BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    custom home expert witness Johnson County Arkansas hospital construction expert witness Johnson County Arkansas production housing expert witness Johnson County Arkansas low-income housing expert witness Johnson County Arkansas casino resort expert witness Johnson County Arkansas structural steel construction expert witness Johnson County Arkansas tract home expert witness Johnson County Arkansas condominium expert witness Johnson County Arkansas institutional building expert witness Johnson County Arkansas industrial building expert witness Johnson County Arkansas housing expert witness Johnson County Arkansas Subterranean parking expert witness Johnson County Arkansas custom homes expert witness Johnson County Arkansas townhome construction expert witness Johnson County Arkansas high-rise construction expert witness Johnson County Arkansas office building expert witness Johnson County Arkansas retail construction expert witness Johnson County Arkansas Medical building expert witness Johnson County Arkansas landscaping construction expert witness Johnson County Arkansas condominiums expert witness Johnson County Arkansas mid-rise construction expert witness Johnson County Arkansas parking structure expert witness Johnson County Arkansas
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Johnson County, Arkansas

    Arkansas Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB975: Requires that residential contractors be given notice and an opportunity to repair. Homeowners must provide 20 days notice in writing to builder prior to legal action to address defect and/or repair


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Johnson County Arkansas

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Cleburne County Home Builders Association
    Local # 0405
    PO Box 1325
    Heber Springs, AR 72543


    Greater Fort Smith Associated Home Builders
    Local # 0436
    5111 Rogers Ave Ste 531
    Fort Smith, AR 72903
    http://www.greaterfortsmithhomebuilders.com

    NE Arkansas Home Builders Association
    Local # 0432
    PO Box 17237
    Jonesboro, AR 72403
    http://www.neahba.org

    White County Home Builders Association
    Local # 0472
    PO Box 1501
    Searcy, AR 72143


    Crittenden County Home Builders Association
    Local # 0415
    PO Box 2204
    West Memphis, AR 72303


    Home Builders Association of Faulkner County
    Local # 0439
    PO Box 1228
    Conway, AR 72033
    http://www.faulknercountyhomebuilders.com

    Cabot Area Home Builders Association
    Local # 0420
    PO Box 1291
    Cabot, AR 72023
    http://www.cabotareahba.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Johnson County Arkansas

    Crane Firm Pulled Off NYC Projects Following Multiple Incidents

    California Court Invokes Equity to Stretch Anti-Subrogation Rule Principles

    Implied Warranty Claims–Not Just a Seller’s Risk: Builders Beware!

    Possible Real Estate and Use and Occupancy Tax Relief for Philadelphia Commercial and Industrial Property Owners

    Bad Faith Claim For Independent Contractor's Reduced Loss Assessment Survives Motion to Dismiss

    Is Solar the Next Focus of Construction Defect Suits?

    Relying Upon Improper Exclusion to Deny Coverage Allows Bad Faith Claim to Survive Summary Judgment

    How Long is Your Construction Warranty?

    A Lesson from the Criminal Courtroom to Construction Contractors About Videos and Photos

    Federal Court in New York Court Dismisses Civil Authority Claim for COVID-19 Coverage

    A Game of Texas Hold’em: How Texas Stopped Wage Increases for Salaried Exempt Employees Nationwide

    Haight Brown & Bonesteel Ranked on the 2017 "Best Law Firms" List by U.S. News - Best Lawyers

    DRCOG’s Findings on the Impact of Construction Defect Litigation Have Been Released (And the Results Should Not Surprise You)

    Texas Law Bars Coverage under Homeowner’s Policy for Mold Damage

    Haight’s Kristian Moriarty Selected for Super Lawyers’ 2021 Southern California Rising Stars

    Home Prices Beat Estimates With 0.8% Gain in November

    Negligent Construction an Occurrence Says Ninth Circuit

    The Texas Supreme Court Limits the Use of the Economic Loss Rule

    Quick Note: Steps to Protect and Avoid the “Misappropriation” of a “Trade Secret”

    N.J. Appellate Court Confirms that AIA Construction Contract Bars Insurer's Subrogation Claim

    State Supreme Court Cases Highlight Importance of Wording in Earth Movement Exclusions

    Exculpatory Provisions in Business Contracts

    Contractor Sues for $5.7M in Pay for Iowa Jail Project

    Extreme Rainfall Is Becoming More Frequent and Deadly

    Protecting and Perfecting Your Mechanics Lien when the Property Owner Files Bankruptcy

    Rhode Island Examines a Property Owner’s Intended Beneficiary Status and the Economic Loss Doctrine in the Context of a Construction Contract

    Illinois Favors Finding Construction Defects as an Occurrence

    Bridging Documents and Design-Build Warranties: Building Bridges to Avoid Pitfalls

    A General Contractor’s Guide to Additional Insured Coverage

    Illinois Attorney General Warns of Home Repair Scams

    Ownership and Licensing in Design Agreements

    2021 Executive Insights: Leaders in Construction Law

    2011 Worst Year Ever for Home Sales

    Federal Judge Rips Shady Procurement Practices at DRPA

    Industry Groups Decry Jan. 6 Riot; DOT Chief Chao Steps Down in Protest

    How to Survive the Insurance Claim Process Before It Starts –Five Tips to Keep Your Insurance Healthy

    A New Hope - You Now May Have Coverage for Punitive Damages in Connecticut

    Home Buyer May Be Third Party Beneficiary of Property Policy

    Edison Utility Accused of Igniting LA Fire in Lawsuits

    WSHB Secures Victory in Construction Defect Case: Contractor Wins Bench Trial

    Bertha – The Tunnel is Finished, but Her Legacy Continues

    Construction Defect Coverage Summary 2013: The Business Risks Shift To Insurers

    Avoid a Derailed Settlement in Construction

    Uniformity in Florida’s Construction Bond Laws Brings About Fairness for the Industry

    BWB&O’s LA Team Secures a Defense Victory for General Contractor Client in Riverside Superior Court!

    New World Cup Stadiums Failed at their First Trial

    Government Claiming Contract Is Void Ab Initio by Contractor Knowingly Making False Statements

    The Construction Project is Late—Allocation of Delay

    Discussion of the Discovery Rule and Tolling Statute of Limitations

    Wildfire Insurance Coverage Series, Part 2: Coverage for Smoke-Related Damages
    Corporate Profile

    JOHNSON COUNTY ARKANSAS CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through over four thousand construction related expert witness designations, the Johnson County, Arkansas Construction Expert Directory provides a streamlined multi-disciplinary expert retention and support solution to attorneys and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect, scheduling, and delay matters. BHA provides construction claims and trial support services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. In connection with in house assets comprising construction delay claims experts, registered design professionals, professional engineers, and credentailed construction consultants, the firm brings regional experience and local capabilities to Johnson County and the surrounding areas.

    Johnson County Arkansas architect expert witnessJohnson County Arkansas construction project management expert witnessesJohnson County Arkansas contractor expert witnessJohnson County Arkansas construction expertsJohnson County Arkansas delay claim expert witnessJohnson County Arkansas expert witness windowsJohnson County Arkansas building consultant expert
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Johnson County, Arkansas

    50 State Matrices | 2026 Edition

    March 03, 2026 —
    GRSM’s 50 State Legal Matrices provide a comprehensive, state-by-state snapshot of statutory law across all 50 U.S. states. Spanning critical areas such as indemnification, contractor licensing, labor standards, statute of limitations, and more, this resource enables businesses and counsel to quickly identify key legal requirements and variations across jurisdictions. Designed as a practical starting point rather than definitive legal advice, the Matrices help multi-state operators and attorneys navigate the complex patchwork of laws that can vary dramatically from one state to another. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    GRSM Attorneys Selected to 2025 Super Lawyers and Rising Stars Lists

    January 06, 2026 —
    Super Lawyers® has released its 2025 attorney lists across various regions of the United States. This year, 189 Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani attorneys have been selected, with 60 named to Super Lawyers and 129 named to Rising Stars. *For attorneys licensed to practice in New Jersey: No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey. Please visit the Super Lawyers Selection Process for a detailed description of the Super Lawyers and Rising Stars selection methodology. GRSM Super Lawyers 2025 Northern California Michael D. Bruno David C. Capell Lisa M. Cappelluti Dion N. Cominos Matthew S. Foy Natalie Fujikawa Marie Trimble Holvick Michael A. Laurenson Michael J. Pietrykowski Andrew I. Port Gina Stassi Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Forget Fifth Graders - Are You Smarter Than a CEO?

    December 02, 2025 —
    The Supreme Court of South Dakota says that (in certain circumstances) you need to be. That court wrangled with the evidentiary requirements for professional negligence and breach of contract claims arising from the construction of a clinical research facility in Brookings, South Dakota. The general contractor on the project alleged defects in the design and installation of the HVAC system and suspended ceiling, resulting in contamination and operational failures. The general contractor sued the architect, engineers, and contractors, asserting breach of contract and implied warranties. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Daniel Lund III, Phelps Dunbar
    Mr. Lund may be contacted at daniel.lund@phelps.com

    How to Properly Fill Out and Use the Conditional Waiver and Release on Progress Payment Form Used in California Construction

    December 15, 2025 —
    This is the first article in a series of four articles discussing how to properly fill out the four California construction releases described in California Civil Code 8132 – 8138. Let me start by noting that in addition to practicing construction law for more than 35 years, I chaired the committee of California construction attorneys who revised those sections of the California Civil Code dealing with this release form and many other construction forms as part of Senate Bill 189 in 2010. I also wrote the first version of this release form and made it free to the public well before the new law took effect in 2012. With this background, let me note a few things about the Conditional Waiver and Release on Progress Payment form to help you avoid mistakes that might prevent you from achieving the intended effect or the form or releasing claim rights to a greater extent than you intend. At the end of this article is a copy of the form itself which includes numbers coinciding with the instructions I will give below. A live electronically fillable version of the form is available on our firm’s website (www.porterlaw.com) under the “Forms” section. It is free and you can fill it out on your screen before printing it out and signing it. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of William L. Porter, Porter Law Group
    Mr. Porter may be contacted at bporter@porterlaw.com

