BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    casino resort expert witness Leslie Arkansas condominiums expert witness Leslie Arkansas townhome construction expert witness Leslie Arkansas housing expert witness Leslie Arkansas landscaping construction expert witness Leslie Arkansas hospital construction expert witness Leslie Arkansas structural steel construction expert witness Leslie Arkansas custom homes expert witness Leslie Arkansas high-rise construction expert witness Leslie Arkansas Medical building expert witness Leslie Arkansas low-income housing expert witness Leslie Arkansas retail construction expert witness Leslie Arkansas industrial building expert witness Leslie Arkansas office building expert witness Leslie Arkansas tract home expert witness Leslie Arkansas concrete tilt-up expert witness Leslie Arkansas institutional building expert witness Leslie Arkansas production housing expert witness Leslie Arkansas custom home expert witness Leslie Arkansas condominium expert witness Leslie Arkansas multi family housing expert witness Leslie Arkansas parking structure expert witness Leslie Arkansas
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Leslie, Arkansas

    Arkansas Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB975: Requires that residential contractors be given notice and an opportunity to repair. Homeowners must provide 20 days notice in writing to builder prior to legal action to address defect and/or repair


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Leslie Arkansas

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    NE Arkansas Home Builders Association
    Local # 0432
    PO Box 17237
    Jonesboro, AR 72403
    http://www.neahba.org

    Cleburne County Home Builders Association
    Local # 0405
    PO Box 1325
    Heber Springs, AR 72543


    Northwest Arkansas Home Builders Association
    Local # 0424
    2022 Long Ave Ste C
    Springdale, AR 72764
    http://www.nwabuilders.com

    North Central Arkansas Chapter
    Local # 0438
    PO Box 550
    Harrison, AR 72602
    http://www.buildwithapro.com

    Greater Fort Smith Associated Home Builders
    Local # 0436
    5111 Rogers Ave Ste 531
    Fort Smith, AR 72903
    http://www.greaterfortsmithhomebuilders.com

    Carroll County Home Builders Association
    Local # 0412
    908 W. Trimble
    Berryville, AR 72616


    Twin Lakes Home Builders Association
    Local # 0448
    1520 Hwy 62 East
    Mountain Home, AR 72653
    http://www.twinlakeshomebuilders.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Leslie Arkansas

    Housing Affordability Down

    A Property Tax Exemption, Misapplied, in Texas

    Under the Hood of U.S. Construction Spending Is Revised Data

    So You Want to Build a Safety Plan

    Construction Resumes after Defects

    Summary Judgment Granted to Insurer for Hurricane Damage

    A Permitting Base Checklist for Data Centers and Power Plants

    Colorado Federal Court Confirms Consequetial Property Damage, But Finds No Coverage for Subcontractor

    Judge Halts Sale of Brazilian Plywood

    Nine ACS Lawyers Recognized by Best Lawyers®

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (3/19/25) – Data Center REITs, AI-Based Tools and CHIPS on the Chopping Block

    More Details Emerge in Fatal Charlotte, NC, Scaffold Collapse

    Carolinas Storm Damage Tally Impeded by Lingering Floods

    Traub Lieberman Partner Greg Pennington and Associate Kevin Sullivan Win Summary Judgment Dismissing Homeowner’s Claim that Presented an Issue of First Impression in New Jersey

    BWB&O is Recognized in the 2024 Edition of Best Law Firms®!

    Athletic Trainers Help Workers Get Back to the Jobsite and Stay Healthy After Injury

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Win Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings In Favor of Insurer

    Colorado Legislature Kills SB 20-138 – A Bill to Extend Colorado’s Statute of Repose

    When Delays Cost More Than Time: Understanding Consequential Damages

    Pulte’s Kitchen Innovation Throw Down

    Leonard Fadeeff v. State Farm General Insurance Company

    Smart Construction and the Future of the Construction Industry

    The Status of OSHA’s Impending Heat Stress Standard

    Conspirators Bilked Homeowners in Nevada Construction Defect Claims

    CARB Issues Proposed Climate Disclosure Regulations

    Don’t Believe Everything You Hear: Liability of Asbestos Pipe Manufacturer Upheld Despite Exculpatory Testimony of Plaintiff

    New Jersey Law Firm Sued for Malpractice in Construction Defect Litigation

    Read Before You Sign: Claim Waivers in Project Documents

    U.S. Homeownership Rate Rises for First Time in Two Years

    The Show Must Go On: Shuttered Venues Operators Grant Provides Lifeline for Live Music and Theater Venues

    Library to Open with Roof Defect Lawsuit Pending

    Virginia Joins California and Nevada in Passing its Consumer Privacy Act

    Gain in Home Building Points to Sustained U.S. Growth

    Construction Law Firm Opens in D.C.

    Are COVID-19 Claims Covered by Builders Risk Insurance Policies?

    Adjuster's Report No Substitute for Proof of Loss Under Flood Policy

    Contract Change # 10: Differing Site Conditions (law note)

    US Appeals Court Halts OSHA Vaccine Mandate, Unclear How Long

    DC Circuit Issues Two Important Clean Air Act and Administrative Law Decisions

    Appeal of an Attorney Disqualification Order Results in Partial Automatic Stay of Trial Court Proceedings

    Feds OK $9B Houston Highway Project After Two-Year Pause

    Just Because You Can, Doesn’t Mean You Should. The “Retained Control” Exception to the Privette Doctrine

    Congratulations to Haight Attorneys Selected to the 2021 Southern California Super Lawyers List

    Disputed Facts on Cause of Collapse Results in Denied Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment

    Oracle's $16B Michigan Data Center Secures Financing as Power Contracts Face Appeals

    Corps Spells Out Billions in Infrastructure Act Allocations

    Farewell Capsule Tower, Tokyo’s Oddest Building

    Cal/OSHA ETS: Newest Version Effective Today

    Terminating the Notice of Commencement (with a Notice of Termination)

    COVID-19 and Mutual Responsibility Clauses
    Corporate Profile

    LESLIE ARKANSAS CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    With over 4500 construction, architectural, and engineering related expert designations, the Leslie, Arkansas Construction Expert Directory provides a wide range of trial support and construction consulting services to attorneys and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides building related trial support and expert consulting services to the industry's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, insurers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing in house resources which include construction delay claims experts, registered design professionals, professional engineers, and credentailed construction consultants, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Leslie and the surrounding areas.

    Leslie Arkansas construction expertsLeslie Arkansas construction forensic expert witnessLeslie Arkansas fenestration expert witnessLeslie Arkansas construction claims expert witnessLeslie Arkansas expert witness concrete failureLeslie Arkansas testifying construction expert witnessLeslie Arkansas construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Leslie, Arkansas

    Scope of Products Requiring Proposition 65 Warnings in California Poised to Grow

    February 23, 2026 —
    The scope of products to be drawn into the warning requirements under California’s Proposition 65 law may soon be growing. California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) requested information from the public on the reproductive toxicity of p,p’-bisphenol chemicals. OEHHA is the lead agency for the implementation of Proposition 65, formerly known as the Safe Drinking Water and Toxicity Enforcement Act of 1986. OEHHA’s request for information is a step toward regulators classifying all p,p’-bisphenol chemicals as reproductive toxicants under Proposition 65. California’s Proposition 65 Under Proposition 65, businesses are required to post clear and reasonable warnings before individuals are exposed to chemicals listed by the state of California as carcinogens or reproductive toxicants. To date, California has listed approximately 900 chemicals that fall under Proposition 65 regulation. Businesses may be held liable for up to $2,500 per violation per day. Proposition 65 can be enforced by public prosecutors (e.g., the California attorney general or district attorneys) or by private enforcers (known as “bounty hunters”). Reprinted courtesy of Brian M. Ledger, Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani and Chassen B. Palmer, Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Mr. Ledger may be contacted at bledger@grsm.com Mr. Palmer may be contacted at cbpalmer@grsm.com Read the full story...

    Leaders in Dispute Resolution Need to Make Unbiased Decisions for Mediation to Succeed

    March 31, 2026 —
    As a mediator helping to settle construction disputes and as an arbitrator deciding outcomes of these disputes, I found certain lessons to be especially helpful after graduating last summer from the Executive Education program at Harvard Kennedy School (HKS). The exceptional HKS curriculum included courses focused on negotiation strategies for multiparty disputes, decisive leadership during crisis, and human behavior affecting dispute resolution. In particular, our HKS class debated the impact of cognitive bias in dispute resolution, and we studied a central theme that decision-making is universally scientific. That is, parties making decisions in dispute resolution exhibit and rely upon empirical factors that good mediators and decision makers should appreciate and understand. Bias, for example, can cause key players to discount persuasive witnesses, admissible evidence, and reliable expert opinions that influence the outcome of a construction dispute. Biased decision makers may also choose to withhold key information from the mediator, as though doing so will help rather than hurt what is supposed to be an objective and diplomatic process. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Rick G. Erickson, Snell & Wilmer
    Mr. Erickson may be contacted at rerickson@swlaw.com

    Four Kahana Feld Attorneys Selected to 2026 Southern California Super Lawyers List

    March 03, 2026 —
    IRVINE, CA – Feb. 20, 2026 – Kahana Feld is pleased to announce that partners Jason Feld, Amir Kahana, Sharon Oh-Kubisch, and Manuel Ugarte were selected to the 2026 Southern California Super Lawyers® list. Jason Feld is a founding partner of Kahana Feld. He focuses his practice on the defense of homebuilders, contractors, developers, and real estate professionals primarily in construction defect, general liability, insurance defense, construction accident, and real estate matters. He also represents government entities handling construction, premises liability, general liability, and environmental claims. He serves as panel counsel for many prominent insurance carriers, as well as personal counsel to several national and regional homebuilders, developers, and general contractors. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Kahana Feld

    The Firm Turns 16!

