BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    tract home expert witness Rocky Ford Colorado landscaping construction expert witness Rocky Ford Colorado townhome construction expert witness Rocky Ford Colorado retail construction expert witness Rocky Ford Colorado institutional building expert witness Rocky Ford Colorado parking structure expert witness Rocky Ford Colorado high-rise construction expert witness Rocky Ford Colorado casino resort expert witness Rocky Ford Colorado multi family housing expert witness Rocky Ford Colorado custom home expert witness Rocky Ford Colorado production housing expert witness Rocky Ford Colorado condominium expert witness Rocky Ford Colorado custom homes expert witness Rocky Ford Colorado office building expert witness Rocky Ford Colorado mid-rise construction expert witness Rocky Ford Colorado housing expert witness Rocky Ford Colorado hospital construction expert witness Rocky Ford Colorado Subterranean parking expert witness Rocky Ford Colorado concrete tilt-up expert witness Rocky Ford Colorado low-income housing expert witness Rocky Ford Colorado structural steel construction expert witness Rocky Ford Colorado condominiums expert witness Rocky Ford Colorado
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Rocky Ford, Colorado

    Colorado Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 1161 has three significant components that effect construction defect litigation. The first is a right to remedy and notice provision (75 days written notice) The homeowner must give the builder a notice that describes the nature of the claimed construction defects, the location of the defects and a general description of the type of damages that are claimed. The second component is a limitation on the nature and type of damages that can be pursued and awarded in a construction defect case. The third is a limitation on the availability and amount of punitive damages ($250,000) under the provisions of the Colorado Consumer Protection Act


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Rocky Ford Colorado

    State license required for electrical, asbestos removal, plumbers, and pesticides trade; no state license for general contracting. Licensing may be required on a city or county level.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Pueblo Associated Home Builders
    Local # 0675
    635 West Corona Ave Suite 101
    Pueblo, CO 81004
    http://www.homebuilderspueblo.org

    Home Builders Association of the Upper Rio Grande
    Local # 0679
    PO Box 1210
    South Fork, CO 81154
    http://www.hbaurg.com

    Home Builders Association of Southwest Co Inc
    Local # 0683
    1199 Main Ave #234
    Durango, CO 81301
    http://www.hbasc.com

    Four Corners Chapter
    Local # 0655
    PO Box TL
    Cortez, CO 81321
    http://hbamontdolores.com

    Builders Association of Pagosa Springs
    Local # 0698
    PO Box 3956
    Pagosa Springs, CO 81147
    http://www.pagosabuilders.com

    Housing & Builders Association Of Colorado Springs
    Local # 0625
    4585 Hilton Pkwy Ste 100
    Colorado Springs, CO 80907
    http://www.cshba.com

    Home Builders Association of Teller Co
    Local # 0690
    PO Box 713
    Woodland Park, CO 80866
    http://www.hbatellercounty.com/


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Rocky Ford Colorado

    ASCE Statement on Senate Passage of the Water Resources Development Act of 2024

    Congratulations to Las Vegas Partner Jeff Saab and Associate Shanna Carter on Another Big Win at Arbitration!

    Part of the Whole: Idaho District Court Holds Economic Loss Rule Bars Tort Claims Related to Water Supply Line that was Part of Home Purchase

    Pentagon Has Big Budget for Construction in Colorado

    New Washington Law Nixes Unfair Indemnification in Construction Contracts

    Substantial Completion Explained: What Contractors & Owners Should Know

    #6 CDJ Topic: Construction Defect Legislative Developments

    Missouri Asbestos Litigation Reform: New Bill Seeks to Establish Robust Disclosure Obligations

    Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell Recognized in 2024 Best Law Firm® Rankings

    Contractual Fee-Shifting in Litigation: Who Pays the Price?

    The Miller Act: More Complex than You Think

    Housing Markets Continue to Improve

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (7/2/24) – Increase in Commercial Property Vacancy Rates, Trouble for the Real Estate Market and Real Estate as a Long-Term Investment

    Home Prices Expected to Increase All Over the U.S.

    Who is a “Contractor” as Used in “Unlicensed Contractor”?

    Illinois Federal Court Applies Insurer-Friendly “Mutual Exclusive Theories” Test To Independent Counsel Analysis

    Los Angeles Team Secures Defense Verdict for Public Entity Client in High-Exposure Personal Injury Case

    Alaska Supreme Court Finds Insurer Owes No Independent Duty to Injured Party

    Sewage Treatment Agency Sues Insurer and Contractor after Wall Failure and Sewage Leak

    South African Building Industry in Line for More State Support

    Granting of Lodestar Multiplier in Coverage Case Affirmed

    Splashdown: Fire-Weakened Beijing Bridge Deck Falls Into River

    Happy Thanksgiving from CDJ

    Water Leak Covered for First Thirteen Days

    Insurance Policies and Indemnity Provisions Are Not the Same

    Suzanne Pollack Elected to Lawyers Club of San Diego 2021 Board of Directors

    Cal/OSHA Approves COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Standards; Executive Order Makes Them Effective Immediately

    Recent Amendments and Caselaw Affecting the Construction Industry in Texas

    When Is a Survival Clause Absolutely Necessary?

    Important Environmental Insurance Ruling Issued In Protracted Insurance-Coverage Dispute

    Eighth Circuit Considers Judicial Estoppel in Hazardous Substance Release-Related Personal Injury Case

    How Wildfires Upended California’s Insurance Market

    Presumption of Prejudice Applies to All Affirmative Defenses Regarding Insured’s Failure to Comply with Post-Loss Policy Conditions

    Second Circuit Finds Potential Ambiguity in Competing “Anti-Concurrent Cause” Provisions in Hurricane Sandy Property Loss

    Want a Fair Chance at a Government Contract? Think Again

    The Best Lawyers in America© Peer Review Names Eight Newmeyer & Dillion Partners in Multiple Categories and Two Partners as Orange County’s Lawyers of the Year in Construction and Insurance Law

    CEO/Founding Principal Nicole Whyte is recognized as one of the most Influential Leaders in Orange County by the OC Business Journal!

    Meet the Hipster Real Estate Developers Building for Millennials

    U.S. Navy Sailors Sue Tokyo Utility Company Over Radiation Poisoning

    Good Ole Duty to Defend

    Fire Protection You Can Trust Starts With the Right Testing

    BWB&O’s Motion for Summary Judgment is Granted in a Premises Liability Matter

    Insurer’s Motion for Summary Judgment Based on Earth Movement Exclusion Denied

    Google Advances Green Goal With AES Deal for Carbon-Free Power

    Purely “Compensatory” Debts Owed by Attorneys to Clients (Which Are Not Disciplinary or Punitive Fees Imposed by the State Bar) Are Dischargeable In Bankruptcy

    Claims for Breach of Express Indemnity Clauses Subject to 10-Year Statute of Limitations

    Woodbridge II and the Nuanced Meaning of “Adverse Use” in Hostile Property Rights Cases in Colorado

    2026 Southern California Super Lawyers Recognizes 14 Snell & Wilmer Attorneys

    How a $1,400 Humanoid Hints at Construction’s Robotic Future

    2019’s Biggest Labor and Employment Moves Affecting Construction
    Corporate Profile

    ROCKY FORD COLORADO CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Drawing from more than four thousand construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Rocky Ford, Colorado Construction Expert Directory provides a streamlined multi-disciplinary expert retention and support solution to construction claims professionals seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction practice groups, public builders, risk managers, owners, state and local government agencies. Employing in house assets which comprise building envelope experts, forensic architects, professional engineers, credentialed construction standard of care consultants, the organization brings national experience and local capabilities to Rocky Ford and the surrounding areas.

    Rocky Ford Colorado fenestration expert witnessRocky Ford Colorado expert witness commercial buildingsRocky Ford Colorado testifying construction expert witnessRocky Ford Colorado construction expert witnessesRocky Ford Colorado reconstruction expert witnessRocky Ford Colorado architectural expert witnessRocky Ford Colorado engineering consultant
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Rocky Ford, Colorado

    Bad Faith Claim Survives Summary Judgment

    June 08, 2026 —
    The court denied the insurer’s motion for partial summary judgment on the insured’s bad faith claim, but granted the motion on the insured’s claim for punitive damages. Serbian Orthodox Church v. Brotherhood Mut. Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58234 (S.D. Cal. March 19, 2026). On February 1, 2023, the Church filed a claim for water damage with Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company (BMIC). The claim was based on rain and wind that caused extensive water intrusion into the Sanctuary, damaging its plaster walls and ceilings and fresco paintings. The claim was assigned to Patrick Hurley. Hurley sent a letter discussing potential bars to coverage and requesting further information and documents from the Church. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Risk Reset: Concerns Top of Mind for Top Construction Law Firms

