BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    hospital construction expert witness Paradox Colorado structural steel construction expert witness Paradox Colorado Subterranean parking expert witness Paradox Colorado retail construction expert witness Paradox Colorado casino resort expert witness Paradox Colorado condominium expert witness Paradox Colorado parking structure expert witness Paradox Colorado housing expert witness Paradox Colorado production housing expert witness Paradox Colorado concrete tilt-up expert witness Paradox Colorado custom homes expert witness Paradox Colorado multi family housing expert witness Paradox Colorado tract home expert witness Paradox Colorado Medical building expert witness Paradox Colorado landscaping construction expert witness Paradox Colorado custom home expert witness Paradox Colorado high-rise construction expert witness Paradox Colorado low-income housing expert witness Paradox Colorado condominiums expert witness Paradox Colorado institutional building expert witness Paradox Colorado townhome construction expert witness Paradox Colorado office building expert witness Paradox Colorado
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Paradox, Colorado

    Colorado Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 1161 has three significant components that effect construction defect litigation. The first is a right to remedy and notice provision (75 days written notice) The homeowner must give the builder a notice that describes the nature of the claimed construction defects, the location of the defects and a general description of the type of damages that are claimed. The second component is a limitation on the nature and type of damages that can be pursued and awarded in a construction defect case. The third is a limitation on the availability and amount of punitive damages ($250,000) under the provisions of the Colorado Consumer Protection Act


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Paradox Colorado

    State license required for electrical, asbestos removal, plumbers, and pesticides trade; no state license for general contracting. Licensing may be required on a city or county level.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Pueblo Associated Home Builders
    Local # 0675
    635 West Corona Ave Suite 101
    Pueblo, CO 81004
    http://www.homebuilderspueblo.org

    Housing & Builders Association Of Colorado Springs
    Local # 0625
    4585 Hilton Pkwy Ste 100
    Colorado Springs, CO 80907
    http://www.cshba.com

    Home Builders Association of the Upper Rio Grande
    Local # 0679
    PO Box 1210
    South Fork, CO 81154
    http://www.hbaurg.com

    Home Builders Association of Teller Co
    Local # 0690
    PO Box 713
    Woodland Park, CO 80866
    http://www.hbatellercounty.com/

    Housing and Bldng Assn of Northwestern Colorado
    Local # 0664
    569 S Westgate Dr Ste 3
    Grand Junction, CO 81505
    http://www.hbanwco.com

    Home Builders Association of Southwest Co Inc
    Local # 0683
    1199 Main Ave #234
    Durango, CO 81301
    http://www.hbasc.com

    Four Corners Chapter
    Local # 0655
    PO Box TL
    Cortez, CO 81321
    http://hbamontdolores.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Paradox Colorado

    Failure to Strictly Adhere to Limitations for Flood Claim Leads to Denial

    Building in the Age of Technology: Improving Profitability and Jobsite Safety

    Seattle Council May Take a New Look at Micro-Housing

    Best Practices for Installing Networks in New Buildings

    New Case Alert: California Federal Court Allows Policy Stacking to Cover Continuous Injury

    Injury to Employees Endorsement Eliminates Coverage for Insured Employer

    Fixing the Problem – Not the Blame

    Agree to Use your “Professional Best"? You may Lose Insurance Coverage! (Law Note)

    Quick Note: Do Your Homework When it Comes to Selecting Your Arbitrator

    Federal Interpleader Dealing with Competing Claims over Undisputed Payable to Subcontractor

    For Smart Home Technology, the Contract Is Key

    Insurance Law Alert: California Supreme Court Limits Advertising Injury Coverage for Disparagement

    Construction Defect Litigation at San Diego’s Alicante Condominiums?

    Motion for Summary Judgment Granted in Significant California Public Utilities Suit

    Construction Law Breaking News: California Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Beacon Residential Community Association

    Steel-Fiber Concrete Link Beams Perform Well in Tests

    Shiloh and Vallejo: The DOI Tale of Two Properties

    140 Days Until The California Consumer Privacy Act Becomes Law - Why Aren't More Businesses Complying?

    The California Legislature Passes SB 496 Limiting Design Professional Defense and Indemnity Obligations

    Turmoil Slows Rebuilding of Puerto Rico's Power Grid

    South Carolina Law Clarifies Statue of Repose

    One-Upmanship by Contractors In Prevailing Wage Decision Leads to a Bad Result for All . . . Perhaps

    Traub Lieberman Partner Ryan Jones Provides Testimony Before Florida Senate Committees

    Connecticut Expands Construction Wage-Theft Liability and Prevailing Wage Recordkeeping Requirements

    The Prompt Payment Act Obligation is Not Triggered When the Owner Holds Less Retention from the General Contractor