    Arizona Court Enters $323 Million Judgment Against ZOM Living Following Unanimous Jury Verdict

    May 26, 2026 —
    PHOENIX, May 19, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- A Maricopa County court has entered a $323 million compensatory damages judgment in favor of Gray Development Group against ZOM Holding Inc., doing business as ZOM Living, following a 12-day trial, a unanimous jury verdict and post-trial proceedings related to a proposed business transaction. The jury found ZOM liable on claims of breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing stemming from a proposed joint venture tied to a planned pipeline of luxury multifamily and commercial projects in Phoenix and Scottsdale. The lawsuit centered on a 13-project, $1.4 billion development pipeline originated and planned by Gray Development Group over more than a decade. In 2019, Gray invited Florida-based ZOM to participate in a joint venture involving the completion of five projects, which would have marked ZOM's entry into the Arizona market. According to court findings presented at trial, the companies entered into a mutual confidentiality and non-circumvention agreement before Gray shared extensive sensitive and proprietary information related to the projects, including planning, market analysis, costs, financial data, local business relationships and operational strategies developed by Gray over decades in Arizona. Evidence presented during trial showed that over a 10-month period while under contract, ZOM made hundreds of requests for confidential project and market information before circumventing Gray and pursuing the projects independently, ultimately displacing Gray from projects it spent years planning and developing. ZOM Living, headquartered in Orlando, develops multifamily and senior housing communities across the United States and operates regional offices in Boston, Dallas, Fort Lauderdale, Nashville, Phoenix, and Raleigh. ZOM is owned by Timeless Investments, the Amsterdam-based family office of Dutch businessman Hans van Veggel, which acquired the company in 1997. About Gray Development Group Gray Development Group was founded by architect Bruce Gray in 1991. The Phoenix-based company was the top-ranked multifamily developer in Arizona for more than a decade. The company designed and developed more than 15,000 apartment and condominium units throughout metropolitan Phoenix. Two Gray-designed developments — a Tempe midrise and a San Diego high-rise — received National Apartment Community of the Year awards.

    Scope of Products Requiring Proposition 65 Warnings in California Poised to Grow

    February 23, 2026 —
    The scope of products to be drawn into the warning requirements under California’s Proposition 65 law may soon be growing. California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) requested information from the public on the reproductive toxicity of p,p’-bisphenol chemicals. OEHHA is the lead agency for the implementation of Proposition 65, formerly known as the Safe Drinking Water and Toxicity Enforcement Act of 1986. OEHHA’s request for information is a step toward regulators classifying all p,p’-bisphenol chemicals as reproductive toxicants under Proposition 65. California’s Proposition 65 Under Proposition 65, businesses are required to post clear and reasonable warnings before individuals are exposed to chemicals listed by the state of California as carcinogens or reproductive toxicants. To date, California has listed approximately 900 chemicals that fall under Proposition 65 regulation. Businesses may be held liable for up to $2,500 per violation per day. Proposition 65 can be enforced by public prosecutors (e.g., the California attorney general or district attorneys) or by private enforcers (known as “bounty hunters”). Reprinted courtesy of Brian M. Ledger, Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani and Chassen B. Palmer, Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Mr. Ledger may be contacted at bledger@grsm.com Mr. Palmer may be contacted at cbpalmer@grsm.com Read the full story...

    Collapse Claim Dismissed as Untimely

    January 26, 2026 —
    The insureds’ suit for coverage due to a collapse of their barn was dismissed while the bad faith against the insurer survived. Funaro v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 227346 (W. D. Pa. Nov 19, 2025). The insureds’ barn was insured by State Farm. The insureds alleged that the barn roof collapsed from the weight of snow, causing damage to the structure of the barn itself and the contents of the barn (including a custom French stove that the insureds alleged was worth between $90,000 and $100,000). Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Why Construction Tendering Needs Specialized Intelligence

    March 31, 2026 —
    The construction industry has never lacked data; it lacks usable intelligence at the moments that matter most. In the high-stakes phases of tendering and pre-construction, the industry still relies on manual “Control-F” searches through thousands of pages of unstructured documents. I recently spoke with Herman Smith, a civil engineer and former Chief Digital Officer at Multiconsult, who left the corporate world to solve this specific bottleneck. His startup, Volve, isn’t just another AI wrapper; it is a specialized “drill” designed to penetrate the complexity of construction documentation. The Paradox of Digitalization without a Productivity Boost For years, the AEC industry has faced a frustrating paradox: we have more digital tools than ever, yet productivity has not improved. Herman observed this from the inside, managing hundreds of unique software licenses while seeing companies struggle to adapt to new workflows. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi