Arizona Supreme Court Clarifies Parties’ Post-Default Conduct Cannot Validate Void Default Orders
August 24, 2026 —
Joseph Kanefield, Ryan P. Hogan & Lilly M. Geiler - Snell & WilmerAfter filing a lawsuit, the first step is always serving process on the opposing party. While that preliminary step sounds basic enough, in McMahan v. Grasshopper, the Arizona Supreme Court recently provided a helpful refresher on the nuances of the service requirement and its importance in litigation for plaintiffs and defendants alike.1
Background
McMahan arose from a hit-and-run where a tractor-trailer collided with safety barricades and injured a construction worker. The construction worker sued the tractor-trailer company, and he attempted to serve the company by leaving a copy of the complaint with the assistant to the company’s statutory agent who forwarded the complaint to the company. The assistant, however, was not authorized to accept service on the company’s behalf. Before the company appeared in the action, the construction worker successfully obtained an entry of default.
Reprinted courtesy of
Joseph Kanefield, Snell & Wilmer,
Ryan P. Hogan, Snell & Wilmer and
Lilly M. Geiler, Snell & Wilmer
Mr. Kanefield may be contacted at jkanefield@swlaw.com
Mr. Hogan may be contacted at rhogan@swlaw.com
Ms. Geiler may be contacted at lgeiler@swlaw.com
Read the full story...
White and Williams LLP Ranked in the Chambers USA 2026 Guide
June 15, 2026 —
White and Williams LLPWhite and Williams LLP is proud to celebrate the Chambers USA 2026 Guide which has ranked several of the Firm's attorneys and practice groups, underscoring the Firm's overall commitment to providing client service excellence.
The Chambers USA 2026 Guide recognized attorneys Tim Davis, Managing Partner, and Nancy Frantz, Chair of the Real Estate Group, for Real Estate: Finance in the state of Pennsylvania. Randy Maniloff, Partner, Patricia Santelle, Chair Emeritus/Former Managing Partner, and Robert Walsh, Partner were ranked for Insurance in Pennsylvania, and Thomas Pinney, Partner, was ranked in Pennsylvania for Bankruptcy/Restructuring. In the state of Maryland, Partners David Gilliss and Eric Korphage were recognized for their work in Construction.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
White and Williams LLP
Lewis Brisbois Partner and National Trial Team Member Ian B. Lane Elected President of ABOTA’s Southern New York Chapter
October 20, 2026 —
Lewis BrisboisLewis Brisbois is pleased to announce that New York Partner Ian B. Lane, a member of the firm’s National Trial Team, has been elected president of the Southern New York Chapter of the American Board of Trial Advocates (ABOTA) for the 2027-2028 term. In this role, Mr. Lane will help lead the organization's efforts to promote excellence in trial advocacy, to foster professionalism within the legal profession, and to advance the chapter's educational, professional, and public service initiatives. Lewis Brisbois has nearly 40 ABOTA members across the country.
"I am deeply honored by the confidence my colleagues have placed in me," said Mr. Lane. "ABOTA plays a vital role in preserving the right to trial by jury and promoting the highest standards of professionalism, civility, and advocacy. I look forward to working with our members to advance those goals, support the development of the next generation of trial lawyers, and strengthen the important role of the civil justice system."
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Lewis Brisbois
Lost in Translation: AEC Tech’s Missing Role
May 12, 2026 —
Aarni Heiskanen - AEC BusinessI once visited a construction site where the contractor’s headquarters had commissioned a tech company to build an on-site quality-inspection application. The developer had admitted to the site engineer that they had never set foot on a construction site before. The engineer showed me what he was actually using: his own phone camera and an Excel sheet. The new app did not map to how work actually happened on site.
This is not an isolated story. The vendor builds something technically coherent but operationally disconnected. The client, somewhere up the chain, had fallen in love with the idea of the solution before anyone had built an honest business case for it.
The result is a tool that gets demonstrated at a board meeting but isn’t used in the field.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Aarni Heiskanen, AEC BusinessMr. Heiskanen may be contacted at
aec-business@aepartners.fi
The Most Expensive Signature to Not Get: Why Change Orders Matter
August 16, 2026 —
Kathryne E. Baldwin - Wilke FleuryGeorge Bernard Shaw has a quote we use a lot in my family: “The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place.” This is pertinent to contractors and homeowners alike because the cost of failing to get proper signatures on documents like construction contracts, and particularly, change orders, is heavy. Both contractors and homeowners are in the same boat as far as wanting to complete a job as swiftly as possible: contractors go on to their next job and homeowners can return to peace in their home. This is prime territory for either party to suggest the work be completed today and the contract or change order executed tomorrow, or even later. However, without a contract, there is no memorialization of the communication between the parties, which can lead to confusion and missed expectations on both sides.
