BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    multi family housing expert witness Saint Cloud Florida low-income housing expert witness Saint Cloud Florida structural steel construction expert witness Saint Cloud Florida condominiums expert witness Saint Cloud Florida parking structure expert witness Saint Cloud Florida office building expert witness Saint Cloud Florida townhome construction expert witness Saint Cloud Florida casino resort expert witness Saint Cloud Florida Subterranean parking expert witness Saint Cloud Florida custom home expert witness Saint Cloud Florida retail construction expert witness Saint Cloud Florida housing expert witness Saint Cloud Florida tract home expert witness Saint Cloud Florida concrete tilt-up expert witness Saint Cloud Florida high-rise construction expert witness Saint Cloud Florida hospital construction expert witness Saint Cloud Florida industrial building expert witness Saint Cloud Florida mid-rise construction expert witness Saint Cloud Florida production housing expert witness Saint Cloud Florida custom homes expert witness Saint Cloud Florida Medical building expert witness Saint Cloud Florida condominium expert witness Saint Cloud Florida
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Saint Cloud, Florida

    Florida Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: In Title XXXIII Chapter 558, the Florida Legislature establishes a requirement that homeowners who allege construction defects must first notify the construction professional responsible for the defect and allow them an opportunity to repair the defect before the homeowner canbring suit against the construction professional. The statute, which allows homeowners and associations to file claims against certain types of contractors and others, defines the type of defects that fall under the authority of the legislation and the types of housing covered in thelegislation. Florida sets strict procedures that homeowners must follow in notifying construction professionals of alleged defects. The law also establishes strict timeframes for builders to respond to homeowner claims. Once a builder has inspected the unit, the law allows the builder to offer to repair or settle by paying the owner a sum to cover the cost of repairing the defect. The homeowner has the option of accepting the offer or rejecting the offer and filing suit. Under the statute the courts must abate any homeowner legal action until the homeowner has undertaken the claims process. The law also requires contractors, subcontractors and other covered under the law to notify homeowners of the right to cure process.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Saint Cloud Florida

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders & CA of Brevard
    Local # 1012
    1500 W Eau Gallie Blvd Ste A
    Melbourne, FL 32935
    http://www.hbca-brevard.org

    Polk County Builders Association
    Local # 1028
    2232 Heritage Dr
    Lakeland, FL 33801
    http://www.pcba.com

    Hernando Bldrs Assoc
    Local # 1010
    7391 Sunshine Grove Rd
    Brooksville, FL 34613
    http://www.hernandobuilders.com

    Home Builders Association of Metro Orlando
    Local # 1040
    544 Mayo Ave
    Maitland, FL 32751
    http://www.hbaofmetroorlando.com

    Tampa Bay Builders Association
    Local # 1036
    11242 Winthrop Main St
    Riverview, FL 33578
    http://www.tbba.net

    Home Builders Association of Lake County
    Local # 1026
    1100 N Joanna Ave
    Tavares, FL 32778
    http://www.lakehba.com

    Citrus Cty Bldr Assn
    Local # 1006
    1196 S Lecanto Hwy
    Lecanto, FL 34461
    http://www.citrusbuilders.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Saint Cloud Florida

    Arizona Supreme Court Leaves Limits on Construction Defects Unclear

    Everyone Wins When a Foreclosure Sale Generates Excess Proceeds

    A Survey of New Texas Environmental Laws

    New Report Outlines Roadmap for Construction Jobsites to Cut Carbon Emissions by 2040

    Enforceability Of Subcontract “Pay-When-Paid” Provisions – An Important Update

    California Supreme Court Finds Vertical Exhaustion Applies to First-Level Excess Policies

    Women Make Slow Entry into Building Trades

    Definitions Matter in Illinois: Tenant Held Liable Only for Damage to Apartment Unit

    Accounting for Payments on Projects Became Even More Crucial This Year

    Tidal Lagoon Plans Marine Project to Power Every Home in Wales

    Big News for “Smaller” Construction Cases

    Connecticut District Court to Review Proposed Class Action in Defective Concrete Suit