    July 20, 2026 —
    I have always found it appropriate that my jump to solo practice and Independence Day are so close in time. Today marks the 16th anniversary of my first day as a solo practitioner of construction law at The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill, PC. Time sure has flown by thanks to the great clients and friends who followed me to solo practice and whom I have met since the firm’s founding on July 1, 2010. I also could not have made the transition and had the fun and success I have enjoyed over the past 16 years without the support of the best wife and family that any construction lawyer could want. Since the firm’s last anniversary, my youngest child (who was 7 when this journey began!) has graduated from N. C. State University with a fisheries and wildlife biology degree and is currently in Casper, Wyoming working for Wyoming Game & Fish, my second oldest is an assistant director of admissions at Appalachian State University in Boone, NC, and has celebrated his second wedding anniversary, and my oldest has celebrated her fifth marriage anniversary. Our home in Captiva, Florida continues its recovery from from Hurricane Ian and subsequent hurricanes. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill

    The Seventh Circuit Rejects Navigators Insurance Company’s Attempt to Escape Additional Insured Coverage For a Gas Explosion

    March 24, 2026 —
    In a recent Seventh Circuit decision, Atlanta Gas Light Company v. Navigators Insurance Company, the court addressed a theme that policyholders are often confronted with by insurers[1] – insurers disputing additional insured coverage where the named insured is not named in the underlying action. The court aptly rejected this position since it was undisputed that the bodily injuries alleged in the underlying lawsuits were due to a gas explosion that was “caused, in whole or in part, by” the named insured’s acts or omissions. I. Background The additional insureds, Atlanta Gas Light Company and Southern Company Gas (collectively, “AGL”), retained the named insured, United States Infrastructure Corporation (“USIC”), to locate and mark gas lines that AGL owned in Georgia. USIC failed to mark a certain gas line, which was later struck by a boring company, leading to an explosion that injured three people. Reprinted courtesy of Kyle A. Rudolph, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. and Anna M. Perry, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. Mr. Rudolph may be contacted at KRudolph@sdvlaw.com Ms. Perry may be contacted at APerry@sdvlaw.com Read the full story...

    New York Amends Prompt Payment Act: Retainage Above 5% in Private Construction Contracts Now Void

    February 10, 2026 —
    In 2023 New York overhauled its Prompt Payment Act. The 2023 amendments, largely aimed at restricting the amount of retainage that can be withheld on private projects, were unclear about whether parties could contract around the statute, as they can with other provisions of the statute. The State Legislature recently clarified that issue. On December 19, 2025, New York enacted a new law, tightening the State’s Prompt Payment Act retainage laws by amending the Prompt Payment Act under General Business Law § 757. Under § 757, the new law renders void any contract provision in private construction contracts that requires retainage in excess of 5% of the total contract sum, meaning owners cannot hold more than 5% from their prime contractors and prime contractors cannot hold more than 5% from their subcontractors. Reprinted courtesy of Mark A. Snyder, Peckar & Abramson, P.C., Levi W. Barrett, Peckar & Abramson, P.C., Patrick T. Murray, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Skyler L. Santomartino, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Snyder may be contacted at msnyder@pecklaw.com Mr. Barrett may be contacted at lbarrett@pecklaw.com Mr. Murray may be contacted at pmurray@pecklaw.com Mr. Santomartino may be contacted at ssantomartino@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Brenda Radmacher Authors Chapter in ABA Publication on Construction Delays

    May 26, 2026 —
    Brenda Radmacher, a partner in Seyfarth’s Construction Law practice and a mediator and arbitrator serving on the American Arbitration Association’s panels, is among the contributing authors to the American Bar Association’s forthcoming guide on construction disputes: Time – The Legal Implications of Project Delay in Construction. Drawing on three decades of experience, Radmacher authors Chapter 8, Contractor Delay Damages, offering practical insight into one of the most contested issues in construction litigation and arbitration. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Brenda Radmacher, Seyfarth Shaw LLP

    Structuring Water Resilience for Data Center Development: Water Rights, Reuse Incentives, and Emerging Disclosure Risk

    March 10, 2026 —
    As AI-driven data center development accelerates, developers, communities and regulators are increasingly focused on water demand—both the volume required and the sources from which that water will be drawn. While industry attention has largely centered on electricity procurement and grid impacts, the availability and legal entitlement to a firm water supply has become equally material to siting, permitting and community acceptance. Particularly as surface and groundwater supplies become increasingly constrained and new projects are sited in regions experiencing tighter hydrologic conditions or growth-related supply constraints, project teams are increasingly integrating water supply analysis into early-stage development to address issues that can materially affect schedule, financing and long-term operations. Reprinted courtesy of Ashleigh Myers, Pillsbury, Jillian Marullo, Pillsbury and Jason Drogin Atwood, Pillsbury Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Marullo may be contacted at jillian.marullo@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Atwood may be contacted at jason.atwood@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...