BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    parking structure expert witness Preston Connecticut industrial building expert witness Preston Connecticut concrete tilt-up expert witness Preston Connecticut Subterranean parking expert witness Preston Connecticut custom home expert witness Preston Connecticut custom homes expert witness Preston Connecticut condominiums expert witness Preston Connecticut housing expert witness Preston Connecticut institutional building expert witness Preston Connecticut office building expert witness Preston Connecticut landscaping construction expert witness Preston Connecticut tract home expert witness Preston Connecticut hospital construction expert witness Preston Connecticut townhome construction expert witness Preston Connecticut casino resort expert witness Preston Connecticut retail construction expert witness Preston Connecticut low-income housing expert witness Preston Connecticut structural steel construction expert witness Preston Connecticut mid-rise construction expert witness Preston Connecticut condominium expert witness Preston Connecticut Medical building expert witness Preston Connecticut high-rise construction expert witness Preston Connecticut
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Preston, Connecticut

    Connecticut Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Preston Connecticut

    License required for electrical and plumbing trades. No state license for general contracting, however, must register with the State.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Builders Association of Eastern Connecticut
    Local # 0740
    20 Hartford Rd Suite 18
    Salem, CT 06420
    http://www.baec.net

    Home Builders Association of New Haven Co
    Local # 0720
    2189 Silas Deane Highway
    Rocky Hill, CT 06067
    http://www.hbanewhaven.com

    Home Builders Association of Hartford Cty Inc
    Local # 0755
    2189 Silas Deane Hwy
    Rocky Hill, CT 06067
    http://www.hbahartford.com

    Home Builders Association of NW Connecticut
    Local # 0710
    110 Brook St
    Torrington, CT 06790
    http://www.hbanwct.org

    Home Builders Association of Connecticut (State)
    Local # 0700
    3 Regency Dr Ste 204
    Bloomfield, CT 06002
    http://www.hbact.org

    Home Builders & Remo Assn of Fairfield Co
    Local # 0780
    433 Meadow St
    Fairfield, CT 06824
    http://www.buildfairfieldcounty.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Preston Connecticut

    The Contributors to This Blog Are Pleased to Announce That….

    Power & Energy - Emerging Insurance Coverage Cases of Interest

    House Approves $715B Transportation and Water Infrastructure Bill

    Vegas Hi-Rise Not Earthquake Safe

    Quick Note: Be Careful with Pay if Paid Clauses (Both Subcontractors and General Contractors)

    NIBS Consultative Council Issues Moving Forward Report on Healthy Buildings

    Candis Jones Named to Atlanta Magazine’s 2025 “Atlanta 500” List

    Home Sales Going to Investors in Daytona Beach Area

    Construction Termination Issues Part 6: This is the End (Tips for The Design Professional)

    Exponential Acceleration—Interview with Anders Hvid

    Wisconsin Supreme Court Holds Fire Damage Resulted from Single Occurrence

    Plan Ahead for the Inevitable Murphy’s Law Related Accident

    Gordon & Rees Ranked #4 of Top 50 Construction Law Firms in the Nation by Construction Executive Magazine

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Recognized as 2021 New York – Metro Super Lawyers®

    Burden of Proof Under All-Risk Property Insurance Policy

    Virtual Jury Trials: The Next Wave of Remote Legal Practice

    Fire Damages Unfinished Hospital Tower at NYU Langone Medical Center

    Is Everybody Single? More Than Half the U.S. Now, Up From 37% in '76

    Insurer Wrongfully Denies Coverage When Household Member Fails to Submit to EUO

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “You May Want an Intervention …”

    Fourth Circuit Holds that a Municipal Stormwater Management Assessment is a Fee and Not a Prohibited Railroad Tax

    Colorado’s Federal District Court Finds Carriers Have Joint and Several Defense Duties

    Sept. 11 Victims Rejected by U.S. High Court on Lawsuit

    Second Circuit Affirms Win for General Contractor on No Damages for Delay Provision

    Contractors Can No Longer Make Roof Repairs Following Their Own Inspections

    “Other Insurance” and Indemnity Provisions Determine Which Insurer Must Cover

    N.J. Appellate Court Confirms that AIA Construction Contract Bars Insurer's Subrogation Claim

    A Vision and Strategy for the Adoption of Open International Standards

    Reasons to Be Skeptical About a Millennial Homebuying Boom in 2016

    Contractual Setoff and Application When Performance Bond Buys Out of its Exposure

    Montana Court Finds Duty to Defend over Construction Defect Allegation

    Federal Court Upholds Privity Requirement in Additional Insured Endorsement; Finds No Equitable Estoppel

    Colorado HB 13-1090: Concerning Payment of Amounts Due Under a Construction Agreement

    Home Repair Firms Sued for Fraud

    Florida Contractor on Trial for Bribing School Official

    Defining Construction Defects

    Traub Lieberman Senior Trial Counsel Timothy McNamara Wins Affirmation of Summary Judgment Denial

    Why Being Climate ‘Positive’ Is the Buzzy New Goal of Green Building

    Collaborating or Competing with Construction Tech Startups

    Modification: Exceptions to Privette Doctrine Do Not Apply Where There is No Evidence a General Contractor Affirmatively Contributed to the Injuries of an Independent Contractor’s Employee

    Defend Trade Secret Act of 2016–-Federalizing Trade Secret Law

    Waiving Consequential Damages—What Could Go Wrong?

