BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    hospital construction expert witness Challenge California townhome construction expert witness Challenge California Medical building expert witness Challenge California concrete tilt-up expert witness Challenge California institutional building expert witness Challenge California office building expert witness Challenge California low-income housing expert witness Challenge California custom homes expert witness Challenge California parking structure expert witness Challenge California production housing expert witness Challenge California retail construction expert witness Challenge California casino resort expert witness Challenge California condominium expert witness Challenge California Subterranean parking expert witness Challenge California mid-rise construction expert witness Challenge California custom home expert witness Challenge California condominiums expert witness Challenge California landscaping construction expert witness Challenge California high-rise construction expert witness Challenge California housing expert witness Challenge California industrial building expert witness Challenge California multi family housing expert witness Challenge California
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Challenge, California

    California Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB800 (codified as Civil Code §§895, et seq) is the most far-reaching, complex law regulating construction defect litigation, right to repair, warranty obligations and maintenance requirements transference in the country. In essence, to afford protection against frivolous lawsuits, builders shall do all the following:A homeowner is obligated to follow all reasonable maintenance obligations and schedules communicated in writing to the homeowner by the builder and product manufacturers, as well as commonly accepted maintenance practices. A failure by a homeowner to follow these obligations, schedules, and practices may subject the homeowner to the affirmative defenses.A builder, under the principles of comparative fault pertaining to affirmative defenses, may be excused, in whole or in part, from any obligation, damage, loss, or liability if the builder can demonstrate any of the following affirmative defenses in response to a claimed violation:


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Challenge California

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    North State Building Industry Association
    Local # 0540
    1536 Eureka Rd
    Roseville, CA 95661
    http://www.northstatebia.org

    California Building Industry Association
    Local # 0500
    1215 K Street Ste 1200
    Sacramento, CA 95814
    http://www.cbia.org

    Building Industry Association of the Bay Area - Northern Division
    Local # 0538
    PO Box 7100
    Santa Rosa, CA 95407


    Building Industry Association of the Delta
    Local # 0513
    315 N San Joaquin St Ste 2
    Stockton, CA 95202
    http://www.biadelta.org

    Building Industry Association of the Bay Area
    Local # 0538
    101 Ygnacio Valley Rd # 210
    Walnut Creek, CA 94596
    http://www.biabayarea.org

    Building Industry Association of the Bay Area - Eastern Division
    Local # 0538
    PO Box 5160
    San Ramon, CA 94583


    Building Industry Association of Central California
    Local # 0536
    900 H St Ste E2
    Modesto, CA 95354
    http://www.biacc.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Challenge California

    The Requirement to Post Collateral Under General Agreement of Indemnity Is Real

    “Incidental” Versus “Direct” Third Party Beneficiaries Under Insurance Policies in Which a Party is Not an Additional Insured

    Missouri Legislature Passes Bill to Drastically Change Missouri’s “Consent Judgment” Statute

    When Your Scheduler Hallucinates: Managing AI Risk on the Job Site

    It’s That Time of Year: Contract Review Time

    Lower Manhattan Condos Rival Midtown’s Luxury Skyscrapers

    Saved By The Statute: The Economic Loss Doctrine Does Not Bar Claims Under Pennsylvania’s Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law

    America’s Infrastructure Gets a C-. It’s an Improvement Though

    Altman Contractors, Inc. v. Crum & Forster Specialty Ins. Co.

    Lead Paint: The EPA’s Renovation, Repair and Painting Rule

    The Evolution of Construction Defect Trends at West Coast Casualty Seminar

    Tennessee Court of Appeals Holds Defendant Has the Burden of Offering Alternative Measure of Damages to Prove that Plaintiff’s Measure of Damages is Unreasonable

    OSHA Issues Fines for Fatal Building Collapse in Philadelphia

    Someone Who Hires an Independent Contractor May Still Be Liable, But Not in This Case

    Massachusetts Appellate Court Confirms Construction Defects are Not Covered Under Commercial General Liability Policies

    Home Prices Expected to Increase All Over the U.S.

    Document Everything! Always! No Exceptions! (AKA, Help Your Lawyer Help You!)

    No Coverage Under Anti-Concurrent Causation Clause

    New York Moves to Tighten Third-Party Practice: Key Changes to CPLR 1007

    David Uchida Joins Kahana Feld’s Los Angeles Office as Partner

    Risk-Shifting Tactics for Construction Contracts

    Contractor’s Coverage For Additional Insured Established by Unilateral Contract

    Panel Declares Colorado Construction Defect Laws Reason for Lack of Multifamily Developments

    Benchmark Litigation Recognizes Multiple Snell & Wilmer Offices and Attorneys in 2026 Rankings

    Developers Can Tap into DOE’s $400 Million for Remote and Rural Clean Energy Projects

    Contractor’s Poor Workmanship: How You Can Deal With It – Bad Contractor Series Part 3

    Illinois Appellate Court Address the Scope of the Term “Resident” in Homeowners Policy

    New York Orders Moratorium on Large Data Center Permits

    The Economic Loss Rule and the Disclosure of Latent Defects: In re the Estate of Carol S. Gattis

    D.R. Horton Earnings Rise as Sales and Order Volume Increase

    Indiana Federal Court Holds No Coverage for $50M Default Judgment for Lack of Timely Notice of Class Action

    You Need to be a Contractor for Workers’ Compensation Immunity to Apply

    When Rule 702 Motions Fail: A Close Look at AECOM v. Flatiron

    A Quick Checklist for Subcontractors

    Want a Fair Chance at a Government Contract? Think Again

    2019 California Construction Law Update

    Case-Shiller Redo Shows Less Severe U.S. Home-Price Slump

    Blueprint for Change: How the Construction Industry Should Respond to the FTC’s Ban on Noncompetes

    Substituting Materials and Failure to Comply with Contractual Requirements

    Georgia Court Clarifies Landlord Liability for Construction Defects

    New York Court Holds Insurer Can Rely on Exclusions After Incorrectly Denying Defense

    Green Construction Claims: More of the Same

    Warranty of Workmanship and Habitability Cannot Be Disclaimed or Waived Under Any Circumstance

    The Importance of Providing Notice to a Surety

    Is the Event You Are Claiming as Unforeseeable Delay Really Unforeseeable?

    Indiana Court of Appeals Rules Against Contractor and Performance Bond Surety on Contractor's Differing Site Conditions Claim

    Hoboken Mayor Admits Defeat as Voters Reject $241 Million School

    Defining a Property Management Agreement

    Texas Legislative Update: Breaking Down the New Texas Laws Impacting Construction

    Know Whether Your Course of Business Operations Are Covered Or Excluded By Your Insurance
    Corporate Profile

    CHALLENGE CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through more than four thousand construction and design related expert witness designations, the Challenge, California Construction Expert Directory provides a single point of reference for construction defect and claims related support to attorneys and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect, scheduling, and delay matters. BHA provides building claims investigation, testimony, and support services to the industry's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, insurers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. In connection with in house personnel which comprise building envelope and design experts, forensic engineers, forensic architects, and construction cost and scheduling consultants, the firm brings a wealth of experience and local capabilities to Challenge and the surrounding areas.

    Challenge California reconstruction expert witnessChallenge California construction expert witness public projectsChallenge California slope failure expert witnessChallenge California construction expert testimonyChallenge California consulting architect expert witnessChallenge California architectural engineering expert witnessChallenge California contractor expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Challenge, California

    Meet BWB&O’s Super Lawyers Rising Stars in Colorado!

    April 08, 2026 —
    Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLP is thrilled to share that Partner Devin Brunson and Associate Melissa Youngpeter have been named to the Super Lawyers 2026 Colorado Rising Stars list. This recognition reflects their exceptional work in Personal Injury and Civil Litigation.
    SUPER LAWYERS RISING STARS
    Devin Brunson: 2024-2026
    Melissa Youngpeter: 2026
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLP

    Dispute Erupts Into Public Over Castro Theater Rehab Project Costs

    September 08, 2026 —
    As it was about to start an arbitration of final payments on a complex theater renovation, the entertainment company that leases San Francisco's landmark Castro Theatre has filed a state court trademark violation lawsuit seeking to bar the contractor from publicizing as a success its work for the owner on that and other projects. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com

    Endorsement is Void Where Compliance is Impossible

    September 21, 2026 —
    The Sixth Circuit found that the insured’s loss of property due to fire was covered despite noncompliance with an endorsement requiring encompassing the property. 3371 Reading, LLC v. Liberty Mut Group, Inc., et al., 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 19156 (6th Cir. June 29, 2026). The insured, 3371 Reading, owned a building undergoing renovation. After the structure burned down, 3371 Reading made a claim under its policy with Ohio Casualty Insurance Company. Ohio Casualty relied on an endorsement requiring fencing round the jobsite. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Bad Faith Claim Survives Summary Judgment

    June 08, 2026 —
    The court denied the insurer’s motion for partial summary judgment on the insured’s bad faith claim, but granted the motion on the insured’s claim for punitive damages. Serbian Orthodox Church v. Brotherhood Mut. Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58234 (S.D. Cal. March 19, 2026). On February 1, 2023, the Church filed a claim for water damage with Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company (BMIC). The claim was based on rain and wind that caused extensive water intrusion into the Sanctuary, damaging its plaster walls and ceilings and fresco paintings. The claim was assigned to Patrick Hurley. Hurley sent a letter discussing potential bars to coverage and requesting further information and documents from the Church. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Idaho Contractor Registration: Lessons from the Ward v. Bishop Decision

    April 20, 2026 —
    The Idaho Supreme Court’s recent decision in Ward v. Bishop Constr., Ltd. Liab. Co., No. 51118, 2025 Ida. LEXIS 143 (Dec. 31, 2025) offers valuable guidance for contractors and construction attorneys navigating the Idaho Contractor Registration Act (ICRA). The December 2025 ruling clarifies critical questions about when and how defendants may raise contractor registration defenses, the weight of pretrial stipulations, and the consequences of procedural missteps in construction litigation. This article examines the key takeaways from the decision and offers practical actions for consideration by those working in Idaho’s construction industry. The Facts Behind the Dispute The case arose from a long-standing working relationship between cousins Joel Ward and Ren Bishop dating to the 1990s. Ward performed general construction work for Bishop Construction, LLC, including building, plumbing, electrical, framing, roofing, and siding work on projects in Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming. Bishop agreed to pay Ward $10 per hour, later increased to $12 per hour, plus one-way travel expenses. Between 2017 and 2019, Ward worked over 1,100 hours but was never paid, totaling $12,443.54 in claimed damages. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tara Martens Miller, Snell & Wilmer
    Ms. Miller may be contacted at tmmiller@swlaw.com

    Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC Recognized by Best Lawyers 2027

    September 28, 2026 —
    Continuing the trend from last year, Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC is excited to announce that thirteen members of our firm have received recognition from Best Lawyers® in America for 2027. The Best Lawyers in America® has been an annual publication since 1983 and focuses on the top legal talent across the United States and the globe. Through its rankings, Best Lawyers® provides a comprehensive guide to legal representation for individuals and businesses alike. Over time, Best Lawyers® has been recognized as one of the leading publications for attorney achievements and references. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC

    U.S. Supreme Court Decision May Negate State Law Requirement to File a Certificate of Merit with the Complaint in a Federal Action Against a Design Professional

    April 27, 2026 —
    To deter frivolous and unfounded claims against design professionals, states throughout the country have enacted statutes which generally require litigants to furnish a formal certification of merit (“COM”) from a qualified expert or face potential dismissal of their lawsuit. These COM statutes can impose a significant front-end burden on claimants who must pay an expert to review project records, interview the project team, and prepare a formal report before the lawsuit can be filed—often regardless of the amount in controversy. However, in light of a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in a medical malpractice case, most, if not all of these statutes, may no longer be enforceable in federal court. This article examines the recent decision in Berk v. Choy, 146 S. Ct. 546 (2026), the decisions thus far which have applied Berk to invalidate COM statutes, and other categories of statutes applicable to the construction industry which may face a similar fate. The U.S. Supreme Court Decision (Berk v. Choy) In Berk, the plaintiff, Harold Berk, sued a doctor for medical malpractice under Delaware law in Delaware federal court. 146 S. Ct. at 551. Under Del. Code, Tit. 18, § 6853(a)(1), an affidavit of merit (like a COM) must accompany a complaint alleging medical malpractice. Id. Berk failed to include an affidavit of merit with his complaint. Id. at 552. Applying Delaware state law, the federal court dismissed Berk’s medical malpractice claim. Berk appealed to the Third Circuit, arguing that the affidavit of merit required by § 6853(a)(1) is unenforceable in federal court because it is more onerous than the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Third Circuit affirmed the District Court’s ruling, finding § 6853(a)(1) enforceable in federal court. Reprinted courtesy of Christopher Olsen, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Phillip Boldt, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Olsen may be contacted at colsen@pecklaw.com Mr. Boldt may be contacted at pboldt@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Lewis Brisbois Welcomes Clients and Community Leaders to New Garden City Office Opening

    July 27, 2026 —
    On July 15, Lewis Brisbois hosted a ribbon-cutting event for its new Garden City office, which opened in April to serve the Long Island community and beyond. The event was attended by more than 100 people, including Lewis Brisbois attorneys and staff as well as clients, local business and government leaders, Nassau County Supreme Court judges, and members of the press. Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman delivered remarks and cut the ribbon for the office. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois