BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    Medical building expert witness London Arkansas Subterranean parking expert witness London Arkansas office building expert witness London Arkansas parking structure expert witness London Arkansas retail construction expert witness London Arkansas townhome construction expert witness London Arkansas hospital construction expert witness London Arkansas concrete tilt-up expert witness London Arkansas production housing expert witness London Arkansas industrial building expert witness London Arkansas institutional building expert witness London Arkansas multi family housing expert witness London Arkansas condominium expert witness London Arkansas custom home expert witness London Arkansas mid-rise construction expert witness London Arkansas custom homes expert witness London Arkansas landscaping construction expert witness London Arkansas condominiums expert witness London Arkansas high-rise construction expert witness London Arkansas housing expert witness London Arkansas casino resort expert witness London Arkansas low-income housing expert witness London Arkansas
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    London, Arkansas

    Arkansas Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB975: Requires that residential contractors be given notice and an opportunity to repair. Homeowners must provide 20 days notice in writing to builder prior to legal action to address defect and/or repair


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines London Arkansas

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Greater Fort Smith Associated Home Builders
    Local # 0436
    5111 Rogers Ave Ste 531
    Fort Smith, AR 72903
    http://www.greaterfortsmithhomebuilders.com

    Cleburne County Home Builders Association
    Local # 0405
    PO Box 1325
    Heber Springs, AR 72543


    White County Home Builders Association
    Local # 0472
    PO Box 1501
    Searcy, AR 72143


    Crittenden County Home Builders Association
    Local # 0415
    PO Box 2204
    West Memphis, AR 72303


    Home Builders Association of Faulkner County
    Local # 0439
    PO Box 1228
    Conway, AR 72033
    http://www.faulknercountyhomebuilders.com

    Cabot Area Home Builders Association
    Local # 0420
    PO Box 1291
    Cabot, AR 72023
    http://www.cabotareahba.com

    NE Arkansas Home Builders Association
    Local # 0432
    PO Box 17237
    Jonesboro, AR 72403
    http://www.neahba.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For London Arkansas

    Lien Claimant’s Right to Execute against Bond Upheld in Court of Appeals

    New York Court Rules on Architect's Duty Under Contract and Tort Principles

    Contractor May Be Barred Until Construction Lawsuit Settled

    Foundation Arbitration Doesn’t Preclude Suing Over Cracks

    Traub Lieberman Elects New Partners for 2020

    California Joins the Majority of States in Modifying Its Survival Action Statute To Now Permit Recovery for Pain, Suffering And Disfigurement

    Competition to Design Washington D.C.’s 11th Street Bridge Park

    The EPA and the Corps of Engineers Propose Another Revised Definition of “Waters of the United States”

    Broker's Motion for Summary Judgment on Negligence Claim Denied

    Differences in Types of Damages Matter

    North Carolina Federal Court Holds “Hazardous Materials” Exclusion Does Not Bar Duty to Defend Under CGL Policy for Bodily Injury Claims Arising Out of Direct Exposure to PFAs

    New Pedestrian, Utility Bridge Takes Shape on Everett Waterfront

    Canada’s Largest Homebuilder Sets U.S. Growth Plan

    “Genuine” Issue of “Material” Fact and Summary Judgments

    California Insurance Commissioner Lacks Authority to Regulate Formula for Estimating Replacement Cost Value

    Missouri Asbestos Litigation Reform: New Bill Seeks to Establish Robust Disclosure Obligations

    Court Finds That $400 Million Paid Into Abatement Fund Qualifies as “Damages” Under the Insured’s Policies

    How Long Does a Civil Lawsuit Take?

    Overview of New Mexico Construction Law

    Luxury Villa Fraudsters Jailed for Madeira Potato Field Scam

    “License and Registration, Please.” The Big Risk of Getting Busted for Working without a Proper Contractor’s License

    Exploring the Future of Robotic Construction with Dr. Thomas Bock

    Expired Contract Not Revived Due to Sovereign Immunity and the Ex Contractu Clause

    U.S. Home Lending Set to Bounce Back in 2015 After Slump

    Sometimes a Reminder is in Order. . .