Construction plans are rarely as neat and tidy as they originally seem to be. A contractor may uncover unforeseen conditions, an owner may request additional work or changes that require additional work, or weather interferes with project schedules or the work itself. Unfortunately, the signature that never gets collected can become one of the most expensive omissions on a project – for both sides.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Kathryne E. Baldwin, Wilke FleuryMs. Baldwin may be contacted at
kbaldwin@wilkefleury.com
White and Williams LLP Secures Trio of Cyber Coverage Wins
May 12, 2026 —
Gabriel Darwick & Sean Elman - White and Williams LLPThree weeks, three jurisdictions, three cyber wins.
White and Williams picked up the first victory on March 9, 2026, in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, where the court granted summary judgment to their client enforcing a Cyber Crime Loss sublimit. See Perry & Perry Builders, Inc. v. Cowbell Cyber and Obsidian Specialty Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49409 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 9, 2026). In Perry, the insured was deceived into transferring money intended for a vendor to an unintended third party. The insurer acknowledged that the loss was covered and paid the insured the policy’s Cyber Crime Loss sublimit. Discontent with a single sublimit, the insured argued that because it wired the money to the fraudster in separate transfers, it was entitled to a second Cyber Crime Loss sublimit.
Reprinted courtesy of
Gabriel Darwick, White and Williams LLP and
Sean Elman, White and Williams LLP
Mr. Darwick may be contacted at darwickg@whiteandwilliams.com
Mr. Elman may be contacted at elmans@whiteandwilliams.com
Read the full story...
Meaningful Change to Contractors License Law Disgorgement Rule of Business and Professions Code Section 7031
November 02, 2026 —
Garret Mandel - Porter Law GroupCalifornia Business and Professions Code section 7031 has historically imposed a severe and unforgiving penalty on any licensed contractor or subcontractor (“licensee”) performing any construction work after its contractor’s license becomes suspended or is revoked. The penalty for many years has been a prohibition against the licensee bringing an action to collect payment owed and a draconian penalty allowing the party who paid the licensee to recover, or cause the licensee to “disgorge,” any payment the licensee received for the entire contract. This strict penalty could apply to funds received for the entire contract even when the license was suspended or revoked for only a short period of time during the project. This meant, for example, that a licensee who was paid $10 million under a contract for a project that took a year to build could have to disgorge the entire $10 million it received under that contract as a result of performing work while its license was suspended for only a week of the entire project duration. Draconian indeed. A limited statutory substantial-compliance exemption could provide relief, but it requires a court determination that the statutory conditions have been met.
Beginning on January 1, 2027, the licensee will be thrown a lifeline on this issue. Under California Senate Bill 342, becoming effective on January 1, 2027, California contractors on qualifying projects will no longer face the same severe penalties – but there are limitations.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Garret Mandel, Porter Law GroupMr. Mandel may be contacted at
gmandel@porterlaw.com
Beyond the Storm: How Non-Hurricane Catastrophes Expose Florida’s Construction Defect Blind Spot
August 11, 2026 —
Franchesco “Frank” Soto & Amanda L. Gonzalez - Ball JanikOn June 8, 2026, a magnitude 6.1 earthquake struck the Gulf near the coast of Cuba, the largest instrumentally recorded earthquake in the Gulf since seismic monitoring began in 1950. Buildings swayed, offices were evacuated, and many residents along the east coast of Florida, from Miami-Dade to Jacksonville, felt the ground shake. Although no tsunami followed and reported structural damage was limited, this event exposed a blind spot that Florida property owners, developers, and their counsel cannot afford to ignore: catastrophic stress on Florida buildings does not always come in the form of a named storm.
Florida property owners have grown accustomed to preparing for wind, storm surge, floods, and torrential rain. Far less attention is paid to earthquakes, sinkholes, tornadoes, hail, and non-tropical flooding, each of which can place unexpected stress on buildings not designed with those forces top of mind and can trigger deficiencies in buildings that were not otherwise known, expose design failures, and create an urgency for both insurance claims and subsequent litigation.
Non-Hurricane Triggers of Latent Defects
Seismic activity is the clearest example. Florida’s building code accounts for wind loads, not seismic forces, meaning even a moderate earthquake can reveal weaknesses in curtain wall systems, structural connections, or foundations that were already marginal. Sinkholes, driven by Florida’s karst limestone geology, remain a persistent threat, particularly in Central Florida, where subsurface voids can undermine foundations without warning. Non-tropical flooding, like the record rainfall that flooded South Florida in June 2024, can intrude through building envelopes and waterproofing systems that were never stress-tested for such volumes of water. Tornadoes and hail, while more localized, can cause roofing and envelope failures that mimic, mask, or trigger latent construction defects.
The Litigation and Coverage Disputes That Follow
When one of these events strikes a building already carrying undisclosed or unresolved construction defects, the resulting disputes become considerably more complex. Property owners and associations must move quickly to document existing conditions and distinguish damage caused by the event from pre-existing defective construction, the same causation issue that arises in the hurricane context under Chapter 558, but often without the benefit of established precedent or adjuster experience with these less common events.
