BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    Subterranean parking expert witness Piedmont California condominiums expert witness Piedmont California institutional building expert witness Piedmont California landscaping construction expert witness Piedmont California condominium expert witness Piedmont California industrial building expert witness Piedmont California custom home expert witness Piedmont California concrete tilt-up expert witness Piedmont California retail construction expert witness Piedmont California office building expert witness Piedmont California hospital construction expert witness Piedmont California parking structure expert witness Piedmont California housing expert witness Piedmont California structural steel construction expert witness Piedmont California low-income housing expert witness Piedmont California townhome construction expert witness Piedmont California custom homes expert witness Piedmont California Medical building expert witness Piedmont California mid-rise construction expert witness Piedmont California casino resort expert witness Piedmont California production housing expert witness Piedmont California multi family housing expert witness Piedmont California
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Piedmont, California

    California Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB800 (codified as Civil Code §§895, et seq) is the most far-reaching, complex law regulating construction defect litigation, right to repair, warranty obligations and maintenance requirements transference in the country. In essence, to afford protection against frivolous lawsuits, builders shall do all the following:A homeowner is obligated to follow all reasonable maintenance obligations and schedules communicated in writing to the homeowner by the builder and product manufacturers, as well as commonly accepted maintenance practices. A failure by a homeowner to follow these obligations, schedules, and practices may subject the homeowner to the affirmative defenses.A builder, under the principles of comparative fault pertaining to affirmative defenses, may be excused, in whole or in part, from any obligation, damage, loss, or liability if the builder can demonstrate any of the following affirmative defenses in response to a claimed violation:


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Piedmont California

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Building Industry Association of the Bay Area - Eastern Division
    Local # 0538
    PO Box 5160
    San Ramon, CA 94583


    Building Industry Association of the Bay Area
    Local # 0538
    101 Ygnacio Valley Rd # 210
    Walnut Creek, CA 94596
    http://www.biabayarea.org

    Building Industry Association of the Delta
    Local # 0513
    315 N San Joaquin St Ste 2
    Stockton, CA 95202
    http://www.biadelta.org

    Building Industry Association of Central California
    Local # 0536
    900 H St Ste E2
    Modesto, CA 95354
    http://www.biacc.com

    Building Industry Association of the Bay Area - Southern Division
    Local # 0538
    675 N 1st St Suite 620
    San Jose, CA 95112


    Building Industry Association of the Bay Area - Northern Division
    Local # 0538
    PO Box 7100
    Santa Rosa, CA 95407


    California Building Industry Association
    Local # 0500
    1215 K Street Ste 1200
    Sacramento, CA 95814
    http://www.cbia.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Piedmont California

    Maritime Law: An Albatross for Contractors Navigating Marine Construction

    California Court of Appeal: Inserting The Phrase “Ongoing Operations” In An Additional Endorsement Is Not Enough to Preclude Coverage for Completed Operations

    Endorsement to Insurance Policy Controls

    Oregon Codifies Tall Wood Buildings

    Can I Be Required to Mediate, Arbitrate or Litigate a California Construction Dispute in Some Other State?

    Specific Source of Water Not Relevant in Construction Defect Claim

    Eleventh Circuit’s Noteworthy Discussion on Bad Faith Insurance Claims

    Presidential Memorandum Promotes Reliable Supply and Delivery of Water in the West

    Subcontractors Have Remedies, Even if “Pay-if-Paid” Provisions are Enforced

    Will Protecting Copyrights Get Easier for Architects?

    SDOT Issues Construction Moratorium for FIFA 2026: What Contractors Need to Know and How to Prepare

    Give Way or Yield? The Jurisdiction of Your Contract Does Matter! (Law note)

    Women in Construction Aren’t Silent Anymore. They Are Using TikTok to Battle Discrimination

    New Mexico Holds One-Sided Dispute Resolution Provisions Are Unenforceable

    Type I Differing Site Conditions Claim is Not Easy to Prove

    Construction Industry Survey Says Optimism Hits All-Time High

    Palo Alto Considers Fines for Stalled Construction Projects

    Fifth Circuit Rules that Settlements in Underlying Action Constitute "Other Insurance"

    Texas Case Exposes Cracks in the Government Contractor Immunity Shield

    Traub Lieberman Partner Jessica Kull and Associate Jonathan Powell Win Motion to Dismiss in Favor of General Contractor

    Recovering For Inflation On Federal Contracts: Recent DOD Guidance On Economic Price Adjustment Clauses

    Pre-Judgment Interest Not Awarded Under Flood Policy

    Liability Insurer’s Duty To Defend Insured Is Broader Than Its Duty To Indemnify

    Mitigating Mold Exposure in Manufacturing and Multifamily Buildings

    Congratulations to Las Vegas Partner Jeffrey W. Saab and Associate Shanna B. Carter on Obtaining Another Defense Award at Arbitration!

