BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    low-income housing expert witness Palatka Florida custom homes expert witness Palatka Florida production housing expert witness Palatka Florida condominiums expert witness Palatka Florida housing expert witness Palatka Florida tract home expert witness Palatka Florida Subterranean parking expert witness Palatka Florida custom home expert witness Palatka Florida parking structure expert witness Palatka Florida casino resort expert witness Palatka Florida high-rise construction expert witness Palatka Florida industrial building expert witness Palatka Florida structural steel construction expert witness Palatka Florida Medical building expert witness Palatka Florida multi family housing expert witness Palatka Florida landscaping construction expert witness Palatka Florida office building expert witness Palatka Florida retail construction expert witness Palatka Florida condominium expert witness Palatka Florida mid-rise construction expert witness Palatka Florida concrete tilt-up expert witness Palatka Florida townhome construction expert witness Palatka Florida
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Palatka, Florida

    Florida Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: In Title XXXIII Chapter 558, the Florida Legislature establishes a requirement that homeowners who allege construction defects must first notify the construction professional responsible for the defect and allow them an opportunity to repair the defect before the homeowner canbring suit against the construction professional. The statute, which allows homeowners and associations to file claims against certain types of contractors and others, defines the type of defects that fall under the authority of the legislation and the types of housing covered in thelegislation. Florida sets strict procedures that homeowners must follow in notifying construction professionals of alleged defects. The law also establishes strict timeframes for builders to respond to homeowner claims. Once a builder has inspected the unit, the law allows the builder to offer to repair or settle by paying the owner a sum to cover the cost of repairing the defect. The homeowner has the option of accepting the offer or rejecting the offer and filing suit. Under the statute the courts must abate any homeowner legal action until the homeowner has undertaken the claims process. The law also requires contractors, subcontractors and other covered under the law to notify homeowners of the right to cure process.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Palatka Florida

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Builders Association of North Central FL
    Local # 1020
    2217 NW 66th Ct
    Gainesville, FL 32653
    http://www.bancf.com

    Flagler Co-Palm Coast Home Builders Association
    Local # 1011
    4863 Palm Coast Parkway NW Ste 1
    Palm Coast, FL 32137
    http://www.flaglerhba.com

    Forgotten Coast Builders Assoc
    Local # 1015
    PO Box 1005
    Port Saint Joe, FL 32457
    http://www.forgottencoastbuilder.com/

    Home Builders Association of Panama City (Fla)
    Local # 1042
    PO Box 979
    Panama City, FL 32402


    Volusia Building Industry Association
    Local # 1090
    3520 W International Speedway Blvd
    Daytona Beach, FL 32124
    http://www.volusiahomebuilders.org

    Marion County Building Industry Association
    Local # 1038
    2635 SE 58th Avenue
    Ocala, FL 34480
    http://www.mcbia.org

    Northeast Florida Builders Association
    Local # 1024
    103 Century 21 Dr Ste 100
    Jacksonville, FL 32216
    http://www.nefba.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Palatka Florida

    Civil Megaprojects: The Evolving Use of Dispute Prevention and Collaborative Delivery Methods in Public Contracting

    Arizona – New Discovery Rules

    Contractor’s Claim for Interest on Subcontractor’s Defective Work Claim Gains Mixed Results

    Insured Under Property Insurance Policy Should Comply With Post-Loss Policy Conditions

    Litigation Privilege Saves the Day for Mechanic’s Liens

    Construction Picks Up Post-COVID and So Do Claims (and A Construction Lawyer Can Help)

    Nebraska Joins the Ranks—No CGL Coverage for Faulty Work

    The Single Source of Truth in Construction Projects: Reality or Myth?

    Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rules that Insurance Salesman had No Fiduciary Duty to Policyholders

    Fact of Settlement Communications in Underlying Lawsuits is Not Ground for Anti-SLAPP Motion in Subsequent Bad Faith Lawsuit

    Todd Ehrenreich Joins International Academy of Trial Lawyers

    What If an Irma-Like Hurricane Hit the New York City Metro Area?

    Legislative Update – The CSLB’s Study Under SB465

    Meet D1's Neutrals Series: BILL FRANCZEK

    “Wait! Do You Have All Your Ducks in a Row?” Filing of a Certificate of Merit in Conjunction With a Complaint

    Construction Law Client Advisory: What The Recent Beacon Decision Means For Developers And General Contractors

    Florida Litigation Team Delivers Crushing Summary Judgment Victory for National Home Builder

    Lewis Brisbois Moves to Top 15 in Law360 2022 Diversity Snapshot

    Insurer Entitled to Reimbursement of Defense Costs Under Unjust Enrichment Theory

    U.S. District Court for Hawaii Again Determines Construction Defect Claims Do Not Arise From An Occurrence

    OSHA Updates: New Submission Requirements for Injury and Illness Records

    3 Common Cash Flow Issues That Plague The Construction Industry

    Builders Seek to Modify Scaffold Law

    Contractor’s Charge Of Improvements To Real Property Not Required For Laborers To Have Lien Rights

    Texas Supreme Court Holds that Invoking Appraisal Provision and Paying Appraisal Amount Does Not Insulate an Insurer from Damages Under the Texas Prompt Payment of Claims Act

    Under New York Law a Recourse Provision Bars Most Claims Except for Fraud

    Exploring the Future of Robotic Construction with Dr. Thomas Bock

    Colorado Legislative Update: HB 20-1155, HB 20-1290, and HB 20-1348

    Consultant’s Corner: Why Should Construction Business Owners Care about Cyber Liability Insurance?

    Cyber Security Insurance and Design Professionals

    Insured's Claim for Replacement Cost Denied

    Lien Actions Versus Lien Foreclosure Actions

    From the Ashes: Reconstructing After the Maui Wildfire

    City Sues over Leaking Sewer System

    Eleventh Circuit Reverses Attorneys’ Fee Award to Performance Bond Sureties in Dispute with Contractor arising from Claim against Subcontractor Performance Bond

    A Game of Texas Hold’em: How Texas Stopped Wage Increases for Salaried Exempt Employees Nationwide

    An Increase of US Metro Areas’ with Normal Housing & Economic Health

    Chicago’s Bungalows Are Where the City Comes Together

    California Supreme Court Finds that When it Comes to Intentional Interference Claims, Public Works Projects are Just Different, Special Even

    Colorado Supreme Court Reverses Course on Public Project Liens: Key Takeaways From Wadsworth v. Regional Rail Partners

    Traub Lieberman Senior Trial Counsel Timothy McNamara Wins Affirmation of Summary Judgment Denial

    Las Vegas HOA Conspiracy & Fraud Case Delayed Again

    Impossibility of Performance as Excuse to Failure to Achieve Performance Specification

    Connecticut Supreme Court Finds Duty to Defend When Case Law is Uncertain

    What is an Alternative Dispute Resolution?

    Additional Insured’s Claim for a Defense Is Dismissed

    Why Hurricane Preparedness Isn’t About the Property

    Ensuing Loss Provision Found Ambiguous

    New Green Standards; Same Green Warnings for Architects & Engineers (law note)

    ACEC Statement on Negotiated Bipartisan Debt Limit Compromise
    Corporate Profile

    PALATKA FLORIDA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    With over 4500 building and construction related expert designations, the Palatka, Florida Construction Expert Directory delivers a superior construction and design expert support solution to builders, risk managers, and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect, scheduling, and delay claims. BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing in house assets which include building envelope experts, forensic architects, professional engineers, credentialed construction standard of care consultants, the firm brings a wealth of experience and local capabilities to Palatka and the surrounding areas.

    Palatka Florida soil failure expert witnessPalatka Florida architectural engineering expert witnessPalatka Florida expert witness concrete failurePalatka Florida eifs expert witnessPalatka Florida construction forensic expert witnessPalatka Florida construction expertsPalatka Florida construction defect expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Palatka, Florida

    Insured’s Failure to Determine Depreciation When Presenting Claim for Replacement Cost Value

    August 16, 2026 —
    The Third Circuit affirmed the district court’s granting of summary judgment to the insurer when the insured submitted replacement cost value of the loss but did not include a determination of depreciation. Kimmel v. Massachusetts Bay Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 16569 (3d Cir. June 9, 2026). A lightning strike downed a tree on the insured’s property, causing extensive damage to the home. The insured had a homeowner’s policy with Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company (MBIC). MBIC denied the claim, determining that much of the claimed damage already existed and that several policy exclusions otherwise barred coverage. The insured filed suit for breach of contract and bad faith. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    GRSM Secures Complete Judgment for Defense in Years-Long Dispute Spanning Multiple Venues

    June 22, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani’s Hartford, Connecticut, and Dallas offices recently secured a complete defense judgment and recovery of attorney’s fees and costs in an arbitration on behalf of a longtime client, concluding a dispute that lasted several years and traversed multiple jurisdictions. The dispute initially arose in Texas state court, and almost immediately, the claimant began pursuing the matter aggressively, a pattern that continued until the day judgment was entered in GRSM’s client’s favor. GRSM’s team mounted a strong defense, achieving an early success in compelling mandatory arbitration. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    EPA Expands PFAS Reporting Requirements with Addition of New Chemical to Toxics Release Inventory, Published by Law360