    September 28, 2026 —
    In the summer of 2025, contractors were consumed by one major issue: tariffs. Owners, builders and suppliers were trying to understand how shifting trade policy would affect bid pricing and ongoing projects. While those concerns have eased after a Supreme Court ruling, some of the industry’s top legal experts—all of whom practice at some of CE’s Top 50 Construction Law Firms—point to a different set of worries that are keeping their clients up at night and keeping their offices busy. Inflation is not fading away, creating continued price challenges. Artificial intelligence is moving at a breakneck pace, offering potential time-saving benefits paired with major liability concerns. The federal government continues to make surprising policy changes, and contractors remain focused on managing financial risk across increasingly complex projects. Reprinted courtesy of David McMillin, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Substantial Evidence of Flood Loss is Not a Substitute for Required Proof of Loss

    April 20, 2026 —
    The court found that the insurer properly denied the insured’s claim for loss due to flood because a proof of loss was never submitted. Bay Haven at Coco Bay Condominium Association, Inc. v. Hartford Ins. Co. of the Midwest, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6847 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 14, 2026). Bay Haven managed several condo buildings. When Hurricane Ian hit, it caused significant flood damage to these properties. Bay Haven held federal flood insurance policies through Hartford under “Write-Your-Own” policies. This meant Hartford was essentially a fiscal agent that managed policies and handled claims but paid them using federal funds. Following the storm, FEMA extended the usual 60-day deadline for filing a proof of loss to one year, or until September 28, 2023. Bay Haven did not submit its proofs of loss until November 2023. FEMA granted an extension but only for the specific amounts in the November requests. Hartford did not waive the 60-day proof of loss requirement for any other proof of loss. Hartford paid the amounts reflected in the November submissions. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Preventing Common and Costly Water Intrusion Events in Construction

    July 13, 2026 —
    Water leaking into a building is a leading cause of damage and loss in the construction industry. On one jobsite, heavy rains flooded a sub-basement, damaging a new electrical transformer—all because a roof drain was not property connected. On another jobsite, a drinking-fountain supply line broke in a multistory building that was undergoing renovation, causing water to run—undetected—for an entire weekend, resulting in water damage to all lower floors, where construction had been finished. Those loss scenarios could have been prevented with a comprehensive and effective water damage prevention plan (WDPP). This includes routine site inspections to identify uncontrolled water damage exposures and basic maintenance to make sure drains are clean of debris and divert them to a catch basin or low point away from the building. An effective WDPP plan also incorporates technology such as backflow preventers on sewer connections and water sensing technology to monitor the most vulnerable exposures. Reprinted courtesy of Andrew Swift, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    The Modern Nuclear Renaissance Reaches New England

    April 14, 2026 —
    On March 31, 2026, the governors of all six New England states issued a joint, bipartisan statement committing the region to explore deployment of advanced nuclear energy technologies while supporting the continued safe, affordable and reliable operation of New England’s existing nuclear generation facilities. This coordinated regional initiative follows a major policy announcement in June 2025 by New York Governor Kathy Hochul directing the New York Power Authority to pursue development of at least 1,000 MW of advanced nuclear generation to support statewide reliability needs and New York’s zero‑carbon mission. Less than one year after New York formally embraced a modern nuclear renaissance, that renaissance has now expanded across the New England states—signaling a broader Northeast regional pivot toward nuclear as a core element of long‑term reliability, affordability and decarbonization strategies. For utilities and power generators, this shift creates both opportunities and planning imperatives that warrant immediate attention. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Stephen J. Humes, Pillsbury
    Mr. Humes may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com

    Four Families Now Live in the Season Six Rock the Block Homes in Grantsville, Utah

    April 20, 2026 —
    SALT LAKE CITY, April 20, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- The premier of Rock the Block season seven aired last Monday and is set in Las Vegas, Nevada. Rock The Block is HGTV's highest rated show. Last year, season six was set in Utah and had HGTV's highest rating yet, with over 14 million viewers. All episodes of season six were filmed in the Worthington Ranch community in Grantsville, Utah. The four homes on the show were built by Utah builder Hamlet Homes. During the show, the location of the four Rock The Block homes had to be kept secret and were surrounded by a locked gate. After over a year of being inaccessible, the Utah public was invited in May 2025 to tour the homes and help raise money together for charity. On May 30-31, 2025, Hamlet hosted a 'Rock The Block Party' where the public was able to walk through the homes made famous by the show. Hamlet Owner, VP of Marketing & Design Tami Ostmark shares stories from the show and her perspective of what it's like to be the builder on a national show like this. Ostmark was on set almost the entire time. "As expected, there were times when there was tension on the set. All four designers were super competitive with each other. It's amazing that the production team was able to produce the show as well as they did. I'm very impressed," said Ostmark. Another interesting point related to the show is how much work the local builder is responsible for. Some nights as many as 30 Hamlet team members worked through the night to keep up with the pace of production. "Each designer provided their own trusted carpenters to do finishing work. In two of the cases, designers' flew their favorite carpenters in to carry out their visions. Given the quick turnaround, it's not always practical for finishing work to be permanent. Sometimes, it just needs to look appealing on camera," said Ostmark. This is frequently referred to as 'TV Magic'. "When the show was over, Hamlet re-did any areas that required extra attention". The show really does shoot in only 7 weeks as depicted. This creates a fast pace that was very exciting to be a part of", continued Ostmark. All four of the homes featured on the show have since been purchased; four Utah families currently call them home. ABOUT HAMLET HOMES Hamlet Homes (www.hamlethomes.com) crafts quality customer-oriented townhomes and single-family homes located in attractively designed communities in Utah and Idaho. Since the company's founding in 1995, Hamlet has built over 5,000 homes in 80 communities. The company is a proud recipient of many awards on Sustainable Business & Design, Quality Builder Awards; recognized both locally and nationally. Named by the Salt Lake Chamber of Commerce as the 'Veteran Owned Small Business of the Year, in 2019'. Hamlet has since been named several times to the Professional Builder's Housing Giants List and annual HOME AWARDS Best Customer Experience. Most recently in 2026, Hamlet was named Utah's 'Best of State for Real Estate Development and Utah Businesses 'Best Companies to Work For' for the 6th consecutive year.

    EPA, Maryland Sue DC Water Over Massive Potomac River Sewage Spill

    May 14, 2026 —
    The state of Maryland and the federal government have filed separate lawsuits against the District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority (DC Water), both alleging that the agency’s failure to address longstanding deterioration in the Potomac Interceptor contributed to a weeklong release of more than 240 million gallons of raw sewage into the Potomac River this past January. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jim Parsons, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    U.S. Supreme Court Decision Alters Course of $745M Louisiana Coastal Damage Judgment

    June 15, 2026 —
    The U.S. Supreme Court has issued a unanimous decision allowing oil and gas companies to move Louisiana coastal erosion lawsuits from state court to federal court under the federal officer removal statute. While the ruling is procedural, it carries significant implications for environmental- and energy-related risks. The case, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana, Slip Op. 24-813 (April 17, 2026), addressed a threshold jurisdictional question but has broader significance for environmental and climate related litigation. State courts are often viewed as more favorable forums for plaintiffs asserting environmental damage claims, particularly those brought by governmental entities. The opinion issued on April 17, 2026 is the latest development in long-running Louisiana coastal litigation that began more than a decade ago. Starting in 2013, Louisiana parishes filed 42 lawsuits against oil and gas companies alleging environmental damage related to historic oil field operations. The parishes alleged that oil and gas companies violated state coastal management laws by failing to properly restore impacted areas. Chevron sought to remove the cases from state court under 28 U.S.C. § 1442(a)(1), known as federal officer removal, which provides federal jurisdiction over “any person acting under [an] officer” of the United States "for or relating to any act under color of such office." The Fifth Circuit rejected the argument and remanded the case, and others like it, to state court. Trial began in March 2025 in Point à la Hache, Louisiana. On April 4, 2025, the jury awarded a total of $745 million to compensate for land loss, contamination and abandoned equipment. On June 16, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review the question of whether a federal contractor can remove to federal court when sued for oil-production activities undertaken to fulfill a federal oil-refinement contract. Reprinted courtesy of Jennifer Kretschmann, Lewis Brisbois and Jennifer E. Michel, Lewis Brisbois Ms. Kretschmann may be contacted at Jennifer.Kretschmann@lewisbrisbois.com Ms. Michel may be contacted at Jenny.Michel@lewisbrisbois.com Read the full story...