BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    production housing expert witness Fort Pierce Florida industrial building expert witness Fort Pierce Florida structural steel construction expert witness Fort Pierce Florida mid-rise construction expert witness Fort Pierce Florida parking structure expert witness Fort Pierce Florida low-income housing expert witness Fort Pierce Florida multi family housing expert witness Fort Pierce Florida Medical building expert witness Fort Pierce Florida tract home expert witness Fort Pierce Florida custom home expert witness Fort Pierce Florida high-rise construction expert witness Fort Pierce Florida casino resort expert witness Fort Pierce Florida condominiums expert witness Fort Pierce Florida institutional building expert witness Fort Pierce Florida retail construction expert witness Fort Pierce Florida condominium expert witness Fort Pierce Florida office building expert witness Fort Pierce Florida townhome construction expert witness Fort Pierce Florida concrete tilt-up expert witness Fort Pierce Florida Subterranean parking expert witness Fort Pierce Florida hospital construction expert witness Fort Pierce Florida housing expert witness Fort Pierce Florida
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Fort Pierce, Florida

    Florida Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: In Title XXXIII Chapter 558, the Florida Legislature establishes a requirement that homeowners who allege construction defects must first notify the construction professional responsible for the defect and allow them an opportunity to repair the defect before the homeowner canbring suit against the construction professional. The statute, which allows homeowners and associations to file claims against certain types of contractors and others, defines the type of defects that fall under the authority of the legislation and the types of housing covered in thelegislation. Florida sets strict procedures that homeowners must follow in notifying construction professionals of alleged defects. The law also establishes strict timeframes for builders to respond to homeowner claims. Once a builder has inspected the unit, the law allows the builder to offer to repair or settle by paying the owner a sum to cover the cost of repairing the defect. The homeowner has the option of accepting the offer or rejecting the offer and filing suit. Under the statute the courts must abate any homeowner legal action until the homeowner has undertaken the claims process. The law also requires contractors, subcontractors and other covered under the law to notify homeowners of the right to cure process.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Fort Pierce Florida

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Manatee - Sarasota County
    Local # 1041
    8131 Lakewood Main St Ste 207
    Lakewood Ranch, FL 34202
    http://hbamanatee-sarasota.org/

    Highlands County Builders Association
    Local # 1022
    PO Box 7546
    Sebring, FL 33872


    Treasure Coast Builders Association
    Local # 1030
    6560 South Federal Highway
    Port Saint Lucie, FL 34952
    http://www.treasurecoastba.com

    Tampa Bay Builders Association
    Local # 1036
    11242 Winthrop Main St
    Riverview, FL 33578
    http://www.tbba.net

    Charlotte-DeSoto Building Industry Association
    Local # 1002
    17984 Toledo Blade Blvd
    Port Charlotte, FL 33948
    http://www.cdbia.com

    Polk County Builders Association
    Local # 1028
    2232 Heritage Dr
    Lakeland, FL 33801
    http://www.pcba.com

    Gold Coast Builders Association
    Local # 1025
    2617 North Australian Ave
    West Palm Beach, FL 33407
    http://www.gcbaonline.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Fort Pierce Florida

    Communications between Counsel and PR Firm Hired by Counsel Held Discoverable

    Home Prices in 20 U.S. Cities Rose at Slower Pace in May

    Exclusion Does Not Bar Coverage for Injury To Subcontractor's Employee

    Don’t Overlook Leading Edge Hazards

    A Primer on Suspension and Debarment for Federal Construction Projects

    What Makes Building Ventilation Good Enough to Withstand a Pandemic?

    How to Properly Fill Out and Use the Unconditional Waiver and Release on Final Payment Form Used in California Construction

    Colorado’s Abbreviated Legislative Session Offers Builders a Reprieve

    Workers Compensation Immunity and the Intentional Tort Exception

    New York Philharmonic Will Open Geffen Hall Two Years Ahead of Schedule

    At the Border of Contract and Torts in Construction Disputes

    Insurer Cannot Dispose of Water Leak or Bad Faith Claims on Motion for Summary Judgment

    New WOTUS Rule

    What Will the 2024 Construction Economy Look Like?

    Contract Provisions That Help Manage Risk on Long-Term Projects

    Keeping Your Workers Safe When Air Quality Isn't

    Just How Climate-Friendly Are Timber Buildings? It’s Complicated

    Law Firm Fails to Survive Insurer's and Agent's Motions to Dismiss

    Ninth Circuit Affirms Duty to Defend CERCLA Section 104 (e) Letter

    Insurer's Motion to Dismiss Complaint for Failure to Cover Collapse Fails

    Breaking Ground On New California Public Works Prevailing Wage Requirements

    Defective Concrete Blocks Spell Problems for Donegal Homeowners

    Ways of Evaluating Property Damage Claims in Various Contexts

    Insurance Law Client Alert: California Appeals Court Refuses to Apply Professional Services Exclusion to Products-Completed Operations Loss

    N.J. Appellate Court Applies Continuous Trigger Theory in Property Damage Case and Determines “Last Pull” for Coverage

    Arctic Fires Are Melting Permafrost That Keeps Carbon Underground

    What Every Project Participant Needs to Know About Delay Claims

    Wildfire Insurance Coverage Series, Part 7: How to Successfully Prepare, Submit and Negotiate the Claim

    Are Modern Buildings Silently Killing Us?

    Judgment Stemming from a Section 998 Offer Without a Written Acceptance Provision Is Void

    Texas Supreme Court Declines to Waive Sovereign Immunity in Premises Defect Case

    U.S. Home Sellers Return for Spring as Buyers Get Relief

    When Employer’s Liability Coverage May Be Limited in New York

    2022 California Construction Law Update

    Court Grants Summary Judgment to Insurer in HVAC Defect Case

    Michigan Supreme Court Concludes No Statute of Repose on Breach of Contract

    DA’s Office Checking Workers Comp Compliance

    Additional Insured Not Entitled to Indemnity Coverage For Damage Caused by Named Insured

    Hurricane Ian: Discussing Wind-Water Disputes

    Yellowstone Park Aims for Quick Reopening After Floods

    Defective Panels Threatening Profit at China Solar Farms: Energy

    Congratulations to BWB&O’s Orange County Team for Securing a Strong MSJ Result in a Residential Gas Explosion Matter!

    Testimony from Insureds' Expert Limited By Motion In Limine

    Subsurface Water Exclusion Found Unambiguous

    Virginia Joins California and Nevada in Passing its Consumer Privacy Act

    Contractor Gets Benched After Failing to Pay Jury Fees

    Ball Janik LLP Strengthens Miami Construction Defect Team with Litigator Nicolas Aixala

    Soot Constitutes Property Damage

    Engineering, Architecture, and Modern Technology – An Interview with Dr. Jakob Strømann-Andersen

    Slavin Doctrine and Defense from Patent Defects
    Corporate Profile

    FORT PIERCE FLORIDA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through over four thousand construction defect and claims related expert designations, the Fort Pierce, Florida Construction Expert Directory delivers a superior construction and design expert support solution to legal professionals and construction practice groups concerned with the effective resolution of construction defect and claims litigation. BHA provides building claims and trial support services to the industry's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, real estate investment trusts, risk managers, owners, as well as a variety of municipalities and government offices. Employing in house resources which include construction cost, scheduling, and delay experts, professional engineers, ASPE certified professional estimators, and construction safety professionals, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Fort Pierce and the surrounding areas.

    Fort Pierce Florida construction forensic expert witnessFort Pierce Florida construction expertsFort Pierce Florida construction claims expert witnessFort Pierce Florida fenestration expert witnessFort Pierce Florida construction code expert witnessFort Pierce Florida building consultant expertFort Pierce Florida consulting architect expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Fort Pierce, Florida

    Lewis Brisbois Welcomes Clients and Community Leaders to New Garden City Office Opening

    July 27, 2026 —
    On July 15, Lewis Brisbois hosted a ribbon-cutting event for its new Garden City office, which opened in April to serve the Long Island community and beyond. The event was attended by more than 100 people, including Lewis Brisbois attorneys and staff as well as clients, local business and government leaders, Nassau County Supreme Court judges, and members of the press. Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman delivered remarks and cut the ribbon for the office. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    SB 342 Eliminates the “All-or-Nothing” Rule Under Dreaded Business and Professions Code Section 7031

    November 02, 2026 —
    Most California contractors are aware of dreaded Business and Professions Code section 7031 which has been described even by courts – who typically veer away from ascribing judgment to legislation – as being “harsh[ ],” “draconian” and “unjust.” For those less familiar with Section 7031, the statute provides two remedies, described as a shield and a sword, against unlicensed contractors who perform work requiring a license. The first, the “shield” also referred to as the “claim preclusion” provision, precludes unlicensed contractors from suing for payment when performing work requiring a license. The second, the “sword” also referred to as the “disgorgement” provision, allows a property owner to sue an unlicensed contractor for disgorgement of all money paid to the unlicensed contractor. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    Navigating Timelines and Technology: Patent Strategies for Space and Earth

    June 01, 2026 —
    More than half a century after the Apollo 11 landing fulfilled President John F. Kennedy’s bold vision, the global race back to the Moon is no longer theoretical. With renewed attention on NASA’s Artemis program and a surge of commercial investment in space infrastructure, lunar exploration is again shaping technology priorities here on Earth. Reprinted courtesy of Kate Nuehring Su, Engineering News-Record and Vanessa Wang, Engineering News-Record Read the full story...
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Fraud Allegations Stymie Additional Insured’s Request for a Defense

    May 14, 2026 —
    The Federal District Court granted the insurer’s motion to dismiss the insured’s complaint seeking a defense of the underlying case alleging fraud. Renovation Realty, Inc. v. Colony Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21409 (S.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2026). Mara Fortin sued Renovation Realty and others (“Fortin litigation”) from the fraudulent sale of a residence. The underlying complaint alleged Renovation “deliberately misrepresented of the residence as ‘completely remodeled’ and ‘meticulously maintained’.” The defendants, however, including Renovation, “knew from sources including a pre-renovation termite report documenting fungus and dry rot . . . that the Property harbored pre-existing material defects.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Bad Faith Claim Survives Summary Judgment

    June 08, 2026 —
    The court denied the insurer’s motion for partial summary judgment on the insured’s bad faith claim, but granted the motion on the insured’s claim for punitive damages. Serbian Orthodox Church v. Brotherhood Mut. Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58234 (S.D. Cal. March 19, 2026). On February 1, 2023, the Church filed a claim for water damage with Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company (BMIC). The claim was based on rain and wind that caused extensive water intrusion into the Sanctuary, damaging its plaster walls and ceilings and fresco paintings. The claim was assigned to Patrick Hurley. Hurley sent a letter discussing potential bars to coverage and requesting further information and documents from the Church. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Beyond the Forecast: Managing Extreme Weather Risks on Construction Sites

    November 02, 2026 —
    Construction leaders would never downplay or dismiss a fall, struck-by incident or equipment failure as “just part of the job.” Yet, some temperature-related conditions, such as heat exhaustion, frostbite and hypothermia, are often accepted as unavoidable consequences of working conditions. Temperature-related incidents likely won’t command the same attention as a crane collapse, but understating their seriousness can be a costly mistake. As extreme weather becomes more frequent and unpredictable, that mindset is becoming increasingly difficult to defend. Extreme weather is not simply a seasonal inconvenience; it’s a serious occupational hazard. Heat waves, cold snaps and rapid temperature swings can contribute to serious injuries and fatalities—or SIFs—productivity losses and costly project disruptions. A single temperature-related incident can quickly become an OSHA recordable and project management challenge. Reduced physical and impaired cognitive performance from heat or cold stress can increase the risk of workplace incidents long before a medical emergency occurs. Reprinted courtesy of Jordan Graustark, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Are “Financial Hardship” Damages Recoverable?

    June 08, 2026 —
    In a case out of the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, F.O.G., LLC v. Department of the Interior, CBCA 8203, 2026 WL 1191881 (CBCA 2026) a contractor claimed damages that included “financial hardship” damages due to slow payments. The financial hardship damages included personal damages to the contractor’s president and his wife. Are these damages recoverable? Drumroll…The Board ruled that the contractor cannot recover such financial hardship damages. As it relates the personal financial hardship damages, the Board ruled, “Neither [the contractor’s] president nor his wife are a party to this contract, are in privity of contract with [the government], or are the beneficiaries under this contract. [The contractor], therefore, cannot recover for any losses that either one has suffered individually and that [the contractor] claimed in this appeal.” F.O.G., LLC, supra. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Insureds’ Altering Dates for Hailstorm Damage Justifies Denial of Claim

    June 02, 2026 —
    The Firth Circuit affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the insurer due to the insureds’ failure to establish the date of loss after a hailstorm. Cutchall v. Chubb Lloyds Ins. Co. of Texas, 2026 WL 625633 (5th Cir. March 5, 2026). In September 2021, the Cutchalls made a claim on their policy for interior water damage due to a hailstorm that breached their roof. Chubb retained two engineers to inspect the home, but neither found evidence that a hailstorm caused the damage. Instead, the engineers concluded a variety of other causes, such as poor ventilation and as-built defects, caused the damage. Because Chubb concluded that some of these other causes were covered by the policy, it paid only for the covered portions. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com