BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    condominium expert witness Pine Mountain Valley Georgia Medical building expert witness Pine Mountain Valley Georgia Subterranean parking expert witness Pine Mountain Valley Georgia production housing expert witness Pine Mountain Valley Georgia mid-rise construction expert witness Pine Mountain Valley Georgia retail construction expert witness Pine Mountain Valley Georgia industrial building expert witness Pine Mountain Valley Georgia custom homes expert witness Pine Mountain Valley Georgia high-rise construction expert witness Pine Mountain Valley Georgia low-income housing expert witness Pine Mountain Valley Georgia structural steel construction expert witness Pine Mountain Valley Georgia casino resort expert witness Pine Mountain Valley Georgia parking structure expert witness Pine Mountain Valley Georgia tract home expert witness Pine Mountain Valley Georgia institutional building expert witness Pine Mountain Valley Georgia landscaping construction expert witness Pine Mountain Valley Georgia townhome construction expert witness Pine Mountain Valley Georgia office building expert witness Pine Mountain Valley Georgia concrete tilt-up expert witness Pine Mountain Valley Georgia hospital construction expert witness Pine Mountain Valley Georgia condominiums expert witness Pine Mountain Valley Georgia multi family housing expert witness Pine Mountain Valley Georgia
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Pine Mountain Valley, Georgia

    Georgia Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB 563 stipulates that prior to filing a claim, a homeowner must give the contractor 30 day written notice detailing the nature of the defect. In response, contractor must provide (within 30 days of receipt) a written reply containing an offer of settlement, requirement of inspection or rejection. The law provides definitions relating to construction; offers immunity from liability for certain conditions; and sets up an alternative dispute resolution process.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Pine Mountain Valley Georgia

    No state license for general contracting required. License is required for Air Conditioning, Electrical, and Plumbing trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Macon
    Local # 1172
    PO Box 27447
    Macon, GA 31221
    http://hbaofmacon.org/

    Milledgeville/Lake Sinclair Home Builders Association
    Local # 1105
    131 N. Lakeshore Dr.
    Ivey, GA 31031


    Home Builders Association Of Warner Robins
    Local # 1196
    PO Box 8297
    Warner Robins, GA 31095
    http://homebuilderswr.com/

    West Georgia Home Builders Association
    Local # 1198
    207 N Lewis St
    Lagrange, GA 30240


    Greater Columbus Home Builders Association
    Local # 1148
    6432 Bradley Park Dr
    Columbus, GA 31904
    http://www.gchba.com

    Statesboro Home Builders Association
    Local # 1191
    1223 Merchants Way
    Statesboro, GA 30458


    Home Builders Association of Midwest Georgia
    Local # 1174
    101 Devant Street Suite 306
    Fayetteville, GA 30214
    http://www.hbaofmidwestgeorgia.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Pine Mountain Valley Georgia
    Corporate Profile

    PINE MOUNTAIN VALLEY GEORGIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from approximately 5000 construction, architectural, and engineering related expert designations, the Pine Mountain Valley, Georgia Construction Expert Directory offers a wide range of trial support and construction consulting services to construction claims professionals concerned with construction defect, scheduling, and delay claims. BHA provides construction claims investigation and expert services to the construction industry's leading builders and developers, legal professionals, and owners, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies. Utilizing in house assets which include construction cost, scheduling, and delay experts, professional engineers, ASPE certified professional estimators, and construction safety professionals, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Pine Mountain Valley and the surrounding areas.

    Pine Mountain Valley Georgia concrete expert witnessPine Mountain Valley Georgia construction forensic expert witnessPine Mountain Valley Georgia soil failure expert witnessPine Mountain Valley Georgia construction expert witnessesPine Mountain Valley Georgia architect expert witnessPine Mountain Valley Georgia expert witness structural engineerPine Mountain Valley Georgia construction claims expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Pine Mountain Valley, Georgia

    Snell & Wilmer Recognized With Top Honor in Ranking Arizona: Top Law Firms for 2026

    June 22, 2026 —
    PHOENIX – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that the firm has been voted as the top law firm in Arizona for the 17th consecutive year in the 2026 edition of AZ Big Media’s Ranking Arizona: The Best of Arizona Business. The firm was again recognized in the category of “Top 10 large law firms in Arizona” which looked at firms with 39 attorneys or more. “We are honored to receive this award recognizing our team’s ongoing commitment to excellence in service of our clients, our community, and each other,” said Firm Chair Barbara J. Dawson. “We are proud to play a meaningful role in supporting the strength and growth of Arizona’s vibrant business environment amid a rapidly changing global economy.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer

    New Law Prompts ABC Minnesota/North Dakota to Design New Telecommunications Safety Training Program

    June 29, 2026 —
    On the first day of the year, a Minnesota law requiring installers of underground telecommunication infrastructure broadband, fiber or phone lines (when projects utilize directional drilling, and/or work is being conducted within 10 feet of existing utilities) to undergo a 40-hour certification went into effect. Originally passed in mid-2024 and proposed to go into effect in July 2025, the law’s requirements were postponed until January 2026, giving ABC Minnesota/North Dakota—in partnership with NCCER and the Minnesota Cable Communications Association—time to roll out their Safety Qualified Underground Telecommunications Installer training program, which would ensure the workforce of their contractor members were certified. Reprinted courtesy of Grace Calengor, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    $356 Million Judgement Against Developer for Defective Construction of DC Condominium

    August 16, 2026 —
    On July 31, 2026, the Superior Court of the District of Columbia entered a $356,085,513.00 judgment against developers JBG Smith for defective construction and renovation of the Wardman Tower Residential Condominium in Washington, D.C. The case is Wardman Tower Residential Condominium Unit Owners Association v. JBG Smith Properties, et al., No. 2020 CA 004807 B (D.C. Super. Ct.). In a 148-page Trial Order, the D.C. Superior Court awarded $118,695,171.00 in damages in favor of the condominium association and against the condominium developers, including JBG Smith. The Court trebled those damages pursuant to the District of Columbia Consumer Protection Procedures Act (“CPPA”) to reach an ultimate judgment of $356,085,513.00. See Cowie Law Group: DC Condominium Construction Defects: Recovering Attorney’s Fees, Litigation Expenses & Treble Damages Under the Consumer Protection Procedures Act. Cowie Law Group, P.C. filed the lawsuit on behalf of the Association in 2020. The firm represented the Association throughout years of pretrial discovery and ultimately served as trial counsel with Williams & Connolly LLP during a lengthy bench trial before the Honorable Yvonne Williams. The Cowie Law Group team included attorneys, George A. Bealefeld, III, Albert G. McCarraher, Stanford L. Kimmel, III and Nicholas D. Cowie. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Nicholas D. Cowie, Cowie Law Group
    Mr. Cowie may be contacted at ndc@cowielawgroup.com

    Pulling the Plug, Preserving the Product: Protecting Rights to a Modular Subcontractor’s Work Post-Termination

    June 08, 2026 —
    Volumetric Modular Construction (VMC) is a building method where a structure is divided into large components or modules, fabricated in an offsite factory and then transported to a construction site for assembly.[1] Proponents of VMC hail it as a cost-efficient alternative to traditional building methods that leads to more consistent quality and shorter construction duration.[2] Due to a growing labor shortage, high demand for compressed project schedules, and stagnant construction productivity rates, the construction industry is embracing VMC.[3] A recent report on the market size of prefabricated construction estimates that from 2026 to 2031, VMC will grow at a compound annual growth rate of 7.16% and become a 413.11-billion-dollar industry.[4] As VMC becomes more prevalent, owners, general contractors, and subcontractors must consider how to effectively contract for modular construction. One important consideration, which this article focuses on, is navigating termination of a modular subcontractor. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Paul Williamson, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.
    Mr. Williamson may be contacted at pwilliamson@pecklaw.com

    GRSM Team Obtains Defense Verdict for Homeowners’ Association in Orange County Superior Court

    July 20, 2026 —
    A Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani multi-state team, including Partners Christine Barker, Sean Ferron, and Keith Cramer, obtained a defense verdict on behalf of a homeowners’ association (HOA) in an Orange County Superior Court bench trial spanning two months. The case began in 2022 when a homeowner sued after the Architectural Review Committee and HOA Board of Directors declined his teardown-and-rebuild plans due to view and aesthetic concerns. After a motion for summary judgment ruling in which the court found that the existing covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) did not protect views, the HOA held a special election to add explicit view protections to the CC&Rs. At the February 2025 trial call, the plaintiff sought leave to file a third amended complaint challenging the validity of that vote, drastically reframing the case from CC&R enforcement to one of election validity. A second plaintiff then filed a parallel action toward the end of the limitations period, and the two cases were consolidated. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    High-Rise Design and Construction: Then, Now, and Next

    March 16, 2026 —
    The Empire State Building was built in 14 months. Since 2010, the average completion time for a 200-meter-plus building has increased from 4.3 to 5.8 years. Buildings have become more complex, and there's more regulation than in the 1930s. Still, there are ways to make high-rise construction more efficient. An Unlikely Benchmark From 1930 When construction began on the Empire State Building on March 17, 1930, the world was in the midst of the Great Depression. That turned out to be an advantage. Contractors Starrett Brothers & Eken had access to a vast, motivated workforce, peaking at 3,439 workers on a single day in August 1930. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Supreme Court Strikes Down IEEPA Tariffs: The Refund Process Will Be Messy

    March 10, 2026 —
    On February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, and the consolidated case Trump v. V.O.S. Selections, Inc., that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize the President to impose tariffs unilaterally.1 The decision invalidates both the “reciprocal” tariffs and the drug-trafficking tariffs imposed under IEEPA. For importers, the immediate question is whether, how, and when refunds can actually be obtained. On that issue, the U.S. Supreme Court provided no roadmap. To the contrary, the dissent warned that the United States “may be required to refund billions of dollars,” that the process is likely to be a “mess,” and that the majority opinion “says nothing today about whether, and if so how, the Government should go about returning the billions of dollars that it has collected from importers.” Reprinted courtesy of Brett W. Johnson, Snell & Wilmer, Derek Flint, Snell & Wilmer, T. Troy Galan, Snell & Wilmer and Thomas Williams, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Johnson may be contacted at bwjohnson@swlaw.com Mr. Flint may be contacted at dflint@swlaw.com Mr. Galan may be contacted at tgalan@swlaw.com Mr. Williams may be contacted at twilliams@swlaw.com> Read the full story...

    Fourth Circuit Extends Coverage to Contractor

    May 14, 2026 —
    The Fourth Circuit in APAC-Atlantic, Inc. v. Owners Insurance Co., No. 24-1969, 2026 WL 458402 (4th Cir. Feb. 18, 2026) recently endorsed broad coverage for additional insureds, interpreting “arising out of” broadly under North Carolina law to extend coverage to a repaving company under its subcontractor’s liability insurance policy. The court held that an additional insured’s liability “arising out of” a named insured’s work in an additional-insured endorsement means liability “relating to” or “causally connected to” the named insured’s operations, rather than liability defined more narrowly as “caused by” or “the fault of” the named insured. Iconic Seattle Center Arena Roof the Only Piece to Stay in $900-Million Rebuild

    Seven Kahana Feld Attorneys Recognized in The Best Lawyers
    Traub Lieberman Partner Stephen Straus Wins Spoliation Motion in Favor of Defendant

    The World’s Largest 3D-Printed Neighborhood Is Here

    Renters Trading Size for Frills Fuel U.S. Apartment Boom

    Ball Janik LLP Welcomes Construction Defect Associate Miguel Bonnelly as Orlando Office Continues to Grow

    Ninth Circuit Holds Efficient Proximate Cause Doctrine Applies Beyond All-Risk Policies

    In Pricey California, Renters Near Respite From Landlord Gouging

    Construction Costs Absorb Two Big Hits This Quarter

    Disappearing Data: Avoid Losing Electronic Information to Avoid Losing the Case

    Massachusetts Federal Court Rejects Adria Towers, Finds Construction Defects Not an “Occurrence”

    Additional Insured’s Claim for a Defense Is Dismissed

    Three Firm Members Are Top 100 Super Lawyers & Ten Are Recognized As Super Lawyers Or Rising Stars In 2018

    Run Spot...Run!

    Pennsylvania Sues Firms to Recoup Harrisburg Incinerator Losses

    Firm Leadership – New Co-Chairs for the Construction Law Practice Group

    Notice Provisions in Contracts Matter

    Bid Protests: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly (Redeux)

    US Court Questions 102-Mile Transmission Project Over River Crossing

    Lenders Facing Soaring Costs Shutting Out U.S. Homebuyers

    Miller Act Bond Claims Subject to “Pay If Paid”. . . Sometimes

    BKV Barnett, LLC v. Electric Drilling Technologies, LLC: Analyzing the Impact of Colorado’s Anti-Indemnification Statute

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (8/14/24) – Commercial Real Estate AI, Hotel Pipeline Growth, and Housing Market Improvements

    Court of Appeals Discusses the Difference Between “Claims-Made” and “Occurrence-Based” Insurance Policies

    Enforceability Of Subcontract “Pay-When-Paid” Provisions – An Important Update

    2024 Update to CEB’s Mechanics Liens Now Available

    There's No Place Like Home

    Forcible Entry and Detainer Actions: Courts May Not Consider Tenant’s Hardship

    New Report Reveals Heavy Civil Construction Less Impacted by COVID-19 Than Commercial Construction

    Technology and the Environment Lead Construction Trends That Will Continue Through 2019

    Congratulations Devin Brunson on His Promotion to Partner!

    Climate-Proofing Your Home: Upgrades to Weather a Drought

    Survey: Workers Lack Awareness of Potentially Hazardous Nanomaterials

    Strategic Implementation of AI in AEC

    Texas Federal Court Delivers Another Big Win for Policyholders on CGL Coverage for Construction-Defect Claims and “Rip-and-Tear” Damages

    Court Grants Partial Summary Judgment on Conversion Claim Against Insurer

    Texas Supreme Court Rules on Contractual Liability Exclusion in Construction Cases

    Public Housing Takes Priority in Biden Spending Bill

    Downtown Sacramento Building Riddled with Defects

    FAA Seeks Largest Fine Yet on Drones in Near-Miss Crackdown

    Drastic Rebuild Resurrects Graves' Landmark Portland Building

    No Coverage for Foundation Collapse

    Breath of Fresh Air

    Architect Plans to 3D-Print a Two-Story House

    The Right to Repair Act Isn’t Out for the Count, Yet. Homebuilders Fight Back

    NJ Supreme Court Declines to Review Decision that Exxon Has No Duty to Indemnify Insurers for Environmental Liability Under Prior Settlement Agreement

    Thomson Reuters Construction Law (Virginia Practice Series)

    San Diego County Considering Updates to Green Building Code

    City Covered From Lawsuits Filed After Hurricane-Damaged Dwellings Demolished

    Coverage For Advertising Injury Barred by Prior Publication Exclusion

    Texas LGI Homes Goes After First-Time Homeowners

    Another Case Highlighting the Difference Between CGL Policies and Performance Bonds