BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    landscaping construction expert witness Effingham County Georgia condominium expert witness Effingham County Georgia institutional building expert witness Effingham County Georgia custom homes expert witness Effingham County Georgia hospital construction expert witness Effingham County Georgia housing expert witness Effingham County Georgia multi family housing expert witness Effingham County Georgia mid-rise construction expert witness Effingham County Georgia Medical building expert witness Effingham County Georgia high-rise construction expert witness Effingham County Georgia industrial building expert witness Effingham County Georgia office building expert witness Effingham County Georgia custom home expert witness Effingham County Georgia production housing expert witness Effingham County Georgia condominiums expert witness Effingham County Georgia parking structure expert witness Effingham County Georgia casino resort expert witness Effingham County Georgia Subterranean parking expert witness Effingham County Georgia low-income housing expert witness Effingham County Georgia retail construction expert witness Effingham County Georgia concrete tilt-up expert witness Effingham County Georgia structural steel construction expert witness Effingham County Georgia
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Effingham County, Georgia

    Georgia Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB 563 stipulates that prior to filing a claim, a homeowner must give the contractor 30 day written notice detailing the nature of the defect. In response, contractor must provide (within 30 days of receipt) a written reply containing an offer of settlement, requirement of inspection or rejection. The law provides definitions relating to construction; offers immunity from liability for certain conditions; and sets up an alternative dispute resolution process.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Effingham County Georgia

    No state license for general contracting required. License is required for Air Conditioning, Electrical, and Plumbing trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Greater Columbus Home Builders Association
    Local # 1148
    6432 Bradley Park Dr
    Columbus, GA 31904
    http://www.gchba.com

    Home Builders Association Of Warner Robins
    Local # 1196
    PO Box 8297
    Warner Robins, GA 31095
    http://homebuilderswr.com/

    Statesboro Home Builders Association
    Local # 1191
    1223 Merchants Way
    Statesboro, GA 30458


    Home Builders Association of Macon
    Local # 1172
    PO Box 27447
    Macon, GA 31221
    http://hbaofmacon.org/

    Milledgeville/Lake Sinclair Home Builders Association
    Local # 1105
    131 N. Lakeshore Dr.
    Ivey, GA 31031


    West Georgia Home Builders Association
    Local # 1198
    207 N Lewis St
    Lagrange, GA 30240


    Home Builders Association of Greater Savannah
    Local # 1188
    7116 Hodgson Memorial Dr
    Savannah, GA 31406
    http://www.homebuildersofsavannah.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Effingham County Georgia

    Appetite for Deconstruction

    Benchmark Litigation Recognizes Multiple Snell & Wilmer Offices and Attorneys in 2026 Rankings

    Collapse Claim Fails Due To Defectively Designed Roof and Deck

    Top 10 Take-Aways: the ABA Forum's 2024 Mid-Winter Meeting

    West Coast Casualty Construction Defect Seminar Announced for 2014

    Zillow Topping Realogy Shows Web Surge for Housing Market

    It's a Wrap! Enforcing Online Agreements in Light of the CPRA

    OSHA Set to Tag More Firms as Severe Violators Under New Criteria

    Predicting the Future of Texas’s Grid Is a Texas-Sized Challenge

    Falling Tree Causing Three Injuries/Deaths Is One Occurrence

    Insurer in Bad Faith Due to Adjuster's Failure to Keep Abreast of Case Law

    Pennsylvania Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Attorney Fee Award Under the Contractor and Subcontractor Payment Act

    “The Myth of Sisyphus”

    Contract Not So Clear in South Carolina Construction Defect Case

    Construction Is Holding Back the Economy

    Georgia Appellate Court Supports County Claim Against Surety Company’s Failure to Pay

    Hawaii Federal District Court Denies Title Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment

    Toll Brothers Climbs After Builder Reports Higher Sales

    Highest Building Levels in Six Years in Southeast Michigan

    DA’s Office Checking Workers Comp Compliance

    ACEC Research Institute Report: Real Risk of AI Isn’t Technology. It’s the Org Chart.

    Celebrating 29 Years – Thank You for Your Continued Trust!

    Affirmed: Insureds Bear the Burden of Allocating Covered Versus Uncovered Losses

    Yet ANOTHER Reminder to Always Respond

    Toll Brothers Named #1 Home Builder on Fortune Magazine's 2023 World's Most Admired Companies® List

    Newark Trial Team Defends “No Cause” With Appellate Affirmance Of 2023 Jury Verdict

    2026 Construction Outlook: Dampening Outlook With Some Potential Bright Spots

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “You Left Out a Key Ingredient!”

    Claims Against Broker Dismissed

    Insurers Refuse Indemnification of Subcontractors in Construction Defect Suit

    The Burden of Betterment

    Undercover Sting Nabs Eleven Illegal Contractors in California

    Home Buyers will Pay More for Solar

    Defective Concrete Blocks Spell Problems for Donegal Homeowners

    Contractor's Agreement to Perform Does Not Preclude Coverage Under Contractual Liability Exclusion

    Policing Those Subcontractors: It Might Take Extra Effort To Be An Additional Insured

    GRSM Houston Office Recognized as Outstanding Diverse Organization by Houston Business Journal

    Construction and AI: What Contractors Need to Know from ABC’s New Report

    Roof's "Cosmetic" Damage From Hail Storm Covered

    Collapse Claim Dismissed as Untimely

    The G2G Mid-Year Roundup (2022)

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (3/20/24) – Construction Backlog Falls, National Association of Realtors Settle Litigation, and Commercial Real Estate Market’s Effect on City Cuts

    Joint Venture Dispute Over Profits

    Congratulations to Haight Attorneys Selected to the 2024 Southern California Super Lawyers List

    Homebuilders Go Green in Response to Homebuyer Demand

    California Judicial Council Votes to Rescind Prohibitions on Eviction and Foreclosure Proceedings

    Eleventh Circuit Affirms Jury Verdict on Covered Property Loss

    Blackstone Suffers Court Setback in Irish Real Estate Drama

    Top 10 Construction Contract Provisions – Changes and Claims

    Construction and Contract Issues Blamed for Problems at Anchorage Port
    eys Featured in “The Best Lawyers in America” & “Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch” 2025 Editions

    Ohio Court Finds No Coverage for Construction Defect Claims

    California Courts Call a “Time Out” During COVID-19 –New Emergency Court Rules on Civil Litigation

    Payment Bond Surety Entitled to Award of Attorneys’ Fees Although Defended by Principal

    Parol Evidence can be Used to Defeat Fraudulent Lien

    Round and Round: Inside the Las Vegas Sphere

    Resolving Subcontractor Disputes with Pass-Through Claims and Liquidation Agreements

    2013 May Be Bay Area’s Best Year for Commercial Building

    ASCE Statement on Devastating Tornado Damages Throughout U.S.

    Insurer Wrongfully Denies Coverage When Household Member Fails to Submit to EUO

    Contractual Assumption of Liability Does Not Bar Coverage

    The Sounds of Silence: Pennsylvania’s Sutton Rule

    Beware of Statutory Limits on Change Orders
    60">Appellate Team Secures Victory in North Carolina Governmental Immunity Personal Injury Matter

    Crowdfunding Comes to Manhattan’s World Trade Center

    Another Colorado District Court Refuses to Apply HB 10-1394 Retroactively

    Engineer Proposes Slashing Scope of Millennium Tower Pile Upgrade

    Echoes of Shutdown in Delay of Key Building Metric

    Engineering Report Finds More Investigation Needed of Balconies at New Jersey Condo

    The Job is Substantially Complete, the Subcontract was Never Signed, the Subcontractor Wants to be Paid—Now What?

    The Future of Airport Infrastructure in a Post-Pandemic World
    Corporate Profile

    EFFINGHAM COUNTY GEORGIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Drawing from more than 4500 building and construction related expert designations, the Effingham County, Georgia Construction Expert Directory provides a streamlined multi-disciplinary expert retention and support solution to construction claims professionals concerned with construction defect and claims litigation. BHA provides construction claims evaluation and expert support services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Employing in house assets which include credentialed construction consultants, NCARB certified architects, forensic engineers, building envelope and design experts, the firm brings regional experience and local capabilities to Effingham County and the surrounding areas.

    Effingham County Georgia expert witness concrete failureEffingham County Georgia OSHA expert witness constructionEffingham County Georgia construction scheduling expert witnessEffingham County Georgia concrete expert witnessEffingham County Georgia soil failure expert witnessEffingham County Georgia roofing construction expertEffingham County Georgia testifying construction expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Effingham County, Georgia

    GRSM Defeats Class Certification in Precedent-Setting HOA Management Case

    September 15, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Partners Fletcher Alford and Kevin Liu and Associate Jigar Desai secured a favorable outcome on behalf of an HOA management company in a precedent-setting class action before the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, obtaining denial of the plaintiff’s motion for class certification and dismissal without prejudice of the three claims at issue. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant received earnings credit payments from a bank in exchange for maintaining HOA deposit accounts and failed to disclose the arrangement to its HOA clients. The plaintiff sought more than $40 million in damages, asserting five claims: (1) breach of contract for failing to act in class members’ best interests by not disclosing the alleged earnings credit arrangement; (2) violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL) based on alleged violations of California Civil Code §§ 5375, 5375.5, and 5380; (3) breach of fiduciary duty based on the alleged undisclosed arrangement; (4) violation of the UCL for unfair business practices arising from the alleged nondisclosure; and (5) unjust enrichment. The plaintiff sought class certification under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(2) and 23(b)(3) only as to its second, third, and fourth causes of action. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Structural Concerns Force Emergency Closure of Maryland Office Building

    August 16, 2026 —
    A 10-story Baltimore-area office building was evacuated after an underground parking structure was compromised during construction work. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jim Parsons, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Oracle's $16B Michigan Data Center Secures Financing as Power Contracts Face Appeals

    June 08, 2026 —
    A $16 billion hyperscale data center under construction outside Ann Arbor, Mich., has secured financing backed by Blackstone and other institutional investors, even as the project's power supply agreements now face a legal challenge before the Michigan Court of Appeals. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    New Executive Order on AI Innovation and Security: Key Takeaways for the Construction Industry

    June 15, 2026 —
    On June 2, 2026, President Trump signed an Executive Order titled “Promoting Advanced Artificial Intelligence Innovation and Security.” At its core, the Order is a cybersecurity and national-security measure rather than a broad regulation of how private companies develop or use AI. It directs federal agencies to harden government systems against AI-enabled cyber threats, establishes voluntary frameworks for collaboration between the federal government and the AI and critical-infrastructure sectors, and strengthens criminal enforcement against the malicious use of AI. Notably, the Order expressly disclaims any intent to create a “mandatory governmental licensing, preclearance, or permitting” regime for the “development, publication, release, or distribution of new AI models.” Instead, the Executive Order seeks to “promote AI innovation and security” by working with the private sector to modernize government and private-sector information systems and harden them against external threats, protect intellectual property from exploitation or theft, and cultivate American AI capabilities. Reprinted courtesy of Richard R. Volack, Peckar & Abramson, PC and Denis Serkin, Peckar & Abramson, PC Mr. Volack may be contacted at rvolack@pecklaw.com Mr. Serkin may be contacted at dserkin@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Connecticut Expands Construction Wage-Theft Liability and Prevailing Wage Recordkeeping Requirements

    June 29, 2026 —
    This post was co-authored by Labor + Employment group lawyer Christopher Costain, Hayden Eckblom (Summer Intern), and Pasqualina Fox-Mina (Summer Associate). Hayden and Pasqualina are not admitted to practice law. On May 11, 2026, Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont signed into law Public Act 26-12, a wide-ranging bill centered around employee rights. Our colleagues in Robinson+Cole’s Labor, Employment, Benefits + Immigration group recently published a legal update summarizing the key components of Public Act 26-12. Here, we focus on the Wage Theft and Prevailing Wage concepts in the bill that directly relate to the construction industry. Wage Theft With exceptions for public works and small residential projects, general contractors will be jointly and severally liable for any unpaid wages owed to an employee of a subcontractor of any tier on private construction projects, beginning with contracts entered into on or after January 1, 2027. As we know, there is a separate regime for public works projects involving payment bonds. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Anand Gupta, Robinson & Cole LLP
    Mr. Gupta may be contacted at agupta@rc.com

    Best Lawyers Recognizes 33 White and Williams LLP Lawyers

    August 24, 2026 —
    White and Williams LLP is pleased to congratulate our attorneys recognized among the 2027 Best Lawyers in America® rankings. Best Lawyers® has recognized Michael W. Horner, Chair of the Healthcare Group and Managing Partner of the Cherry Hill, NJ Office, as a 2027 "Lawyer of the Year” in the area of Litigation - Insurance for Cherry Hill. Michael Horner’s has extensive experience litigating, mediating and arbitrating complex catastrophic cases throughout multiple jurisdictions in the Northeast, with litigation and counseling experience that spans several decades in the areas of healthcare, catastrophic loss and employment matters in multiple state and federal jurisdictions. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of White and Williams LLP

    Credibility Matters…Even in Delay Claims

    September 29, 2026 —
    Credibility matters. Here’s another example involving a delay claim on public private partnership delivery method. The project agreement required claims to be tried by a hearing examiner. The public private partnership developer (for lack of a better term) submitted delay claims that it contended were caused by Miami-Dade County. The hearing examiner awarded the developer delay time and compensation. On appeal, the County argued that the delays awarded by the hearing examiner were concurrent critical path delays with other delays caused by the developer’s team (the developer’s contractor). This was demonstrated by the fact that in an attempt to mitigate the County delay, the contractor’s incorporated a schedule fragnet into its schedule to mitigate delay that showed the critical path was driven by events deemed caused by the contractor. This was also reported in the contractor’s monthly updates. The developer argued that its mitigation plan did not work and, thus, the schedules showed a hypothetical delay caused by the contractor when, in actuality, it was the County-caused delay that drove the critical path. The hearing officer agreed with the contractor. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Ayushi Neogi Published in ADC Defense Comment on Arbitration in Evolving Plaintiff-Friendly Landscape

    May 12, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Senior Counsel Ayushi Neogi has authored an article in the Association of Defense Counsel of Northern California and Nevada’s Defense Comment magazine examining the shifting landscape of arbitration following the Ending Forced Arbitration Act. Titled “Compelling Arbitration in a Post-Ending Forced Arbitration Act, Plaintiff-Friendly Landscape,” the article analyzes how recent legislative changes are reshaping arbitration strategy, particularly as employees gain greater ability to bypass arbitration in certain claims. Neogi provides practical insight into how courts are responding and what this means for defense counsel navigating increasingly complex and plaintiff-friendly environments. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani