BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    casino resort expert witness Paicines California townhome construction expert witness Paicines California structural steel construction expert witness Paicines California high-rise construction expert witness Paicines California condominium expert witness Paicines California production housing expert witness Paicines California industrial building expert witness Paicines California office building expert witness Paicines California multi family housing expert witness Paicines California concrete tilt-up expert witness Paicines California landscaping construction expert witness Paicines California Medical building expert witness Paicines California parking structure expert witness Paicines California custom homes expert witness Paicines California custom home expert witness Paicines California retail construction expert witness Paicines California housing expert witness Paicines California tract home expert witness Paicines California institutional building expert witness Paicines California Subterranean parking expert witness Paicines California hospital construction expert witness Paicines California condominiums expert witness Paicines California
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Paicines, California

    California Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB800 (codified as Civil Code §§895, et seq) is the most far-reaching, complex law regulating construction defect litigation, right to repair, warranty obligations and maintenance requirements transference in the country. In essence, to afford protection against frivolous lawsuits, builders shall do all the following:A homeowner is obligated to follow all reasonable maintenance obligations and schedules communicated in writing to the homeowner by the builder and product manufacturers, as well as commonly accepted maintenance practices. A failure by a homeowner to follow these obligations, schedules, and practices may subject the homeowner to the affirmative defenses.A builder, under the principles of comparative fault pertaining to affirmative defenses, may be excused, in whole or in part, from any obligation, damage, loss, or liability if the builder can demonstrate any of the following affirmative defenses in response to a claimed violation:


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Paicines California

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Tulare/Kings Ctys
    Local # 0505
    PO Box 3930
    Visalia, CA 93278
    http://www.biatk.com

    Building Industry Association of Fresno/Madera Counties
    Local # 0516
    1530 E. Shaw Ave #113
    Fresno, CA 93710
    http://www.biafm.org

    Building Industry Association of Fresno/Madera Counties - Madera Chapter
    Local # 0516
    1530 E. Shaw Ave Ste 113
    Fresno, CA 93710
    http://www.biasjv.org

    Building Industry Association of the Bay Area - Southern Division
    Local # 0538
    675 N 1st St Suite 620
    San Jose, CA 95112


    Home Builders Association of Kern County
    Local # 0510
    PO Box 21118
    Bakersfield, CA 93390
    http://www.kernbia.com

    Building Industry Association of Central California
    Local # 0536
    900 H St Ste E2
    Modesto, CA 95354
    http://www.biacc.com

    Home Builders Association of the Central Coast
    Local # 0570
    PO Box 748
    San Luis Obispo, CA 93406
    http://www.hbacc.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Paicines California
    Corporate Profile

    PAICINES CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through more than 4500 building and claims related expert witness designations, the Paicines, California Construction Expert Directory delivers a wide range of trial support and consulting services to construction claims professionals concerned with construction defect and claims litigation. BHA provides building related consulting and expert witness support services to the industry's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, real estate investment trusts, risk managers, owners, as well as a variety of municipalities and government offices. Utilizing in house resources which include construction cost, scheduling, and delay experts, professional engineers, ASPE certified professional estimators, and construction safety professionals, the firm brings specialized expertise and local capabilities to the Paicines region.

    Paicines California OSHA expert witness constructionPaicines California structural engineering expert witnessesPaicines California concrete expert witnessPaicines California construction project management expert witnessPaicines California construction expert witness public projectsPaicines California fenestration expert witnessPaicines California construction cost estimating expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Paicines, California

    Supreme Court Strikes Down IEEPA Tariffs: The Refund Process Will Be Messy

    March 10, 2026 —
    On February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, and the consolidated case Trump v. V.O.S. Selections, Inc., that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize the President to impose tariffs unilaterally.1 The decision invalidates both the “reciprocal” tariffs and the drug-trafficking tariffs imposed under IEEPA. For importers, the immediate question is whether, how, and when refunds can actually be obtained. On that issue, the U.S. Supreme Court provided no roadmap. To the contrary, the dissent warned that the United States “may be required to refund billions of dollars,” that the process is likely to be a “mess,” and that the majority opinion “says nothing today about whether, and if so how, the Government should go about returning the billions of dollars that it has collected from importers.” Reprinted courtesy of Brett W. Johnson, Snell & Wilmer, Derek Flint, Snell & Wilmer, T. Troy Galan, Snell & Wilmer and Thomas Williams, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Johnson may be contacted at bwjohnson@swlaw.com Mr. Flint may be contacted at dflint@swlaw.com Mr. Galan may be contacted at tgalan@swlaw.com Mr. Williams may be contacted at twilliams@swlaw.com> Read the full story...

    Outer Banks Homes Collapsing Is Just a Taste of What’s to Come

    December 22, 2025 —
    On Sept. 20, 2024, a four-bedroom, three-bathroom beach house in Buxton, North Carolina, in the heart of the Outer Banks, sold for $580,000. On Oct. 28 this year, the house, known as Mermaid’s Rest, collapsed into the ocean. It was one of five homes swallowed that day by high waves churned up by an offshore storm. Few things demonstrate how climate change is already upending lives and fortunes quite like watching somebody’s stately vacation home topple into the drink. But Outer Banks houses like Mermaid’s Rest (a striking example first dug up by the New York Times but just one of many such cases), are mere showroom models for the havoc that rising seas are already threatening. First, let’s get one caveat out of the way: Barrier islands like the Outer Banks are always changing shape, regardless of the climate. Homes built on the shores of such islands have always been at risk of eventually sliding off the edge like a quarter in one of those coin-pusher arcade games. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Mark Gongloff, Bloomberg

    Government Claiming Contract Is Void Ab Initio by Contractor Knowingly Making False Statements

    January 06, 2026 —
    Can the federal government declare a contract “void ab initio” or void from the beginning? Yes, if the government can “prove that the contractor (a) obtained the contract by (b) knowingly (c) making a false statement.” MLB Transportation v. U.S., 2025 WL 2962897, *8 (Fed.Cl. 2025) (citation omitted).
    Where a contractor “obtained [a] contract by knowingly falsely stating that it was a small business … [the] government contract [is] tainted from its inception by fraud [and] is void ab initio.” The general rule that “a Government contract tainted by fraud or wrong-doing is void ab initio … protects the integrity of the federal contracting process and safeguards the public from undetectable threats to the public fisc.” A contract found to be void ab initio has “no legal effect,” and is “[n]ull from the beginning, as from the first moment when a contract is entered into.”
    MLB Transportation, supra (citations omitted).
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    UPDATED: No Easy Fix for Potomac River Sewage Spill, Now Estimated at $20M

    April 08, 2026 —
    One month after a collapsed pipeline north of Washington, D.C., spilled about 240 million gallons of raw sewage into the Potomac River and possibly between 300 and 400 million—which could be the largest wastewater spill in U.S. history—efforts are progressing to clear the damaged section and begin repairs despite weather and other impacts. Reprinted courtesy of Jim Parsons, Engineering News-Record and Debra K. Rubin, Engineering News-Record Ms. Rubin may be contacted at rubind@enr.com Read the full story...

    How to Document Changes and Preserve Claims Without Starting a Fight

    December 02, 2025 —
    Construction is a team sport, but you can play nice while still preserving your contractual rights. In every construction project, changes happen and disagreements arise. The trouble comes when during formal dispute resolution months (or years) later, the parties argue about the basic facts of what the issue was, what was authorized, who knew, and whether notice was given. In formal dispute resolution, the most compelling evidence is the contemporaneous, factual documentation in the project record, but many fail to document these issues for fear of harming the relationship with the owner, general contractor, or subcontractor. This article provides practical guidance on how to document changes and potential claims in a way that preserves relationships and avoids escalation during the project itself. Here’s how to document changes (or your disagreement) to preserve your contract rights and ability to make a claim later, without jeopardizing the working relationship during construction. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Kristina Southwell, Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC
    Ms. Southwell may be contacted at kristina.southwell@acslawyers.com

    Ninth Circuit Affirms District Court’s Finding of No Coverage for Interior Leak

    March 24, 2026 —
    Applying California law, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court’s finding that water damage caused by a leaking pipe over time was not covered under the insured’s homeowners’ policy. Mojica v. State Farm General Ins. Co., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 32405 (9th Cir. Dec. 11, 2025). A small hole, slightly larger than a pen tip in size, developed in a pressurized hot water pipe. The resulting leak lasted for nearly six days and released enough water to saturate and ruin all the subflooring and flooring in the insureds’ home. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Washington Court of Appeals Narrows Arbitrator Authority in Construction Dispute

    November 21, 2025 —
    In a recent opinion, Division III of the Washington Court of Appeals clarified arbitrator limits in Reecer Creek Excavating v. SRI-Rochlin Construction JV,[1] holding that consequential damage waivers are enforceable, fee-shifting depends on who “substantially prevails,” and arbitration awards can be vacated only in narrow circumstances. Reecer Creek Excavating (“Reecer”) was subcontracted by SRI-Rochlin Construction JV (“SRI”) to perform excavation and paving work on a housing development in Ellensburg, Washington. When payment disputes arose, both parties filed breach-of-contract claims and later agreed to private arbitration. Their arbitration agreement included terms mandating that “the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and costs” and providing for an exception to the finality of the award where the arbitrator exceeded its authority. After a multi-day arbitration, the arbitrator found both parties partly at fault - Reecer for incomplete and defective work, and SRI for withholding certain payments. The net award favored Reecer by about $55,000, with each side ordered to bear its own attorney’s fees. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Joshua Lane, Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC
    Mr. Lane may be contacted at joshua.lane@acslawyers.com

    Can Anything Supersede Excel in AEC?

    April 27, 2026 —
    If there’s one piece of software that dominates the business world across industries, it’s Microsoft Excel. Can AI finally dethrone the mighty spreadsheet? Memorable Spreadsheet Moments Everyone has memorable spreadsheet moments. I have a few. For example, my then-architecture firm was involved in more than a dozen housing developments abroad. I developed an Excel workbook that took the required number of households as input and automatically generated a breakdown of buildings and their apartment types for AutoCAD. This was urban planning and architectural design done with a spreadsheet. I also developed business software using Excel for project portfolio management. The prototype was later scaled into a c
    At Least 32 Dead in Massive US Storm, Extreme Risks Remain

    Eighth Circuit Affirms Finding of Bad Faith, Award of Costs and Prejudgment Interest

    Beth Cook Expands Insurance Litigation Team at Payne & Fears

    Buyers Are Flocking to NYC’s Suburbs. Too Bad There Aren’t Many Homes to Sell.

    Instant Hotel Tower, But Is It Safe?

    Court Makes an Unsettling Inference to
    Boston Nonprofit Wants to Put Grown-Ups in Dorms

    Does a Contractor (or Subcontractor) Have to Complete its Work to File a Mechanics Lien

    PSA: Virginia DOLI Amends COVID Workplace Standard

    Crane Dangles and So Do Insurance Questions

    Update Relating to SB891 and Bond Claim Waivers

    How to Build a Water-Smart City

    “Since You Asked. . .”

    Breach Of Duty of Good Faith And Fair Dealing Packaged With Contract Disputes Act Claim

    Ten-Year Statute Of Repose To Sue For Latent Construction Defects

    EPA Grants Arizona Lead Over Underground Injection Control Program

    Texas Supreme Court: Breach of Contract Not Required to Prevail on Statutory Bad Faith Claim

    A Murder in Honduras Reveals the Dark Side of Clean Energy

    Building Stagnant in Las Cruces Region

    Congratulations to Partners Nicole Whyte, Keith Bremer, Peter Brown, Karen Baytosh, and Associate Matthew Cox for Their Inclusion in 2022 Best Lawyers!

    When is a “Notice of Completion” on a California Private Works Construction Project Valid? Why Does It Matter for My Collection Rights?

    Client Alert: Absence of a Court Reporter at a Civil Motion Hearing May Preclude Appellate Review

    Arizona Court of Appeals Decision in $8.475 Million Construction Defect Class Action Suit

    NY Supreme Court Rules City Not Liable for Defective Sidewalk

    Limited Number of Insurance-Related Bills Passed by 2014 Hawaii Legislature

    Keep it Simple with Nunn-Agreements in Colorado

    Court Confirms No Duty to Reimburse for Prophylactic Repairs Prior to Actual Collapse

    Bremer Whyte’s Newport Beach Team Prevails on a Motion for Summary Judgment in a Wrongful Death Case!

    Lien Attaches To Landlord’s Interest When Landlord Is Party To Tenant Improvement Construction Contract

    BHA Sponsors 28th Annual Construction Law Conference in San Antonio, TX

    "Is the Defective Work Covered by Insurance?"

    Construction Defects could become Issue in Governor’s Race

    Washington Court Denies Subcontractor’s Claim Based on Contractual Change and Notice Provisions

    Massachusetts Business Court Addresses Defense Cost Allocation and Non-Cumulation Provisions in Long-Tail Context

    Disjointed Proof of Loss Sufficient

    Counsel Investigating Coverage Can be Sued for Invasion of Privacy

    ACEC Statement on Negotiated Bipartisan Debt Limit Compromise

    ACI 318-25 Structural Concrete Code Update Adds Sustainability Guide, Performance-based Wind Design

    SunTrust Will Pay $968 Million to Resolve Mortgage Probes

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Who Needs Them”

    'There Was No Fighting This Fire,' California Survivor Says

    NYC’s Next Hot Neighborhoods Targeted With Property Funds

    California to Build ‘Total Disaster City’ for Training

    Yet Another Reminder to ALWAYS Show Up for Court

    He's the Top U.S. Mortgage Salesman. His Daughter Isn't Buying It

    Construction Robotics: The Sentiment-Implementation Gap

    Benefits and Pitfalls of Partnerships Between Companies

    Top 10 Cases of 2019

    California Court of Appeal Finds Lingering Smoke From Wildfire is not Direct Physical Loss

    The Prompt Payment Rollercoaster

    Calling Hurricanes a Category 6 Risks Creating Deadly Confusion

    BIM Meets Reality on the Construction Site

    Why a Challenge to Philadelphia’s Project Labor Agreement Would Be Successful

    Additional Dismissals of COVID Business Interruption, Civil Authority Claims

    Insurer's Bad Faith is Actionable Tort for Purposes of Choice of Law Analysis

    Cliff White Expands Insurance Litigation Team at Payne & Fears
    ica’s Bridges and the Need for Bridge Infrastructure Investment

    Too Costly to Be Fair: Texas Appellate Court Finds the Arbitration Clause in a Residential Construction Contract Unenforceable

    Common Law Indemnity Claim Affirmed on Justifiable Beliefs

    California Fire Lawyers File Suit Against PG&E on Behalf of More Than 50 Wildfire Victims

    California Supreme Court Finds that the Notice-Prejudice Rule Applicable to Insurance is a Fundamental Public Policy of the State

    Mind Those Deadlines! Party Loses Appeal of Arbitration Decision by Failing to Timely File a Petition to Vacate

    Pollution Exclusion Bars Coverage for Damage Caused by Tar Escaping From Roof

    Residential Construction Surges in Durham

    Ambiguity in Insurance Policy will be Interpreted in Favor of Insurance Coverage

    Netherlands’ Developer Presents Modular Homes for Young Professionals

    Waiving Consequential Damages—What Could Go Wrong?

    Is a Text a Writing?

    Consequential Damages Can Be Recovered Against Insurer In Breach Of Contract