BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    Medical building expert witness Clayton County Georgia townhome construction expert witness Clayton County Georgia parking structure expert witness Clayton County Georgia mid-rise construction expert witness Clayton County Georgia retail construction expert witness Clayton County Georgia condominiums expert witness Clayton County Georgia office building expert witness Clayton County Georgia custom homes expert witness Clayton County Georgia concrete tilt-up expert witness Clayton County Georgia industrial building expert witness Clayton County Georgia structural steel construction expert witness Clayton County Georgia tract home expert witness Clayton County Georgia housing expert witness Clayton County Georgia multi family housing expert witness Clayton County Georgia low-income housing expert witness Clayton County Georgia high-rise construction expert witness Clayton County Georgia landscaping construction expert witness Clayton County Georgia production housing expert witness Clayton County Georgia condominium expert witness Clayton County Georgia custom home expert witness Clayton County Georgia institutional building expert witness Clayton County Georgia casino resort expert witness Clayton County Georgia
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Clayton County, Georgia

    Georgia Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB 563 stipulates that prior to filing a claim, a homeowner must give the contractor 30 day written notice detailing the nature of the defect. In response, contractor must provide (within 30 days of receipt) a written reply containing an offer of settlement, requirement of inspection or rejection. The law provides definitions relating to construction; offers immunity from liability for certain conditions; and sets up an alternative dispute resolution process.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Clayton County Georgia

    No state license for general contracting required. License is required for Air Conditioning, Electrical, and Plumbing trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Builders Association of Metro Augusta
    Local # 1132
    PO Box 211685
    Augusta, GA 30917
    http://www.homebuildersaugusta.org

    Home Builders Association of Newton Co
    Local # 1183
    PO Box 2055
    Covington, GA 30015
    http://www.newtoncountyhba.com

    Home Builders Association of Midwest Georgia
    Local # 1174
    101 Devant Street Suite 306
    Fayetteville, GA 30214
    http://www.hbaofmidwestgeorgia.org

    Lake Oconee Area Builders Association
    Local # 1162
    1041 Village Park Dr Ste 102
    Greensboro, GA 30642
    http://www.LakeOconeeBuildersAssociation.com

    Madison-Morgan Builders Association
    Local # 1178
    PO Box 1229 1749 Four Lakes Drive
    Madison, GA 30650


    Home Builders Association of Georgia
    Local # 1100
    3015 Camp Creek Parkway
    Atlanta, GA 30344
    http://www.hbag.org

    Westside Home Builders Association
    Local # 1158
    PO Box 1272
    Douglasville, GA 30133
    http://www.westsideHBA.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Clayton County Georgia

    Ex-Turner Exec Gets 46 Months for Bloomberg Construction Bribes

    Accounting for Payments on Projects Became Even More Crucial This Year

    California Is Running Out of Safe Places to Build Homes Due to Fires, Rising Seas

    Yet Another Reminder to ALWAYS Show Up for Court

    Harlem Developers Reach Deal with Attorney General

    Reroof Blamed for $10 Million in Damage

    How AI Turns Construction Documents Into Procurement Intelligence

    EPA Can't Evade Enviro Firm's $2.7M Cleanup Site Pay Claim, US Court Says

    Remand of Bad Faith Claim Evidences Split Among Florida District Courts

    Regional US Airports Are Back After Years of Decay

    North Carolina Weakened Its Building Codes in 2013

    Disappointment on an Olympian Scale After Rio 2016 Summer Games

    The Coverage Fun House Mirror: When Things Are Not What They Seem

    Quick Note: Do Your Homework When it Comes to Selecting Your Arbitrator

    Law Firm Fails to Survive Insurer's and Agent's Motions to Dismiss

    Is the Sky Actually Falling (on Green Building)?

    Liquidated Damages: Too High and It’s a Penalty. Too Low and You’re Out of Luck.

    “Other Insurance” and Indemnity Provisions Determine Which Insurer Must Cover

    Vallagio v. Metropolitan Homes: The Colorado Court of Appeals’ Decision Protecting a Declarant’s Right to Arbitration in Construction Defect Cases

    Commercial Development Nearly Quadruples in Jacksonville Area

    Don’t Put All Your Eggs in the Silent-Cyber Basket

    Increase in Single-Family New Home Sales Year-Over-Year in January

    Eyes on the Sky: Regulating DJI Drones on Federal and Private Construction Sites

    Subrogation 101 (and Why Should I Care?)

    Suit Limitation Provision Eliminates Wind Loss Claim

    Vacation during a Project? Time for your Construction Documents to Shine!