    Texas Central Wins Authority to Take Land for High-Speed Rail System

    Home Sales Topping $100 Million Smash U.S. Price Records

    Newmeyer Dillion Announces Jessica Garland as Its Newest Partner

    Under Construction – November 2025

    The Benefits of Incorporating AI Into the Construction Lifecycle

    Florida Adopts Less Stringent Summary Judgment Standard

    Hawaii Supreme Court Bars Insurers from Billing Policyholders for Uncovered Defense Costs

    Lessee Deemed Statutory Employer, Immune from Tort Liability by Pennsylvania Court

    Insurance Law Client Alert: California Appeals Court Refuses to Apply Professional Services Exclusion to Products-Completed Operations Loss

    Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court Limits The Scope Of A Builder’s Implied Warranty Of Habitability

    Revisiting OSHA’s Controlling Employer Policy

    Prime Contractor & Surety’s Recovery of Attorney’s Fees in Miller Act Lawsuit

    Ambiguity in Pennsylvania’s Statute of Repose Finally Cleared up by Superior Court

    Know Whether Your Course of Business Operations Are Covered Or Excluded By Your Insurance

    Quick Note: Mitigation of Damages in Contract Cases

    Mediation Success – Strategies for Avoiding Prolonged Litigation and Getting To “Settled”

    Instant Hotel Tower, But Is It Safe?

    Federal Court Pauses New Mexico PFAS Labeling Rule, but Not Its Bans or Reporting Deadline

    Alabama Limits Duty to Defend for Construction Defects

    NY Estimating Consultant Settles $3.1M Government Project Fraud Case

    Builders Can’t Rely on SB800

    Where Parched California Is Finding New Water Sources

    Newmeyer Dillion Attorneys Named to 2022 Super Lawyers and Rising Stars Lists

    Fannie Overseer Moves to Rescue Housing With Lower Risk to Lenders

    The Evolution of Construction Defect Trends at West Coast Casualty Seminar

    Giant Floating Solar Flowers Offer Hope for Coal-Addicted Korea

    Seven Key Issues for Construction Professionals to Consider When Dealing With COVID-19

    The General Assembly Adds Some Clarity to Contracts and Unlicensed Contractors

    Security on Large Construction Projects. The Payment Remedy You Probably Never Heard of

    Sometimes a General Damages Assessment is Enough. . .

    Are Millennials Finally Moving Out On Their Own?

    Why Clinton and Trump’s Infrastructure Plans Leave Us Wanting More

    Sources of Insurance Recovery for Emerging PFAS Claims

    Connecticutt Class Action on Collapse Claims Faces Motion to Dismiss

    Engineering, Architecture, and Modern Technology – An Interview with Dr. Jakob Strømann-Andersen

    AI Can Now Train the Soft Skills Construction Ignored

    White and Williams LLP Recognized on the List of Largest Law Firms in Greater Philadelphia

    Approaches to Managing Job Site Inventory
    temprop="name">Pulling the Plug

    Structuring Water Resilience for Data Center Development: Water Rights, Reuse Incentives, and Emerging Disclosure Risk

    The Requirement to State a “Sum Certain” No Longer a Jurisdictional Bar to Government Contract Claims

    Putting for a Cure: Don’t Forget to Visit BHA’s Booth at WCC to Support Charity
    Corporate Profile

    SAINT CLOUD FLORIDA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 4500 engineering, construction, and builders standard of care related expert designations, the Saint Cloud, Florida Construction Expert Directory delivers a comprehensive construction and design expert support solution to legal professionals and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction claims investigation and expert services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. In connection with in house personnel which comprise licensed architects, civil engineers, building envelope experts, general and specialty contractors focused on the evaluation of construction claims, the organization brings national experience and local capabilities to Saint Cloud and the surrounding areas.

    Saint Cloud Florida multi family design expert witnessSaint Cloud Florida slope failure expert witnessSaint Cloud Florida window expert witnessSaint Cloud Florida construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witnessSaint Cloud Florida structural engineering expert witnessesSaint Cloud Florida architect expert witnessSaint Cloud Florida building code compliance expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Saint Cloud, Florida

    Over 50 Lewis Brisbois Attorneys Recognized in 7th Edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America

