BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    mid-rise construction expert witness Mount Berry Georgia industrial building expert witness Mount Berry Georgia low-income housing expert witness Mount Berry Georgia custom home expert witness Mount Berry Georgia retail construction expert witness Mount Berry Georgia production housing expert witness Mount Berry Georgia tract home expert witness Mount Berry Georgia parking structure expert witness Mount Berry Georgia institutional building expert witness Mount Berry Georgia condominium expert witness Mount Berry Georgia custom homes expert witness Mount Berry Georgia multi family housing expert witness Mount Berry Georgia landscaping construction expert witness Mount Berry Georgia concrete tilt-up expert witness Mount Berry Georgia high-rise construction expert witness Mount Berry Georgia structural steel construction expert witness Mount Berry Georgia casino resort expert witness Mount Berry Georgia Subterranean parking expert witness Mount Berry Georgia housing expert witness Mount Berry Georgia hospital construction expert witness Mount Berry Georgia office building expert witness Mount Berry Georgia townhome construction expert witness Mount Berry Georgia
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Mount Berry, Georgia

    Georgia Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB 563 stipulates that prior to filing a claim, a homeowner must give the contractor 30 day written notice detailing the nature of the defect. In response, contractor must provide (within 30 days of receipt) a written reply containing an offer of settlement, requirement of inspection or rejection. The law provides definitions relating to construction; offers immunity from liability for certain conditions; and sets up an alternative dispute resolution process.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Mount Berry Georgia

    No state license for general contracting required. License is required for Air Conditioning, Electrical, and Plumbing trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Gainesville-Hall Co
    Local # 1175
    PO Box 631
    Gainesville, GA 30503
    http://www.hbagainesville.com

    Rome Home Builders Association
    Local # 1180
    PO BOX 1286
    Rome, GA 30162


    Bartow Co Home Builders Association
    Local # 1134
    PO Box 1024
    Cassville, GA 30123


    Home Builders Association of NE Georgia
    Local # 1121
    PO Box 842
    Hartwell, GA 30643
    http://www.hbaneg.com

    Dawson Lumpkin Builders Association
    Local # 1130
    6625 Hwy 53 E Ste 410 191
    Dawsonville, GA 30534
    http://www.dawsoncountyhba.com

    Pickens County Builders Association
    Local # 1182
    PO Box 157
    Jasper, GA 30143


    Jackson County Builders Association
    Local # 1165
    PO Box 189
    Jefferson, GA 30549
    http://www.jacksoncountybuilders.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Mount Berry Georgia

    Righting Past Wrongs Through Equitable Development

    Professional Liability and Attorney-Client Privilege Bulletin: Intra-Law Firm Communications

    Ohio Condo Owners Sue Builder, Alleging Construction Defects

    Staten Island Villa Was Home to Nabisco 'Nilla' Wafer Inventor

    First-Time Homebuyers Make Biggest Share of Deals in 17 Years

    Fluor Agrees to $14.5M Fixed-Price Project Cost Pact with SEC

    Will Colorado Pass a Construction Defect Reform Bill in 2016?

    Yet Another Reminder that Tort and Contract Don’t Mix

    Trump’s Infrastructure Weak

    Nomos LLP Partner Garret Murai Recognized by Super Lawyers

    Zinc in London Climbs for Second Day Before U.S. Housing Data

    Chinese Hunt for Trophy Properties Boosts NYC, London Prices

    Atlanta Office Wins Defense Verdict For Property Manager On Claims By Vendor, Cross-Claims By Property Owner

    Delaware Settlements with Minors and the Uniform Transfer to Minor Act

    National Demand Increases for Apartments, Refuting Calls for Construction Defect Immunity in Colorado

    Subcontractor Not Liable for Defending Contractor in Construction Defect Case

    140 Days Until The California Consumer Privacy Act Becomes Law - Why Aren't More Businesses Complying?

    Global Insights Center: Monthly Newsletter

    HOA Coalition Statement on Construction-Defects Transparency Legislation

    Rich NYC Suburbs Fight Housing Plan They Say Will ‘Destroy’ Them

    Construction Defect Case Not Over, Despite Summary Judgment

    Illinois Supreme Court Finds Construction Defect Claim Triggers Initial Grant of Coverage

    Nevada’s Construction Defect Law

    Utah Supreme Court Allows Citizens to Block Real Estate Development Project by Voter Referendum

    Premises Liability: Everything You Need to Know

    Monumental Museum Makeover Comes In For Landing

    Certificates of Merit: Is Your Texas Certificate Sufficient?

    Fargo Shows Record Home Building

    Robots on Construction Sites Are Raising Legal Questions

    Leveraging the 50-State Initiative, Connecticut and Maine Team Secure Full Dismissal of Coverage Claim for Catastrophic Property Loss

    Homebuilding Continues to Recover in San Antonio Area

    Florida Extends Filing Time for Claims Subject to the Statute of Repose

    Jobsite Safety Should Be Every Contractors' Priority

    Pennsylvania Civil Engineers Give the State's Infrastructure a "C-" Grade

    Design Immunity Defense Gets Special Treatment on Summary Judgment

    Using the Prevention Doctrine

    Congratulations to Haight Attorneys Selected for the 2026 Edition of Best Lawyers and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch

    Policy Renewals: Has Your Insurer Been Naughty or Nice?

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Burks Smith and Katie Keller Win Daubert Motion Excluding Plaintiff’s Expert’s Testimony in the Middle District of Florida

    Want to Make Your Jobsite Safer? Look to the Skies.

    Does Your 998 Offer to Compromise Include Attorneys’ Fees and Costs?

    Housing Starts in U.S. Drop to Lowest Level in Three Months

    PA Superior Court Provides Clarification on Definition of CGL “Occurrence” When Property Damage Is Caused by Faulty Building Conditions

    Claims against Broker for Insufficient Coverage Fail

    Balcony Collapses Killing Six People

    Nine Haight Attorneys Selected for Best Lawyers®: Ones to Watch 2021

    Slow Down?

    Measure Twice, Cut (the Check) Once: Liability for Cybercrime and How to Avoid It

    Design-build Trends, Challenges and Risk Mitigation

    Unlicensed Contracting and Florida Statute S. 489.128
    Corporate Profile

    MOUNT BERRY GEORGIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Drawing from more than four thousand construction defect and claims related expert designations, the Mount Berry, Georgia Construction Expert Directory provides a single point of reference for construction defect and claims related support to legal professionals and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction claims investigation, testimony, and support services to the construction industry's leading builders and developers, legal professionals, and owners, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies. Employing in house resources which include building envelope and design experts, forensic engineers, forensic architects, and construction cost and scheduling consultants, the firm brings a wealth of experience and local capabilities to Mount Berry and the surrounding areas.

    Mount Berry Georgia architect expert witnessMount Berry Georgia construction project management expert witnessMount Berry Georgia construction expert witness consultantMount Berry Georgia hospital construction expert witnessMount Berry Georgia construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witnessMount Berry Georgia structural engineering expert witnessesMount Berry Georgia defective construction expert
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Mount Berry, Georgia

    Standing When It Comes to Real Property Owned by a Trust

    February 23, 2026 —
    It is not uncommon for property to be owned in the name of the trust as part of an estate planning agenda. In construction, improvements are made all the time to real property owned in the name of a trust or later transferred to a trust for estate planning purposes. In a recent case, the question became that if the property is owned by the trust does only the trust have standing to file the lawsuit. In this case, homeowners, in their individual capacities, sued a flooring contractor for defective work; however, prior to the lawsuit, the homeowners deeded the home (which would include the flooring in the home) to a revocable trust. The plaintiffs, though, were the trustees of the revocable trust and the settlors of the trust. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Snell & Wilmer Recognized Among the Top 10 Largest Law Firms in Orange County by the Orange County Business Journal for the Ninth Consecutive Year

    April 27, 2026 —
    ORANGE COUNTY – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that its Orange County office has been named the eighth largest law firm in Orange County on the Orange County Business Journal’s 2026 List of Law Firms. The office has been ranked among the top 10 largest law firms in the region by the Orange County Business Journal for nine consecutive years. “We are proud to once again be recognized among the top law firms in Orange County,” said Jonathan E. Frank, managing partner of the firm’s Orange County office. “This recognition is a testament to the outstanding attorneys and professionals in our Orange County office and the clients who trust us with their most important matters. Being ranked among the top 10 largest firms in the region for nine consecutive years reflects both the strength of our team and our deep commitment to serving the Orange County business community.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer

    Angela Zanin Featured in LACBA List of Women’s History Month Honorees

    March 17, 2026 —
    Los Angeles Partner Angela Zanin was recently honored for her leadership and diversity initiatives in the California legal community by the Los Angeles County Bar Association (LACBA) as part of the organization’s Women’s History Month initiative. LACBA highlighted Ms. Zanin’s efforts in the community. After serving as President of the Italian American Lawyers Association (IALA) in 2023, she co-founded the Los Angeles County Unity Bar (LACUB), an alliance of bar associations dedicated to promoting diversity in the judiciary. Consisting of ten member organizations, the LACUB takes pride in its endorsement of over 40 candidates appointed to the California Court of Appeal, U.S. District Courts, Los Angeles Superior Court, and Orange County Superior Court. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    End of an (Endangerment) Era

    February 23, 2026 —
    On February 12, 2026, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced the repeal of the 2009 Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Endangerment Finding and the elimination of all federal GHG emission standards for motor vehicles and engines.1 The EPA characterized the action as the “single largest deregulatory action in U.S. history.”2 This development marks a fundamental shift in federal climate policy under the Clean Air Act (CAA) and is expected to trigger immediate and extensive litigation. In Massachusetts v. EPA, the U.S. Supreme Court held that GHGs qualify as “air pollutants” under the CAA and that the EPA must determine whether emissions from new motor vehicles cause or contribute to air pollution that may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare under CAA Section 202(a).3 Following this decision, on December 7, 2009, the EPA issued two findings. First, the EPA classified six different GHGs as threatening public health and welfare. Second, the EPA determined that emissions from new motor vehicles contribute to that endangerment.4 Although the findings themselves imposed no direct regulatory requirements, they served as the legal predicate for GHG emission standards for light-duty and heavy-duty vehicles, and later for other CAA programs affecting statutory sources. In 2012, the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia upheld the Endangerment Finding and related regulations.5 Reprinted courtesy of Sukhmani K. Singh, Snell & Wilmer, Christopher P. Colyer, Snell & Wilmer and Sean M. Sherlock, Snell & Wilmer Ms. Singh may be contacted at ssingh@swlaw.com Mr. Colyer may be contacted at ccolyer@swlaw.com Mr. Sherlock may be contacted at ssherlock@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Navigating Wind and Solar Development Opportunities on State and Private Lands During Uncertain Times for Renewable Energy

    February 02, 2026 —
    Recent executive actions and federal guidance have targeted wind and solar development, creating substantial uncertainty for the U.S. offshore wind industry and also reshaping the regulatory landscape governing onshore wind and solar development. Wind and solar projects on federal lands are now subject to heightened review processes and enhanced regulatory scrutiny. As a result, many developers are considering opportunities on state-owned and privately held lands rather than federal lands. 2025 Federal Executive Actions Impacting Wind and Solar At the federal level, renewable energy development on public lands is governed primarily by the Federal Land Policy and Management Act and administered by the Bureau of Land Management. The agency provides rights of way and leases (in designated leasing areas) for energy project development. Despite significant incentives for renewable energy development under the Biden administration, the Trump administration has deprioritized renewable energy in support of traditional energy sources like oil, gas and coal, as well as nuclear and geothermal energy. Reprinted courtesy of Cara M. MacDonald, Pillsbury, Robert G. Howard, Pillsbury and Andrew Jacobs, Pillsbury Ms. MacDonald may be contacted at cara.macdonald@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Howard may be contacted at robert.howard@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Jacobs may be contacted at andrew.jacobs@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    2026 Construction Outlook: Dampening Outlook With Some Potential Bright Spots

    February 17, 2026 —
    According to Dodge Construction Network’s Outlook 2026 Ebook, “the construction industry came roaring into 2025” – with large government investments through the Infrastructure Bill and the CHIPS Act (promoting investment in the domestic semiconductor industry), as well as outsized spending on data centers to support cloud and AI technology – but “throttled back significantly” due to “rapid changes to economic and fiscal policies.” These changes include short-term cost impacts due to tariffs and labor impacts due to the federal government’s immigration crackdown and long-term concerns following enactment of the One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBBA) which is anticipated to add $3.4 trillion to the federal deficit over ten years. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret Murai, Nomos
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    Ninth Circuit Holds That Policies Covering Environmental Claims Do Not Have Aggregate Limits

    May 12, 2026 —
    In the case of County of San Bernardino v. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, the Ninth Circuit recently addressed the issue of whether general liability policies issued in the 1960s and 1970s included aggregate limits for claims arising under the premises-operations coverage in CGL policies. The difference between the policyholder’s interpretation of the policies’ limits clauses and the insurer’s interpretation was worth hundreds of millions of dollars in exposure for the insurer. The Court closely examined the policy language and extrinsic evidence from both the insurance industry’s drafting history and the parties before concluding that the policies were ambiguous. The Court construed that ambiguity in favor of the policyholder and ruled that aggregate limits did not apply to the claims at issue. The Court’s decision underscores the importance of carefully examining a policy’s limits, especially for older policies written before 1986 when the insurance industry revised the standard-form CGL policy to state the aggregate limits apply not only to products liability claims but to premises-operations claims as well. Decades of insurance industry drafting history confirms, as the policyholder’s submissions in this case indicate, that the industry well understood that operations claims like the environmental waste-disposal claims at issue here typically were not subject to aggregate limits. Reprinted courtesy of Lorelie S. Masters, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Joseph T. Niczky, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Ms. Masters may be contacted at lmasters@hunton.com Mr. Niczky may be contacted at jniczky@hunton.com Read the full story...

    'Drywall Isn't Light': Peter Lupo on Safety Management at Standard Drywall

    May 26, 2026 —
    Peter Lupo has been safety director since 2019 at San Diego-based Standard Drywall Inc., a major wall and ceiling contractor. He draws on over two decades of safety experience across a wide range of commercial construction work, having previously served as safety director for general contractor T.B. Penick & Sons. He has also previously operated Peter Lupo Consulting, where he reviewed legal cases and provided expert testimony, and blogged on safety for ENR.com. Lupo recently spoke to ENR Correspondent Elaine Silver about the weight of drywall, heat hazard control, bilingual crews and how he supports safety creativity and learning on the Standard Drywall staff. The conversation has been edited. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Elaine Silver, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com