    Contractor Haunted by “Demonized” Flooring

    No Alerts Heard in Deadly Texas Flash Flood as 161 Still Missing

    Preserving your Rights to Secure Payment on Construction Projects (with Examples)

    Saving Manhattan: Agencies, Consultants, Contractors Join Fight to Keep New York City Above Water

    Breaking Ground On New California Public Works Prevailing Wage Requirements

    “Bound by the Bond”

    Drastic Rebuild Resurrects Graves' Landmark Portland Building

    Deck Police - The New Mandate for HOA's Takes Safety to the Next Level

    2026 Colorado Super Lawyers Recognizes 11 Snell & Wilmer Attorneys

    Vermont Supreme Court Reverses, Finding No Coverage for Collapse

    Distressed Home Sales Shrinking

    The Death of Retail and Legal Issues

    Why Death Follows Faulty Edge Fall Protection–And How to Fix It

    How Drones are Speeding Up Construction

    “Wait! Do You Have All Your Ducks in a Row?” Filing of a Certificate of Merit in Conjunction With a Complaint

    President Trump Issued Two New EOs on Energy Infrastructure and Federal Energy Policy

    Gene Witkin Celebrates First Anniversary as Member of Ross Hart’s Mediation Team

    TV Kitchen Remodelers Sued for Shoddy Work

    Arbitration—No Opportunity for Appeal

    Surfside Condo Collapse Investigators Have Nearly Finished Technical Work

    Coverage for Collapse Ordered on Summary Judgment

    “It’s My Retainage and I Want It Now!” - Fundamentals to Requirements and Entitlement for Retainage

    EPA Expands PFAS Reporting Requirements with Addition of New Chemical to Toxics Release Inventory, Published by Law360

    Agreement Authorizing Party’s Own Engineer to Determine Substantial Compliance Found Binding on Adverse Party

    Not so Fast – Florida’s Legislature Overrules Gindel’s Pre-Suit Notice/Tolling Decision Related to the Construction Defect Statute of Repose
    Corporate Profile

    LONDON ARKANSAS CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    With over 4500 building and construction related expert designations, the London, Arkansas Construction Expert Directory provides a single point of reference for construction defect and claims related support to builders, risk managers, and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect, scheduling, and delay claims. BHA provides building claims investigation, testimony, and support services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Employing in house assets which include licensed general and specialty contractors, consulting civil engineers, NCARB certified architects, roofing, and building envelope experts, the construction experts group brings national experience and local capabilities to London and the surrounding areas.

    London Arkansas fenestration expert witnessLondon Arkansas ada design expert witnessLondon Arkansas expert witness commercial buildingsLondon Arkansas construction defect expert witnessLondon Arkansas construction claims expert witnessLondon Arkansas architectural expert witnessLondon Arkansas construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    London, Arkansas

    2026 Colorado Super Lawyers Recognizes 11 Snell & Wilmer Attorneys

    May 05, 2026 —
    DENVER – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that eleven attorneys in its Denver office have been selected for inclusion in the 2026 Colorado Super Lawyers publication. Of those eleven, four were recognized as Rising Stars. Super Lawyers is a listing of lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement. The selection process is multi-phased and includes independent research, peer nominations, and peer evaluations. The final published list represents no more than 5 percent of the lawyers in the state. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer

    Massachusetts Settlement Targets Mortgage-Backed “Homeowner Benefit” Agreements

    April 08, 2026 —
    On March 11, Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell announced a consent order with a real estate-related lender’s subsidiary, and affiliated individuals resolving allegations that the company violated the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act by deceptively marketing mortgage-backed “Homeowner Benefit Agreements” to financially struggling homeowners. According to the complaint, the company offered homeowners relatively small upfront cash payments, typically less than $1,500, in exchange for a 40-year exclusive right to act as the listing broker if the homeowner later sold the property. The Attorney General alleged that the agreements also triggered substantial payment obligations upon other transfers, including death or foreclosure, and that the transactions were secured by recorded mortgages that could interfere with refinancing, home-equity access, or the ability to sell the home. The complaint further alleged that the company marketed the product to vulnerable consumers searching for loans or public benefits while obscuring the true nature of the transaction. Reprinted courtesy of A.J. S. Dhaliwal, Sheppard, Mehul N. Madia, Sheppard and Maxwell Earp-Thomas, Sheppard Mr. Dhaliwal may be contacted at adhaliwal@sheppard.com Mr. Madia may be contacted at mmadia@sheppard.com Mr. Earp-Thomas may be contacted at mearp-thomas@sheppard.com Read the full story...

