BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    custom home expert witness Seal Beach California industrial building expert witness Seal Beach California low-income housing expert witness Seal Beach California Subterranean parking expert witness Seal Beach California parking structure expert witness Seal Beach California landscaping construction expert witness Seal Beach California condominiums expert witness Seal Beach California concrete tilt-up expert witness Seal Beach California tract home expert witness Seal Beach California hospital construction expert witness Seal Beach California townhome construction expert witness Seal Beach California casino resort expert witness Seal Beach California retail construction expert witness Seal Beach California custom homes expert witness Seal Beach California structural steel construction expert witness Seal Beach California production housing expert witness Seal Beach California mid-rise construction expert witness Seal Beach California high-rise construction expert witness Seal Beach California institutional building expert witness Seal Beach California housing expert witness Seal Beach California Medical building expert witness Seal Beach California condominium expert witness Seal Beach California
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Seal Beach, California

    California Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB800 (codified as Civil Code §§895, et seq) is the most far-reaching, complex law regulating construction defect litigation, right to repair, warranty obligations and maintenance requirements transference in the country. In essence, to afford protection against frivolous lawsuits, builders shall do all the following:A homeowner is obligated to follow all reasonable maintenance obligations and schedules communicated in writing to the homeowner by the builder and product manufacturers, as well as commonly accepted maintenance practices. A failure by a homeowner to follow these obligations, schedules, and practices may subject the homeowner to the affirmative defenses.A builder, under the principles of comparative fault pertaining to affirmative defenses, may be excused, in whole or in part, from any obligation, damage, loss, or liability if the builder can demonstrate any of the following affirmative defenses in response to a claimed violation:


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Seal Beach California

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Building Industry Association Southern California - Desert Chapter
    Local # 0532
    77570 Springfield Ln Ste E
    Palm Desert, CA 92211
    http://www.desertchapter.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California
    Local # 0532
    17744 Sky Park Circle Suite 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biasc.org

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Orange County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    17744 Skypark Cir Ste 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biaoc.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Riverside County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    3891 11th St Ste 312
    Riverside, CA 92501


    Building Industry Association Southern California - Baldy View Chapter
    Local # 0532
    8711 Monroe Ct Ste B
    Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
    http://www.biabuild.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - LA/Ventura Chapter
    Local # 0532
    28460 Ave Stanford Ste 240
    Santa Clarita, CA 91355


    Building Industry Association of San Diego
    Local # 0556
    9201 Spectrum Center Blvd Ste 110
    San Diego, CA 92123
    http://www.biasandiego.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Seal Beach California
    Corporate Profile

    SEAL BEACH CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from approximately 5000 building and claims related expert witness designations, the Seal Beach, California Construction Expert Directory offers a wide range of trial support and construction consulting services to legal professionals and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims litigation. BHA provides construction related consulting and expert witness support services to widely recognized construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing in house resources which comprise licensed architects, registered professional engineers, ASPE certified professional estimators, ICC Certified inspection and testing professionals, the construction experts group brings specialized experience and local capabilities to Seal Beach and the surrounding areas.

    Seal Beach California consulting general contractorSeal Beach California architectural expert witnessSeal Beach California expert witness structural engineerSeal Beach California slope failure expert witnessSeal Beach California construction claims expert witnessSeal Beach California engineering expert witnessSeal Beach California construction defect expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Seal Beach, California

    AI & Digital Tools on Construction Projects: Contract Risks to Address Before Peak Season

    April 08, 2026 —
    Artificial intelligence and advanced digital tools are no longer experimental on construction projects. In Q1 of 2026, we can already see how they are already influencing schedules, estimates, submittals, safety reporting, and day‑to‑day project documentation. As peak construction season approaches, many teams are accelerating adoption of AI to gain efficiency. What often lags behind, however, is the contract framework governing how those tools are used—and how their outputs are treated when something goes wrong. On sophisticated construction projects, that gap can quickly become a dispute driver. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Meghan Douris, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Ms. Douris may be contacted at mdouris@seyfarth.com

    SDV Celebrates 30th Anniversary Press Release

    April 08, 2026 —
    Trumbull, Connecticut – Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. (SDV) is proud to announce the celebration of its 30th anniversary. Founded in 1996 by three attorneys in a small New Haven, Connecticut office, SDV was built on a clear and focused mission: representing policyholders in insurance coverage matters. Three decades later, that commitment remains at the core of the firm’s identity and has been instrumental in its continued success and reputation nationwide. Today, SDV is a nationally recognized boutique firm with 50 attorneys serving policyholders across the United States. Building on its longstanding reputation for excellence and client advocacy, the firm is pleased to announce the opening of its newest office in Massachusetts—an exciting milestone that reflects SDV’s continued growth. The new office is led by Managing Partner Anna Perry. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.

    Risks of Using an AI Chatbot for Legal Advice: Lessons from United States v. Heppner

    April 08, 2026 —
    Imagine that you are an executive (who is not a lawyer) and are concerned about what your company plans to do is legal. You could call your lawyer who might bill you for the call. Or, you can ask your AI chatbot, such as Claude or ChatGPT, about the legal risk. The chatbot will likely compliment you on the incisive question, provide you with highly confident answer (that may or may not be right) and will not bill you on an hourly basis. That is essentially what financial services executive Bradley Heppner did. It did not end well. A federal court recently ruled that Heppner’s chats with the AI tool Claude were not protected by attorney-client privilege or the work-product doctrine. That means that the other side (in this case, the federal government) could get access to his chatbot prompts, uploads and responses, and learn a great deal about, for example, whether Heppner knew what he was doing was illegal. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Payne & Fears LLP

    On Checks and Balances

    March 03, 2026 —
    It’s called “checks and balances” for a reason. And, generally, it works well so long as there are clear boundaries between the “co-equal” branches of government. In Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. Department of Industrial Relations, 108 Cal.App.5th 243 (2025), the 3rd District Court of Appeals upheld a set of regulations issued by the California Apprenticeship Council that contradicted an earlier 2015 ruling of the Court of Appeals. The Associated General Contractors of California Case At issue in the case was California’s Prevailing Wage Law which requires public works contractors to hire a certain ratio of apprentices. The purpose of the apprenticeship requirements is to maintain the pipeline of skilled tradespeople on taxpayer-funded projects. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    Indiana District Court Finds Crane Inspection Services Do Not Trigger “Professional Services” Exclusion in Liability Policy

    February 17, 2026 —
    In Crane 1 Holdco, Inc. et al. v. Continental Ins. Co., 23-cv-205 (N.D. Ind. Jan 12, 2026), the District Court for the Northern District of Indiana had occasion to interpret the scope and meaning of the term “professional services” in an excess liability policy exclusion. By way of background, Robert Coppage was crushed by a crane while at work. He was seriously injured and later received a significant settlement in a state court civil action against the company that inspected the crane, Crane1. Crane1 sought coverage for the settlement under a first layer excess policy issued by Continental Insurance Company, which included an exclusion for any “liability arising out of the actual or alleged rendering of, or failure to render, any professional services by the Insured or any other person for whose acts the Insured is legally responsible.” The underlying complaint alleged that Crane1 was negligent in its modification, services, maintenance, inspection, and/or repair of the crane. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jason Taylor, Traub Lieberman
    Mr. Taylor may be contacted at jtaylor@tlsslaw.com

    Ball Janik LLP Welcomes Construction Defect Attorney and U.S. Air Force Veteran Jake Scott to its Fort Lauderdale Office

    June 02, 2026 —
    Ball Janik LLP, a leading construction defect and insurance recovery law firm, has welcomed Jake Scott as an associate in its Fort Lauderdale office. Scott joins the Construction Defect Practice Group, bringing experience across construction litigation that includes construction defect, contract dispute, and negligence matters, along with a track record of representing construction professionals through depositions, court appearances, and trial preparation to support the firm's steady growth and client service statewide. "We're excited to welcome Jake Scott to our Fort Lauderdale office and Construction Defect Practice Group," said James C. Prichard, Managing Partner at Ball Janik LLP. "We look forward to the fresh perspectives and legal solutions he will provide for community associations across South Florida." Scott is a results-driven attorney dedicated to providing strategic counsel for complex legal challenges. He has experience managing all phases of a case, from early investigation and discovery through trial preparation and settlement negotiations. Prior to joining Ball Janik, Scott served as an associate attorney in Fort Lauderdale, where he represented clients in construction litigation matters, handled depositions and court appearances, conducted legal research, and drafted pleadings, motions, and briefs. He also worked as an attorney in Tampa, where he represented contractors, subcontractors, and construction firms in defending claims involving construction defects, contractual disputes, and negligence, and worked closely with expert witnesses, engineers, and consultants to develop and present technical evidence. Scott's experience representing the development and building sides of construction disputes provides a valuable, contrast-driven perspective that supports the strategic evaluation of claims and practical approaches to resolution for Ball Janik's clients. A proud veteran, Scott served in the United States Air Force for eight years, including roles as an Airspace Control Officer and in Space Systems Operations, supporting safe space flight operations and satellite communications. Carrying the discipline of airborne operations, Scott worked in the aerospace sector as a Satellite Engineer and Orbital Analyst. He also held a role in the housing sector, supporting marketing and business development initiatives. Scott received his law degree from Stetson University College of Law. He attended American Military University, where he earned degrees in marketing, business management, and related support services. About Ball Janik LLP Ball Janik LLP is a Florida-based law firm offering construction defect, construction law, insurance recovery, and commercial litigation counsel to its local and national clients. The firm was founded in 1982 and has expanded its capabilities, professionals, and geographic footprint. What started as a small firm focused on real property, land use, and litigation (known then as Ball Janik & Novack) has grown to a team of 50-plus attorneys and paralegals in 5 offices in Florida, with centuries of combined experience and capabilities. The firm has been recognized by Chambers USA, U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers®, The Best Lawyers in America©, and Corporate International. Read more here: https://www.balljanik.com.

    Alert: Fraudulent Notice of Nonpayment Defense Applies to Payment Bond Claims

    April 27, 2026 —
    Under Florida’s Lien Law, there’s an affirmative defense or affirmative claim known as a “fraudulent lien.” The fraudulent lien defense or claim is set out in Florida Statute s. 713.31. This defense also extends to payment bond claims, whether under a private statutory payment bond (Florida Statute s. 713.23) or a public payment bond (Florida Statute s. 255.05), as it pertains to the notice of nonpayment. A notice of nonpayment needs to be served within 90 days from final furnishing to preserve a claimant’s rights against the bond. However, there really has not been a case, until now, that discusses a “fraudulent notice of nonpayment.”
    Prevailing HOAs Not Entitled to Attorneys’ Fees in Enforcement Actions Brought Under Davis-Stirling

    Fifth Circuit Certifies Questions to Texas Supreme Court on Concurrent Causation Doctrine

    Government’s Termination of Contractor for Default for Failure-To-Make Progress

    What Does It Mean When a House Sells for $50 Million?

    Court Finds Matching of Damaged Materials is Required by Policy

    COVID-19 Is Not Direct Physical Loss Or Damage

    First-Party Statutory Bad Faith – 60 Days to Cure Means 60 Days to Cure

    Biden Administration Focus on Environmental Justice Raises Questions for Industry

    Los Angeles Is Burning. But California’s Insurance Industry Is Not About to Collapse.

    To Ease Housing Crunch, Theme Parks Are Becoming Homebuilders

    Wall Street Is Buying Starter Homes to Quietly Become America’s Landlord

    Governor Signs Permit Extension Bill Extending Permit Deadlines to One Year

    EPA Fines Ivory Homes for Storm Water Pollution

    Bad Faith Jury Verdict Upheld After Insurer's Failure to Settle Within Policy Limits

    TOP TAKE-AWAY SERIES: The 2023 Fall Meeting in Washington, D.C.

    South Carolina Contractors Regain General Liability Coverage

    Construction Industry on the Comeback, But It Won’t Be the Same

    UCF Sues Architects and Contractors Over Stadium Construction Defects

    LLMs in Construction: Where They Fail and Where They Shine

    Famed NYC Bridge’s Armor Is Focus of Suit Against French Company

    OSHA Penalties—What Happened with International Nutrition

    Renters ‘Sold Out’ by NYC Pensions Press Mayor on Housing

    Caterpillar Said to Be Focus of Senate Overseas Tax Probe

    San Diego: Compromise Reached in Fee Increases for Affordable Housing

    Wharf Holdings to Sell Entire Sino-Ocean Stake for $284 Million

    Flood Policy Does Not Cover Debris Removal from Property

    Mixed Reality for Construction: Applicability and Reality

    Intel's $20B Ohio 'Mega-Site' is Latest Development in Chip Makers' Rush to Boost US Production

    One More Thing Moving From California to Texas: Wildfire Risk

    Introducing the Updated 2026 Pillsbury Guide to Data Centers

    Congratulations to Karen Baytosh and August Hotchkin on Their Recognition as 2021 Nevada Legal Elites!

    Employee or Independent Contractor? New Administrator’s Interpretation Issued by Department of Labor Provides Guidance

    First-Party Statutory Bad Faith – 60 Days to Cure Means 60 Days to Cure

    A Look at Trending Legislative Changes Impacting Workers' Comp

    Insurer Obligated to Cover Preventative Remediation of Construction Defects

    Pre-Covid Construction Contracts Unworkable as Costs Surge, Webuild Says

    The Rubber Hits the Ramp: A Maryland Personal Injury Case

    University of Tennessee Commits to $1.9B Capital Plan

    Is Arbitration Okay Under the Miller Act? It Is if You Don’t Object

    Las Vegas, Back From the Bust, Revives Dead Projects

    Wilke Fleury Attorneys Awarded Sacramento Business Journal’s Best of the Bar

    Candis Jones Named to Atlanta Magazine’s 2023 “Atlanta 500” List

    Disaster-Relief Bill Stalls in Senate

    Energy Efficiency Ratings Aren’t Actually Predicting Energy Efficiency

    White and Williams Earns Tier 1 Rankings from U.S. News "Best Law Firms" 2020

    No Duty To Defend Additional Insured When Bodily Injury Not Caused by Insured

    Major Change to Residential Landlord Tenant Law

    Client Alert: Court of Appeal Applies Common Interest Privilege Doctrine to HOA Litigation Meetings

    Eminent Domain Bomb Threats Made on $775M Alabama Highway Project

    Parties to an Agreement to Arbitrate May be Compelled to Arbitrate with Non-Parties

    Federal Court Denies Summary Judgment in Leaky Condo Conversion

    A New Way to Design in 3D – Interview with Pouria Kay of Grib

    Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment on Faulty Workmanship Denied

    Revised Cause Identified for London's Wobbling Millennium Bridge After Two Decades

    Approaching Design-Build Projects to Avoid (or Win) Disputes

    MBS’s $500 Billion Desert Dream Just Keeps Getting Weirder

    All Aboard! COVID-19 Securities Suit Sets Sail, Implicates D&O Insurance

    Pennsylvania Modular Home Builder Buys Maine Firm

    Contractor Entitled to Defense for Alleged Faulty Workmanship of Subcontractor

    When Business is Personal: Negligent and Intentional Interference Claims

    Video: Contractors’ Update on New Regulations Governing Commercial Use of Drones

    Houston Bond Issue Jump-Starts 237 Flood Control Projects

    CGL Policy May Not Cover Cybersecurity and Data-Related Losses

    Judicial Panel Denies Nationwide Consolidation of COVID-19 Business Interruption Cases