BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    Subterranean parking expert witness Pagosa Springs Colorado parking structure expert witness Pagosa Springs Colorado low-income housing expert witness Pagosa Springs Colorado Medical building expert witness Pagosa Springs Colorado hospital construction expert witness Pagosa Springs Colorado landscaping construction expert witness Pagosa Springs Colorado institutional building expert witness Pagosa Springs Colorado concrete tilt-up expert witness Pagosa Springs Colorado structural steel construction expert witness Pagosa Springs Colorado casino resort expert witness Pagosa Springs Colorado retail construction expert witness Pagosa Springs Colorado tract home expert witness Pagosa Springs Colorado industrial building expert witness Pagosa Springs Colorado custom home expert witness Pagosa Springs Colorado townhome construction expert witness Pagosa Springs Colorado multi family housing expert witness Pagosa Springs Colorado office building expert witness Pagosa Springs Colorado custom homes expert witness Pagosa Springs Colorado condominium expert witness Pagosa Springs Colorado mid-rise construction expert witness Pagosa Springs Colorado condominiums expert witness Pagosa Springs Colorado high-rise construction expert witness Pagosa Springs Colorado
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Pagosa Springs, Colorado

    Colorado Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 1161 has three significant components that effect construction defect litigation. The first is a right to remedy and notice provision (75 days written notice) The homeowner must give the builder a notice that describes the nature of the claimed construction defects, the location of the defects and a general description of the type of damages that are claimed. The second component is a limitation on the nature and type of damages that can be pursued and awarded in a construction defect case. The third is a limitation on the availability and amount of punitive damages ($250,000) under the provisions of the Colorado Consumer Protection Act


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Pagosa Springs Colorado

    State license required for electrical, asbestos removal, plumbers, and pesticides trade; no state license for general contracting. Licensing may be required on a city or county level.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Builders Association of Pagosa Springs
    Local # 0698
    PO Box 3956
    Pagosa Springs, CO 81147
    http://www.pagosabuilders.com

    Four Corners Chapter
    Local # 0655
    PO Box TL
    Cortez, CO 81321
    http://hbamontdolores.com

    Home Builders Association of Southwest Co Inc
    Local # 0683
    1199 Main Ave #234
    Durango, CO 81301
    http://www.hbasc.com

    Home Builders Association of the Upper Rio Grande
    Local # 0679
    PO Box 1210
    South Fork, CO 81154
    http://www.hbaurg.com

    Pueblo Associated Home Builders
    Local # 0675
    635 West Corona Ave Suite 101
    Pueblo, CO 81004
    http://www.homebuilderspueblo.org

    Housing & Builders Association Of Colorado Springs
    Local # 0625
    4585 Hilton Pkwy Ste 100
    Colorado Springs, CO 80907
    http://www.cshba.com

    Home Builders Association of Teller Co
    Local # 0690
    PO Box 713
    Woodland Park, CO 80866
    http://www.hbatellercounty.com/


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Pagosa Springs Colorado

    Federal Government Partial Shutdown – Picking Up the Pieces

    Four Dead After Crane Collapses at Google’s Seattle Campus

    Connecticut Supreme Court Rules Matching of Materials Decided by Appraisers

    Construction Trust Fund Statutes: Know What’s Required in the State Where Your Project Is Underway

    California Supreme Court Holds that Requirement of Prejudice for Late Notice Defense is a Fundamental Public Policy of the State for Choice of Law Analysis

    Additional Insured’s Claim for a Defense Is Dismissed

    Superior Court Of Pennsylvania Holds Curb Construction Falls Within The Scope Of CASPA

    When an Insurer Proceeds as Subrogee, Defendants Cannot Assert Contribution Claims Against the Insured

    My Top 5 Innovations for Greater Efficiency, Sustainability & Quality

    Substitute Materials — What Are Your Duties? What Are Your Risks? (Law Note)

    PSA: Latest Updates from AGC-VA on COVID Rules (UPDATED)

    Senior Housing Surplus Seen as Boomers Spur Building Boom

    Real Estate & Construction News Round-Up (11/03/21)

    Parks and Degradation: The Mess at Yosemite

    “Bound by the Bond”

    Harmon Towers Duty to Defend Question Must Wait, Says Court

    Mexico's Richest Man Carlos Slim to Rebuild Collapsed Subway Line

    Do Construction Contracts and Fraud Mix After All?