    COVID-19 Response: Executive Order 13999: Enhancement of COVID-19-Related Workplace Safety Requirements

    Does Arbitration Apply to Contemporaneously Executed Contracts (When One of the Contracts Does Not Have an Arbitration Provision)?

    Construction Termination Issues for the Architect and Engineer: Part 1– Introduction to the Series

    Congratulations to Woodland Hills Partner Patrick Au and Senior Associate Ava Vahdat on Their Successful Motion for Summary Judgment!

    Preliminary Notice Is More Important Than Ever During COVID-19

    Maybe California Actually Does Have Enough Water

    Nevada OSHA Provides Additional Requirements for Construction Employers to Address Feasibility of Social Distancing at Construction Sites

    Chapman Glucksman Press Release
    Corporate Profile

    PRESTON CONNECTICUT CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 4500 construction, architectural, and engineering related expert designations, the Preston, Connecticut Construction Expert Directory provides a streamlined multi-disciplinary expert retention and support solution to attorneys and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides building related litigation support and expert witness services to the building industry's most recognizable companies, insurers, risk managers, and a variety of municipalities. Utilizing in house resources which comprise construction cost and scheduling experts, registered design professionals, forensic engineers, certified professional estimators, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Preston region.

    Preston Connecticut civil engineer expert witnessPreston Connecticut construction forensic expert witnessPreston Connecticut forensic architectPreston Connecticut expert witness windowsPreston Connecticut eifs expert witnessPreston Connecticut building expertPreston Connecticut consulting engineers
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Preston, Connecticut

    No Bad Faith Despite Insurer’s Appraisal Award Exceeding Initial Payment

    August 03, 2026 —
    The federal district court granted the insurer’s motion for summary judgment, finding no bad faith despite the appraisal award exceeding the amount the insurer initially paid. Jazi Kat 4659 Rockridge LLC, et al. v. Travelers Cas. Ins. Co. of Am., et al., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105634 (D. Ariz. May 13, 2026). Plaintiffs sued Travelers for breach of contract and bad faith, alleging that Travelers failed to pay money plaintiffs were owed under the policy. Plaintiffs held a commercial property policy for two properties. A fire destroyed one of the properties. Travelers adjusted the claim and issued two payments. Plaintiffs disagreed with the amount of the payments and demanded an appraisal. Travelers agreed to the appraisal. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    How Mobile Tools Are Capturing Safety Data on Jobsites

    April 08, 2026 —
    Traditionally, construction safety management is “reactive compliance”—reporting on an incident, filling out a form on paper or electronically, taking a picture and filing it away for compliance purposes. Safety management is shifting from reactive to proactive. Forward-thinking companies are using data and leading indicators to identify risks before incidents happen, not just document injuries after the fact. Mobile tools have completely changed the way safety operations work on construction sites, enabling that transition to proactive safety management. Reprinted courtesy of Michael Bruns, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Arizona Court of Appeals Clarifies Homeowners Association Open Meeting Requirements

    June 29, 2026 —
    A Z N H Revocable Trust v. Sunland Springs Village Homeowners Association, No. 1 CA-CV 25-0424 (Ariz. Ct. App. Apr. 28, 2026) OVERVIEW The Arizona Court of Appeals issued an opinion clarifying how homeowners associations must conduct meetings under A.R.S. § 33-1804. The decision reinforces the legislative policy favoring transparency in association governance, bringing association meeting requirements more in line with the open meeting standards applicable to public bodies under A.R.S. § 38-431 et seq. (Arizona’s Open Meeting Law). KEY HOLDINGS 1. All Voting and Formal Actions Must Occur in Open Meetings The Court affirmed that association boards cannot vote or take formal action during closed (executive) sessions. Under A.R.S. § 33-1804(A), associations may close portions of meetings only for “consideration” of certain enumerated topics, such as legal advice, pending litigation, or personal/financial information about individual members. The Court interpreted “consideration” to mean discussion and deliberation, not voting. The Court noted that dictionaries define “consider” as “spending time thinking about a possibility” and “formulating an opinion,” which are processes that precede formal action. This interpretation mirrors how Arizona’s Open Meeting Law (A.R.S. § 38-431.03(D)) prohibits public bodies from voting in executive session. Reprinted courtesy of Jill Casson Owen, Snell & Wilmer, Benjamin J. Hawkins, Snell & Wilmer and Stephen Wright, Snell & Wilmer Ms. Owen may be contacted at jowen@swlaw.com Mr. Hawkins may be contacted at bhawkins@swlaw.com Mr. Wright may be contacted at swright@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Louisiana Legislature Enacts Act 932 – Significant Changes to Insurer Bad-Faith Exposure for Failure to Settle

    July 13, 2026 —
    The Louisiana Legislature has enacted Act 932 (formerly House Bill 1162), which became law this week without the Governor's signature pursuant to the Louisiana Constitution, after expiration of the applicable constitutional review period. Act 932 makes several important amendments to Louisiana's insurer bad-faith statute and appears intended, at least in part, to address issues arising from the Louisiana Supreme Court's decision in Kelly v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 169 So.3d 328 (La. 2015). The Act also makes changes regarding claim payments involving licensed contractors. The Act takes effect on August 1, 2026. Key Takeaways Act 932:
    • Limits certain bad-faith causes of action (bad faith failure to settle) involving personal injury and bodily injury claims where good-faith disputes exist or where an insurer has not been afforded sufficient opportunity to respond to a settlement demand.
    • Requires insurers and adjusters to verify a contractor's Louisiana license status before issuing claim payments when a contractor is named as a payee on a check for repair or restoration of immovable property.
    • Creates a statutory safe harbor protecting insurers from bad-faith penalties and attorney fees when payment delays result from an inability to verify a contractor's license, provided specified documentation and notice requirements are met.
    Reprinted courtesy of Tabitha R. Durbin, Lewis Brisbois and Jennifer E. Michel, Lewis Brisbois Ms. Durbin may be contacted at Tabitha.Durbin@lewisbrisbois.com Ms. Michel may be contacted at Jenny.Michel@lewisbrisbois.com Read the full story...

    Travelers Injury Impact Report Highlights Longer Recovery Times Amid Declining Injury Rates

    May 05, 2026 —
    HARTFORD, Conn.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The Travelers Companies, Inc. (NYSE: TRV) today released its 2026 Injury Impact Report, an analysis of more than 1.2 million workers compensation claims received by the company from 2021 through 2025. The report finds that even as workplace injury rates decline, the injuries that do occur are growing more complex and taking longer to heal – a trend driven by an aging workforce and the disproportionate vulnerability of first-year employees. “The decrease in workplace injuries is a positive story, yet injured workers are still missing an average of 80 workdays,” said Claude Howard, Vice President of Workers Compensation Claim at Travelers. “This report is a reminder that progress doesn’t mean the risk environment requires any less attention, and an employer’s commitment to safety must keep pace with an ever-evolving workforce and injury landscape.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Travelers Companies, Inc.

    Bad Faith Claim Survives Summary Judgment

    June 08, 2026 —
    The court denied the insurer’s motion for partial summary judgment on the insured’s bad faith claim, but granted the motion on the insured’s claim for punitive damages. Serbian Orthodox Church v. Brotherhood Mut. Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58234 (S.D. Cal. March 19, 2026). On February 1, 2023, the Church filed a claim for water damage with Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company (BMIC). The claim was based on rain and wind that caused extensive water intrusion into the Sanctuary, damaging its plaster walls and ceilings and fresco paintings. The claim was assigned to Patrick Hurley. Hurley sent a letter discussing potential bars to coverage and requesting further information and documents from the Church. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Sixth Circuit Revives Builder’s Risk Coverage, Refusing to Let Insurer Escape on a Technicality

    July 27, 2026 —
    In 3371 Reading, LLC v. Liberty Mutual Group, the Sixth Circuit did something courts do not always do in coverage disputes: it refused to let an insurer avoid liability based on a technical policy condition that could never actually be satisfied. The decision is a straightforward reminder of two core principles. First, policies must be interpreted from the standpoint of a reasonably prudent insured. Second, hyper-technical conditions cannot be used to deny coverage where compliance is never possible. Reprinted courtesy of Kevin V. Small, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Adriana A. Perez, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Mr. Small may be contacted at ksmall@hunton.com Ms. Perez may be contacted at pereza@hunton.com Read the full story...

    EPA Expands PFAS Reporting Requirements with Addition of New Chemical to Toxics Release Inventory, Published by Law360

    June 08, 2026 —
    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) addition of sodium perfluorohexanesulfonate (PFHxS-Na) to the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) introduces new federal reporting requirements for businesses that manufacture, process, or use the chemical. Because reporting obligations apply retroactively to the start of the year, affected facilities must quickly evaluate their compliance and recordkeeping practices. In a recent Law360 article, Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Senior Counsel, Ayodeji Ayolola, explains why PFHxS-Na was automatically added to the TRI, how the EPA’s public reporting system works, and which businesses may be affected by the new rule. The article also touches upon key compliance considerations, including supply chain reviews, reporting thresholds for chemicals of special concern, and preparation for public disclosure requirements. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani