BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    institutional building expert witness Searcy County Arkansas low-income housing expert witness Searcy County Arkansas condominiums expert witness Searcy County Arkansas landscaping construction expert witness Searcy County Arkansas parking structure expert witness Searcy County Arkansas high-rise construction expert witness Searcy County Arkansas multi family housing expert witness Searcy County Arkansas industrial building expert witness Searcy County Arkansas office building expert witness Searcy County Arkansas Medical building expert witness Searcy County Arkansas housing expert witness Searcy County Arkansas condominium expert witness Searcy County Arkansas custom home expert witness Searcy County Arkansas production housing expert witness Searcy County Arkansas mid-rise construction expert witness Searcy County Arkansas concrete tilt-up expert witness Searcy County Arkansas Subterranean parking expert witness Searcy County Arkansas hospital construction expert witness Searcy County Arkansas structural steel construction expert witness Searcy County Arkansas casino resort expert witness Searcy County Arkansas custom homes expert witness Searcy County Arkansas retail construction expert witness Searcy County Arkansas
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Searcy County, Arkansas

    Arkansas Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB975: Requires that residential contractors be given notice and an opportunity to repair. Homeowners must provide 20 days notice in writing to builder prior to legal action to address defect and/or repair


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Searcy County Arkansas

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    NE Arkansas Home Builders Association
    Local # 0432
    PO Box 17237
    Jonesboro, AR 72403
    http://www.neahba.org

    Northwest Arkansas Home Builders Association
    Local # 0424
    2022 Long Ave Ste C
    Springdale, AR 72764
    http://www.nwabuilders.com

    North Central Arkansas Chapter
    Local # 0438
    PO Box 550
    Harrison, AR 72602
    http://www.buildwithapro.com

    Carroll County Home Builders Association
    Local # 0412
    908 W. Trimble
    Berryville, AR 72616


    Twin Lakes Home Builders Association
    Local # 0448
    1520 Hwy 62 East
    Mountain Home, AR 72653
    http://www.twinlakeshomebuilders.com

    Cleburne County Home Builders Association
    Local # 0405
    PO Box 1325
    Heber Springs, AR 72543


    Greater Fort Smith Associated Home Builders
    Local # 0436
    5111 Rogers Ave Ste 531
    Fort Smith, AR 72903
    http://www.greaterfortsmithhomebuilders.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Searcy County Arkansas

    City Covered From Lawsuits Filed After Hurricane-Damaged Dwellings Demolished

    Kahana Feld Partner Pascal Arteaga Achieves Prestigious TBLS Construction Law Board Certification

    Don’t Conspire to Build a Home…Wait…What?

    Congratulations to Partners Bryan Stofferahn and Jason DiGioia on Successfully Securing Nearly 12 Million Dollars in a Complex Construction Defect Case!

    What Buyers Want in a Green Home—and What They Don’t

    A Court-Side Seat: Recent Legal Developments at Supreme and Federal Appeals Courts

    SDV Earns Top Honors from Chambers and Partners USA 2025 Award

    The Law of Patent v Latent Defects

    New Certification Requirements for Veteran-Owned Small Business Concerns and Service-Disabled Veteran-owned Small Business Concerns Seeking Public Procurement Contracts

    CGL Insurer’s Duty To Defend Broader Than Duty To Indemnify And Based On Allegations In Underlying Complaint

    Update Relating to SB891 and Bond Claim Waivers

    SEC Proposes Rule Requiring Public Firms to Report Climate Risks

    Reporting Requirements for Architects under California Business and Professions Code Section 5588

    New Jersey Courts Speed Up Sandy Litigation

    Design & Construction Case Expands Florida’s Slavin Doctrine

    California Contractor License Bonds to Increase in 2016

    Reasonable Expectations – Pennsylvania’s Case by Case Approach to the Sutton Rule

    Florida’s Third District Court of Appeal Suggests Negligent Repairs to Real Property Are Not Subject to the Statute of Repose

    Will a Notice of Non-Responsibility Prevent Enforcement of a California Mechanics Lien?

    White and Williams Earns Tier 1 Rankings from U.S. News "Best Law Firms" 2020

    Reconstructing the Francis Scott Key Bridge Utilizing the Progressive Design-Build Method

    Skyline Cockpit’s Game-Changing Tower Crane Teleoperation

    Florida Property Bill Passes Economic Affairs Committee with Amendments

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “It’s One, Two… Eight Strikes: You’re Out!”

    The Cross-Party Exclusion: The Hazards of Additional Named Insured Provisions

    Mediation in the Zero Sum World of Construction

    Hundreds of Coronavirus Coverage Cases Await Determination on Consolidation

    US Proposes Energy Efficiency Standards for Federal Buildings

    GRSM Trial Team Holds Alameda County Asbestos Verdict to $900,000 Against $50 Million Demand

    Hunton Insurance Coverage Group Ranked in National Tier 1 by US News & World Report

    The ARC and The Covenants

    Brooklyn’s Hipster Economy Challenges Manhattan Supremacy

    Navigating Wind and Solar Development Opportunities on State and Private Lands During Uncertain Times for Renewable Energy

    Construction Defect Notice in the Mailbox? Respond Appropriately

    White House Explores Opening Antitrust Probe on Homebuilders

    Do Hurricane-Prone Coastal States Need to Update their Building Codes?

    Yes, Virginia, Contract Terms Do Matter: Financing Term Offers Owner an Escape Hatch

    Newark Trial Team Defends “No Cause” With Appellate Affirmance Of 2023 Jury Verdict

    National Coalition to Provide Boost for Building Performance Standards

    Mitigating FCRA Risk Through Insurance

    Wisconsin High Court Rejects Insurer’s Misuse of “Other Insurance” Provision

    Insurance Law Alert: Incorporation of Defective Work Does Not Result in Covered Property Damage in California Construction Claims

    Modified Plan Unveiled for Chicago's Sixth-Tallest Tower

    Safeguarding History: Fire Risks in Renovating Historic Buildings

    Settlement Reached in Bridge Failure Lawsuit

    2017 Colorado Construction Defect Recap: Colorado Legislature and Judiciary Make Favorable Advances for Development Community

    Just When You Thought General Contractors Were Necessary Parties. . .

    Fire Raging North of Los Angeles Is Getting Fuel From Dry Winds

    Performance Bonds: Follow the Letter of the Bond and Keep The Surety Informed

    2015 California Construction Law Update
    Corporate Profile

    SEARCY COUNTY ARKANSAS CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from approximately 5000 building and construction related expert designations, the Searcy County, Arkansas Construction Expert Directory provides a wide range of trial support and construction consulting services to legal professionals and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction related litigation support and expert consulting services to the building industry's most recognized companies, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, risk managers, and a variety of municipalities. Employing in house resources which comprise building envelope experts, forensic architects, professional engineers, credentialed construction standard of care consultants, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Searcy County region.

    Searcy County Arkansas architecture expert witnessSearcy County Arkansas construction expert witness public projectsSearcy County Arkansas construction forensic expert witnessSearcy County Arkansas architectural expert witnessSearcy County Arkansas construction expert testimonySearcy County Arkansas construction scheduling expert witnessSearcy County Arkansas engineering expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Searcy County, Arkansas

    Self-Healing Infrastructure Could Pave the Road to the Future

    May 05, 2026 —
    A single hairline crack in a bridge deck can seem insignificant. But left undetected, minor cracks and fissures expand, water seeps in, steel corrodes and repair costs start to increase. This risk multiplies across thousands of miles of aging highways and bridges nationwide. As infrastructure endures increasing strain from heavier traffic, extreme weather and deferred maintenance, engineers are exploring “self-healing” systems, where streets and bridges are built with materials that can repair themselves. Concrete, asphalt and composites capable of detecting and mending microcracks autonomously are moving from laboratory research to pilot projects. But while emerging technology promises longer-lasting infrastructure, it also raises questions about long-term maintenance, performance guarantees, procurement frameworks and risk allocation. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Allan C. Van Vliet, Pillsbury
    Mr. Van Vliet may be contacted at allan.vanvliet@pillsburylaw.com

    Cuomo Bridge Lawsuit Adversaries Weigh Mediated Settlement

    July 06, 2026 —
    Rival legal teams have reached a critical juncture as they consider a mediated settlement in one of two major payment lawsuits pending between a design-build contracting team and the New York State Thruway Authority over construction of the more than $3-billion Mario M. Cuomo Bridge north of New York City. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com

    Communication Gaps Can Cost Construction Firms in the Data Center Boom

    June 02, 2026 —
    The data center construction boom is transforming the construction industry at a historic pace. Fueled by cloud computing, artificial intelligence and relentless demand for digital infrastructure, data centers have become one of the fastest-growing project types in the built environment. Billions of dollars are flowing into new facilities and expansions, creating unprecedented opportunities for construction firms positioned to deliver reliably. But opportunity alone does not guarantee success. As competition intensifies, communication failures and poor information management are emerging as some of the most common (and costly) reasons firms lose margins, miss deadlines or fail to secure repeat work. In data center construction, where schedules are compressed and tolerance for error is minimal, even small breakdowns in communication can have outsized consequences. Reprinted courtesy of Mike Lewis, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Did You Know: Unique Legal Considerations for Animal Care Facilities

    August 24, 2026 —
    Animal care facilities are highly specialized environments that require expertise far beyond traditional commercial or even standard medical construction. Whether designing and building animal shelters, doggy daycares, veterinary clinics or full-service animal hospitals, these facilities operate under conditions that introduce unique challenges related to sanitation, durability, animal behavior and operational workflows. Because of these complexities, projects that fail to account for animal care requirements adequately often encounter costly issues—many of which result in litigation. Below are real-world examples drawn from expert witness work, followed by proactive best practices construction professionals should apply to future animal care projects. Reprinted courtesy of Hannah Skidmore, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Location, Location, Location — But Which One? The Few Words in Your Construction Contract that Pick Where You Fight

    June 29, 2026 —
    Most professionals know the old real estate line: location, location, location. It turns out to be just as true for construction contracts as it is for property. Consider a recent case involving a project owner that hired two design firms for a project. When issues arose during construction, the owner sued the design firms in state court in Brazoria County, Texas, pursuant to the forum selection clause in the parties’ contracts. The defendants then removed the case to the federal district court in Galveston, a courthouse in a different county. But the owner wanted the case back in Brazoria County state court. Whether it got its wish came down to two words in the contract: “situated in.” This article is about words like those. A construction contract’s forum selection clause names the place for the fight nobody plans to have, and where that fight happens can shape how it goes. This article explains why the wording in your forum selection clause deserves careful reading before you sign a construction contract. It is not a deep dive into the mechanics of federal removal jurisdiction, and it is not an academic comparison of the terms “forum” and “venue.” Instead, it is a practical look at how courts actually read these clauses, so the location of a future fight is the one you intended. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Brad Sands, Jones Walker, LLP
    Mr. Sands may be contacted at bsands@joneswalker.com

    Arizona Court Enters $323 Million Judgment Against ZOM Living Following Unanimous Jury Verdict

    May 26, 2026 —
    PHOENIX, May 19, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- A Maricopa County court has entered a $323 million compensatory damages judgment in favor of Gray Development Group against ZOM Holding Inc., doing business as ZOM Living, following a 12-day trial, a unanimous jury verdict and post-trial proceedings related to a proposed business transaction. The jury found ZOM liable on claims of breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing stemming from a proposed joint venture tied to a planned pipeline of luxury multifamily and commercial projects in Phoenix and Scottsdale. The lawsuit centered on a 13-project, $1.4 billion development pipeline originated and planned by Gray Development Group over more than a decade. In 2019, Gray invited Florida-based ZOM to participate in a joint venture involving the completion of five projects, which would have marked ZOM's entry into the Arizona market. According to court findings presented at trial, the companies entered into a mutual confidentiality and non-circumvention agreement before Gray shared extensive sensitive and proprietary information related to the projects, including planning, market analysis, costs, financial data, local business relationships and operational strategies developed by Gray over decades in Arizona. Evidence presented during trial showed that over a 10-month period while under contract, ZOM made hundreds of requests for confidential project and market information before circumventing Gray and pursuing the projects independently, ultimately displacing Gray from projects it spent years planning and developing. ZOM Living, headquartered in Orlando, develops multifamily and senior housing communities across the United States and operates regional offices in Boston, Dallas, Fort Lauderdale, Nashville, Phoenix, and Raleigh. ZOM is owned by Timeless Investments, the Amsterdam-based family office of Dutch businessman Hans van Veggel, which acquired the company in 1997. About Gray Development Group Gray Development Group was founded by architect Bruce Gray in 1991. The Phoenix-based company was the top-ranked multifamily developer in Arizona for more than a decade. The company designed and developed more than 15,000 apartment and condominium units throughout metropolitan Phoenix. Two Gray-designed developments — a Tempe midrise and a San Diego high-rise — received National Apartment Community of the Year awards.

    Nordics Are Europe’s Next Data Center Hub

    October 05, 2026 —
    On September 9, 2026, Google announced its largest single investment in Europe. The company commits at least €13 billion to Finnish data centers and energy infrastructure in 2027 and 2028, expanding the existing Hamina campus and adding three new sites in Kajaani, Muhos, and Vaala. For the construction sector, this is great news: thousands of hectares, dozens of buildings, and a construction program that will extend well beyond the two-year investment window. Four Sites, One Regional Cluster Google is not a newcomer in Finland. Back in 2009, it converted a former paper mill in Hamina into a seawater-cooled data center. It has invested around €4.5 billion there over 15 years, and the site’s waste heat already feeds Hamina’s district heating network. The new program shifts the center of gravity north, to the border of North Ostrobothnia and Kainuu. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Micromobility in Smart Cities: Keeping the Wheels in Motion

    May 26, 2026 —
    Mobility is the lifeblood of any city. How people are able to travel in, out and within a metropolitan area is vital to its citizens, businesses, supply chains and social services. And as U.S. cities have expanded in size and population density, the strategies for addressing mobility have evolved. Many have taken different approaches to public transit, and each city boasts a dense tapestry of roadways, walking paths and various parking options. But as cities continue to reexamine infrastructure strategies through smart city technology, a new field of transportation has emerged—micromobility. Designed for short-distance travel using lightweight vehicles (bikes, e-bikes, e-scooters, etc.), the industry’s global net worth has grown exponentially in recent years to the tune of hundreds of billions, with one forecast predicting it could reach $340 billion by 2030. Micromobility also finds itself at the forefront of various smart city technological improvements. Geofencing has been implemented in U.S. cities to determine where micromobility vehicles can operate, control speed limits, and park utilizing the vehicles’ GPS location. Internet of Things (IoT) technologies (satellite-based location receivers, cloud communication, internet links, etc.) have improved vehicle lifespans by keeping track of when vehicles require service and prevent vandalism and theft. Data collected from vehicles’ location tracking is routinely used for urban planning and smart city development. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of James P. Bobotek, Pillsbury
    Mr. Bobotek may be contacted at james.bobotek@pillsburylaw.com