    Yet ANOTHER Reason not to Contract without a License

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Recognized as 2026 Illinois Super Lawyers® and Rising Stars

    San Francisco OKs Revamped Settling Millennium Tower Fix

    ZLien Startup has Discovered a Billion in Payments for Clients

    The Risk of A Fixed Price Contract Is The Market

    Double-Wide World Cup Seats Available to 6-Foot, 221-Pound Fans

    GAO Sustains Unsupported Past Performance Evaluation and Unequal Discussion Bid Protest

    Google’s Floating Mystery Boxes Solved?

    Real Estate & Construction News Round-Up (01/18/23) – Construction Inventory, 3D Printing, and Metaverse Replicas

    Illinois Joins the Pack on Defective Construction as an Occurrence

    The Age of Uncertainty: Monitoring Construction Policy Shifts

    Paul Tetzloff Elected As Newmeyer & Dillion Managing Partner

    Subcontractor’s Miller Act Payment Bond Claim

    Ball Janik LLP Welcomes Construction Defect Attorney and U.S. Air Force Veteran Jake Scott to its Fort Lauderdale Office

    A Tort, By Any Other Name, is Just a Tort: Massachusetts Court Bars Contract Claims That Sound in Negligence

    Court Holds That One-Year SOL Applies to Disgorgement Claims Under B&P Section 7031

    Denis Serkin and Michael S. Zicherman Co-Edit/Author Lexology Panoramic: Construction 2027

    Maintenance Issues Ignite Arguments at Indiana School

    Traub Lieberman Partner Katie Keller and Associate Steven Hollis Obtain Summary Judgment Based on Plaintiff’s Failure to Comply with Policy Conditions

    Hawaii Supreme Court Construes Designated Premises Endorsement In Insured's Favor

    Panama Weighs Another Canal Expansion at Centennial Mark

    The “Program Accessibility” Exception for Public Entities Under the ADA

    Bribe Charges Take Toll on NY Contractor

    Your Contract is a Hodgepodge of Conflicting Proposals

    Faulty Workmanship an Occurrence in Iowa – as Long as Other Property Damage is Involved

    Hurricane Ian: Discussing Wind-Water Disputes

    Drone Use On Construction Projects

    Fire Fears After Grenfell Disaster Set Back Wood Building in UK

    Property Owner’s Defense Goes Up in Smoke in Careless Smoking Case

    15 Wilke Fleury Lawyers Recognized in 2020 Northern California Super Lawyers and Rising Stars Lists

    Five Pointers for Enforcing a Non-Compete Agreement in Texas

    How to Get Your Bedroom Into the Met Museum
    Corporate Profile

    PAGOSA SPRINGS COLORADO CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from approximately 5000 construction claims related expert witness designations, the Pagosa Springs, Colorado Construction Expert Directory delivers a wide range of trial support and consulting services to construction claims professionals seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction claims investigation and expert services to the industry's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, real estate investment trusts, risk managers, owners, as well as a variety of municipalities and government offices. Employing in house assets which include construction cost and scheduling experts, registered design professionals, forensic engineers, certified professional estimators, the construction experts group brings national experience and local capabilities to Pagosa Springs and the surrounding areas.

    Pagosa Springs Colorado building code expert witnessPagosa Springs Colorado construction forensic expert witnessPagosa Springs Colorado fenestration expert witnessPagosa Springs Colorado construction claims expert witnessPagosa Springs Colorado civil engineer expert witnessPagosa Springs Colorado stucco expert witnessPagosa Springs Colorado construction scheduling expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Pagosa Springs, Colorado

    Integration Can Inoculate in Utah

    July 20, 2026 —
    The Utah Court of Appeals recently reaffirmed, in the construction context, Utah’s strict approach to enforcing integration clauses to preclude parol evidence and other legal theories that would vary the written terms of a contract. In Reid v. All Surface LC, 2025 UT App 134, decided last September, the court affirmed in all respects the trial court’s grant of summary judgment based on the strength of an integration clause against a homeowner who sued a contractor for breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, civil conspiracy, negligence, and breach of the implied warranty of habitability. More recently, however, the same court rejected those same arguments in Tidwell v. Jensen, 2026 UT App 13 as to tort claims arising from a used car sale. The facts in Reid were sympathetic to the plaintiff. After being told she had a mold issue near a defective basement shower, the plaintiff solicited bids. A remediation contractor advised that while it could address the mold, the shower replacement should be handled by someone else. The plaintiff contacted All Surface LC, a shower replacement contractor. During an interview, the sales representative stated that All Surface could “do full mold remediation, tear everything out, and reframe the shower.” The plaintiff ultimately retained All Surface, expecting it would both resolve the mold issues and replace the shower. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Mark O. Morris, Snell & Wilmer
    Mr. Morris may be contacted at mmorris@swlaw.com

    Ball Janik LLP Welcomes Construction Defect Attorney and U.S. Air Force Veteran Jake Scott to its Fort Lauderdale Office

    June 02, 2026 —
    Ball Janik LLP, a leading construction defect and insurance recovery law firm, has welcomed Jake Scott as an associate in its Fort Lauderdale office. Scott joins the Construction Defect Practice Group, bringing experience across construction litigation that includes construction defect, contract dispute, and negligence matters, along with a track record of representing construction professionals through depositions, court appearances, and trial preparation to support the firm's steady growth and client service statewide. "We're excited to welcome Jake Scott to our Fort Lauderdale office and Construction Defect Practice Group," said James C. Prichard, Managing Partner at Ball Janik LLP. "We look forward to the fresh perspectives and legal solutions he will provide for community associations across South Florida." Scott is a results-driven attorney dedicated to providing strategic counsel for complex legal challenges. He has experience managing all phases of a case, from early investigation and discovery through trial preparation and settlement negotiations. Prior to joining Ball Janik, Scott served as an associate attorney in Fort Lauderdale, where he represented clients in construction litigation matters, handled depositions and court appearances, conducted legal research, and drafted pleadings, motions, and briefs. He also worked as an attorney in Tampa, where he represented contractors, subcontractors, and construction firms in defending claims involving construction defects, contractual disputes, and negligence, and worked closely with expert witnesses, engineers, and consultants to develop and present technical evidence. Scott's experience representing the development and building sides of construction disputes provides a valuable, contrast-driven perspective that supports the strategic evaluation of claims and practical approaches to resolution for Ball Janik's clients. A proud veteran, Scott served in the United States Air Force for eight years, including roles as an Airspace Control Officer and in Space Systems Operations, supporting safe space flight operations and satellite communications. Carrying the discipline of airborne operations, Scott worked in the aerospace sector as a Satellite Engineer and Orbital Analyst. He also held a role in the housing sector, supporting marketing and business development initiatives. Scott received his law degree from Stetson University College of Law. He attended American Military University, where he earned degrees in marketing, business management, and related support services. About Ball Janik LLP Ball Janik LLP is a Florida-based law firm offering construction defect, construction law, insurance recovery, and commercial litigation counsel to its local and national clients. The firm was founded in 1982 and has expanded its capabilities, professionals, and geographic footprint. What started as a small firm focused on real property, land use, and litigation (known then as Ball Janik & Novack) has grown to a team of 50-plus attorneys and paralegals in 5 offices in Florida, with centuries of combined experience and capabilities. The firm has been recognized by Chambers USA, U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers®, The Best Lawyers in America©, and Corporate International. Read more here: https://www.balljanik.com.

    50 State Matrices | 2026 Edition

    March 03, 2026 —
    GRSM’s 50 State Legal Matrices provide a comprehensive, state-by-state snapshot of statutory law across all 50 U.S. states. Spanning critical areas such as indemnification, contractor licensing, labor standards, statute of limitations, and more, this resource enables businesses and counsel to quickly identify key legal requirements and variations across jurisdictions. Designed as a practical starting point rather than definitive legal advice, the Matrices help multi-state operators and attorneys navigate the complex patchwork of laws that can vary dramatically from one state to another. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    IEEPA Tariff Refunds: CBP Launches CAPE Process

    April 27, 2026 —
    On April 20, 2026, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) launched the first phase of the Consolidated Administration and Processing of Entries (CAPE) tool in the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) portal to administer refunds of duties imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) through a streamlined electronic filing process. Background In February 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court held that certain tariffs imposed under IEEPA were unlawful. Subsequent proceedings before the U.S. Court of International Trade required CBP to develop a scalable refund process applicable not only to litigants but also to non-plaintiffs. According to CBP and court filings, approximately 330,000 importers paid or deposited an estimated $166 billion in IEEPA duties across more than 53 million entries. In response, CBP developed CAPE as an electronic, consolidated refund mechanism within ACE. Reprinted courtesy of David J. Creagan, White and Williams LLP, Guido Antolini, White and Williams LLP, Bruce W. MacLennan, White and Williams LLP and Gary P. Biehn, White and Williams LLP Mr. Creagan may be contacted at creagand@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. Antolini may be contacted at antolinig@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. MacLennan may be contacted at maclennanb@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. Biehn may be contacted at biehng@whiteandwilliams.com Read the full story...

    Meet BWB&O’s Super Lawyers Rising Stars in Colorado!

    April 08, 2026 —
    Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLP is thrilled to share that Partner Devin Brunson and Associate Melissa Youngpeter have been named to the Super Lawyers 2026 Colorado Rising Stars list. This recognition reflects their exceptional work in Personal Injury and Civil Litigation.
    SUPER LAWYERS RISING STARS
    Devin Brunson: 2024-2026
    Melissa Youngpeter: 2026
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLP

    Ownership and Licensing in Design Agreements

    April 14, 2026 —
    The ownership and licensing of design documents in professional services agreements play a significant role in protecting the interests of the design professional and the project owner during and after project completion. The ownership or licensing of the drawings provision typically outlines who owns the drawings and specifications, who can use the documents, and how the documents can be used during and after the project. Project owners and developers should understand that payment for design services does not automatically transfer ownership or an exclusive right to use the professional design. Under U.S. copyright law, the default rule is that the design professional retains ownership of the instruments of service absent a contractual provision transferring ownership or a license. See 17 U.S.C. § 101, et seq. The Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act provides that copyright protection applies to “pictorial, graphic and sculptural works” and includes “architectural works.” 17 U.S.C. § 102. A design professional may only transfer copyright ownership in writing. 17 U.S.C. § 204(a). Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Abby Dvorkin, Snell & Wilmer
    Ms. Dvorkin may be contacted at advorkin@swlaw.com

    Tariffs As Taxes — What Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump Means for Contractors and the WSDOT Specifications

    March 17, 2026 —
    In October 2025, we explored a pressing question for public works contractors: should post-contract award tariffs be reimbursable? The crux of that analysis was whether tariffs imposed after contract award constitute a tax under the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Standard Specifications, triggering reimbursement under Section 1-07.1(5)B (“tax changes”). Since then, a landmark Supreme Court ruling in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump has clarified the legal nature of tariffs in a way that could significantly affect this debate. In Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, 607 U.S. (2026), the U.S. Supreme Court addressed whether the President had the authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to unilaterally impose broad tariffs on imports. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Brett M. Hill, Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at brett.hill@acslawyers.com

    Science-Based Standards for Wildfire Recovery: What California Policyholders Need to Know About A.B. 1642

    March 03, 2026 —
    Wildfires continue to present serious risks for California property owners. Unfortunately, commercial property owners, corporate facilities, landlords, and homeowners need to overcome not only the flames themselves, but also remediating hazardous contamination against a backdrop of unpredictable and ambiguous environmental safety standards. In response to the destructive Los Angeles area fires in 2025, the California Legislature recently introduced Assembly Bill 1642 aimed at creating uniform science-based standards for evaluating, testing, and clearing wildfire-impacted properties. While A.B. 1642 is in its early stages of consideration, it could materially influence claims handling, remediation costs, risk management practices, and broader liability exposures for California policyholders. Reprinted courtesy of Geoffrey B. Fehling, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Yosef Itkin, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Mr. Fehling may be contacted at gfehling@hunton.com Mr. Itkin may be contacted at yitkin@hunton.com Read the full story...