BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    condominium expert witness Cobb County Georgia Medical building expert witness Cobb County Georgia landscaping construction expert witness Cobb County Georgia structural steel construction expert witness Cobb County Georgia casino resort expert witness Cobb County Georgia custom homes expert witness Cobb County Georgia townhome construction expert witness Cobb County Georgia multi family housing expert witness Cobb County Georgia housing expert witness Cobb County Georgia industrial building expert witness Cobb County Georgia production housing expert witness Cobb County Georgia institutional building expert witness Cobb County Georgia condominiums expert witness Cobb County Georgia parking structure expert witness Cobb County Georgia hospital construction expert witness Cobb County Georgia retail construction expert witness Cobb County Georgia low-income housing expert witness Cobb County Georgia mid-rise construction expert witness Cobb County Georgia high-rise construction expert witness Cobb County Georgia concrete tilt-up expert witness Cobb County Georgia Subterranean parking expert witness Cobb County Georgia tract home expert witness Cobb County Georgia
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Cobb County, Georgia

    Georgia Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB 563 stipulates that prior to filing a claim, a homeowner must give the contractor 30 day written notice detailing the nature of the defect. In response, contractor must provide (within 30 days of receipt) a written reply containing an offer of settlement, requirement of inspection or rejection. The law provides definitions relating to construction; offers immunity from liability for certain conditions; and sets up an alternative dispute resolution process.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Cobb County Georgia

    No state license for general contracting required. License is required for Air Conditioning, Electrical, and Plumbing trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Athens Area Home Builders Association
    Local # 1116
    PO Box 1903
    Athens, GA 30603
    http://www.aahba.com

    Barrow Co Builders Association
    Local # 1140
    PO Box 959
    Winder, GA 30680
    http://www.barrowcountybuilders.org

    Paulding Co Builders Association
    Local # 1179
    PO Box 921
    Dallas, GA 30132
    http://www.pauldingcountyhomes.com

    Greater Atlanta Home Builders Association
    Local # 1124
    1484 Brockett Road
    Tucker, GA 30084
    http://www.atlantahomebuilders.com

    Gtr Walton Builders Association
    Local # 1159
    7706 Hampton Place
    Loganville, GA 30052
    http://www.greaterwaltonhba.com

    Jackson County Builders Association
    Local # 1165
    PO Box 189
    Jefferson, GA 30549
    http://www.jacksoncountybuilders.com

    Westside Home Builders Association
    Local # 1158
    PO Box 1272
    Douglasville, GA 30133
    http://www.westsideHBA.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Cobb County Georgia

    Housing Prices Up through Most of Country

    Time to Repair Nevada’s Construction Defect Laws?

    Nuclear Energy Gets a Much-Needed Boost

    Georgia Court of Appeals Holds That Policyholder Can “Stack” the Limits of Each Primary Policy After Asbestos Claim

    Quick Note: COVID-19 Claim – Proving Causation

    California Supreme Court Addresses “Good Faith” Construction Disputes Under Prompt Payment Laws

    Newmeyer Dillion Announces Jason Moberly Caruso As Its Newest Partner

    Hawaii Federal District Court Again Rejects Coverage for Faulty Workmanship

    When Customers Don’t Pay: What Can a Construction Business Do

    Fifth Circuit: Primary Insurer Relieved of Duty to Defend Without Release of Liability of Insured

    Cuba: Construction Boom Potential for U.S. Construction Companies and Equipment Manufacturers?

    The Other Side of the North Dakota Oil Boom: Evictions

    Be Careful in Contracting and Business

    Homebuilding Down in North Dakota

    Privileged Communications With a Testifying Client/Expert

    New York Converting Unlikely Buildings into Condominiums

    New Case Alert: Oregon Supreme Court Prohibits Insurer’s Attempt to Relitigate Insured’s Liability

    Steel-Fiber Concrete Link Beams Perform Well in Tests

    No Additional Insured Coverage for Subcontractor's Work Outside Policy Period

    A Win for Policyholders: Court Finds Flood Exclusion Inapplicable to Plumbing Leaks Caused by Hurricane Rainfall

    Construction Insurance Costs for New York Schools is Going Up

    Solar Power Inc. to Build 30-Megawatt Project in Inner Mongolia

    Pre-Covid Construction Contracts Unworkable as Costs Surge, Webuild Says

    Business Interruption Claim Granted in Part, Denied in Part

    When Cyber Crooks Steal Payments, Think Insurance Makes Up The Loss? Think Again.

    Skanska Found Negligent for Damages From Breakaway Barges

    Brazil's Success at Hosting World Cup Bodes Well for Olympics

    Does the UCC Apply to the Contract for the Sale of Goods and Services

    To Sea or Not to Sea: Fifth Circuit Applies Maritime Law to Offshore Service Contract, Spares Indemnity Provision from Louisiana Oilfield Indemnity Act

    Want to Stay Up on Your Mechanic’s Lien Deadlines? Write a Letter or Two

    COVID-19 Business Interruption Claims Four Years Later: What Have We Learned?

    Insurer Not Entitled to Summary Judgment on Water Damage Claims

    Philadelphia Proposed Best Value Procurement Bill

    New York Appellate Court Addresses “Trigger of Coverage” for Asbestos Claims and Other Coverage Issues

    Working Safely With Silica: Health Hazards and OSHA Compliance

    London Is Falling Down and It's Because of Climate Change

    Can We Compel Insurers To Cover Construction Defect in General Liability Policies?

    Workers at Two NFL Stadiums Test Positive for COVID-19, But Construction Continues

    Fifth Circuit Requires Causal Distinction for Ensuing Loss Exception to Faulty Work Exclusion

    Research Project Underway to Prepare Water Utilities for Wildfire Events

    That Boilerplate Language May Just Land You in Hot Water

    Construction Upturn in Silicon Valley

    Executive Order 14275: Restoring Common Sense to Federal Procurement

    Ohio Court of Appeals: Absolution Pollution Exclusion Bars Coverage for Workplace Coal-Tar Pitch Exposure Claims

    Federal Court Upholds Privity Requirement in Additional Insured Endorsement; Finds No Equitable Estoppel

    #1 CDJ Topic: McMillin Albany LLC v Superior Court of California

    The Architects Who Dream of a New Stone Age

    That’s Common Knowledge! Failure to Designate an Expert Witness in a Professional Negligence Case is Not Fatal Where “Common Knowledge” Exception Applies

    MBS’s $500 Billion Desert Dream Just Keeps Getting Weirder

    Denial of Motion to Dissolve Lis Pendens Does Not Automatically Create Basis for Certiorari Relief
    Corporate Profile

    COBB COUNTY GEORGIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through over 4500 building and construction related expert designations, the Cobb County, Georgia Construction Expert Directory delivers a streamlined multi-disciplinary expert retention and support solution to attorneys and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect, scheduling, and delay matters. BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the industry's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, real estate investment trusts, risk managers, owners, as well as a variety of municipalities and government offices. In connection with regional assets which comprise construction cost, scheduling, and delay experts, professional engineers, ASPE certified professional estimators, and construction safety professionals, the firm brings regional experience and local capabilities to Cobb County and the surrounding areas.

    Cobb County Georgia defective construction expertCobb County Georgia ada design expert witnessCobb County Georgia architect expert witnessCobb County Georgia construction code expert witnessCobb County Georgia civil engineer expert witnessCobb County Georgia OSHA expert witness constructionCobb County Georgia construction expert witness public projects
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Cobb County, Georgia

    Denis Serkin and Michael S. Zicherman Co-Edit/Author Lexology Panoramic: Construction 2027

    August 03, 2026 —
    P&A partners Denis Serkin and Michael S. Zicherman served as co-editors and authors of Lexology’s Panoramic: Construction 2027 – US and Global guide. Formerly Getting the Deal Through, Lexology Panoramic provides members of the construction industry and construction-related legal and business providers with side-by-side comparison of key industry issues in 19 jurisdictions worldwide. Reprinted courtesy of Denis Serkin, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Michael S. Zicherman, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Serkin may be contacted at dserkin@pecklaw.com Mr. Zicherman may be contacted at mzicherman@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Construction Liens: Liening for Amounts Not Yet Technically Due Does Not Mean Lien Is Fraudulent

    August 11, 2026 —
    A 2024 bankruptcy ruling, In re Edgewater Construction Group, Inc., 657 B.R. 668 (S.D.Fla. 2024), touched upon an interesting issue when it comes to construction liens. Is a construction lien fraudulent simply because the lien includes amounts not yet due? Not necessarily. In this bankruptcy dispute, the subcontractor debtor (that filed for bankruptcy) recorded two construction liens on projects. The general contractor argued in the bankruptcy court that the subcontractor debtor’s liens were fraudulent. As to the first lien, the general contractor argued that the lien was fraudulent because it included amounts that the debtor knew the general contractor had already paid to the debtor’s subcontractors/suppliers. The bankruptcy court disagreed: “The Court finds that, although the Debtor had been told that [the general contractor] had paid these subcontractors, in light of the ongoing dispute between Debtor and [the general contractor], it was reasonable for the Debtor to demand proof. Debtor’s subsequent filing of a partial satisfaction of lien once the Debtor received the requested proof of payment from [the general contractor] counters any claim of willful exaggeration.” In re Edgewater Construction Group, supra, at 672-673. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    AI Data Centers Become City-Scale Infrastructure, Prompting New Industry Playbook

    August 11, 2026 —
    AI data centers are no longer just buildings. They are increasingly reaching power-demand levels more commonly associated with municipalities, prompting industry groups to launch a new framework they say is needed to keep pace with rapidly changing power, cooling and reliability requirements. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    The Architects Who Dream of a New Stone Age

    October 26, 2026 —
    Most of the world’s longest-standing buildings have one thing in common: They are made from stone. Still, you’d be hard-pressed to find this civilization-outlasting material as a structural element in modern construction. Many stone buildings are imposters: thin veneers of limestone or granite disguising concrete and steel skeletons. In its day job as Earth’s crust, stone is currently holding up entire cities, countries and continents. But it’s rarely used to its full potential as a load-bearing material that can be stronger than concrete. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jennifer Hahn, Bloomberg

    How AI Turns Construction Documents Into Procurement Intelligence

    May 05, 2026 —
    MEP equipment accounts for up to 40% of costs on data center or hospital projects, has lead times ranging from 20 weeks to over a year, and has historically been the most underserved area in construction software. In this episode, I speak with Victor Muchiri from BuildVision about what it actually takes to make AI useful in construction procurement, not as a pilot, but in production. We dig into why you cannot simply upload a set of construction drawings to ChatGPT and trust the output. Construction documents are complex, cross-referenced, and consequential. Without deep domain context, such as manufacturer ontologies, equipment taxonomies, and engineering expertise, AI produces plausible results, not reliable ones. BuildVision’s approach is to act as a harness around AI models, wrapping them in construction-specific knowledge so the output can be trusted for real procurement decisions. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Italian Court Convicts 32 in Morandi Bridge Collapse Case

    August 25, 2026 —
    Former Autostrade per l'Italia CEO Giovanni Castellucci was sentenced to 12 years in prison July 16 after an Italian court handed down the first criminal verdicts stemming from the 2018 Morandi Bridge collapse in Genoa that killed 43 people. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    Integration Can Inoculate in Utah

    July 20, 2026 —
    The Utah Court of Appeals recently reaffirmed, in the construction context, Utah’s strict approach to enforcing integration clauses to preclude parol evidence and other legal theories that would vary the written terms of a contract. In Reid v. All Surface LC, 2025 UT App 134, decided last September, the court affirmed in all respects the trial court’s grant of summary judgment based on the strength of an integration clause against a homeowner who sued a contractor for breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, civil conspiracy, negligence, and breach of the implied warranty of habitability. More recently, however, the same court rejected those same arguments in Tidwell v. Jensen, 2026 UT App 13 as to tort claims arising from a used car sale. The facts in Reid were sympathetic to the plaintiff. After being told she had a mold issue near a defective basement shower, the plaintiff solicited bids. A remediation contractor advised that while it could address the mold, the shower replacement should be handled by someone else. The plaintiff contacted All Surface LC, a shower replacement contractor. During an interview, the sales representative stated that All Surface could “do full mold remediation, tear everything out, and reframe the shower.” The plaintiff ultimately retained All Surface, expecting it would both resolve the mold issues and replace the shower. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Mark O. Morris, Snell & Wilmer
    Mr. Morris may be contacted at mmorris@swlaw.com

    Louisiana Enacts Important Tort Reform Legislation

    May 12, 2026 —
    The Louisiana legislature enacted tort reform legislation in 2025 to address the increasing cost of insurance in Louisiana and to provide some predictability to the Louisiana legal system. While our colleagues, Jenny Michel and Jennifer Kretschmann, have provided an excellent and comprehensive analysis of the legislation in their article entitled “Louisiana State Legislature 2025 Regular Session: Tort Reform - Acts & Vetoed Insurance Bill,” which can be found here, this article examines the anticipated impact of the tort reform legislation on personal injury trials in federal and state courts in Louisiana. The most significant reform involves the institution of a modified defense of contributory negligence, which went into effect on January 1, 2026. Since 1996, Louisiana had operated as a pure comparative fault state; the liability of each party whose fault caused damages was to be allocated among the respective parties based upon their appropriate percentage of fault, regardless of the legal theory of liability asserted against each party. Thus, a plaintiff 55 percent at fault could recover 45 percent of their damages from the liable defendants. The 2025 Tort Reform Amendments now prohibit a plaintiff in a personal injury action from recovering any damages if they are found to be 51 percent or more at fault for their damages. The 55 percent at-fault party in the example above is now prohibited from recovering any damages from any party. Importantly, this new legislation now requires the trial court to instruct the jury that if they find a plaintiff to be more than 50 percent at fault, then the plaintiff will not recover any damages. Reprinted courtesy of Lee M. Peacocke, Lewis Brisbois and Benjamin Perkins, Lewis Brisbois Mr. Peacocke may be contacted at Lee.Peacocke@lewisbrisbois.com Mr. Perkins may be contacted at Benjamin.Perkins@lewisbrisbois.com Read the full story...