    Avoid Five Common Fraudulent Schemes Used in Construction

    Home Construction Slows in Las Vegas

    Restaurant Wants SCOTUS to Dust Off Eleventh Circuit’s “Physical Loss” Ruling

    All Aboard! COVID-19 Securities Suit Sets Sail, Implicates D&O Insurance

    New York Climate Mobilization Act Update: Reducing Carbon Emissions and Funding Solutions

    Exploring the Future of Robotic Construction with Dr. Thomas Bock

    Los Angeles Is Burning. But California’s Insurance Industry Is Not About to Collapse.

    Traub Lieberman Partners Dana Rice and Jason Taylor Obtain Summary Judgment For Insurance Carrier Client in Missouri Federal Court Coverage Action

    Pacing in Construction Scheduling Disputes

    A Look at Business and Professions Code Section 7031

    D.C. Decision Finding No “Direct Physical Loss” for COVID-19 Closures Is Not Without Severe Limitations

    Insurance Litigation Roundup: “Post No Bills!”

    Expanded Virginia Court of Appeals Leads to Policyholder Relief

    A Property Tax Exemption, Misapplied, in Texas

    Statutory Bad Faith and an Insured’s 60 Day Notice to Cure

    Appeals Court Upholds Decision by Referee in Trial Court for Antagan v Shea Homes

    Connecticut Court Clarifies Construction Coverage

    Climate Superfund Litigation: Courts Split on Venue and Intervention in New York and Vermont Cases

    The Risks and Rewards of Sustainable Building Design

    Unlicensed Contractors Caught in a Sting Operation

    White and Williams Earns Tier 1 Rankings from U.S. News "Best Law Firms" 2017

    Accident/Occurrence Requirement Does not Preclude Coverage for Vicarious Liability or Negligent Supervision

    Construction Contractor “Mean Tweets” Edition

    How Finns Cut Construction Lead Times in Half
    Corporate Profile

    CLAYTON COUNTY GEORGIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    With over 4500 general contracting and design related expert designations, the Clayton County, Georgia Construction Expert Directory delivers a streamlined multi-disciplinary expert retention and support solution to construction claims professionals concerned with construction defect and claims litigation. BHA provides construction claims investigation, testimony, and support services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. In connection with in house assets which include credentialed construction consultants, NCARB certified architects, forensic engineers, building envelope and design experts, the construction experts group brings specialized experience and local capabilities to Clayton County and the surrounding areas.

    Clayton County Georgia multi family design expert witnessClayton County Georgia expert witness windowsClayton County Georgia concrete expert witnessClayton County Georgia ada design expert witnessClayton County Georgia consulting architect expert witnessClayton County Georgia construction expert witness public projectsClayton County Georgia construction cost estimating expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Clayton County, Georgia

    FERC Issues Show-Cause Orders: Impacts on California and Other Regional Power Markets

    July 13, 2026 —
    At an open meeting on June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued show-cause orders under Section 206 of the Federal Power Act to the six FERC-jurisdictional RTOs/ISOs—PJM Interconnection, ISO New England, Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Southwest Power Pool, New York Independent System Operator and California Independent System Operator—along with their transmission owners (TOs), directing each region and the TOs to justify or revise tariff provisions governing how data centers and other large loads connect to and receive transmission service from the grid. These show-cause orders will impact several power markets across the country, including California. Reprinted courtesy of Stephen J. Humes, Pillsbury, Alicia M. McKnight, Pillsbury and Jason Drogin Atwood, Pillsbury Mr. Humes may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com Ms. McKnight may be contacted at alicia.mcknight@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Atwood may be contacted at jason.atwood@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    'Drywall Isn't Light': Peter Lupo on Safety Management at Standard Drywall

    May 26, 2026 —
    Peter Lupo has been safety director since 2019 at San Diego-based Standard Drywall Inc., a major wall and ceiling contractor. He draws on over two decades of safety experience across a wide range of commercial construction work, having previously served as safety director for general contractor T.B. Penick & Sons. He has also previously operated Peter Lupo Consulting, where he reviewed legal cases and provided expert testimony, and blogged on safety for ENR.com. Lupo recently spoke to ENR Correspondent Elaine Silver about the weight of drywall, heat hazard control, bilingual crews and how he supports safety creativity and learning on the Standard Drywall staff. The conversation has been edited. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Elaine Silver, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Kamran Salour Named to Los Angeles Times' 2026 Legal Visionaries List

    June 02, 2026 —
    Orange County Partner and Data Privacy & Cybersecurity Practice Co-Chair Kamran Salour was named to the Los Angeles Times' 2026 Legal Visionaries list, which honors the most innovative attorneys in Southern California. In announcing this year's Legal Visionaries, the Times said that Mr. Salour and his co-honorees "distinguish themselves not only through skilleand results but through an unwavering commitment to their clients, their craft and the communities they serve." "Their paths – shaped by rigorous education, defining cases and purposeful leadership – offer a deeper perspective on what sets true standouts apart," the Times' announcement stated. "Together, these visionaries exemplify a forward-thinking approach to the law, elevating both their profession and the people who depend on it." Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Defend Now, Allocate Later? An Unresolved Tension in Colorado Construction Law

    August 16, 2026 —
    For decades, Colorado law has recognized an important distinction between the duty to defend and the duty to indemnify. The former ordinarily arises at the beginning of litigation; the latter generally cannot be determined until the underlying liability is known. That distinction makes intuitive sense. A defense that becomes due only after litigation concludes is not much of a defense. But Colorado’s construction anti-indemnity statute, C.R.S. § 13-21-111.5(6), raises an interesting question about how that familiar rule operates in construction disputes. The statute expressly regulates contractual obligations not only to indemnify, but also to insure and defend, and it reflects a legislative policy that construction businesses should bear financial responsibility for their own negligence. Those principles have developed along separate tracks. At some point, a Colorado appellate court may have to decide precisely how they fit together. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David McLain, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Mr. McLain may be contacted at mclain@hhmrlaw.com

    Construction Robotics Works Where Variation Ends

    August 11, 2026 —
    BuiltWorlds published its 2026 Robotics Top 50 this summer, and the list is genuinely wide. Fifty solutions across nine categories, from 3D printing and prefabricated component manufacturing to earthmoving, demolition, material transport, layout, installation, inspection, and drilling. The honorees come from sixteen countries. It looks like robotics has finally spread across the whole project lifecycle. However, having vendors in nine categories does not mean that contractors are robotizing their work en masse. Zacua Ventures, in its 2026 construction robotics report, estimates that on-site robotics accounted for less than 0.03% of global construction spending in 2025. Zacua says: “That is not a failed market. It is a market at the beginning of an adoption S-curve”, while warning that its estimates rest on private vendor data and may be high if vendors overstate how widely their machines are deployed. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Federal Court Highlights the Strategic Value of Additional Insured Coverage

    June 22, 2026 —
    A recent decision from the District of Maryland underscores a recurring—but often underutilized—opportunity for policyholders: securing and enforcing additional insured coverage under another party’s liability policy. In Charter Oak Fire Insurance Co. v. Builders Premier Insurance Co., the court held that an equipment lessor qualified as an additional insured under the lessee’s policy and was entitled to a primary defense. The decision is a useful reminder that additional insured coverage can fundamentally shift defense obligations and materially reduce a policyholder’s exposure. We build on the decision to highlight the practical steps policyholders should take to ensure that all potentially available insurance is identified and pursued. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Michael S. Levine, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
    Mr. Levine may be contacted at mlevine@hunton.com

    Tampa Team Obtains Highly Favorable Verdict for Property Owner Client in Lawsuit over Traffic Accident

    March 24, 2026 —
    Tampa Managing Partner John Rine and Partner Nick Dareneau obtained a very favorable verdict for their property owner client in a Sarasota County trial in a lawsuit arising from a traffic accident. At the end of closing arguments, plaintiff’s counsel requested appropriately $18 million from the jury. The jury returned a net verdict of just over a thousand dollars. The plaintiff was on a scooter and was involved in an accident with an SUV in a parking lot intersection. Our firm represented the property owner. The plaintiffs argued that the landscape vegetation was too tall and violated the sight lines of the two drivers, and that the height of the shrubbery violated the owner’s landscaping contract and a local sight line ordinance. They also argued that the intersection lacked a stop sign in contrast to the other six parking lot entrances, which had stop signs. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Breaking Ground On New California Public Works Prevailing Wage Requirements

    April 27, 2026 —
    Seyfarth Synopsis: As of January 1, 2026, AB 889 bulldozed California’s Prevailing Wage law, which impacts public works employers—including public agencies, the contractors that work for them, and private owners and developers whose projects may be subject to public works requirements. The amended law reframes the calculation of fringe benefits for individuals who work on public works project and mandates annualization of such benefits, demolishes the practice of frontloading these benefits, and requires employers to maintain inspection-ready records of compliance. This year, AB 889 significantly revised California’s prevailing wage law, codified at Labor Code section 1773.1, to clarify the state’s prevailing wage regulations and streamline enforcement. Accordingly, as of January 1, 2026, California public works employers are required to annualize employees’ fringe benefits and maintain specific documentation demonstrating statutory compliance. These new obligations impact public agencies and their contractors, as well as private owners and developers whose projects may be subject to public works requirements. Continue reading for the blueprint of how to comply with the state’s amended prevailing wage law. Reprinted courtesy of Heather Frisch, Seyfarth Shaw LLP, Christopher Bouquet, Seyfarth Shaw LLP and Ashley Stein, Seyfarth Shaw LLP Ms. Frisch may be contacted at hfrisch@seyfarth.com Mr. Bouquet may be contacted at cbouquet@seyfarth.com Ms. Stein may be contacted at astein@seyfarth.com Read the full story...