    June 08, 2026 —
    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) addition of sodium perfluorohexanesulfonate (PFHxS-Na) to the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) introduces new federal reporting requirements for businesses that manufacture, process, or use the chemical. Because reporting obligations apply retroactively to the start of the year, affected facilities must quickly evaluate their compliance and recordkeeping practices. In a recent Law360 article, Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Senior Counsel, Ayodeji Ayolola, explains why PFHxS-Na was automatically added to the TRI, how the EPA’s public reporting system works, and which businesses may be affected by the new rule. The article also touches upon key compliance considerations, including supply chain reviews, reporting thresholds for chemicals of special concern, and preparation for public disclosure requirements. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    $10.5M Settlement Ends George Washington Bridge Debris Liability Fight

    September 15, 2026 —
    A $10.5-million settlement that recently came to light has ended a six-year legal fight over whether a truck part that may have been lying on the George Washington Bridge roadway for more than 10 minutes was there long enough for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey to have found and removed it before it caused a catastrophic accident. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    Meaningful Change to Contractors License Law Disgorgement Rule of Business and Professions Code Section 7031

    November 02, 2026 —
    California Business and Professions Code section 7031 has historically imposed a severe and unforgiving penalty on any licensed contractor or subcontractor (“licensee”) performing any construction work after its contractor’s license becomes suspended or is revoked. The penalty for many years has been a prohibition against the licensee bringing an action to collect payment owed and a draconian penalty allowing the party who paid the licensee to recover, or cause the licensee to “disgorge,” any payment the licensee received for the entire contract. This strict penalty could apply to funds received for the entire contract even when the license was suspended or revoked for only a short period of time during the project. This meant, for example, that a licensee who was paid $10 million under a contract for a project that took a year to build could have to disgorge the entire $10 million it received under that contract as a result of performing work while its license was suspended for only a week of the entire project duration. Draconian indeed. A limited statutory substantial-compliance exemption could provide relief, but it requires a court determination that the statutory conditions have been met. Beginning on January 1, 2027, the licensee will be thrown a lifeline on this issue. Under California Senate Bill 342, becoming effective on January 1, 2027, California contractors on qualifying projects will no longer face the same severe penalties – but there are limitations. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret Mandel, Porter Law Group
    Mr. Mandel may be contacted at gmandel@porterlaw.com

    Ahlers Cressman & Sleight Is Pleased to Announce Our Recognition in the 2027 Edition of Best Law Firms®

    November 09, 2026 —
    Ahlers Cressman & Sleight is pleased to announce our recognition in the 2027 edition of Best Law Firms®, ranked by Best Lawyers. ACS received a Tier 1 ranking in Seattle for both Construction Law and Construction Litigation; and a Tier 2 national ranking in the same areas. Best Law Firms® rankings are assessed through analyzing feedback provided by clients and professional references, information supplied by the firm, industry leader interviews, and lawyer evaluations collected through the Best Lawyers research process. For the 2027 edition, more than 110,000 client references were submitted as part of the Best Law Firms research process. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC

    Motion for Summary Judgment Granted in Significant California Public Utilities Suit

    May 12, 2026 —
    Congratulations to Partner Mike D’Andrea and Associates Ruth Rasiah and Kaylah Abdullah in the Los Angeles office for obtaining a complete dismissal of their clients in a significant claim involving California’s Public Utilities regulations. After lengthy litigation, BWB&O’s Motion for Summary Judgment was granted against Claimant, Spectrum (Charter Communications), which resulted in a complete dismissal of the action against BWB&O’s clients. At issue was whether California’s Public Utilities Code shifted the common law duty to maintain certain utility equipment in residential areas within Southern California. After significant briefing, the Superior Court found that BWB&O correctly argued that the Public Utilities Code required utility companies, like Spectrum, to fully maintain utility equipment, and that private residents are not responsible for utility maintenance (even if the physical equipment is located on private property). Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP

    The ROI of Estimating Accuracy in Preconstruction

    September 15, 2026 —
    Precision is the foundation of profitability in construction. Even minor quantity or pricing mistakes can swing bids anywhere from 5-15%, leading to project delays, unprofitable jobs or margin erosion through change orders. And worse, these losses can damage client trust and jeopardize long-term relationships that drive repeat business and future bids. Consistently estimating accurately builds confidence, speeds up bidding and positions your company to win more profitable projects. Estimating accuracy is where profit is either protected or lost. In construction, you make your biggest financial decisions before a project ever starts. Once a bid is won, most of the project’s cost structure is locked in. If the estimate is wrong, no amount of execution can fully fix those mistakes. That makes estimating accuracy a business issue, not just an operations issue. Reprinted courtesy of Aaron Kivett, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...