BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    office building expert witness Hot Spring County Arkansas casino resort expert witness Hot Spring County Arkansas condominiums expert witness Hot Spring County Arkansas landscaping construction expert witness Hot Spring County Arkansas townhome construction expert witness Hot Spring County Arkansas high-rise construction expert witness Hot Spring County Arkansas retail construction expert witness Hot Spring County Arkansas production housing expert witness Hot Spring County Arkansas structural steel construction expert witness Hot Spring County Arkansas institutional building expert witness Hot Spring County Arkansas multi family housing expert witness Hot Spring County Arkansas condominium expert witness Hot Spring County Arkansas mid-rise construction expert witness Hot Spring County Arkansas parking structure expert witness Hot Spring County Arkansas industrial building expert witness Hot Spring County Arkansas tract home expert witness Hot Spring County Arkansas housing expert witness Hot Spring County Arkansas concrete tilt-up expert witness Hot Spring County Arkansas custom homes expert witness Hot Spring County Arkansas hospital construction expert witness Hot Spring County Arkansas Subterranean parking expert witness Hot Spring County Arkansas Medical building expert witness Hot Spring County Arkansas
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Hot Spring County, Arkansas

    Arkansas Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB975: Requires that residential contractors be given notice and an opportunity to repair. Homeowners must provide 20 days notice in writing to builder prior to legal action to address defect and/or repair


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Hot Spring County Arkansas

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Hot Springs Arkansas
    Local # 0440
    PO Box 1046
    Hot Springs, AR 71902
    http://www.hbaofhotsprings.com

    Saline Home Builders Association
    Local # 0458
    PO Box 151
    Benton, AR 72018
    http://www.salinehba.org

    Clark County Home Builders Association
    Local # 0403
    PO Box 502
    Arkadelphia, AR 71923


    Arkansas Home Builders Association - State
    Local # 0400
    1400 W Markham St Ste 305
    Little Rock, AR 72201
    http://www.arkansashomebuilders.org

    Home Builders Association of Greater Little Rock
    Local # 0408
    PO Box 755
    North Little Rock, AR 72115
    http://www.hbaglr.com

    SE Arkansas Home Builders Association
    Local # 0456
    2320 Grist Mill Rd
    Little Rock, AR 72227


    Cabot Area Home Builders Association
    Local # 0420
    PO Box 1291
    Cabot, AR 72023
    http://www.cabotareahba.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Hot Spring County Arkansas

    U.S. Home Sellers Return for Spring as Buyers Get Relief

    Florida’s Citizens Property Insurance May Be Immune From Bad Faith, But Is Not Immune From Consequential Damages

    London Is Falling Down and It's Because of Climate Change

    Managing Narrative, Capturing Context, and Building Together: Talking VR and AEC with David Weir-McCall

    The Contractor’s Contingency: What Contractors and Construction Managers Need to Know and Be Wary Of

    Eighth Circuit Considers Judicial Estoppel in Hazardous Substance Release-Related Personal Injury Case

    Best Construction Technology Podcasts in 2025

    Housing-Related Spending Made Up Significant Portion of GDP in Fourth Quarter 2013

    Ex-Engineered Products Firm Executive Convicted of Bid Rigging

    Wisconsin Court Enforces Breach of Contract Exclusion in E&O Policy

    Adjuster's Report No Substitute for Proof of Loss Under Flood Policy

    Blockbuster Breakwater: Alternative Construction Method Put to the Test in Tampa Bay

    Newark Team Obtains Appellate Ruling Affirming Summary Judgment for Lawyer and Firm in Professional Negligence Lawsuit

    Former Sponsor of the Lenox Facing Suit in Supreme Court

    Subcontractor Default Insurance (“SDI”): What Is It?

    Amos Rex – A Museum for the Digital Age

    Federal Court Ruling Bolsters the “Your Work” Exclusion in Standard CGL Policies

    Insurance Policy to Protect Hawaii's Coral Reefs

    Atlantic City Faces Downward Spiral With Revel’s Demise

    Supreme Judicial Court of Maine Addresses Earth Movement Exclusion

    Court Rules That ERISA Preemption Bars Recovery of Union Benefit Fund Payments Pursuant to New York’s Wage Theft Statute from a General Contractor Where a Subcontractor Failed to Fund Payments

    Allegations Versus “True Facts”: Which Govern the Duty to Defend? Bonus! A Georgia Court Clears Up What the Meaning of “Is” Is

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Hold the Pickles, Hold the Lettuce?”

    Homeowners Battle Insurers Over $2.9 Trillion Climate Risk

    Unjust Enrichment and Express Contract Don’t Mix

    Lawyer Claims HOA Scam Mastermind Bribed Politicians

    Flood Policy Does Not Cover Debris Removal from Property

    D.R. Horton Earnings Rise as Sales and Order Volume Increase

    Contract Void Ab Initio: Key Insights into the KBR vs. Corps of Engineers Affirmative Defense

    Defining Catastrophic Injury Claims

    Using the Prevention Doctrine

    Environmental Justice Update: The Justice40 Initiative

    Who Will Pay for San Francisco's $750 Million Tilting Tower?

    Unbilled Costs Remain in Tutor Perini's Finances

    Does Your 998 Offer to Compromise Include Attorneys’ Fees and Costs?

    Loan Modifications Due to COVID-19 Pandemic: FDIC Answers CARES Act FAQs

    Fourth Circuit Confirms Scope of “Witness Litigation Privilege”

    Sweet News for Yum Yum Donuts: Lost Goodwill is Not an All or Nothing Proposition

    Proposed Changes to Federal Lease Accounting Standards

    Los Angeles County Sues Utility Edison Over Deadly Wildfire

    Auditor: Prematurely Awarded Contracts Increased Honolulu Rail Cost by $354M

    London Shard Developer Wins Approval for Tower Nearby

    ACS Obtains Overwhelming Jury Trial Victory for General Contractor Client

    Montana Trial Court Holds That Youths Have Standing to Bring Constitutional Claims Against State Government For Alleged Climate Change-Related Harms

    Genuine Dispute Over Cause of Damage and Insureds’ Demolition Before Inspection Negate Bad Faith and Elder Abuse Claims

    A Win for Policyholders: Court Finds Flood Exclusion Inapplicable to Plumbing Leaks Caused by Hurricane Rainfall

    SEC Climate Change Disclosure Letter Foreshadows Anticipated Regulatory Changes

    Options When there is a Construction Lien on Your Property

    Jinx: Third Circuit Rules in Favor of Teamsters in Withdrawal Case

    Biden Administration Focus on Environmental Justice Raises Questions for Industry
    p="name">The Practical Distinction Between Anticipatory Breach and Repudiation and How to Deal with Both on Construction Projects

    Navigating Federal Government Contracts Under Newly Imposed Tariffs

    Insurer's Summary Judgment Motion to Reject Claim for Construction Defects Upheld

    Practical Advice: Indemnification and Additional Insured Issues Revisited

    Best Lawyers Recognizes Twenty White and Williams Lawyers

    Who Is To Blame For Defective — And Still LEED Certified — Courthouse Square?
    Corporate Profile

    HOT SPRING COUNTY ARKANSAS CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 4500 construction and design related expert designations, the Hot Spring County, Arkansas Construction Expert Directory provides a wide spectrum of trial support and consulting services to construction claims professionals concerned with construction defect, scheduling, and delay claims. BHA provides construction claims investigation and expert services to the building industry's most recognized companies, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, risk managers, and a variety of municipalities. Utilizing in house assets which comprise licensed architects, registered professional engineers, ASPE certified professional estimators, ICC Certified inspection and testing professionals, the firm brings regional experience and flexible capabilities to the Hot Spring County construction industry.

    Hot Spring County Arkansas hospital construction expert witnessHot Spring County Arkansas roofing and waterproofing expert witnessHot Spring County Arkansas engineering expert witnessHot Spring County Arkansas construction expert witness public projectsHot Spring County Arkansas structural engineering expert witnessesHot Spring County Arkansas building consultant expertHot Spring County Arkansas architect expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Hot Spring County, Arkansas

    Substantiating Termination for Convenience Costs

    November 09, 2025 —
    A termination for convenience clause is an important provision in construction contracts, particularly for the owner. An owner needs the contractual right to terminate a contractor for convenience. This means the owner does NOT need a reason to exercise a termination. This is night-and-day different from a termination for cause (or default) wherein an owner must have a material basis to exercise that right. Sometimes, the relationship is not where it should be, or not what was expected, or performance does not rise up to the level you require but does not rise up to a material breach. The termination for convenience clause gives the owner the discretion to just end the relationship. As a contractor, you need to understand the types of damages (costs) you are entitled if an owner exercises the termination for convenience. Don’t overlook this, because if an owner exercises the termination for convenience, you want to make sure you feel like you are protected. This could include a termination for convenience fee. There are a number of ways this can be accomplished, but you need to be sure you are entitled to costs incurred through the date of termination with reasonable overhead and profit, demobilization costs, early return fees, and costs incurred due to the termination. Regardless, keep in mind that it is your burden, as the contractor, to prove these costs with a reasonable degree of certainty. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    White and Williams LLP Recognized on the List of Largest Law Firms in Greater Philadelphia

    March 03, 2026 —
    White and Williams LLP was recently recognized on the list of Largest Law Firms in Greater Philadelphia by the Philadelphia Business Journal. The Firm is ranked #10 among the largest law firms in the Greater Philadelphia area. This listing ranks over 500 law firms in the counties of Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, or Philadelphia in Pennsylvania; Atlantic, Burlington, Camden, or Gloucester in New Jersey, and Kent or New Castle in Delaware. White and Williams has been named on the list since 2023. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of White and Williams LLP

    Reminder: You Can’t Make Others Indemnify You for Your Own Actions

    January 13, 2026 —
    I have spoken about Virginia Code 11-4.1 and the prohibition on forcing others to indemnify for the actions of the indemnitees on a few occasions here at Construction Law Musings (See Uniwest Posts). The Western District of Virginia gave its take on indemnification clauses and why they need to be carefully drafted in a December 2024 case, Sauer Construction, LLC v. MC3 Solutions, LLC et al. In Sauer, the Court looked at, among other things, an indemnification provision between MC3, a subcontractor to Sauer, and MC3s sub-subcontractor, Bonitz Flooring Group. This was the relatively typical construction dispute where a general contractor sues a subcontractor and then that subcontractor sues its supplier and sub-subcontractors for indemnity pursuant to its contract. When faced with the indemnification claim, Bonitz argued that the indemnification provision violated the Va. Code 11-4.1 because it required Bonitz to indemnify MC3 for MC3’s actions. The provision follows the break. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at chrisghill@constructionlawva.com

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Recognized as 2025 New York – Metro Super Lawyers® and Rising Stars

    January 06, 2026 —
    Traub Lieberman is pleased to announce that seven Partners from the New York office have been selected to the 2025 New York - Metro Super Lawyers list and one associate has been listed in the 2025 New York – Metro Rising Stars. 2025 New York – Metro Super Lawyers
    • Copernicus Gaza – Insurance Coverage
    • Jonathan Harwood – Professional Liability
    • Lisa Rolle – Construction Litigation
    • Hillary Raimondi – Employment Litigation
    • Christopher Russo – Professional Liability
    • Lisa Shrewsberry – Professional Liability
    • Stephen Straus – Insurance Coverage
    2025 New York – Metro Rising Stars
    • James Wise – Insurance Coverage
    Lisa Shrewsberry was also selected to the Top 25: 2025 Westchester County Super Lawyers® list. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Traub Lieberman

    Promptly Notifying Your Insurer of a Claim Matters

    December 30, 2025 —
    Does promptly notifying your insurer of a claim matter? A recent case out of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals answers this question in the affirmative. MAKE SURE TO PROMPTLY NOTIFY YOUR INSURER OF A POTENTIAL CLAIM. In L. Squared Industries, Inc. v. Nautilus Ins. Co., 31 Fla.L.Weekly C529a (11th Cir. 2025), an insured owned gas stations and had a claims-made storage tank liability insurance policy. The policy provided: “You must see to it that we are notified as soon as reasonably possible, but in any event, not more than seven (7) days after the insured first became aware of, or should have become aware of a pollution condition which may result in a claim or any action or proceeding to impose an obligation on the insured for cleanup costs . . . .” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    CEO: Power Isn’t the Only Electrical Challenge for AI Data Centers

    April 14, 2026 —
    Everyone knows that data centers are voracious consumers of electricity. In fact, the U.S. is currently scrambling to meet unprecedented levels of power demand not seen since the early days of electrification and the widespread adoption of air conditioning. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Francesco "Frio" Iorio, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Colorado Court of Appeals Confirms: Prevailing Parties Can Recover “Fees on Fees” — Reinforcing Why Builders Should Strike Attorneys’ Fee Clauses From Their Contracts

    December 30, 2025 —
    Colorado developers, builders, and contractors should take notice of a recently published Colorado Court of Appeals decision that increases the financial exposure created by prevailing party attorneys’ fee clauses. In 1046 Munras Properties, L.P. v. Kabod Coffee, 2025 COA 71, the Court held, for the first time in a published Colorado case, that a prevailing party may recover not only contractual attorneys’ fees, but also the attorney fees incurred to obtain those fees. In short: “fees on fees” are now recoverable when a contract contains a broad fee shifting clause. This development underscores the same warning sounded years ago in a prior HHMR blog post titled, Attorney Fee Clauses Are Engraved Invitations to Sue. If prevailing party fee provisions already encouraged litigation, the Munras decision supercharges that incentive. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David McLain, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Mr. McLain may be contacted at mclain@hhmrlaw.com

    Snell & Wilmer Partner Jonathan Frank Named Winner of 2025 Connect CRE’s Lawyers in Real Estate Award

    January 13, 2026 —
    ORANGE COUNTY — Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that Orange County Partner Jonathan Frank has received the 2025 Connect CRE’s Lawyers in Real Estate Award, a distinction honoring attorneys who demonstrate excellence in commercial real estate law while making meaningful contributions to the industry and their communities. The award recognizes legal leaders whose expertise, vision, and dedication set them apart, reflecting a career marked by both professional achievement and civic impact. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer