BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    custom home expert witness Captiva Florida structural steel construction expert witness Captiva Florida custom homes expert witness Captiva Florida production housing expert witness Captiva Florida townhome construction expert witness Captiva Florida multi family housing expert witness Captiva Florida hospital construction expert witness Captiva Florida institutional building expert witness Captiva Florida concrete tilt-up expert witness Captiva Florida landscaping construction expert witness Captiva Florida industrial building expert witness Captiva Florida condominium expert witness Captiva Florida high-rise construction expert witness Captiva Florida housing expert witness Captiva Florida condominiums expert witness Captiva Florida retail construction expert witness Captiva Florida office building expert witness Captiva Florida low-income housing expert witness Captiva Florida mid-rise construction expert witness Captiva Florida parking structure expert witness Captiva Florida Subterranean parking expert witness Captiva Florida casino resort expert witness Captiva Florida
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Captiva, Florida

    Florida Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: In Title XXXIII Chapter 558, the Florida Legislature establishes a requirement that homeowners who allege construction defects must first notify the construction professional responsible for the defect and allow them an opportunity to repair the defect before the homeowner canbring suit against the construction professional. The statute, which allows homeowners and associations to file claims against certain types of contractors and others, defines the type of defects that fall under the authority of the legislation and the types of housing covered in thelegislation. Florida sets strict procedures that homeowners must follow in notifying construction professionals of alleged defects. The law also establishes strict timeframes for builders to respond to homeowner claims. Once a builder has inspected the unit, the law allows the builder to offer to repair or settle by paying the owner a sum to cover the cost of repairing the defect. The homeowner has the option of accepting the offer or rejecting the offer and filing suit. Under the statute the courts must abate any homeowner legal action until the homeowner has undertaken the claims process. The law also requires contractors, subcontractors and other covered under the law to notify homeowners of the right to cure process.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Captiva Florida

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Lee Building Industry Association
    Local # 1016
    10501 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY Ste 104
    Fort Myers, FL 33966
    http://www.bia.net

    Gold Coast Builders Association
    Local # 1025
    2617 North Australian Ave
    West Palm Beach, FL 33407
    http://www.gcbaonline.com

    Collier Building Industry Association
    Local # 1005
    3200 Bailey Lane Ste 110
    Naples, FL 34105
    http://www.cbia.net

    Charlotte-DeSoto Building Industry Association
    Local # 1002
    17984 Toledo Blade Blvd
    Port Charlotte, FL 33948
    http://www.cdbia.com

    Builders Association of South FL
    Local # 1032
    15225 NW 77th Ave
    Miami Lakes, FL 33014
    http://www.basfonline.org

    Treasure Coast Builders Association
    Local # 1030
    6560 South Federal Highway
    Port Saint Lucie, FL 34952
    http://www.treasurecoastba.com

    Home Builders Association of Manatee - Sarasota County
    Local # 1041
    8131 Lakewood Main St Ste 207
    Lakewood Ranch, FL 34202
    http://hbamanatee-sarasota.org/


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Captiva Florida

    Courts Take Another Swipe at the Implied Warranty of the Plans and Specifications

    The Fifth Circuit, Applying Texas Law, Strikes Down Auto Exclusion

    Quick Note: Don’t Sue Your Arbitrator

    Fifth Circuit Concludes Government’s CAA Legal Claims are Time-Barred But Injunctive-Relief Claims are Not

    OSHA: What to Expect in 2022

    What Do I Do With This Stuff? Dealing With Abandoned Property After Foreclosure

    Construction Defects Not Occurrences under Ohio Law

    Court finds subcontractor responsible for defending claim

    WA Supreme Court Allows Property Owner to Sue Engineering Firm for Lost Profits

    What You Don’t Know About Construction Law Can Hurt Your Engineering Firm (Law Note)

    Construction Law Alert: Builder’s Alternative Pre-litigation Procedures Upheld Over Strong Opposition

    The Future of Construction Tech Is Decision Tech

    Federal District Court Addresses Anti-concurrent Cause Language in Property Policy

    Construction Defect Claim Did Not Harm Homeowner, Court Rules

    Segal McCambridge Recognized in 2026 Chambers USA Rankings

    12 Newmeyer Dillion Attorneys Named to 2022 U.S. News Best Lawyers in Multiple Practice Areas

    In Texas, a Certificate of Merit Must Address the Conduct of Each Defendant Specifically

    When “Normal Cracking” Isn’t So Normal: Parra v. Gillaspie Construction and the Two-Year Clock on Construction Defect Claims

    Washington First State to Require Electric Heat Pumps

    Julie Firestone & Francois Ecclesiaste Recognized as 2023 MSBA North Star Lawyers

    Awarding Insurer Summary Judgment Before Discovery Completed Reversed

    Consultant Says It's Time to Overhaul Construction Defect Laws in Nevada

    California Supreme Court Approves of Annual Civility Oath for Attorneys, Rejects Incivility As Basis for Disciplinary Measures

    Duty to Defend For Accident Exists, But Not Duty to Indeminfy

    New Hampshire Asbestos Abatement Firm Pleads Guilty in Federal Fraud Case

    Effects of Amendment to Florida's Statute of Repose on the Products Completed Operations Hazard

    History and Gentrification Clash in a Gilded Age Resort

    GRSM Named “Powerhouse in Litigation” in 2026 Industry Report

    Suit Limitation Provisions in New York

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (1/10/24) – New Type of Nuclear Reactor, Big Money Surrounding Sports Stadiums, and Positivity from Fannie Mae’s Monthly Consumer Survey

    Architects and Engineers Added to Harmon Towers Lawsuit

    Did You Really Accept That Bid? – How Contractors Can Avoid Post-Acceptance Bid Disputes Over Contract Terms

    Florida Condo Collapse Victims Reach $1 Billion Settlement

    Vermont Supreme Court Reverses, Finding No Coverage for Collapse

    Risk Management and Contracting after Hurricane Irma: Suggestions to Avoid a Second Disaster

    White and Williams Lawyers Recognized by Best Lawyers

    Requirements For Professional Engineers Practicing in Connecticut

    Is Your Construction Business Feeling the Effects of the Final DBA Rule?

    The Single Source of Truth in Construction Projects: Reality or Myth?

    Another Defect Found on the Bay Bridge: Water Leakage

    Billion-Dollar Power Lines Finally Inching Ahead to Help US Grids

    White House Reverses Trump Administration NEPA Cutbacks

    Idaho Business Review Names VF Law Attorney Brittaney Bones Women of the Year Honoree

    Subcontractors Found Liable to Reimburse Insurer Defense Costs in Equitable Subrogation Action

    Thank You!

    2017 Susan G. Komen Race for the Cure

    Ohio Supreme Court Rules That Wrongful Death Claims Are Subject to the Four-Year Statute of Repose for Medical Claims

    PSA: Performing Construction Work in Virginia Requires a Contractor’s License

    Discussion of the Discovery Rule and Tolling Statute of Limitations

    Timely and Properly Assert Affirmative Defenses and Understand Statutory Conditions Precedent
    Corporate Profile

    CAPTIVA FLORIDA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from approximately 5000 construction related expert witness designations, the Captiva, Florida Construction Expert Directory provides a single point of reference for construction defect and claims related support to attorneys and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction claims investigation and expert services to the nation's most recognized builders, risk managers, legal professionals, owners, state and local government agencies. Utilizing captive assets which comprise licensed general and specialty contractors, consulting civil engineers, NCARB certified architects, roofing, and building envelope experts, the firm brings regional experience and flexible capabilities to the Captiva construction industry.

    Captiva Florida consulting general contractorCaptiva Florida architectural engineering expert witnessCaptiva Florida hospital construction expert witnessCaptiva Florida construction safety expertCaptiva Florida OSHA expert witness constructionCaptiva Florida construction claims expert witnessCaptiva Florida architecture expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Captiva, Florida

    Building the Research and Healthcare Facilities of Tomorrow Without Impacting the Progress of Today

    August 16, 2026 —
    Research labs run experiments that can’t be paused. Hospitals treat patients around the clock. Yet these same facilities constantly need upgrades—new infrastructure, modernized systems, renovated spaces—to meet the demands of twenty-first century science and medicine. The challenge for construction teams isn’t just building. It’s building without ever turning the lights off. This unique dynamic creates an environment where construction activities are happening adjacent to sensitive testing and treatment, a complex setting where disruptions can have serious consequences. Skanska continues to successfully navigate these challenges across multiple sectors, including from occupied lab space at the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality’s (NCDEQ) Reedy Creek Laboratory in Raleigh to hospital corridors alongside staff and patients in various hospital locations across the country. Reprinted courtesy of Jason Tobias, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    'Drywall Isn't Light': Peter Lupo on Safety Management at Standard Drywall

    May 26, 2026 —
    Peter Lupo has been safety director since 2019 at San Diego-based Standard Drywall Inc., a major wall and ceiling contractor. He draws on over two decades of safety experience across a wide range of commercial construction work, having previously served as safety director for general contractor T.B. Penick & Sons. He has also previously operated Peter Lupo Consulting, where he reviewed legal cases and provided expert testimony, and blogged on safety for ENR.com. Lupo recently spoke to ENR Correspondent Elaine Silver about the weight of drywall, heat hazard control, bilingual crews and how he supports safety creativity and learning on the Standard Drywall staff. The conversation has been edited. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Elaine Silver, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Emerging Issues in Construction CGL Insurance Part 2: The Separation of Insureds and Additional Insured Interests

    September 29, 2026 —
    Many coverage disputes hinge on first principles—the fundamentals of insurance —rather than the minutiae. Unfortunately, the basic anatomy of insurance policies can get lost sometimes when parties are laser-focused on a particular term or set of circumstances. This is true not just in disputes, but also when writing coverage. One of the fundamentals that is commonly misunderstood and overlooked—but which is absolutely critical to the intended operation of insurance coverage—is what is commonly known as the “separation of insureds.” The “separation of insureds” is the concept that each “insured” under a policy are referred to and treated differently, and most of all that the distinctions matter. The concept is usually included as a condition in the policy. It embodies the requirement that the policy applies to each insured distinctly from how it applies to other insureds. The ISO Form CGL policies specifically state that they apply “[s]eparately to each insured against whom a claim is made or ‘suit’ is brought.” The separate and distinct treatment of insureds is more critical in construction operations than anywhere else. This distinction is essential to ensure coverage works as intended, especially when contracted operations are involved, because the policy must insure the subcontractor that purchased the policy, the general contractor who hired the subcontractor, and the owner that hired the general contractor. Even small modifications can easily frustrate the intent of the parties. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Eric M. Clarkson, SDV Fenchurch
    Mr. Clarkson may be contacted at eric.clarkson@sdvfenchurch.us

    NJ Public Works Contractors Beware – Pay Special Attention When Submitting Your Public Works Contractor Registration

    May 26, 2026 —
    While it is always important to be careful when making submissions to government agencies, recent activity by the New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development (“NJDOL”) reveals considerably increased scrutiny in connection with contractors renewing their New Jersey Public Works Registration. Extra care when completing the registration renewal process is warranted, because the consequences of a misstep can be significant and disruptive. The New Jersey Public Works Contractor Registration Act requires all contractors bidding on or engaging in construction-related public works projects to register with the NJDOL. This registration, which must be resubmitted every 1-2 years, requires contractors to make a number of detailed disclosures relating to, among other things, the entity’s ownership structure, prior state and federal labor law violations, details regarding interests in other businesses, unlawful acts by owners/officers, and participation in apprenticeship programs. Reprinted courtesy of Levi W. Barrett, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Aaron C. Schlesinger, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Barrett may be contacted at lbarrett@pecklaw.com Mr. Schlesinger may be contacted at aschlesinger@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Voluntary Dismissal of an Indemnity Claim Does Not Make the Subcontractor a “Prevailing Party,” Washington Court of Appeals Holds

    September 21, 2026 —
    In King County v. Walsh Construction Company II, LLC, No. 86503-0-I (Wash. Ct. App. Aug. 4, 2025), an unpublished decision from Division I of the Washington Court of Appeals, the Court affirmed the denial of a subcontractor’s request for prevailing-party attorney fees under an indemnity clause after the general contractor voluntarily dismissed its indemnity claims. Because the indemnity claim was no longer live and no determination of fault had occurred, the Court held that the trial court did not err in denying the request. ACS represented Walsh, the general contractor, in securing the denial of the fee request at the trial court that the Court of Appeals affirmed. A Pass-Through Indemnity Claim That Ended Before Fault Was Decided The dispute arose out of a public works contract under which King County hired Walsh Construction Company II, LLC (“Walsh”) to construct and install a conveyance pipeline. After the pipeline broke, King County sued Walsh for breach of contract and warranty, expressly identifying both Walsh and its subcontractor, Mears Group Inc., (“Mears”) as responsible. Walsh tendered defense and indemnity to Mears under the subcontract. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Margarita Kutsin, Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC
    Ms. Kutsin may be contacted at margarita.kutsin@acslawyers.com

    Insurer’s Federal Suit Dismissed in Favor of Insured’s State Suit

    April 14, 2026 —
    The federal district court granted the insured’s motion to dismiss the insurer’s federal suit for declaratory judgment because the insured filed a more complete action in state court. Church Mut. Ins. Co. v. Elmwood Baptist Church, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 259762 (S.D. W.V. Dec. 16, 2025). Elmwood purchased a property policy from Church Mutual Insurance Company. After the roof of Elmwood’s property collapsed, the parties disputed the amount Church Mutual owed to Elmwood. Church Mutual filed suit in federal district court asking for a declaration that the policy was “void ab initio,’ or, alternatively, that Church had fully compensated Elmwood for its loss. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Inaccurate Representations Can Lead to Differing Site Conditions Claim

    May 26, 2026 —
    In the prior posting, I discussed a case dealing with a differing site condition. In that case, the owner did not have an affirmative duty to make a representation and there was no inaccurate representation made by the owner that misled the contractor. Well, what about when there is an inaccurate misrepresentation regarding the site? This was the circumstance in an older Florida case where a dredging contractor had a successful differing site conditions claim. See Jacksonville Port Authority v. Parkhill-Goodloe, Co., Inc., 362 So.2d 1009 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). The government provided inaccurate information as to the lack of rock that would be encountered during the dredging that was relied on by the dredging contractor. But the government had “superior knowledge” that there was rock in an adjacent location based on a prior claim from a contractor, yet the government did not disclose the possibility that rock could be encountered. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Kahana Feld Obtains Favorable Result in High-Exposure NY Premises Liability Case

    June 15, 2026 —
    Kahana Feld partner Leigh Katz obtained a significant victory in a recent matter involving a videotaped alleged trip and fall on the sidewalk in front of the client’s commercial residence. The plaintiff claimed he suffered a knee injury that necessitated surgery, along with other assorted injuries that prevented him from continuing high-level athletic activities. Leigh was able to demonstrate that the fall was staged and received a voluntary discontinuance with prejudice. At mediation, Leigh emphasized that KF’s expert witness challenged the plaintiff’s claim that the fall was caused by a sidewalk height differential after reviewing the videotape footage and determining the plaintiff’s fall began before his feet made contact with the alleged defect. Based on this analysis, the expert concluded the reported height differential did not initiate the fall, which supported KF’s position that the incident depicted in the video was unrealistic and appeared staged. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Leigh Katz, Kahana Feld
    Ms. Katz may be contacted at lkatz@kahanafeld.com