BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    Medical building expert witness Platina California hospital construction expert witness Platina California casino resort expert witness Platina California tract home expert witness Platina California custom homes expert witness Platina California condominium expert witness Platina California multi family housing expert witness Platina California townhome construction expert witness Platina California institutional building expert witness Platina California landscaping construction expert witness Platina California office building expert witness Platina California industrial building expert witness Platina California Subterranean parking expert witness Platina California high-rise construction expert witness Platina California retail construction expert witness Platina California concrete tilt-up expert witness Platina California condominiums expert witness Platina California custom home expert witness Platina California low-income housing expert witness Platina California structural steel construction expert witness Platina California mid-rise construction expert witness Platina California production housing expert witness Platina California
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Platina, California

    California Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB800 (codified as Civil Code §§895, et seq) is the most far-reaching, complex law regulating construction defect litigation, right to repair, warranty obligations and maintenance requirements transference in the country. In essence, to afford protection against frivolous lawsuits, builders shall do all the following:A homeowner is obligated to follow all reasonable maintenance obligations and schedules communicated in writing to the homeowner by the builder and product manufacturers, as well as commonly accepted maintenance practices. A failure by a homeowner to follow these obligations, schedules, and practices may subject the homeowner to the affirmative defenses.A builder, under the principles of comparative fault pertaining to affirmative defenses, may be excused, in whole or in part, from any obligation, damage, loss, or liability if the builder can demonstrate any of the following affirmative defenses in response to a claimed violation:


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Platina California

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    North State Building Industry Association
    Local # 0540
    1536 Eureka Rd
    Roseville, CA 95661
    http://www.northstatebia.org

    California Building Industry Association
    Local # 0500
    1215 K Street Ste 1200
    Sacramento, CA 95814
    http://www.cbia.org

    Building Industry Association of the Bay Area - Northern Division
    Local # 0538
    PO Box 7100
    Santa Rosa, CA 95407


    Building Industry Association of the Delta
    Local # 0513
    315 N San Joaquin St Ste 2
    Stockton, CA 95202
    http://www.biadelta.org

    Building Industry Association of the Bay Area
    Local # 0538
    101 Ygnacio Valley Rd # 210
    Walnut Creek, CA 94596
    http://www.biabayarea.org

    Building Industry Association of the Bay Area - Eastern Division
    Local # 0538
    PO Box 5160
    San Ramon, CA 94583


    Building Industry Association of Central California
    Local # 0536
    900 H St Ste E2
    Modesto, CA 95354
    http://www.biacc.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Platina California

    Georgia Court of Appeals Holds That Insurer Must Defend Oil Company Against Entire Lawsuit

    No Duty to Defend under Homeowner's Policy Where No Occurrence, No Property Damage

    Traub Lieberman Partner Michael Logan and Associate Christian Romaguera Obtain Voluntary Dismissal in Favor of Construction Company Under the Vertical Immunity Doctrine

    Seyfarth’s Brenda Radmacher Presents at Construction Defect and Insurance Conference

    What is the Implied Warranty of Habitability?

    Seventh Circuit Confirms Additional Insured's Coverage for Alleged Construction Defects

    Louisiana Legislature Enacts Act 932 – Significant Changes to Insurer Bad-Faith Exposure for Failure to Settle

    Insurer Must Defend Faulty Workmanship Claims

    Millennials Want Houses, Just Like Everybody Else

    Failure to Timely File Suit in Federal Court for Flood Loss is Fatal

    Seattle Expands Bridge Bioswale Projects

    When Rule 702 Motions Fail: A Close Look at AECOM v. Flatiron

    Bar Against Forum Selection Clauses in Construction Contracts Extended to Design Professionals

    Connecticut’s New False Claims Act Increases Risk to Public Construction Participants

    CSLB Reminds California Public Works Contractors to Renew Their Public Works Registration

    Real Estate & Construction News Round-Up 05/04/22

    Seattle Crane Strike Heads Into Labor Day Weekend After Some Contractors Sign Agreements

    Injury to Employees Endorsement Eliminates Coverage for Insured Employer

    Trends: “Nearshoring” Opportunities for the Construction Industry

    Revamp to Nationwide Permits Impacting Oil and Gas Pipeline, Utility and Telecom Line Work