    Wisconsin Supreme Court Finds Coverage Under Ensuing Loss Provisions

    September 29, 2026 —
    Reversing the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to the insurer, the Wisconsin Supreme Court determined that genuine issues of material fact existed on whether ensuing losses as defined in the policy were covered. Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. Ropicky, 2026 Wisc. LEXIS 302 (Wis. July 7, 2026). The insured suffered damage during a storm on May 11, 2018, when rainwater poured into the home. The insureds gave notice to their insurer, Cincinnati. Upon inspection, Cincinnati determined that water intrusion resulted from multiple construction defects in the home. In the front of the home, water entered through a gap in the stone veneer. The inspector also concluded that the damage from rainwater was not just from the May 11, 2018, storm, but damage had occurred from prior storm events. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    We’re Burning Tokens to Clean Up Bad PDFs

    August 24, 2026 —
    Last Thursday, researchers from Tampere and Aalto universities reported on preliminary results of two AI- and digitalization-related projects. One project demonstrated how AI can automate the Bill of Materials process; the other tried to quantify the impact of data-driven construction and AI. The conclusion was that AI-powered automation can dramatically increase productivity, but unevenly. However, the substantial benefits may come from better outcomes rather than project efficiency. Various standards, company-specific practices, project-specific schemas, and traditions are designed for humans to comprehend. 2D drawings and text documents as PDF files, Excel sheets, and design and planning software have the information, but not the data in ideal form for automation. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Your AEC Firm Has a Memory Problem. Here Is How to Fix It

    June 01, 2026 —
    AEC companies trying to operationalize AI often find they lack the data foundation on which to build. There may be an abundance of data hidden in documents, but you can’t reliably use it for AI. The lack of data quality was a key topic discussed at the AI in AEC 2026 conference. During the event, I met many experts working to solve this problem, including Pavlina Nikolova, Egnyte‘s EMEA AEC Practice Lead. The chat and her presentation highlighted the challenges and ways to overcome them. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Water Reuse Emerges as a Critical Strategy for Data Center Development

    June 22, 2026 —
    As demand for data centers continues to accelerate, water availability is emerging as a critical factor in project development and long-term operations. Although power supply and transmission access have historically dominated siting discussions, increasing water constraints in many regions are placing greater focus on the substantial volumes of water required to support data center cooling systems. As we covered previously, data centers are frequently located in areas already experiencing water stress and require substantial volumes of water to operate—roughly 228 billion gallons in 2023 in the United States alone—with water use projected to increase by up to 170% by 2030. Alternative cooling options, such as free-air cooling or mechanical chillers, can reduce direct water consumption but introduce their own tradeoffs. Free-air cooling is climate-dependent and often ineffective in hotter regions, while mechanical chillers increase energy demand, potentially shifting water consumption upstream through increased electricity generation. Reprinted courtesy of Ashleigh Myers, Pillsbury, Jillian Marullo, Pillsbury and Jason Drogin Atwood, Pillsbury Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Marullo may be contacted at jillian.marullo@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Atwood may be contacted at jason.atwood@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Ninth Circuit Holds That Policies Covering Environmental Claims Do Not Have Aggregate Limits

    May 12, 2026 —
    In the case of County of San Bernardino v. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, the Ninth Circuit recently addressed the issue of whether general liability policies issued in the 1960s and 1970s included aggregate limits for claims arising under the premises-operations coverage in CGL policies. The difference between the policyholder’s interpretation of the policies’ limits clauses and the insurer’s interpretation was worth hundreds of millions of dollars in exposure for the insurer. The Court closely examined the policy language and extrinsic evidence from both the insurance industry’s drafting history and the parties before concluding that the policies were ambiguous. The Court construed that ambiguity in favor of the policyholder and ruled that aggregate limits did not apply to the claims at issue. The Court’s decision underscores the importance of carefully examining a policy’s limits, especially for older policies written before 1986 when the insurance industry revised the standard-form CGL policy to state the aggregate limits apply not only to products liability claims but to premises-operations claims as well. Decades of insurance industry drafting history confirms, as the policyholder’s submissions in this case indicate, that the industry well understood that operations claims like the environmental waste-disposal claims at issue here typically were not subject to aggregate limits. Reprinted courtesy of Lorelie S. Masters, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Joseph T. Niczky, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Ms. Masters may be contacted at lmasters@hunton.com Mr. Niczky may be contacted at jniczky@hunton.com Read the full story...

    Endorsement is Void Where Compliance is Impossible

    September 21, 2026 —
    The Sixth Circuit found that the insured’s loss of property due to fire was covered despite noncompliance with an endorsement requiring encompassing the property. 3371 Reading, LLC v. Liberty Mut Group, Inc., et al., 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 19156 (6th Cir. June 29, 2026). The insured, 3371 Reading, owned a building undergoing renovation. After the structure burned down, 3371 Reading made a claim under its policy with Ohio Casualty Insurance Company. Ohio Casualty relied on an endorsement requiring fencing round the jobsite. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com