    September 01, 2026 —
    56 Lewis Brisbois attorneys across 26 offices have been named to the 7th edition of “Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America.” Congratulations to the following attorneys on this recognition! You can see the full list of Lewis Brisbois attorneys named to Best Lawyers' 33rd edition of The Best Lawyers in America here. Akron, OH
    • Partner Meleah M. Skillern - Commercial Litigation
    Atlanta, GA
    • Partner Catherine Crawley - Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants; and Transportation Law
    • Associate Davis Lackey - Insurance Law; and Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Ninth Circuit Holds That Policies Covering Environmental Claims Do Not Have Aggregate Limits

    May 12, 2026 —
    In the case of County of San Bernardino v. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, the Ninth Circuit recently addressed the issue of whether general liability policies issued in the 1960s and 1970s included aggregate limits for claims arising under the premises-operations coverage in CGL policies. The difference between the policyholder’s interpretation of the policies’ limits clauses and the insurer’s interpretation was worth hundreds of millions of dollars in exposure for the insurer. The Court closely examined the policy language and extrinsic evidence from both the insurance industry’s drafting history and the parties before concluding that the policies were ambiguous. The Court construed that ambiguity in favor of the policyholder and ruled that aggregate limits did not apply to the claims at issue. The Court’s decision underscores the importance of carefully examining a policy’s limits, especially for older policies written before 1986 when the insurance industry revised the standard-form CGL policy to state the aggregate limits apply not only to products liability claims but to premises-operations claims as well. Decades of insurance industry drafting history confirms, as the policyholder’s submissions in this case indicate, that the industry well understood that operations claims like the environmental waste-disposal claims at issue here typically were not subject to aggregate limits. Reprinted courtesy of Lorelie S. Masters, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Joseph T. Niczky, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Ms. Masters may be contacted at lmasters@hunton.com Mr. Niczky may be contacted at jniczky@hunton.com Read the full story...

    PJM’s Reliability Backstop Procurement Proposal—Fast-Track Capacity to Meet Rising Large-Load Demand

    May 12, 2026 —
    In January, we discussed the Statement of Principles jointly signed by the National Energy Dominance Council and governors across the mid-Atlantic region—framing accelerating demand (especially from large-scale data centers) as an emergency reliability issue for PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM), the nation’s largest power grid operator. That policy signal is now becoming a near-term, accelerated procurement and contracting exercise. On April 8, 2026, PJM notified stakeholders of a critical issue fast path reliability backstop procurement process. PJM subsequently released a request for information (RFI) with respect to a proposed Reliability Backstop Procurement (RBP)—a one-time mechanism intended to attract significant new capacity to address projected reliability shortfalls driven by large-load growth. RBP compresses what is often a multiyear market and regulatory conversation into a fast-moving set of commercial choices. Developers, large loads, utilities and capital providers should be preparing now for (i) an accelerated bilateral contracting window and (ii) a standardized PJM-led backstop procurement if bilateral deals do not clear enough capacity. Reprinted courtesy of Stephen J. Humes, Pillsbury, Alicia M. McKnight, Pillsbury, Jason Drogin Atwood, Pillsbury and Andrew H. Jacobs, Pillsbury Mr. Humes may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com Ms. McKnight may be contacted at alicia.mcknight@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Atwood may be contacted at jason.atwood@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Jacobs may be contacted at andrew.jacobs@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    DOI Finalizes Long-Awaited Modernization of Type A Natural Resource Damage Assessment Regulations

    August 03, 2026 —
    For nearly three decades, the U.S. Department of the Interior’s (DOI) simplified “Type A” Natural Resource Damage Assessment (NRDA) regulations were available more in theory than in practice, constrained by dated models, narrow geographic applicability and a $100,000 cap that rarely matched the economics of modern environmental claims. DOI has now finalized revisions to the Type A natural resource damages assessment procedures under 43 C.F.R. Part 11 for hazardous substance releases under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and the Clean Water Act (CWA), with the final rule published in the Federal Register on July 13, 2026 and scheduled to become effective August 12, 2026. As discussed previously, DOI has sought to modernize what it views as an “inefficient and inflexible” process and restore the Type A procedure to its intended role as a more streamlined pathway for smaller, less contentious NRD claims. The final rule adopts a $5 million default damages threshold, allows use above that amount if all parties agree, clarifies that Type A may be used in all environments and for all natural resource types, and removes legacy model appendices that had tethered the process to outdated formulas. Reprinted courtesy of Amanda G. Halter, Pillsbury, Ashleigh K. Myers, Pillsbury and Jillian Marullo, Pillsbury Ms. Halter may be contacted at amanda.halter@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Marullo may be contacted at jillian.marullo@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    California Contractors Get a Much-Needed Break: SB 342 Softens the Harsh Consequences of Contractor License Lapses

    October 20, 2026 —
    Imagine completing a multimillion-dollar project, performing quality work, paying your subcontractors, and satisfying the owner, only to discover that a temporary contractor license lapse could prevent you from recovering payment for that work or pursuing claims for extra work. For decades, that was the reality under California Business and Professions Code section 7031. A contractor that allowed its license to lapse, even briefly, could face catastrophic consequences completely disconnected from the quality of its work. In some cases, a contractor that performed otherwise flawless work could be barred from recovering payment and even be ordered to disgorge compensation already received – even if the owner knew the contractor had a lapse in its licensing and allowed it to continue construction. That reality is about to change. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Heather Frisch, Seyfarth
    Ms. Frisch may be contacted at hfrisch@seyfarth.com

    Cal Unity Bar Names Angela Zanin as Statewide President

    August 11, 2026 —
    The California Unity Bar has named Los Angeles Partner Angela Zanin as its statewide president for the 2026-2027 term. This appointment follows Ms. Zanin's extensive involvement in the organization, including as the founding co-chair of the Los Angeles County Unity Bar in 2024 and as its chair for the 2024-2025 term. Ms. Zanin also has served as a member of the Executive Steering Committee of the California Unity Bar since 2025. In her inaugural message as president, which the Cal Unity Bar published in its newsletter of July 2026, Ms. Zanin stated that she vowed to continue the organization’s “commitment to promoting equal opportunities and embracing diversity, equity, and inclusion in the State of California.” She also noted that as she assumed the role of president, she thought of “the famous words of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.: ‘The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice.”’ Ms. Zanin closed her message by observing, “At a time when the rule of law faces challenges, our alliance stands strong, built on trust and confidence in each other.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Arizona Court of Appeals Clarifies Homeowners Association Open Meeting Requirements

    June 29, 2026 —
    A Z N H Revocable Trust v. Sunland Springs Village Homeowners Association, No. 1 CA-CV 25-0424 (Ariz. Ct. App. Apr. 28, 2026) OVERVIEW The Arizona Court of Appeals issued an opinion clarifying how homeowners associations must conduct meetings under A.R.S. § 33-1804. The decision reinforces the legislative policy favoring transparency in association governance, bringing association meeting requirements more in line with the open meeting standards applicable to public bodies under A.R.S. § 38-431 et seq. (Arizona’s Open Meeting Law). KEY HOLDINGS 1. All Voting and Formal Actions Must Occur in Open Meetings The Court affirmed that association boards cannot vote or take formal action during closed (executive) sessions. Under A.R.S. § 33-1804(A), associations may close portions of meetings only for “consideration” of certain enumerated topics, such as legal advice, pending litigation, or personal/financial information about individual members. The Court interpreted “consideration” to mean discussion and deliberation, not voting. The Court noted that dictionaries define “consider” as “spending time thinking about a possibility” and “formulating an opinion,” which are processes that precede formal action. This interpretation mirrors how Arizona’s Open Meeting Law (A.R.S. § 38-431.03(D)) prohibits public bodies from voting in executive session. Reprinted courtesy of Jill Casson Owen, Snell & Wilmer, Benjamin J. Hawkins, Snell & Wilmer and Stephen Wright, Snell & Wilmer Ms. Owen may be contacted at jowen@swlaw.com Mr. Hawkins may be contacted at bhawkins@swlaw.com Mr. Wright may be contacted at swright@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    AI Can Now Train the Soft Skills Construction Ignored

    August 03, 2026 —
    Most AEC professionals learn to work in teams and across teams through trial and error. There are, however, opportunities to better prepare for the real world with formal training. Until now, it has required human facilitators. Now, generative AI is emerging as a scalable alternative, which I’m also exploring. A Gap in Curricula When I studied architecture, most of the teamwork happened with co-students in the same department. However, one course focused on industrial projects where future architects and engineers collaborated on a simulated project. I’m not sure if a similar course is still in the curriculum, but it was certainly worthwhile and should have been much more extensive. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi