BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    tract home expert witness Fruitland Park Florida retail construction expert witness Fruitland Park Florida concrete tilt-up expert witness Fruitland Park Florida high-rise construction expert witness Fruitland Park Florida Subterranean parking expert witness Fruitland Park Florida custom homes expert witness Fruitland Park Florida housing expert witness Fruitland Park Florida custom home expert witness Fruitland Park Florida production housing expert witness Fruitland Park Florida townhome construction expert witness Fruitland Park Florida industrial building expert witness Fruitland Park Florida condominiums expert witness Fruitland Park Florida structural steel construction expert witness Fruitland Park Florida hospital construction expert witness Fruitland Park Florida low-income housing expert witness Fruitland Park Florida mid-rise construction expert witness Fruitland Park Florida Medical building expert witness Fruitland Park Florida casino resort expert witness Fruitland Park Florida parking structure expert witness Fruitland Park Florida office building expert witness Fruitland Park Florida landscaping construction expert witness Fruitland Park Florida institutional building expert witness Fruitland Park Florida
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Fruitland Park, Florida

    Florida Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: In Title XXXIII Chapter 558, the Florida Legislature establishes a requirement that homeowners who allege construction defects must first notify the construction professional responsible for the defect and allow them an opportunity to repair the defect before the homeowner canbring suit against the construction professional. The statute, which allows homeowners and associations to file claims against certain types of contractors and others, defines the type of defects that fall under the authority of the legislation and the types of housing covered in thelegislation. Florida sets strict procedures that homeowners must follow in notifying construction professionals of alleged defects. The law also establishes strict timeframes for builders to respond to homeowner claims. Once a builder has inspected the unit, the law allows the builder to offer to repair or settle by paying the owner a sum to cover the cost of repairing the defect. The homeowner has the option of accepting the offer or rejecting the offer and filing suit. Under the statute the courts must abate any homeowner legal action until the homeowner has undertaken the claims process. The law also requires contractors, subcontractors and other covered under the law to notify homeowners of the right to cure process.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Fruitland Park Florida

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Citrus Cty Bldr Assn
    Local # 1006
    1196 S Lecanto Hwy
    Lecanto, FL 34461
    http://www.citrusbuilders.com

    Home Builders Association of Lake County
    Local # 1026
    1100 N Joanna Ave
    Tavares, FL 32778
    http://www.lakehba.com

    Marion County Building Industry Association
    Local # 1038
    2635 SE 58th Avenue
    Ocala, FL 34480
    http://www.mcbia.org

    Home Builders Association of Metro Orlando
    Local # 1040
    544 Mayo Ave
    Maitland, FL 32751
    http://www.hbaofmetroorlando.com

    Volusia Building Industry Association
    Local # 1090
    3520 W International Speedway Blvd
    Daytona Beach, FL 32124
    http://www.volusiahomebuilders.org

    Hernando Bldrs Assoc
    Local # 1010
    7391 Sunshine Grove Rd
    Brooksville, FL 34613
    http://www.hernandobuilders.com

    Flagler Co-Palm Coast Home Builders Association
    Local # 1011
    4863 Palm Coast Parkway NW Ste 1
    Palm Coast, FL 32137
    http://www.flaglerhba.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Fruitland Park Florida

    Court Provides Guidance on ‘Pay-When-Paid’ Provisions in Construction Subcontracts

    Congratulations to Nicole Whyte, Keith Bremer, John Toohey, and Tyler Offenhauser for Being Recognized as 2022 Super Lawyers!

    Architect Sues over Bidding Procedure

    Appetite for Deconstruction

    Large Canada Employers and Jobsites Mandate COVID-19 Vaccines

    Congratulations to Partner John O’Meara for Being Named as One of America’s Top 100 Civil Defense Litigators for Three Consecutive Years!