    Burlingame Construction Defect Case Heading to Trial

    No Alerts Heard in Deadly Texas Flash Flood as 161 Still Missing

    Economic Loss Doctrine Bars Negligence Claim Against Building Company Owner, Individually

    Appeals Court Finds Manuscript Additional Insured Endorsements Ambiguous Regarding Completed Operations Coverage for Additional Insured

    Update – Property Owner’s Defense Goes up in Smoke in Careless Smoking Case

    Eleventh Circuit Reverses Attorneys’ Fee Award to Performance Bond Sureties in Dispute with Contractor arising from Claim against Subcontractor Performance Bond

    The Value of Photographic Evidence in Construction Litigation

    KB Homes Sues Condo Buyers over Alleged Cybersquatting and Hacking

    Where Mechanic’s Liens and Contracts Collide

    Seattle Crane Strike Heads Into Labor Day Weekend After Some Contractors Sign Agreements

    Trio of White and Williams Attorneys Named Top Lawyers by Delaware Today

    Three Kahana Feld Attorneys Recognized in The Best Lawyers in America® 2025

    Topic 606: A Retrospective Review of Revenue from Contracts with Customers

    Recovering Unabsorbed Home Office Overhead Due to Delay

    Medical Center Builder Sues Contracting Agent, Citing Costly Delays

    Whose Lease Is It Anyway: Physical Occupancy Not Required in Landlord-Tenant Dispute

    Arizona Purchaser Dwelling Actions Are Subject to a New Construction

    School for Building Trades Helps Fill Need for Skilled Workers

    CFTC Establishes Climate-Risk Unit, Echoing Other Biden Administration Agency Themes

    Four Common Construction Contracts

    Duty to Defend For Accident Exists, But Not Duty to Indeminfy

    The Power of Team Bonding: Transforming Workplaces for the Better

    Public Contract Code Section 1104 Does Not Apply to Claims of Implied Breach of Warranty of Correctness of Plans and Specifications

    State Supreme Court Cases Highlight Importance of Wording in Earth Movement Exclusions

    Is Your Business Insured for the Coronavirus?
    Corporate Profile

    PIEDMONT CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 4500 general contracting and design related expert designations, the Piedmont, California Construction Expert Directory delivers a superior construction and design expert support solution to construction claims professionals concerned with construction defect, scheduling, and delay claims. BHA provides building related litigation support and expert witness services to the building industry's most recognizable companies, insurers, risk managers, and a variety of municipalities. Utilizing captive assets which comprise design experts, civil / structural engineers, ICC Certified Inspectors, ASPE certified professional estimators, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Piedmont region.

    Piedmont California construction claims expert witnessPiedmont California structural engineering expert witnessesPiedmont California civil engineering expert witnessPiedmont California expert witness concrete failurePiedmont California construction project management expert witnessPiedmont California building expertPiedmont California construction expert testimony
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Piedmont, California

    At Lake Powell, Engineering Is Outpacing Colorado River Policy

    February 10, 2026 —
    Arizona’s Lake Powell is in trouble. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation modeling shows the reservoir dropped roughly 36 ft between December 2024 and December 2025, a decline that is no longer a warning but an operating condition engineers are designing around. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    'Drywall Isn't Light': Peter Lupo on Safety Management at Standard Drywall

    May 26, 2026 —
    Peter Lupo has been safety director since 2019 at San Diego-based Standard Drywall Inc., a major wall and ceiling contractor. He draws on over two decades of safety experience across a wide range of commercial construction work, having previously served as safety director for general contractor T.B. Penick & Sons. He has also previously operated Peter Lupo Consulting, where he reviewed legal cases and provided expert testimony, and blogged on safety for ENR.com. Lupo recently spoke to ENR Correspondent Elaine Silver about the weight of drywall, heat hazard control, bilingual crews and how he supports safety creativity and learning on the Standard Drywall staff. The conversation has been edited. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Elaine Silver, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Project Labor Agreements: A New Bid Protest Forum Split

    May 14, 2026 —
    Advertisements often include a disclaimer: “individual results may vary.” Similarly, lawyers are notorious for saying “it depends.” The mandatory Project Labor Agreement (“PLA”) regulations have recently placed into context this adage as it applies to federal contract bid protests, with very different results depending on which forum – the Court of Federal Claims (“COFC”) versus the Government Accountability Office (“GAO”) – different contractors have selected to bring PLA bid protests. Over the last two years, over 30 protesters have successfully achieved removal of mandatory PLAs from large-scale federal construction contracts based on two landmark bid protest decisions issued by the COFC. Similar challenges to PLAs at the GAO, however, have not been successful in removing PLAs, highlighting an emerging trend that the COFC is often a more effective relief forum than GAO for government construction contractors. Reprinted courtesy of Dirk D. Haire, Burr & Forman LLP, David P.J. Timm, Burr & Forman LLP and Michael J. Brewer, Burr & Forman LLP Mr. Haire may be contacted at dhaire@burr.com Mr. Timm may be contacted at dtimm@burr.com Mr. Brewer may be contacted at mbrewer@burr.com Read the full story...

    Massachusetts Construction Industry Continues to Wait While Prompt Payment Law Is Put to the Test

    March 31, 2026 —
    Earlier this month, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) heard argument in J.C. Cannistraro, LLC v. Columbia Construction Co. et al., a dispute concerning the state’s Prompt Payment Act (PPA). Although a decision has yet to be issued, it could potentially pose widespread implications for high-value private construction projects moving forward – and perhaps backwards. The PPA, G. L. c. 149, § 29E, enacted by the Massachusetts Legislature in 2010, has become a keystone in the construction industry. It was enacted to address, in part, downstream cash flow issues that tend to pervade construction projects by mandating a series of strict guidelines for submitting, and responding to, payment applications for private projects valued over $3,000,000. Amongst these requirements are set timeframes to respond to an application, as well as what must be contained in an application rejection. Critically, if an owner or upper-tier contractor fails to fully comply with all the statutory requirements in response to a proper payment application, the application is automatically “deemed to be approved” and payable. Significantly, however, this is not always the end of the line. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Catherine Maronski, Robinson Cole
    Ms. Maronski may be contacted at cmaronski@rc.com

    House Passes ABC-Supported Permitting Reform Legislation

    February 02, 2026 —
    WASHINGTON, Dec. 18—Associated Builders and Contractors applauded the U.S. House of Representatives for passing two comprehensive, ABC-supported permitting reform bills: H.R. 3898, the Promoting Efficient Review for Modern Infrastructure Today Act, and H.R. 4776, the Standardizing Permitting and Expediting Economic Development Act. Reprinted courtesy of ABC, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Battle Looms as Feds Order Washington State Coal Plant to Stay Open

    January 21, 2026 —
    Just days away from closure and a $600-million remake as a gas-powered facility, an independent power producer-owned coal-fired power plant in Washington state is ordered by the Trump administration to remain open through mid-March 2026—and likely longer—setting up a battle with state and company officials. Shutdown of the 730-MW plant, operating since 1972, was timed to comply with a state law banning coal power generation in 2026 and beyond. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tim Newcomb, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Kahana Feld Secures Discontinuance with Prejudice in Fraudulent Case

    January 06, 2026 —
    Kahana Feld secured a victory for its client after uncovering evidence that the plaintiff’s alleged trip-and-fall claim was fraudulent. The plaintiff sought $8 million in damages and claimed serious spinal and knee injuries stemming from an incident outside a Bronx retail store. Through strategic investigation and a crucial non-party deposition, our team established that the plaintiff’s identified eyewitness was out of the country at the time of the alleged accident—contradicting the plaintiff’s testimony and confirming the falsity of the claim. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Kahana Feld

    Seventh Circuit, With an Assist From the Illinois Supreme Court, Finds That “Pollution Exclusion” Bars Coverage For Emissions Allowed Under Regulatory Permit

    April 20, 2026 —
    In Griffith Foods Int’l Inc. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA, 24-1217 & 24-1223 (7th Cir. Mar. 13, 2026), the Seventh Circuit addressed the meaning and scope of a pollution exclusion in a standard-form commercial general liability insurance policy for underlying injuries caused by ethylene oxide (EtO) emissions. The insurance dispute arose out of underlying tort litigation involving bodily injury claims, including cancer, allegedly caused by emissions of ethylene oxide over a 35-year period from 1984 through 2019 by Griffith Foods International and later Sterigenics U.S. The pollution exclusion at issue generally barred coverage for “bodily injury” arising out of the discharge, dispersal, release or escape of smoke, vapors, soot, fumes, acids, alkalis, toxic chemicals, or other irritants, contaminants or pollutants. Interpreting similar exclusions, the Illinois Supreme Court has previously held that the standard CGL pollution exclusion bars coverage for bodily injuries caused by traditional environmental pollution (essentially industrial emissions of pollutants), but not by more commonplace emissions (such as carbon monoxide from a residential furnace or excess chlorine in a backyard swimming pool). See American States Insurance Co. v. Koloms, 177 Ill. 2d 473 (Ill. 1997). In Griffith Foods, the District Court initially concluded that the pollution exclusion did not apply because the companies emitted EtO pursuant to a permit issued by the IEPA. The District Court reached this latter conclusion by applying Erie Insurance Exchange v. Imperial Marble Corp., 957 N.E.2d 1214 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011), an Illinois intermediate appellate court decision finding it ambiguous whether a CGL policy’s pollution exclusion barred coverage for emissions authorized by regulatory permit. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jason Taylor, Traub Lieberman
    Mr. Taylor may be contacted at jtaylor@tlsslaw.com