    School for Building Trades Helps Fill Need for Skilled Workers

    Architect Sues School District

    Detroit Showed What ‘Build Back Better’ Can Look Like

    Engineer and CNA Dispute Claim Over Dual 2014 Bridge Failures

    Washington Court Denies Subcontractor’s Claim Based on Contractual Change and Notice Provisions

    Home Building Up in Kansas City

    Home Building Likely to Stick to Slow Pace

    U.S. Supreme Court Decision Alters Course of $745M Louisiana Coastal Damage Judgment

    Court Upholds Denial of Collapse Coverage Where Building Still Stands

    Excess Carrier's Declaratory Judgment Action Stayed While Underlying Case Still Pending

    Buffett Says ‘No-Brainer’ to Get a Mortgage to Short Rates

    Insured's Complaint for Breach of Contract and Bad Faith Adequately Pleads Consequential Damages

    The Anatomy of a Construction Dispute- The Claim

    David Samani Joins BHBA Podcast on Mediation Best Practices

    WARN Act Exceptions in Response to COVID-19

    NLRB Finalizes Rule for Construction Industry Unions to Obtain Majority Support Representational Status

    New Year’s Resolution: Engineering the “Tee-Up Day” for Complex Construction Mediations

    No One to Go After for Construction Defects at Animal Shelter

    Sewage Treatment Agency Sues Insurer and Contractor after Wall Failure and Sewage Leak

    The Future of High-Rise is Localized and Responsive

    Baby Boomer Housing Deficit Coming?

    NYC’s Next Hot Neighborhoods Targeted With Property Funds

    Will Protecting Copyrights Get Easier for Architects?

    California Team Secures Appellate Victory on Behalf of Celebrity Comedian Kathy Griffin in Dispute with Bel Air Neighbor

    English v. RKK- There is Even More to the Story

    Contractor Definition Central to Coverage Dispute

    Colorado’s Federal District Court Finds Carriers Have Joint and Several Defense Duties

    Dispute Among Joint Venture Partners and Joint Venture Agreement

    Celebrating BWB&O’s 2026 Super Lawyers Rising Stars in San Diego!

    The Hazards of Carrier-Specific Manuscript Language: Ohio Casualty's Off-Premises Property Damage and Contractors' E&O Endorsements
    Corporate Profile

    PLATINA CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 4500 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Platina, California Construction Expert Directory delivers a superior construction and design expert support solution to construction claims professionals seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction claims investigation and expert services to the building industry's most recognizable companies, insurers, risk managers, and a variety of municipalities. Employing in house resources which include construction delay claims experts, registered design professionals, professional engineers, and credentailed construction consultants, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Platina region.

    Platina California construction project management expert witnessesPlatina California architectural engineering expert witnessPlatina California expert witnesses fenestrationPlatina California building envelope expert witnessPlatina California expert witness roofingPlatina California hospital construction expert witnessPlatina California construction expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Platina, California

    Legal 500 US Ranks Hunton’s Insurance Coverage Team Among Top Policyholder Practices in 2026 Guide

    July 06, 2026 —
    Hunton’s insurance coverage practice was once again recognized among the nation’s top policyholder insurance practices, receiving a Band 2 national ranking in the 2026 United States Edition of The Legal 500 for Insurance: Advice to Policyholders. The Legal 500 recognizes firms solely based on merit through numerous factors including client feedback and peer input. Bolstering the team’s national recognition, several coverage lawyers received individual accolades: special counsel Lorelie “Lorie” S. Masters was named to The Legal 500’s Hall of Fame; team head Syed S. Ahmad and partner Michael S. Levine were named Leading Lawyers; and partners Andrea DeField and Latosha M. Ellis were named Next Generation Partners. In addition, partners Walter J. Andrews, Lawrence J. Bracken II, and Koorosh “KT” Talieh were recognized as Key Lawyers on the team. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP

    For Urban Walkers, a Patchy Dilemma: Who Owns the Sidewalk?

    July 06, 2026 —
    In 2007, New York City’s sanitation department threatened Natalie Shea with a $300 fine for defacing public property with graffiti. Her crime: drawing a blue flower in front of her family’s Park Slope home with sidewalk chalk. She was six years old. The incident, which made local and national news at the time, captures the fraught role that sidewalks often play in US cities. These patches of pavement do more than carry pedestrians to their destinations: They’re also places for commerce, social interaction and childhood play, from chalking to learning how to ride a bike. Urbanist Jane Jacobs once likened the range of activities that city sidewalks attract to an “intricate ballet.” In the new book Sidewalk Nation: The Life and Law of America’s Most Overlooked Resource (Harvard University Press), author Michael Pollack explores the “tangled web of state and local regulation” that governs sidewalks, with cities often passing along responsibilities for tasks like clearing snow and keeping walkways safe. He paints a portrait of the American sidewalk a disorderly and often neglected network, filled with literal and metaphorical cracks that give rise to all sorts of conflict, from mundane clashes over maintenance to more consequential fights over accessibility and inequality. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Linda Poon, Bloomberg

    White and Williams LLP Attorneys Recognized as PA and DE Super Lawyers

    July 06, 2026 —
    White and Williams LLP is proud to announce that eight attorneys in the firm’s Philadelphia office and one attorney in the firm's Delaware Office have been recognized on the 2026 Super Lawyers® and Rising Star lists. This recognition highlights our attorney's exceptional legal acumen and their commitment to client service excellence. Lawyers are selected for inclusion in Pennsylvania and Delaware Area Super Lawyers® and Rising Stars through a process that considers independent research, peer recognition and the professional achievements of attorneys from more than 70 practice areas. Approximately 2.5% of lawyers in each state are selected by the research team at Super Lawyers® to receive this honor. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of White and Williams LLP

    California Enacts Change Order Fair Payment Act

    March 24, 2026 —
    For private works construction contracts entered on or after January 1, 2026, recent legislation establishes a claims and dispute resolution process for change orders. The law is codified at Civil Code § 8850. A synopsis of the pertinent provisions includes the following:
    1. Submitting a Claim. Contractors or subcontractors must submit a detailed, documented claim when requesting additional time or payment.
    2. Owner’s Response Time. The owner must meet and confer within thirty (30) days after receiving the claim. Within ten (10) days of meeting, the owner must provide a written statement identifying which portions of the claim are undisputed and which are disputed. An owner’s failure to respond is treated as disputing the entire claim.
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Michael J. Baker, Snell & Wilmer
    Mr. Baker may be contacted at mjbaker@swlaw.com

    Managing Rising Costs and Shifting Legal Risk for Florida High-Rise and Condominium Projects

    May 05, 2026 —
    Florida's construction defect landscape is experiencing a major shift. The convergence of material and labor cost volatility, regulatory tightening, and increasingly complex litigation strategies is forcing associations, developers, and their counsel to rethink how they approach risk management and dispute resolution. For those managing large-scale condo and high-rise projects, the stakes have never been higher. The Cost Volatility Trap Construction material prices rose at a "staggering" 12.6% annualized rate during the first two months of 2026, according to recent industry analysis. Tariff impacts are projected to lead to more increases of 5.4% to 6.8%, depending on property type. For associations facing construction defect claims, this volatility creates a cascading problem: repair scopes defined two years ago are now dramatically underpriced, and damage calculations that appeared reasonable at discovery are obsolete by the time of settlement. Courts and mediators are increasingly scrutinizing how cost estimates were developed and whether they account for existing market circumstances. Associations must now commission updated repair assessments more frequently, a practice that increases investigation costs but strengthens the credibility of damage claims. Conversely, defendants are weaponizing cost inflation as a defense, arguing that claimed damages are speculative or inflated. The practical result: repair sequencing and phasing strategies have become critical litigation tools. Associations that can demonstrate a rational, cost-effective repair plan tied to current market data are more favorably placed in settlement negotiations. Regulatory Pressure and Deliberate Timing Florida's 2026 condo compliance regime has significantly changed the defect claims landscape. Elevated transparency requirements, stricter reserve funding mandates, and tightened building safety inspection protocols mean that associations now face dual pressures: Comply with new regulations while simultaneously handling construction defect exposure. This regulatory environment is changing investigation and documentation strategy. Associations that delay defect investigation to avoid triggering reserve funding obligations or disclosure requirements are taking on considerable legal risk. Recent case law such as the Third District Court of Appeal's reaffirmation of Chapter 558's pre-suit mediation requirements, underscores Florida's intent to resolve disputes early. Associations that move deliberately and record carefully during the pre-suit phase gain leverage in mediation and reduce the risk of expensive litigation. Timing also intersects with repair sequencing. Associations must now balance the urgency of compliance inspections against the strategic advantage of phased repairs. Some associations are using compliance deadlines as a forcing mechanism to accelerate settlement discussions, while others are sequencing repairs to demonstrate good-faith remediation efforts before litigation commences. The Emerging Risk Transfer Challenge As construction defect claims grow more complex and costly, the traditional risk transfer systems, such as design-build warranties, contractor bonds, and insurance, are proving inadequate. Developers and general contractors are increasingly shifting risk to subcontractors and material suppliers, fragmenting liability and complicating recovery efforts for associations. Permitting and approval friction is also creating new litigation pressure points. Delays in municipal approvals, changes to building code interpretations, and disputes over remedial work compliance continue to spawn collateral claims that go beyond the original defect. Associations must now anticipate not only defect liability but also regulatory compliance disputes with municipalities, creating a dual-front legal challenge. For large communities, this means reconsidering the entire risk architecture. Insurance carriers are tightening coverage, and traditional indemnification chains are breaking down. Forward-thinking associations are engaging counsel earlier in the development process to negotiate clearer risk allocation provisions and more robust insurance requirements. Taking a Data-Driven Approach Managing rising costs and shifting legal risk in Florida's high-rise and condo market requires a more sophisticated, data-driven approach. Associations must commission frequent cost updates, move deliberately through pre-suit investigation and mediation, and challenge traditional assumptions about risk transfer. Developers and their counsel should view regulatory compliance not as a burden but as an opportunity to demonstrate good-faith risk management and strengthen settlement positioning. The firms and associations that succeed in 2026 will be those that treat cost volatility, regulatory change, and litigation strategy not as separate challenges but as linked elements of a coherent risk management framework. Stephen Hauptman is special counsel in Ball Janik LLP’s Fort Lauderdale office. He may be reached at shauptman@balljanik.com.

    New York Team Secures Dismissal of Premises Liability Action Against Client

    May 26, 2026 —
    New York Associate Nicole Koch and Partner Jennine Gerrard recently secured a complete dismissal of a plaintiff’s claims for injuries following a fall in front of a client’s business at an outdoor mall. The plaintiff alleged that she was walking on the sidewalk outside of the client's hair care supply store in the Bronx in May 2024 when she tripped and fell on a broken/defective portion of the sidewalk. As a result of the accident, the plaintiff suffered injuries to her spine, hip, wrist, and both knees. She proceeded to file suit in New York County Supreme Court against Lewis Brisbois’ client and the landlord for the property. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    That’s a Wrap! Pennsylvania Court Holds Arbitration Clause in Online Agreement Unenforceable

    May 14, 2026 —
    In Duffy v. Tatum, 2026 Pa. Super. LEXIS 112, 2026 PA Super 41, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania (Superior Court) considered whether an arbitration provision contained in the online Terms of Service on the defendant’s website were enforceable. The plaintiff, Daniel Duffy (Duffy), visited the website of defendant, Dolly, Inc. (Dolly), to purchase moving services. Duffy selected the number of movers, items to be moved and the type of vehicle needed. To complete the booking, the website required Duffy to checkmark a box labeled “By checking this box I accept the Dolly Terms of Service.” Duffy did not have to open the link or scroll to the bottom of the agreement before being able to click on the checkmark box. The Terms of Service included an arbitration provision requiring that any dispute related to the moving services to be resolved by arbitration in accordance with the American Arbitration Association. The Terms of Service did not include any statement that the user was waiving the right to a jury trial. The Superior Court found the internet Terms of Service unenforceable. During the moving process, an accident occurred and injured Duffy. In May 2024, Duffy and his wife sued Dolly and other related entities alleging negligence and loss of consortium. Dolly filed preliminary objections alleging that the parties agreed to alternative dispute resolution. The lower court overruled the preliminary objections, finding that Dolly’s website did not provide reasonably obvious notice of its Terms of Service to Duffy and, as such, Duffy never agreed to waive his constructional right to a jury trial. Dolly filed an appeal to the Superior Court. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gus Sara, White and Williams LLP
    Mr. Sara may be contacted at sarag@whiteandwilliams.com

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (3/11/25) – An AI Inflection Point for Hotels, Investor Pivot in Build-to-Rent and Looming Legislation for Single-Family Investors

    March 24, 2026 —
    In our latest roundup, lodging demand for World Cup brings growth, commercial property management firms use of AI becomes firmer, construction industry shows slow start to the year, and more! Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team