BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    high-rise construction expert witness Parshall Colorado Subterranean parking expert witness Parshall Colorado hospital construction expert witness Parshall Colorado institutional building expert witness Parshall Colorado industrial building expert witness Parshall Colorado condominiums expert witness Parshall Colorado townhome construction expert witness Parshall Colorado casino resort expert witness Parshall Colorado low-income housing expert witness Parshall Colorado mid-rise construction expert witness Parshall Colorado custom home expert witness Parshall Colorado office building expert witness Parshall Colorado custom homes expert witness Parshall Colorado concrete tilt-up expert witness Parshall Colorado tract home expert witness Parshall Colorado structural steel construction expert witness Parshall Colorado housing expert witness Parshall Colorado multi family housing expert witness Parshall Colorado landscaping construction expert witness Parshall Colorado condominium expert witness Parshall Colorado Medical building expert witness Parshall Colorado parking structure expert witness Parshall Colorado
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Parshall, Colorado

    Colorado Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 1161 has three significant components that effect construction defect litigation. The first is a right to remedy and notice provision (75 days written notice) The homeowner must give the builder a notice that describes the nature of the claimed construction defects, the location of the defects and a general description of the type of damages that are claimed. The second component is a limitation on the nature and type of damages that can be pursued and awarded in a construction defect case. The third is a limitation on the availability and amount of punitive damages ($250,000) under the provisions of the Colorado Consumer Protection Act


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Parshall Colorado

    State license required for electrical, asbestos removal, plumbers, and pesticides trade; no state license for general contracting. Licensing may be required on a city or county level.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Grand County Builders Association
    Local # 0654
    PO Box 185
    Granby, CO 80446
    http://www.grandcountybuildersassoc.com

    Home Builders Association of Colorado
    Local # 0600
    600 Grant St Ste 550
    Denver, CO 80203
    http://www.hbacolorado.com

    Home Builders Association of Metropolitan Denver
    Local # 0650
    9033 E Easter Pl Ste 200
    Centennial, CO 80112
    http://www.hbadenver.com

    Eagle Valley Home Builders Association Inc
    Local # 0652
    PO Box 3550
    Eagle, CO 81631
    http://www.evhba.com

    Home Builders Association of Northern Colorado
    Local # 0660
    PO Box 669
    Windsor, CO 80550
    http://www.hbanco.com

    Summit County Builders Association
    Local # 0688
    PO Box 2245
    Frisco, CO 80443
    http://www.summitcountybuilders.org

    Mountain to Mesa Home Builders Association
    Local # 0670
    PO Box 2719
    Glenwood Springs, CO 81602
    http://www.memhba.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Parshall Colorado

    Google’s Biggest Moonshot Is Its Search for a Carbon-Free Future

    The Evolution of Construction Defect Trends at West Coast Casualty Seminar

    Were Quake Standards Illegally Altered for PG&E Nuclear Power Plant?

    Third Circuit Limits Pennsylvania’s Kvaerner Decision; Unexpected and Unintended Injury May Constitute an “Occurrence” Under Pennsylvania Law

    No Occurrence Found for Damage to Home Caused by Settling

    Contract Provisions That Help Manage Risk on Long-Term Projects

    Unintended Consequences of New Building Products and Services

    Navigating Threshold Arbitration Issues in Construction Contracts

    Not Remotely Law as Usual: Don’t Settle for Delays – Settle at Remote Mediation

    Sixth Circuit Revives Builder’s Risk Coverage, Refusing to Let Insurer Escape on a Technicality

    Proposed Bill Provides a New Federal Tax Credit for the Conversion of Office Buildings

    CA Supreme Court Finds “Consent-to-Assignment” Clauses Unenforceable After Loss Occurs During the Policy Period

    Pentagon Has Big Budget for Construction in Colorado

    How to Mitigate Lien Release Bond Premiums with Disappearing Lien Claimants

    Report: Construction Firms Could Better Protect Workers From Noise Hazards

    Window Installer's Alleged Faulty Workmanship On Many Projects Constitutes Multiple Occurrences

    Granting of Lodestar Multiplier in Coverage Case Affirmed

    How Long does a Florida Condo Association Have to File a Construction Defect Claim?

    Contractors Board May Discipline Over Workers’ Comp Reporting

    Lorelie S. Masters Nominated for Best in Insurance & Reinsurance for the Women in Business Law Awards 2021

    Waste Not: NJ Digester Plant Transforms Food Waste to Fuel

    The Legal Landscape

    Miller Law Firm Helped HOA Recover for Construction Defects without Filing a Lawsuit

    Blackstone Said in $1.7 Billion Deal to Buy Apartments

    U.S. Supreme Court Decision Alters Course of $745M Louisiana Coastal Damage Judgment

    UK Construction Defect Suit Lost over One Word

    Federal Court Sets High Bar for Pleading Products Liability Cases in New Jersey

    “He Chose…Poorly: How Bad DSC Clauses Lead to Project Doom in the Last Crusade of Construction Risk”

    No Ink, No Problem: When Employees and Agents Can Enforce Arbitration Agreements

    The AI Knows Too Much: When Employees Feed Trade Secrets into Generative AI Tools

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Builder’s Risk Indeed”

    Association Insurance Company v. Carbondale Glen Lot E-8, LLC: Federal Court Reaffirms That There Is No Duty to Defend or Indemnify A Builder For Defective Construction Work

    Anatomy of an Indemnity Provision

    Terms of Your Teaming Agreement Matter

    Hawaii Supreme Court Paves the Way for Maui Fire Settlement to Proceed

    Ohio Court of Appeals Affirms Judgment in Landis v. Fannin Builders

    Is Settling a Bond Claim in the Face of a Seemingly Clear Statute of Limitations Defense Bad Faith?

    U.S. Homeownership Rate Falls to Lowest Since Early 1995

    Condo Developers Buy in Washington despite Construction Defect Litigation

    Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment to Dispose of Hail Damage Claim Fails

    Citigroup Reaches $1.13 Billion Pact Over Mortgage Bonds

    Best Lawyers® Recognizes 29 White and Williams Lawyers

    Construction Executives Expect Improvements in the Year Ahead

    Maryland Enacts Climate-Cost Study Over Veto, New Jersey Advances Climate Superfund Proposal as Earlier State Laws Face Ongoing Court Challenges

    Wilke Fleury Attorneys Featured in 2022 Northern California Super Lawyers and Rising Stars Lists

    Gilbert’s Plan for Downtown Detroit Has No Room for Jail

    Motion to Dismiss COVID Claim Granted in Part, Denied in Part

    Traub Lieberman Senior Trial Counsel Timothy McNamara Wins Affirmation of Summary Judgment Denial

    Structural Problems May Cause Year-Long Delay Opening New Orleans School

    Jury Trials: A COVID Update
    Corporate Profile

    PARSHALL COLORADO CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through more than 4500 general contracting and design related expert designations, the Parshall, Colorado Construction Expert Directory delivers a wide range of trial support and consulting services to attorneys and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect, scheduling, and delay matters. BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. In connection with in house assets comprising building envelope and design experts, forensic engineers, forensic architects, and construction cost and scheduling consultants, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Parshall region.

    Parshall Colorado building code expert witnessParshall Colorado consulting engineersParshall Colorado construction project management expert witnessesParshall Colorado reconstruction expert witnessParshall Colorado multi family design expert witnessParshall Colorado expert witnesses fenestrationParshall Colorado roofing construction expert
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Parshall, Colorado

    Flatiron Said Disputed Concrete Mix Cost Millions on Large Caltrans Project

    June 22, 2026 —
    For awhile in 2023, part of the California Dept. of Transportation's (Caltrans) Fix 50 HOV lane and resurfacing project in Sacramento itself needed to be fixed. Reprinted courtesy of Elaine Silver, Engineering News-Record and Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com Read the full story...

    OC Streetcar Project Mediation Sets $50M Payment to Walsh

    July 20, 2026 —
    Walsh Construction told a California state court judge last month that lawsuit mediation of its claims on an Orange County light-rail project—known as OC Streetcar—had produced a settlement of some claims under which the county agreed to pay the contractor almost an additional $50 million. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com

    Trend Continues Where Unlicensed Contractors Have No Recourse

    July 13, 2026 —
    There’s been a recent trend in Florida case law that has figuratively “killed” unlicensed contractors. Here’s another one. The moral to this trend and case is simple: make sure you have the proper licenses prior to serving as a contractor under Florida law. Trying to be cute, as seemed to be the situation in this case with a creative argument, is not an argument that will carry the day and your resources will be devoted to being creative versus the ultimate merits of the dispute. In Ramindesign, LLC v. Skarzynski, 2026 WL 1649571 (S.D.Fla. 2026) an owner of real property hired a company to design and construct a spec home on the property. The company and its owner were NOT licensed contractors. The contract stated the company was serving as a “spec developer” and referred to it as the contractor throughout the contract. Other than this, the contract was set up as a cost plus a fee. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    New Executive Order Prohibits Federal Contractors from Engaging in DEI Through Employment and Procurement Activities

    April 27, 2026 —
    On March 26, 2026, President Trump signed Executive Order 14398, entitled Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors, requiring federal agencies to add contractual language in all federal contracts prohibiting contractors and subcontractors from engaging in any racially discriminatory DEI activities, as defined by the Executive Order (EO). While this EO includes language similar to prior DEI-related orders, it introduces a significant expansion in enforcement by subjecting non-compliant contractors to liability under the False Claims Act (FCA), including exposure to whistleblower actions and qui tam litigation. A qui tam claim is a civil action by a private individual on behalf of the government alleging fraud against federal programs and seeking to recover damages. The new EO states that involvement in any racially discriminatory DEI activities is not only unethical and illegal, but also deemed fraudulent against federal programs because it is material to the government’s payment decisions. The definition of DEI activities here matters, as this EO expands a contractor’s obligations beyond the management of its employment policies and includes prohibitions against funding or expending time or resources on DEI activities and contracting with subcontractors, vendors, or suppliers utilizing DEI programs. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Laura De Santos, Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani
    Ms. De Santos may be contacted at ldesantos@grsm.com

    U.S. Supreme Court Decision May Negate State Law Requirement to File a Certificate of Merit with the Complaint in a Federal Action Against a Design Professional

    April 27, 2026 —
    To deter frivolous and unfounded claims against design professionals, states throughout the country have enacted statutes which generally require litigants to furnish a formal certification of merit (“COM”) from a qualified expert or face potential dismissal of their lawsuit. These COM statutes can impose a significant front-end burden on claimants who must pay an expert to review project records, interview the project team, and prepare a formal report before the lawsuit can be filed—often regardless of the amount in controversy. However, in light of a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in a medical malpractice case, most, if not all of these statutes, may no longer be enforceable in federal court. This article examines the recent decision in Berk v. Choy, 146 S. Ct. 546 (2026), the decisions thus far which have applied Berk to invalidate COM statutes, and other categories of statutes applicable to the construction industry which may face a similar fate. The U.S. Supreme Court Decision (Berk v. Choy) In Berk, the plaintiff, Harold Berk, sued a doctor for medical malpractice under Delaware law in Delaware federal court. 146 S. Ct. at 551. Under Del. Code, Tit. 18, § 6853(a)(1), an affidavit of merit (like a COM) must accompany a complaint alleging medical malpractice. Id. Berk failed to include an affidavit of merit with his complaint. Id. at 552. Applying Delaware state law, the federal court dismissed Berk’s medical malpractice claim. Berk appealed to the Third Circuit, arguing that the affidavit of merit required by § 6853(a)(1) is unenforceable in federal court because it is more onerous than the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Third Circuit affirmed the District Court’s ruling, finding § 6853(a)(1) enforceable in federal court. Reprinted courtesy of Christopher Olsen, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Phillip Boldt, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Olsen may be contacted at colsen@pecklaw.com Mr. Boldt may be contacted at pboldt@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    DOI Finalizes Long-Awaited Modernization of Type A Natural Resource Damage Assessment Regulations

    August 03, 2026 —
    For nearly three decades, the U.S. Department of the Interior’s (DOI) simplified “Type A” Natural Resource Damage Assessment (NRDA) regulations were available more in theory than in practice, constrained by dated models, narrow geographic applicability and a $100,000 cap that rarely matched the economics of modern environmental claims. DOI has now finalized revisions to the Type A natural resource damages assessment procedures under 43 C.F.R. Part 11 for hazardous substance releases under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and the Clean Water Act (CWA), with the final rule published in the Federal Register on July 13, 2026 and scheduled to become effective August 12, 2026. As discussed previously, DOI has sought to modernize what it views as an “inefficient and inflexible” process and restore the Type A procedure to its intended role as a more streamlined pathway for smaller, less contentious NRD claims. The final rule adopts a $5 million default damages threshold, allows use above that amount if all parties agree, clarifies that Type A may be used in all environments and for all natural resource types, and removes legacy model appendices that had tethered the process to outdated formulas. Reprinted courtesy of Amanda G. Halter, Pillsbury, Ashleigh K. Myers, Pillsbury and Jillian Marullo, Pillsbury Ms. Halter may be contacted at amanda.halter@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Marullo may be contacted at jillian.marullo@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Builders Support Most of Bipartisan Housing Reform Bill in Congress

    March 31, 2026 —
    Several homebuilding groups say they support most of the massive housing reform bill making its way through Congress but want to see certain provisions including those related to build-to-rent and manufactured homes changed before it advances any further. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Esther D'Amico, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Your AEC Firm Has a Memory Problem. Here Is How to Fix It

    June 01, 2026 —
    AEC companies trying to operationalize AI often find they lack the data foundation on which to build. There may be an abundance of data hidden in documents, but you can’t reliably use it for AI. The lack of data quality was a key topic discussed at the AI in AEC 2026 conference. During the event, I met many experts working to solve this problem, including Pavlina Nikolova, Egnyte‘s EMEA AEC Practice Lead. The chat and her presentation highlighted the challenges and ways to overcome them. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi