BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    housing expert witness Flagler County Florida hospital construction expert witness Flagler County Florida retail construction expert witness Flagler County Florida townhome construction expert witness Flagler County Florida condominiums expert witness Flagler County Florida custom home expert witness Flagler County Florida tract home expert witness Flagler County Florida casino resort expert witness Flagler County Florida concrete tilt-up expert witness Flagler County Florida mid-rise construction expert witness Flagler County Florida high-rise construction expert witness Flagler County Florida parking structure expert witness Flagler County Florida industrial building expert witness Flagler County Florida Subterranean parking expert witness Flagler County Florida custom homes expert witness Flagler County Florida landscaping construction expert witness Flagler County Florida production housing expert witness Flagler County Florida office building expert witness Flagler County Florida multi family housing expert witness Flagler County Florida structural steel construction expert witness Flagler County Florida condominium expert witness Flagler County Florida Medical building expert witness Flagler County Florida
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Flagler County, Florida

    Florida Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: In Title XXXIII Chapter 558, the Florida Legislature establishes a requirement that homeowners who allege construction defects must first notify the construction professional responsible for the defect and allow them an opportunity to repair the defect before the homeowner canbring suit against the construction professional. The statute, which allows homeowners and associations to file claims against certain types of contractors and others, defines the type of defects that fall under the authority of the legislation and the types of housing covered in thelegislation. Florida sets strict procedures that homeowners must follow in notifying construction professionals of alleged defects. The law also establishes strict timeframes for builders to respond to homeowner claims. Once a builder has inspected the unit, the law allows the builder to offer to repair or settle by paying the owner a sum to cover the cost of repairing the defect. The homeowner has the option of accepting the offer or rejecting the offer and filing suit. Under the statute the courts must abate any homeowner legal action until the homeowner has undertaken the claims process. The law also requires contractors, subcontractors and other covered under the law to notify homeowners of the right to cure process.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Flagler County Florida

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Flagler Co-Palm Coast Home Builders Association
    Local # 1011
    4863 Palm Coast Parkway NW Ste 1
    Palm Coast, FL 32137
    http://www.flaglerhba.com

    Volusia Building Industry Association
    Local # 1090
    3520 W International Speedway Blvd
    Daytona Beach, FL 32124
    http://www.volusiahomebuilders.org

    Builders Association of North Central FL
    Local # 1020
    2217 NW 66th Ct
    Gainesville, FL 32653
    http://www.bancf.com

    Marion County Building Industry Association
    Local # 1038
    2635 SE 58th Avenue
    Ocala, FL 34480
    http://www.mcbia.org

    Forgotten Coast Builders Assoc
    Local # 1015
    PO Box 1005
    Port Saint Joe, FL 32457
    http://www.forgottencoastbuilder.com/

    Citrus Cty Bldr Assn
    Local # 1006
    1196 S Lecanto Hwy
    Lecanto, FL 34461
    http://www.citrusbuilders.com

    Home Builders Association of Lake County
    Local # 1026
    1100 N Joanna Ave
    Tavares, FL 32778
    http://www.lakehba.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Flagler County Florida

    Shifting Fees and Costs in Nevada Construction Defect Cases

    Bill Proposes First-Ever Federal Workforce Housing Tax Credit for Middle-Class Housing

    Los Angeles Team Secures Summary Judgment for Hotel Owner & Manager in Tenant’s Lawsuit

    Two-Part Series on Condominium Construction Defect Issues

    Drones Used Despite Uncertain Legal Consequences

    A WARNing for Companies

    A Classic Blunder: Practical Advice for Avoiding Two-Front Wars

    Edison Utility Accused of Igniting LA Fire in Lawsuits

    Builder Survey Focuses on Green Practices of Top 200 Builders

    Extrinsic Evidence, or Eight Corners? Texas Court Sheds Light on Determining the Duty to Defend

    Coverage for Construction Defects Barred by Business Risk Exclusions

    Relying Upon Improper Exclusion to Deny Coverage Allows Bad Faith Claim to Survive Summary Judgment

    The Future of Pandemic Coverage for Real Estate Owners and Developers

    Mind The Gap!

    Case-Shiller Redo Shows Less Severe U.S. Home-Price Slump

    Philadelphia Voters to Consider Best Value Bid Procurment

    Required Contract Provisions for Construction Contracts in California

    Florida Legislative Change Extends Completed Operations Tail for Condominium Projects

    Georgia Coal-to-Solar Pivot Shows the Way on Climate Regs

    For Breach of Contract Claim, There Needs to be a Breach of a Contractual Duty

    Construction Defect Claim Must Be Defended Under Florida Law

    #12 CDJ Topic: Am. Home Assur. Co. v. SMG Stone Co., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75910 (N. D. Cal. June 11, 2015)

    Five Frequently Overlooked Points of Construction Contracts

    Lost in Translation: AEC Tech’s Missing Role

    Delaware River Interstate Bridge Shut to Assess Truss Fracture

    The Privilege Is All Mine: California Appellate Court Finds Law Firm Holds Attorney Work Product Privilege Applicable to Documents Created by Formerly Employed Attorney

    The Importance of the Subcontractor Exception to the “Your Work” Exclusion

    Court Voids Settlement Agreement in Construction Defect Case

    Recent Florida Legislative Changes Shorten Both Statute of Limitation ("SOL") and Statute of Repose ("SOR") for Construction Defect Claims

    Michigan Court of Appeals Remands Construction Defect Case

    Homeowners Battle Insurers Over $2.9 Trillion Climate Risk

    Courts Generally Favor the Enforcement of Arbitration Provisions

    Too Late for The Blame Game: Massachusetts Court Holds That the Statute of Repose Barred a Product Manufacturer from Seeking Contribution from a Product Installer

    An Insurance Policy Isn’t Ambiguous Just Because You Want It to Be

    Sub-Limit Restricts Insured's Flood Damage Recovery

    Winter COVID-19 Relief Bill: Overview of Key Provisions

    New York Court of Appeals Addresses Choice of Law Challenges

    School System Settles Design Defect Suit for $5.2Million

    Insured Versus Insured Clause Does Not Bar Coverage

    Differences in Types of Damages Matter

    Fire Consultants Cannot Base Opinions on Speculation

    A Court-Side Seat: An End-of-Year Environmental Update

    The Goldilocks Rule: Panel Rejects Proposed Insurer-Specific MDL Proceedings for Four Large Insurers, but Establishes MDL Proceeding for the Smallest

    NYT Points to Foreign Minister and Carlos Slim for Collapse of Mexico City Metro

    Massachusetts Federal Court Rejects Adria Towers, Finds Construction Defects Not an “Occurrence”

    Candis Jones Named to Atlanta Magazine’s 2025 “Atlanta 500” List

    Florida Representative Wants to Change Statute of Repose

    The First UK Hospital Being Built Using AI Technology

    Construction Law: Unexpected, Fascinating, Bizarre

    Construction Defect Leads to Death, Jury Awards $39 Million
    Corporate Profile

    FLAGLER COUNTY FLORIDA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Drawing from more than 4500 general contracting and design related expert designations, the Flagler County, Florida Construction Expert Directory provides a single point of reference for construction defect and claims related support to lawyers and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect and claims litigation. BHA provides building related trial support and expert consulting services to the industry's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, insurers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. In connection with in house assets which include licensed architects, civil engineers, building envelope experts, general and specialty contractors focused on the evaluation of construction claims, the firm brings specialized expertise and local capabilities to the Flagler County region.

    Flagler County Florida construction claims expert witnessFlagler County Florida consulting general contractorFlagler County Florida civil engineer expert witnessFlagler County Florida construction expert witness consultantFlagler County Florida architectural expert witnessFlagler County Florida construction claims expert witnessFlagler County Florida contractor expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Flagler County, Florida

    Why AI Data Centers Cost Billions to Build

    November 02, 2026 —
    Roughly $750 billion. That’s how much Meta Platforms Inc., Amazon.com Inc., Microsoft Corp. and Google owner Alphabet Inc. are expected to devote to capital expenditures this year alone. That’s more than the entire gross domestic product of Ireland or Belgium. More than half of what all of the companies in the S&P 500 Index spent in total last year. Enough to cut a $5,500 check for every household in the US. There was a time when John McWilliams, part of the research group at real estate services firm Cushman & Wakefield, would’ve found it impossible to imagine four companies spending that much, primarily on data centers, in a single year. “We’ve never seen it,” he said. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lynn Doan, Bloomberg

    Insureds’ Altering Dates for Hailstorm Damage Justifies Denial of Claim

    June 02, 2026 —
    The Firth Circuit affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the insurer due to the insureds’ failure to establish the date of loss after a hailstorm. Cutchall v. Chubb Lloyds Ins. Co. of Texas, 2026 WL 625633 (5th Cir. March 5, 2026). In September 2021, the Cutchalls made a claim on their policy for interior water damage due to a hailstorm that breached their roof. Chubb retained two engineers to inspect the home, but neither found evidence that a hailstorm caused the damage. Instead, the engineers concluded a variety of other causes, such as poor ventilation and as-built defects, caused the damage. Because Chubb concluded that some of these other causes were covered by the policy, it paid only for the covered portions. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC Recognized by Best Lawyers 2027

    September 28, 2026 —
    Continuing the trend from last year, Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC is excited to announce that thirteen members of our firm have received recognition from Best Lawyers® in America for 2027. The Best Lawyers in America® has been an annual publication since 1983 and focuses on the top legal talent across the United States and the globe. Through its rankings, Best Lawyers® provides a comprehensive guide to legal representation for individuals and businesses alike. Over time, Best Lawyers® has been recognized as one of the leading publications for attorney achievements and references. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC

    OC Streetcar Project Mediation Sets $50M Payment to Walsh

    July 20, 2026 —
    Walsh Construction told a California state court judge last month that lawsuit mediation of its claims on an Orange County light-rail project—known as OC Streetcar—had produced a settlement of some claims under which the county agreed to pay the contractor almost an additional $50 million. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com

    Ninth Circuit Holds That Policies Covering Environmental Claims Do Not Have Aggregate Limits

    May 12, 2026 —
    In the case of County of San Bernardino v. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, the Ninth Circuit recently addressed the issue of whether general liability policies issued in the 1960s and 1970s included aggregate limits for claims arising under the premises-operations coverage in CGL policies. The difference between the policyholder’s interpretation of the policies’ limits clauses and the insurer’s interpretation was worth hundreds of millions of dollars in exposure for the insurer. The Court closely examined the policy language and extrinsic evidence from both the insurance industry’s drafting history and the parties before concluding that the policies were ambiguous. The Court construed that ambiguity in favor of the policyholder and ruled that aggregate limits did not apply to the claims at issue. The Court’s decision underscores the importance of carefully examining a policy’s limits, especially for older policies written before 1986 when the insurance industry revised the standard-form CGL policy to state the aggregate limits apply not only to products liability claims but to premises-operations claims as well. Decades of insurance industry drafting history confirms, as the policyholder’s submissions in this case indicate, that the industry well understood that operations claims like the environmental waste-disposal claims at issue here typically were not subject to aggregate limits. Reprinted courtesy of Lorelie S. Masters, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Joseph T. Niczky, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Ms. Masters may be contacted at lmasters@hunton.com Mr. Niczky may be contacted at jniczky@hunton.com Read the full story...

    Understanding the EPA’s Latest Proposed Drinking Water Contaminant Monitoring Rule, Published in Law360

    September 01, 2026 —
    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) proposed Sixth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 6) represents another step in the federal government’s ongoing effort to identify and evaluate emerging contaminants in drinking water. The proposal would require certain public water systems to monitor and report on 30 unregulated drinking water contaminants from 2028 through 2030, while generating occurrence data that could inform future regulation and affect environmental, commercial, litigation and risk assessments. In an article published by Law360, Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Senior Counsel, Ayodeji Ayolola, analyzes the scope and practical implications of UCMR 6, including the contaminants selected, the proposed monitoring requirements for public water systems, and the EPA’s continued focus on PFAS and related organofluorine compounds. The article also touches upon the potential significance of publicly available monitoring data for businesses and property stakeholders. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Traub Lieberman Wins Affirmation of Judgment on Pleadings Before the Seventh Circuit

    August 16, 2026 —
    Traub Lieberman Partners Dana Rice and Adam Joffe obtained affirmation of judgment from the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in favor of an Insurance Company. The Insurance Company filed suit seeking a declaration that it had no duty to defend or indemnify its Insured, a Roofing Contractor, in an underlying lawsuit. The Insurance Company issued a commercial general liability policy with a one-year policy term. The policy included an exclusion that barred coverage for any losses arising out of work the insured completed before the date the policy incepted. Reprinted courtesy of Dana A. Rice, Traub Lieberman and Adam P. Joffe, Traub Lieberman Mr. Rice may be contacted at drice@tlsslaw.com Mr. Joffe may be contacted at ajoffe@tlsslaw.com Read the full story...

    Steel Cooling: Steel Costs Steadily Decline After Pandemic Price Shock

    May 12, 2026 —
    Steel prices have continued trending downward after several years of volatility, according to Gordian’s latest analysis based on RSMeans Data. After dramatic spikes during the pandemic-era supply disruptions, the market has gradually stabilized as supply chains improve and demand softens in some construction segments. However, selective volatility and tariff uncertainty continue to influence pricing across the sector. Key findings from the report include:
    • Steel prices declining: The national average price of structural steel fell to about $2,343.93 per ton in January 2026, down 5.38% from the previous quarter and 7.18% year over year.
    • Longer-term price correction: Steel costs have been trending downward since 2024 after earlier volatility driven by inflation, supply shortages and global demand swings.
    Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...