    One Insurer's Settlement with Insured Does Not Bar Contribution Claim by Other Insurers

    Tariffs and the Art of the Price Escalation “Deal”

    After Breaching Its Duty to Defend, Insurer Must Pay Market Rates for Defense Counsel

    COVID-19 Response: Recent Executive Orders Present Opportunities for Businesses Seeking Regulatory and Enforcement Relief and Expedited Project Development

    Los Angeles Team Secures Summary Judgment for Hotel Owner & Manager in Tenant’s Lawsuit

    Wood Wizardry in Oregon: Innovation Raises the Roof for PDX Terminal

    Court Concludes That COVID-19 Losses Can Qualify as “Direct Physical Loss”

    How to Protect the High-Tech Home

    When Employer’s Liability Coverage May Be Limited in New York

    After More than Two Years, USDOT Rejects WSDOT’s Recommendation to Reinstate Non-Minority Women-Owned DBEs into DBE Participation Goals

    New York Court Holds Insurer Can Recover Before Insured Is Made Whole

    New OSHA Rule Creates Electronic Reporting Requirement

    Georgia Federal Court Holds That Pollution Exclusion Bars Coverage Under Liability Policy for Claims Arising From Discharge of PFAS Into Waterways

    MDL Panel Grants Consolidation for One Group of COVID-19 Claims

    Hiring Subcontractors with Workers Compensation Insurance

    EEOC Focuses on Eliminating Harassment, Recruitment and Hiring Barriers in the Construction Industry

    Remote Work Issues to Consider in Light of COVID-19

    Case Remanded for Application of Efficient Proximate Cause Doctrine

    Common Construction Contract Provisions: Indemnity Provisions

    Trump, Infrastructure and the Construction Industry

    New Plan Submitted for Explosive Demolition of Old Tappan Zee Bridge

    Indemnification Against Release/“Disposal” of Hazardous Materials

    Connecticut Appellate Court Breaks New Ground on Policy Exhaustion

    Do Not Lose Your Mechanics Lien Right Through a Subordination Agreement

    Hawaii Federal District Court Rejects Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment on Construction Defect Claims
    Corporate Profile

    PARADOX COLORADO CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from approximately 5000 construction, architectural, and engineering related expert designations, the Paradox, Colorado Construction Expert Directory provides a wide range of trial support and construction consulting services to developers, risk managers, and construction claims professionals concerned with construction defect, scheduling, and delay claims. BHA provides construction related trial support and expert consulting services to the nation's most recognized construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. In connection with in house personnel which comprise construction cost and scheduling experts, registered design professionals, forensic engineers, certified professional estimators, the firm brings specialized expertise and local capabilities to the Paradox region.

    Paradox Colorado testifying construction expert witnessParadox Colorado construction project management expert witnessParadox Colorado structural engineering expert witnessesParadox Colorado construction forensic expert witnessParadox Colorado concrete expert witnessParadox Colorado construction safety expertParadox Colorado construction defect expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Paradox, Colorado

    Lewis Brisbois Ranked Tier 1 Nationally for Seven Practice Areas in 2026 Best Law Firms

    January 06, 2026 —
    November 6, 2025) - Lewis Brisbois has been ranked Tier 1 nationally by Best Lawyers for 'Appellate Practice,' 'Commercial Litigation,' ‘Insurance Law,’ 'Litigation - Construction,' ‘Litigation - Labor and Employment,’ ‘Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions – Defendants,’ and ‘Transportation Law,’ as well as ranking Tier 1 in an array of practice areas across 27 metro regions in its 2026 edition of Best Law Firms®. In addition to Lewis Brisbois' national rankings, the firm was also ranked Tier 1 in the following regional categories: Akron
    • Bet-the-Company Litigation
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Tax Law
    • Trusts and Estates
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Southwest Super Lawyers Recognizes 50 Snell & Wilmer Attorneys in 2026 Rankings

    June 15, 2026 —
    PHOENIX (April 22, 2026) – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that 50 attorneys in the Phoenix and Tucson offices have been selected for inclusion in the 2026 Southwest Super Lawyers publication. Of those 50, four were recognized for the first time and 24 were recognized as Southwest Rising Stars. Super Lawyers is a listing of lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement. The selection process is multi-phased and includes independent research, peer nominations, and peer evaluations. Super Lawyers was first published in 1991 by Law & Politics and was acquired by Thomson Reuters, Legal in February 2010. Thomson Reuters is a leading source of information for businesses and professionals. The below Snell & Wilmer attorneys have been selected for inclusion in the 2026 Southwest Super Lawyers rankings. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer

    “He Chose…Poorly: How Bad DSC Clauses Lead to Project Doom in the Last Crusade of Construction Risk”

    March 10, 2026 —
    “We do not follow maps to buried treasure, and X never, ever marks the spot.” That’s the advice that Indiana Jones offered in the Last Crusade film. But what’s beneath the surface isn’t just important to adventure archaeologists. It has real-world application to our industry, where success depends on the stability of materials below the surface. The study of geology and soils has ancient roots. Egyptians relied on soil stability for the pyramids; Rome built a continent-wide roadway system utilizing subgrade preparation techniques; Medieval builders implemented a rudimentary foundation pier system; Henri Gautier studied what is now called the “angle of repose” for French retaining walls in the early 18th Century. Through the 19th Century, contractors bore the risk of the stability of their work, and the attendant peril of unforeseen site conditions. But in the early 20th Century, design trades continued to develop increased understanding of soil and underground conditions. In the 1920’s US federal contracts began employing “differing site conditions” clauses, which provided for cost/time adjustments if subsurface conditions differed from expectations. Industry forms followed the federal policy, and these clauses became almost universally accepted. Reprinted courtesy of Curt Martin, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Lee Banta, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Martin may be contacted at cmartin@pecklaw.com Mr. Banta may be contacted at lbanta@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    GRSM Attorneys Named Finalists in 2026 Women, Influence & Power in Law Awards

    March 10, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani attorneys have been shortlisted as finalists for Corporate Counsel’s 2026 Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) Awards, which honor women leaders who have demonstrated a commitment to advancing the empowerment of women in the legal profession. In the Law Firm Internal Collaborative Leadership category, Stephanie Jones was recognized for her exceptional ability to foster collaboration, mentor talent, and align colleagues across GRSM. Jones has consistently demonstrated leadership rooted in trust, inclusion, and shared purpose, qualities that have strengthened the firm during a period of extraordinary growth. Her impact on the firm’s culture and success will continue as she steps into her role as Chief Operating Partner in June 2026, where she will further build on her leadership in fostering teamwork, mentorship, and alignment across the firm’s national platform. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Insureds’ Altering Dates for Hailstorm Damage Justifies Denial of Claim

    June 02, 2026 —
    The Firth Circuit affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the insurer due to the insureds’ failure to establish the date of loss after a hailstorm. Cutchall v. Chubb Lloyds Ins. Co. of Texas, 2026 WL 625633 (5th Cir. March 5, 2026). In September 2021, the Cutchalls made a claim on their policy for interior water damage due to a hailstorm that breached their roof. Chubb retained two engineers to inspect the home, but neither found evidence that a hailstorm caused the damage. Instead, the engineers concluded a variety of other causes, such as poor ventilation and as-built defects, caused the damage. Because Chubb concluded that some of these other causes were covered by the policy, it paid only for the covered portions. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Why the Renovation of Federal Reserve Headquarters Costs $2.5 Billion

    January 21, 2026 —
    For months, the renovation of the Federal Reserve’s headquarters in Washington has been a subject of friction between the White House and the central bank. On Jan. 11, Fed Chair Jerome Powell said the Justice Department had issued subpoenas in advance of a possible criminal indictment related to the ongoing work. The cost of the work has ballooned to $2.5 billion, and allies of President Donald Trump have previously pressed for an investigation. Powell described the DOJ inquiry as a pressure campaign led by the White House. Any evidence of mismanagement or fraud, as Trump administration officials have suggested, could prove a useful pretext for removing Powell, who the president has repeatedly lambasted for interest rates higher than he’d like. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Kriston Capps, Bloomberg

    An “Agreement to Agree” Is Not a Binding Contract

    January 13, 2026 —
    A driving issue in a recent dispute was whether a binding contract existed simply through the selection of a proposal in response to a solicitation. Or, was there nothing more than an “agreement to agree,” which does not create a binding contract. There is an important distinction between a binding contract an an “agreement to agree.” A Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) issued a Request for Proposals otherwise referred to as an RFP. The RFP specifically stated that the CRA and proposer will be contractually bound only if and when a written contract is executed between the parties. A proposer was notified that it was selected as the winning proposer however a written contract was never executed because the proposer was subsequently disqualified. The proposer filed a lawsuit claiming it was wrongfully disqualified and prevailed. The trial court found it was entitled to attorney’s fees pursuant to a contract that had been formed when the proposer’s proposal was originally accepted. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Oracle's $16B Michigan Data Center Secures Financing as Power Contracts Face Appeals

    June 08, 2026 —
    A $16 billion hyperscale data center under construction outside Ann Arbor, Mich., has secured financing backed by Blackstone and other institutional investors, even as the project's power supply agreements now face a legal challenge before the Michigan Court of Appeals. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com