinted courtesy of Jordan Heath, Associate, Jones Walker LLP and Jacob Morrison, Law Student University of Georgia, Jones Walker LLP Read the full story...
    Mr. Heath may be contacted at jheath@joneswalker.com

    Additional Insureds Obligated to Meet Self-Insured Retention

    October 20, 2026 —
    The federal district court found that the additional insureds had to meet the policy’s self-insured retention before a duty to defend was triggered. Amerisure Ins. Co. v. Premier Design & Build Group, LLC, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXXIS 170741 (N.D. Ill. July 31, 2026). Amerisure issued CGL and umbrella policies to Premier Design & Build Group, LLC. Amerisure had the right and duty to defend in certain suits for property damage under both policies. Premier contracted with MG East, LLC (MGE) to build three buildings. After the buildings were constructed, MG filed suit against Premier in state court, seeking recovery for allegedly defective installation of the roof, flashing, and gutters on each of the buildings. Premier had subcontracted with Tecta American Sough Florida, Inc. to install the flashing. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    White and Williams LLP Secures a Clean Sweep Dismissal of Architect's Professional Liability Coverage Lawsuit

    August 16, 2026 —
    White and Williams LLP achieved a complete dismissal of professional liability coverage claims through a strategic defense led by Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Practice Group attorneys Daniel E. Bryer, Partner and Brendaliz Minaya Ruiz, Associate. In a nuanced action styled, Vincent Cusumano Architect P.C., et al. v. Berkshire Hathaway Direct Insurance Company, et al., decided in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, plaintiffs asserted twelve pre-contractual and contractual-based causes of action against their liability insurer, Berkshire Hathaway Direct Insurance Company, and its insurance agent (collectively, “Defendants”) for denying a professional liability claim arising from plaintiffs’ prior work. Reprinted courtesy of Daniel E. Bryer, White and Williams LLP and Brendaliz Minaya Ruiz, White and Williams LLP Mr. Bryer may be contacted at bryerd@whiteandwilliams.com Ms. Ruiz may be contacted at minayaruizb@whiteandwilliams.com Read the full story...