Insurance coverage disputes frequently follow close behind. Carriers may dispute whether an earthquake, flood, or other peril is covered at all, particularly where policies contain earthquake or flood exclusions requiring separate endorsements, or anti-concurrent causation language that can bar coverage entirely when a covered peril combines with an uncovered one, such as pre-existing defective construction, to cause a loss. Sinkhole claims carry their own statutory framework under Florida law, requiring specific testing protocols and reporting before a claim is compensable. Developers and contractors, in turn, may find themselves defending Chapter 558 claims while simultaneously litigating with their own
No Coverage For Construction Defect Under Illinois Law“Pay No Attention to the Man Behind the Curtain!”Eight Payne & Fears Attorneys Named 2025 Southern California Super LawyersSubcontractors Found Liable to Reimburse Insurer Defense Costs in Equitable Subrogation ActionSan Francisco OKs Revamped Settling Millennium Tower FixJudge's Order Halts Google Data Center Project in MinnesotaRecent Bad Faith Decisions in Florida Raise ConcernsMichael C. Zisa and Phillip Boldt Co-Author D.C. Chapter of “50-State Guide to Electronic Execution of the General Agreement of Indemnity”Panthers Withdraw City, County Deal Over Abandoned FacilityWhen is a Contract not a Contract?Senior Housing Surplus Seen as Boomers Spur Building BoomLast Call: Tokyo Iconic Okura Hotel Meets the Wrecking BallFaulty Workmanship Causing Damage to Other Property Covered as Construction DefectThe New York Lien Law - Top Ten Things You Ought to KnowSupreme Court Rejects “Wholly Groundless” Exception to Question of ArbitrabilityFla. Researchers Probe 'Mother of All Sinkholes'Foundation Differences Across the U.S.Congratulations 2019 DE, MA, NJ, NY and PA Super Lawyers and Rising StarsOvertime! – When the Statute of Limitations Isn’t Game Over For Your ClaimMississippi Floods Prompt New Look at Controversial Dam ProjectHake Law Attorneys Join National Law Firm Wilson ElserArbitration and Mediation: What’s the Difference? What to Expect. The American Rescue Plan Act: What Restaurants Need to Act on NOWClimate Change a Factor in 'Unprecedented' South Asia FloodsCongratulations 2016 DE, NJ, and PA Super Lawyers and Rising StarsConstruction Termination Issues for the Architect and Engineer: Part 1– Introduction to the SeriesUS Homes Face Costly Retrofits for Induction Stoves, EV ChargersRecord Keeping—the Devil’s in the DetailsTexas Mechanic’s Lien Law Update: New Law Brings a Little Relief for Subcontractors and a Lot of Relief for Design ProfessionalsWhat I Learned at My First NAWIC National ConferenceReview of Recent Contractors State License Board ChangesInsured's Claim for Cyber Coverage RejectedBenchmark Litigation Recognizes Multiple Snell & Wilmer Offices and Attorneys in 2026 Rankings The Role of Code Officials in the Design-Build ProcessU.K. Construction Unexpectedly Strengthens for a Second MonthSenate’s Fannie Mae Wind-Down Plan Faces High HurdlesDOE Abruptly Cancels $13B Cleanup Award to BWXT-Fluor TeamClaim Preclusion: The Doctrine Everyone Thinks They Know But No One Really Knows What it Means in PracticeHB24-1014: A Warning Bell for Colorado Businesses Amid Potential Consumer Protection ChangesNo Occurrence Where Contract Provides for DelaysNew York Court Holds Insurer Can Recover Before Insured Is Made WholeSchool Board Sues Multiple Firms over Site Excavation ProblemWhen Licensing Lapses: How One Contractor Lost a $1 Million DisputeInvestigation of Orange County LandslideMaterial Prices Climb…And Climb…Are You Considering A Material Escalation Provision?New Zealand Using Plywood Banned ElsewhereFlow-Down Clauses Can Drown Your ProjectCity of Aspen v. Burlingame Ranch II Condominium Owners Association: Clarifying the Application of the Colorado Governmental Immunity ActPA Superior Court Provides Clarification on Definition of CGL “Occurrence” When Property Damage Is Caused by Faulty Building Conditions10 Haight Lawyers Recognized in Best Lawyers in America© 2022 and The Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch 2022Caution to GCs! An Exception to Privette Can Leave You Open to LiabilityInvestigation Continues on Children Drowning at Construction SiteIllinois Supreme Court Holds That the Implied Warranty of Habitability Does Not Extend to SubcontractorsHeathrow Speeds New-Runway Spending Before Construction ApprovalApproaches to Managing Job Site InventoryFourth Circuit Confirms Scope of “Witness Litigation Privilege”Court Reminds Insurer that the Mere Possibility Of Coverage at the Time of Tender Triggers a Duty to Defend in a Defect ActionBoston Developer Sues Contractor Alleging Delays That Cost MillionsOther Colorado Cities Looking to Mirror Lakewood’s Construction Defect OrdinanceAppeal of an Attorney Disqualification Order Results in Partial Automatic Stay of Trial Court ProceedingsDon’t Ignore a Notice of Contest of LienTexas Legislative UpdateTop 10 Hurricane Preparedness Practices for Construction SitesTender the Defense of a Lawsuit to your Liability Carrier