    Construction Spending Drops in March

    Foreclosing Junior Lienholders and Recording A Lis Pendens

    Administration Seeks To Build New FBI HQ on Current D.C. Site

    NYC Condo Skyscraper's Builder Wins a Round -- With a Catch

    NY Appeals Court Ruled Builders not Responsible in Terrorism Cases

    Alleged Serious Defects at Hanford Nuclear Waste Treatment Plant

    Wisconsin Court of Appeals Re-affirms American Girl To Find Coverage for Damage Caused by Subcontractors

    Sales of New Homes in U.S. Increased 5.4% in July to 507,000

    Construction Law Firm Opens in D.C.

    No Cross-Complaint Needed: Contractor Can Fight Co-Defendant’s Summary Judgment

    Implementation of CA Building Energy Efficiency Standards Delayed

    Undercover Sting Nabs Eleven Illegal Contractors in California

    Dotted Line: How Construction Is Dealing with Cybersecurity in the Age of AI

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Recognized in the 2023 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America®

    Virginia Multi-Employer Site Safety Issues–and How to Deal with Them

    Colorado Legislature Considers Series of Bills Aimed at Boosting Affordable Housing Construction in Colorado — What Homebuilders Need to Know

    Hurricane Harvey Victims Face New Hurdles In Pursuing Coverage

    Will The New U.S.-Mexico-Canada Trade Deal Calm Industry Jitters?

    Massachusetts Nuclear Verdict Leads To $90M Bad Faith Award

    Preparation Is Key: How Condo and Homeowner Associations Can Protect Their Communities Amid Hurricane Season

    Why Financial Advisers Still Hate Reverse Mortgages

    Breach of Contract Exclusion Bars Coverage for Construction Defect Claim

    The DOL Claims Most Independent Contractors Are Employees

    Connecting Construction Project Information: Open Technology Databases Improve Project Communication, Collaboration and Visibility

    A Year-End Review of the Environmental Regulatory Landscape

    Contractor’s Poor Workmanship: How You Can Deal With It – Bad Contractor Series Part 3

    Prevailing HOAs Not Entitled to Attorneys’ Fees in Enforcement Actions Brought Under Davis-Stirling

    Attorneys’ Fees and the American Arbitration Association Rule

    Addenda to Construction Contracts Can Be an Issue

    Spain’s Sagrada Familia: Contemporary Construction Methods Speed Iconic Basilica to Completion

    6,500 Bridges in Ohio Allegedly Functionally Obsolete or Structurally Deficient

    Privette: The “Affirmative Contribution” Exception, How Far Does It Go?

    Wildfire Insurance Coverage Series, Part 5: Valuation of Loss, Sublimits, and Amount of Potential Recovery

    Tampa Office Secures Summary Judgment for Property Owner Client in Trip-and-Fall Lawsuit

    Ontario Court of Appeal Clarifies the Meaning of "Living in the Same Household" for Purposes of Coverage Under a Homeowners Policy

    Construction Termination Issues Part 4: What to Do When They Want to Fire You, the Architect or Engineer

    Corps of Engineers to Prepare EIS for Permit to Construct Power Lines Over Historic James River

    Everybody Is Going to End Up Paying for Texas' Climate Crisis

    Contractor Removed from Site for Lack of Insurance

    Newmeyer & Dillion Welcomes Three Associates to Newport Beach Office

    Jenny Michel Named Top Lawyer by Acadiana Profile Magazine

    Spearin Doctrine 100 Years Old and Still Thriving in the Design-Build Delivery World

    How You Plead Allegations to Trigger Liability Insurer’s Duties Is Critical

    Mediation is (Almost) Always Worth a Shot
    Corporate Profile

    FRUITLAND PARK FLORIDA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Drawing from more than four thousand construction defect and claims related expert designations, the Fruitland Park, Florida Construction Expert Directory delivers a streamlined multi-disciplinary expert retention and support solution to attorneys and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect, scheduling, and delay matters. BHA provides building claims investigation, testimony, and support services to widely recognized construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing captive assets which comprise building envelope and design experts, forensic engineers, forensic architects, and construction cost and scheduling consultants, the construction experts group brings specialized experience and local capabilities to Fruitland Park and the surrounding areas.

    Fruitland Park Florida contractor expert witnessFruitland Park Florida expert witness windowsFruitland Park Florida architecture expert witnessFruitland Park Florida construction scheduling expert witnessFruitland Park Florida construction forensic expert witnessFruitland Park Florida eifs expert witnessFruitland Park Florida construction project management expert witnesses
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Fruitland Park, Florida

    Your AI Tool Could Be Your Next Breach of Contract

    October 20, 2026 —
    Like many industries, the construction industry is rapidly adopting artificial intelligence. AI-powered tools now help construction teams estimate costs, transcribe meetings, summarize RFIs, model schedules, and manage project documents faster than ever before. But amid this rush toward efficiency, a serious risk hides in plain sight: every time project documents are uploaded into a third-party AI tool, contractual confidentiality obligations may be implicated — or outright breached — exposing companies to potentially substantial and uncapped liability. General contractors often face strict confidentiality and nondisclosure obligations, whether under the prime construction contract or a separate NDA. This is especially true for complex projects or those involving proprietary technology — such as data centers, medical or scientific facilities, and energy generation and storage facilities. These confidentiality clauses typically define “confidential information” broadly to encompass all non-public information provided for the project, including plans, specifications, pricing, schedules, RFPs, and even the contract terms themselves. These confidentiality obligations almost always flow down to subcontractors. Reprinted courtesy of Laurie Choi, Snell & Wilmer and Christian Fernandez, Snell & Wilmer Ms. Choi may be contacted at lchoi@swlaw.com Mr. Fernandez may be contacted at cfernandez@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    OC Streetcar Project Mediation Sets $50M Payment to Walsh

    July 20, 2026 —
    Walsh Construction told a California state court judge last month that lawsuit mediation of its claims on an Orange County light-rail project—known as OC Streetcar—had produced a settlement of some claims under which the county agreed to pay the contractor almost an additional $50 million. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com

    Nicole Whyte is the Newly Elected Secretary of the Orange County Bar Association

    September 28, 2026 —
    “I am deeply honored to serve as Secretary of the Orange County Bar Association. To everyone who supported me, endorsed me, encouraged me, shared my message, and cast a ballot, thank you. I am profoundly grateful for your trust and confidence. Thank you from the bottom of my heart. I am ready to get to work.” – Nicole Whyte Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP

    Bad Faith Claim Survives Summary Judgment

    June 08, 2026 —
    The court denied the insurer’s motion for partial summary judgment on the insured’s bad faith claim, but granted the motion on the insured’s claim for punitive damages. Serbian Orthodox Church v. Brotherhood Mut. Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58234 (S.D. Cal. March 19, 2026). On February 1, 2023, the Church filed a claim for water damage with Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company (BMIC). The claim was based on rain and wind that caused extensive water intrusion into the Sanctuary, damaging its plaster walls and ceilings and fresco paintings. The claim was assigned to Patrick Hurley. Hurley sent a letter discussing potential bars to coverage and requesting further information and documents from the Church. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    WSHB Managing Partner Chad Dunigan Named Finalist for Jerrold S. Oliver "Ollie" Award of Excellence

    May 12, 2026 —
    Chad Dunigan, Managing Partner of Wood Smith Henning & Berman's Orlando, Florida, office, has been selected as one of just four finalists for the prestigious Jerrold S. Oliver Award of Excellence, affectionately known in the construction defect community as the "Ollie" Award. This distinguished honor recognizes individuals who have made exceptional contributions and demonstrated unwavering dedication to advancing the field of construction defect law. Named in honor of the late Judge Jerrold S. Oliver, a revered founder of alternative dispute resolution in construction defect claims and litigation, the Ollie award symbolizes loyalty, commitment, and trust within the industry. Judge Oliver's legacy as a staunch believer in the resolution process continues to inspire professionals who strive for excellence in the construction defect community. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Wood Smith Henning Berman

    Texas Prepares to Restart Data Center Construction, with Around 300 Projects Under Review And 6,608 MW Awaiting Energization Approval, Driving Demand for Rapid-Response Lifting Operations

    October 20, 2026 —
    Texas is experiencing an unprecedented increase in power demand. The ERCOT (Electric Reliability Council of Texas) power grid reached a record peak demand of 91.1 GW in summer 2026, 6% above the previous record, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). This is compounded by interconnection requests totaling around 474 GW, more than five times the record peak, with approximately 90% of these requests related to data centers, according to the Office of the Governor of Texas. Within this context, authorities have launched a comprehensive review process. In August , the Governor directed the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT) and ERCOT to audit all data centers progressing toward grid connection, covering around 300 projects. ERCOT has also suspended approvals to energize data centers of 75 MW or more and has set December 10 as the date for the publication of its reports. For the industry, this pause creates a valuable planning window. Goldman Sachs notes that it takes 18 to 24 months to build a data center once permits have been secured, while only 50% to 60% of planned capacity is delivered on schedule. Supply chain constraints and labor shortages are among the most common causes of delays. In this context, construction agility is becoming increasingly critical. A one-month delay at a typical 60 MW U.S. data center is estimated to cost up to $14.2 million in lost revenue, additional costs and penalties, according to STL Partners data. Against this backdrop, Sarens, which has operated in the U.S. since 2009 and is headquartered in Houston, with offices also in Odessa and Beaumont, positions as a logistics partner for developers and contractors preparing for the execution phase. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Sarens

    Ninth Circuit Holds That Policies Covering Environmental Claims Do Not Have Aggregate Limits

    May 12, 2026 —
    In the case of County of San Bernardino v. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, the Ninth Circuit recently addressed the issue of whether general liability policies issued in the 1960s and 1970s included aggregate limits for claims arising under the premises-operations coverage in CGL policies. The difference between the policyholder’s interpretation of the policies’ limits clauses and the insurer’s interpretation was worth hundreds of millions of dollars in exposure for the insurer. The Court closely examined the policy language and extrinsic evidence from both the insurance industry’s drafting history and the parties before concluding that the policies were ambiguous. The Court construed that ambiguity in favor of the policyholder and ruled that aggregate limits did not apply to the claims at issue. The Court’s decision underscores the importance of carefully examining a policy’s limits, especially for older policies written before 1986 when the insurance industry revised the standard-form CGL policy to state the aggregate limits apply not only to products liability claims but to premises-operations claims as well. Decades of insurance industry drafting history confirms, as the policyholder’s submissions in this case indicate, that the industry well understood that operations claims like the environmental waste-disposal claims at issue here typically were not subject to aggregate limits. Reprinted courtesy of Lorelie S. Masters, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Joseph T. Niczky, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Ms. Masters may be contacted at lmasters@hunton.com Mr. Niczky may be contacted at jniczky@hunton.com Read the full story...

    Colorado Supreme Court Reverses Course on Public Project Liens: Key Takeaways From Wadsworth v. Regional Rail Partners

    July 27, 2026 —
    On April 6, 2026, the Colorado Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion in Ralph L. Wadsworth Construction Company, LLC v. Regional Rail Partners, 2026 CO 19, reversing the Colorado Court of Appeals and providing much-needed clarity regarding verified statements of claim (VSOCs) under the Colorado Public Works Act, C.R.S. §§ 38-26-101 et seq. The decision resolves two issues that have generated significant concern among construction industry professionals since the Court of Appeals issued its opinion on August 1, 2024. Under C.R.S. § 38-26-107(1), a subcontractor on a public works project may file a VSOC with the contracting public entity for amounts due and unpaid for “…furnished labor, materials, sustenance, or other supplies used or consumed by a contractor or his or her subcontractor in or about the performance of the work contracted to be done or that supplies laborers, rental machinery, tools, or equipment to the extent used in the prosecution of the work….” If a claimant files a VSOC for “an amount greater than the amount due” without a reasonable possibility that the amount is due and with knowledge that the claim is excessive, the claimant “shall forfeit all rights to the amount claimed” and becomes liable for the opposing party’s costs and attorneys’ fees. C.R.S. § 38-26-110. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Amanda E. McKinlay, Snell & Wilmer
    Ms. McKinlay may be contacted at amckinlay@swlaw.com