BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    structural steel construction expert witness Tavernier Florida condominium expert witness Tavernier Florida multi family housing expert witness Tavernier Florida low-income housing expert witness Tavernier Florida casino resort expert witness Tavernier Florida office building expert witness Tavernier Florida retail construction expert witness Tavernier Florida tract home expert witness Tavernier Florida custom home expert witness Tavernier Florida production housing expert witness Tavernier Florida high-rise construction expert witness Tavernier Florida parking structure expert witness Tavernier Florida Subterranean parking expert witness Tavernier Florida institutional building expert witness Tavernier Florida concrete tilt-up expert witness Tavernier Florida condominiums expert witness Tavernier Florida mid-rise construction expert witness Tavernier Florida housing expert witness Tavernier Florida hospital construction expert witness Tavernier Florida townhome construction expert witness Tavernier Florida custom homes expert witness Tavernier Florida landscaping construction expert witness Tavernier Florida
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Tavernier, Florida

    Florida Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: In Title XXXIII Chapter 558, the Florida Legislature establishes a requirement that homeowners who allege construction defects must first notify the construction professional responsible for the defect and allow them an opportunity to repair the defect before the homeowner canbring suit against the construction professional. The statute, which allows homeowners and associations to file claims against certain types of contractors and others, defines the type of defects that fall under the authority of the legislation and the types of housing covered in thelegislation. Florida sets strict procedures that homeowners must follow in notifying construction professionals of alleged defects. The law also establishes strict timeframes for builders to respond to homeowner claims. Once a builder has inspected the unit, the law allows the builder to offer to repair or settle by paying the owner a sum to cover the cost of repairing the defect. The homeowner has the option of accepting the offer or rejecting the offer and filing suit. Under the statute the courts must abate any homeowner legal action until the homeowner has undertaken the claims process. The law also requires contractors, subcontractors and other covered under the law to notify homeowners of the right to cure process.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Tavernier Florida

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Builders Association of South FL
    Local # 1032
    15225 NW 77th Ave
    Miami Lakes, FL 33014
    http://www.basfonline.org

    Collier Building Industry Association
    Local # 1005
    3200 Bailey Lane Ste 110
    Naples, FL 34105
    http://www.cbia.net

    Lee Building Industry Association
    Local # 1016
    10501 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY Ste 104
    Fort Myers, FL 33966
    http://www.bia.net

    Gold Coast Builders Association
    Local # 1025
    2617 North Australian Ave
    West Palm Beach, FL 33407
    http://www.gcbaonline.com

    Charlotte-DeSoto Building Industry Association
    Local # 1002
    17984 Toledo Blade Blvd
    Port Charlotte, FL 33948
    http://www.cdbia.com

    Treasure Coast Builders Association
    Local # 1030
    6560 South Federal Highway
    Port Saint Lucie, FL 34952
    http://www.treasurecoastba.com

    Home Builders Association of Manatee - Sarasota County
    Local # 1041
    8131 Lakewood Main St Ste 207
    Lakewood Ranch, FL 34202
    http://hbamanatee-sarasota.org/


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Tavernier Florida

    Colorado Springs may be Next Colorado City to Add Construction Defects Ordinance

    Drones, Googleplexes and Hyperloops

    Insurer Springs a Leak in Its Pursuit of Subrogation

    Construction Liens and the “Substantial Performance” Doctrine

    Pushing the Edge: Crews Carve Dam Out of Remote Turkish Mountains

    New York State Legislature Passes Legislation Expanding Wrongful Death Litigation

    OSHA Issues COVID-19 Guidance for Construction Industry

    NY Court Holds Excess Liability Coverage Could Never be Triggered Where Employers’ Liability Policy Provided Unlimited Insurance Coverage

    Minnesota Addresses How Its Construction Statute of Repose Applies to Condominiums

    Pennsylvania Reconstruction Project Beset by Problems

    Builders Can’t Rely on SB800

    Defend Trade Secret Act of 2016–-Federalizing Trade Secret Law

    Reminder: The Devil is in the Mechanic’s Lien Details

    When Licensing Lapses: How One Contractor Lost a $1 Million Dispute

    Snell & Wilmer’s Orange County Office Recognized as One of the “Best Places to Work” by the Orange County Business Journal

    Update: Lawyers Can Be Bound to Confidentiality Provision in Settlement Agreement

    Henderson Engineers Tests AI for Building Systems Design with Torch.AI

    Recommendations and Drafting Considerations for Construction Contingency Clauses Part III

    Boston Team Obtains Complete Defense Verdict for Engineering Firm in Professional Liability Matter

    24th Annual West Coast Casualty Construction Defect Seminar A Success

    Colorado Temporarily Requires Employers to Provide Sick Leave While Awaiting COVID-19 Testing

    Alabama Appeals Court Rules Unexpected and Unintended Property Damage is an Occurrence

    EPA and the Corps of Engineers Repeal the 2015 “Waters of the United States” Rule

    Thanks to All for the 2024 Super Lawyers Nod!

    What Should Business Owners Do If a Customer Won’t Pay

    Home-Rentals Wall Street Made Say Grow or Go: Real Estate

    Be Aware of Two New Statutes that Became Effective May 1, 2021

    SCOTUS to Weigh Landowners' Damage Claim Against Texas DOT

    South Carolina Supreme Court Requires Transparency by Rejecting an Insurer’s “Cut-and-Paste” Reservation of Rights

    Delay Leads to Problems with Construction Defects

    Ignoring Employee ADA Accommodation Requests Can Be Costly – A Cautionary Tale

    Bond Principal Necessary on a Mechanic’s Lien Claim

    He's the Top U.S. Mortgage Salesman. His Daughter Isn't Buying It

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (7/8/26) – Data Centers Negotiate Flexibility for Speed, Hotel Deal Activities Focus on Luxury, and DC Sues Apartment Owners

    GRSM Attorneys Recognized in The Best Lawyers in America® 2027

    May Heat Wave Deaths Prompt New Cooling Rules in Chicago

    Florida Court of Appeals Rejects Insurer’s Attempt to Intervene in Underlying Lawsuit to Submit Special Interrogatories

    General Contractor Cited for Safety Violations after Worker Fatality

    Michigan Lawmakers Pass $4.7B Infrastructure Spending Bill

    Las Vegas Partner Sarah Odia Named a 2023 Mountain States Super Lawyer Rising Star

    What Startup Funding Reveals About the Future of Construction Technology

    Colorado’s New Construction Defect Law Takes Effect in September: What You Need to Know

    Senate Bill 15-091 Passes Out of the Senate State, Veterans & Military Affairs Committee

    Wilke Fleury Attorneys Featured in 2021 Best Lawyers in America and Best Lawyers: Ones To Watch!

    Property Owner Entitled to Rely on Zoning Administrator Advice

    "Abrupt Falling Down of Building or Part of Building" as Definition of Collapse Found Ambiguous

    Contract And IP Implications Of Design Professionals Monetizing Non-Fungible Tokens Comprising Digital Construction Designs

    An Insurance Policy Isn’t Ambiguous Just Because You Want It to Be

    Best U.S. Home Sales Since 2007 Show Momentum in Housing Market

    Architect Responds to Defect Lawsuit over Defects at Texas Courthouse
    Corporate Profile

    TAVERNIER FLORIDA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through more than four thousand construction, architectural, and engineering related expert designations, the Tavernier, Florida Construction Expert Directory delivers a streamlined multi-disciplinary expert retention and support solution to legal professionals and construction practice groups concerned with the effective resolution of construction defect and claims litigation. BHA provides building claims and trial support services to the industry's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, real estate investment trusts, risk managers, owners, as well as a variety of municipalities and government offices. In connection with in house assets comprising licensed general and specialty contractors, consulting civil engineers, NCARB certified architects, roofing, and building envelope experts, the firm brings a wealth of experience and local capabilities to Tavernier and the surrounding areas.

    Tavernier Florida OSHA expert witness constructionTavernier Florida construction scheduling expert witnessTavernier Florida construction expert witnessesTavernier Florida building consultant expertTavernier Florida consulting general contractorTavernier Florida expert witness commercial buildingsTavernier Florida construction expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Tavernier, Florida

    PJM’s Reliability Backstop Procurement Proposal—Fast-Track Capacity to Meet Rising Large-Load Demand

    May 12, 2026 —
    In January, we discussed the Statement of Principles jointly signed by the National Energy Dominance Council and governors across the mid-Atlantic region—framing accelerating demand (especially from large-scale data centers) as an emergency reliability issue for PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM), the nation’s largest power grid operator. That policy signal is now becoming a near-term, accelerated procurement and contracting exercise. On April 8, 2026, PJM notified stakeholders of a critical issue fast path reliability backstop procurement process. PJM subsequently released a request for information (RFI) with respect to a proposed Reliability Backstop Procurement (RBP)—a one-time mechanism intended to attract significant new capacity to address projected reliability shortfalls driven by large-load growth. RBP compresses what is often a multiyear market and regulatory conversation into a fast-moving set of commercial choices. Developers, large loads, utilities and capital providers should be preparing now for (i) an accelerated bilateral contracting window and (ii) a standardized PJM-led backstop procurement if bilateral deals do not clear enough capacity. Reprinted courtesy of Stephen J. Humes, Pillsbury, Alicia M. McKnight, Pillsbury, Jason Drogin Atwood, Pillsbury and Andrew H. Jacobs, Pillsbury Mr. Humes may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com Ms. McKnight may be contacted at alicia.mcknight@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Atwood may be contacted at jason.atwood@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Jacobs may be contacted at andrew.jacobs@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Kahana Feld Opens New Office in Sacramento, Adding Key Litigator and Expanding Northern California Footprint

    August 24, 2026 —
    IRVINE, CA – Aug. 11, 2026 – Kahana Feld is pleased to announce the opening of a new office in Sacramento, CA. This will be the firm’s 19th office across the United States. Partner Melvin F. Marcia has joined Kahana Feld and will lead the opening of the Sacramento office. He is joined by attorneys Matthew Brenner and Britney Lucchesi as well as paralegal Michelle Welcker. “We’re excited to welcome Melvin to the Kahana Feld team and expand our footprint in Northern California,” said Amir Kahana, Firmwide Managing Partner of Kahana Feld. “His addition strengthens Kahana Feld’s capabilities and will allow us to work more closely with our general liability, construction defect, and labor and employment clients in the Sacramento area while continuing to provide the level of service and experience they have come to expect from our firm.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Kahana Feld

    The Goal Is the Repair, Not the Lawsuit: What Colorado HOA Boards Should Consider Before Suing a Builder

    September 08, 2026 —
    Fourteen years ago, we cautioned Colorado homeowners associations against a “ready, fire, aim” approach to construction-defect litigation. In The Hidden Dangers of Construction Defect Litigation, we suggested a fairly simple proposition: when legitimate construction defects exist, the goal should be to get them repaired. Litigation should be a last resort, not an end in itself. Much has changed in Colorado construction-defect law since then. But a recent Douglas County case, and significant amendments to the Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act (“CCIOA”) enacted in 2025, provide good reasons for HOA board members and owners to revisit that basic premise. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gail Gudder, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Ms. Gudder may be contacted at gudder@hhmrlaw.com

    In the Eye of the Beholder: Court of Appeal Finds Duty of Care Owed by Owner and Contractors for Death of Minors Caused by Independent Truck Driver

    May 05, 2026 —
    I was a T.A. for my high school history teacher, a really smart and nice guy, Mr. Reynolds. In the room at the back of the classroom which served as his office he had the picture above. It’s called “My Wife and My Mother-in-Law” and is taken from a German postcard from 1888. Depending on how you look it, you might see fashionable young lady, or an old lady. Cases can sometimes be like that: You see what you want to see. The next case is also like that. In Lorenzo v. Calex Engineering, Inc., 110 Cal.App.5th 49 (2025), the 2nd District Court of Appeals reversed a motion for summary judgment granted in favor of an owner and its contractors in a case involving the death of two minors struck by a dump truck enroute to a non-permitted off-site staging area. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    My Current Love-Hate Relationship with AI

    June 08, 2026 —
    It’s early in the relationship, I know. But still, there are some things that bug me. Yet, I also know that it’s a relationship in which leaving is not an option, and even if I could, it’s not to the point where it’s so bad that I would do so. So, if you would, let me gripe a bit. While there’s been much discussion about AI and, at least in my neck of the woods, a fair amount of discussion about how lawyers can, should, and must use AI or risk becoming discarded into the dustbin of history, much less has been written about clients’ use of AI. Increasingly, I’ve gotten the sense that my clients are using AI. For example, I had a client ask for confirmation that if he disagreed with an administrative decision that he could file a writ of mandate, and if so, whether that deadline was 30, 60 or 90 days after the administrative decision. The answer to the first question was yes, and as to the second question, the answer was 90 days. This was from a client who, smart as he is, probably didn’t know this off the top of his head. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    The Firm Turns 16!

    July 20, 2026 —
    I have always found it appropriate that my jump to solo practice and Independence Day are so close in time. Today marks the 16th anniversary of my first day as a solo practitioner of construction law at The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill, PC. Time sure has flown by thanks to the great clients and friends who followed me to solo practice and whom I have met since the firm’s founding on July 1, 2010. I also could not have made the transition and had the fun and success I have enjoyed over the past 16 years without the support of the best wife and family that any construction lawyer could want. Since the firm’s last anniversary, my youngest child (who was 7 when this journey began!) has graduated from N. C. State University with a fisheries and wildlife biology degree and is currently in Casper, Wyoming working for Wyoming Game & Fish, my second oldest is an assistant director of admissions at Appalachian State University in Boone, NC, and has celebrated his second wedding anniversary, and my oldest has celebrated her fifth marriage anniversary. Our home in Captiva, Florida continues its recovery from from Hurricane Ian and subsequent hurricanes. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill

    Insured’s Failure to Determine Depreciation When Presenting Claim for Replacement Cost Value

    August 16, 2026 —
    The Third Circuit affirmed the district court’s granting of summary judgment to the insurer when the insured submitted replacement cost value of the loss but did not include a determination of depreciation. Kimmel v. Massachusetts Bay Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 16569 (3d Cir. June 9, 2026). A lightning strike downed a tree on the insured’s property, causing extensive damage to the home. The insured had a homeowner’s policy with Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company (MBIC). MBIC denied the claim, determining that much of the claimed damage already existed and that several policy exclusions otherwise barred coverage. The insured filed suit for breach of contract and bad faith. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Las Vegas Partner Jeffrey Saab and Team Leader D. Ryan Efros Secure a $0.00 Settlement on a Multimillion-Dollar Construction Defect Case!

    April 14, 2026 —
    Partner Jeffrey Saab and Team Leader D. Ryan Efros’ client was a construction supervisor on a palatial mansion. The homeowners claimed millions of dollars in damages and asserted the client was a general contractor (GC) and so responsible for the alleged defects. Jeff and Ryan took more than 15 depositions, reinforcing their trial strategy theme: that the client was not a GC, but Plaintiffs were. They secured significant concessions from Plaintiffs, pressed Plaintiffs’ own negligent construction choices, and made the risk of trying the case intolerable. On the eve of trial, Plaintiffs backed down, settling out Jeff and Ryan’s client for $0.00. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Dolores Montoya, Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP