BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    custom home expert witness Union County Georgia concrete tilt-up expert witness Union County Georgia mid-rise construction expert witness Union County Georgia condominiums expert witness Union County Georgia low-income housing expert witness Union County Georgia office building expert witness Union County Georgia landscaping construction expert witness Union County Georgia multi family housing expert witness Union County Georgia Subterranean parking expert witness Union County Georgia structural steel construction expert witness Union County Georgia production housing expert witness Union County Georgia parking structure expert witness Union County Georgia housing expert witness Union County Georgia custom homes expert witness Union County Georgia hospital construction expert witness Union County Georgia high-rise construction expert witness Union County Georgia casino resort expert witness Union County Georgia institutional building expert witness Union County Georgia condominium expert witness Union County Georgia industrial building expert witness Union County Georgia Medical building expert witness Union County Georgia retail construction expert witness Union County Georgia
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Union County, Georgia

    Georgia Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB 563 stipulates that prior to filing a claim, a homeowner must give the contractor 30 day written notice detailing the nature of the defect. In response, contractor must provide (within 30 days of receipt) a written reply containing an offer of settlement, requirement of inspection or rejection. The law provides definitions relating to construction; offers immunity from liability for certain conditions; and sets up an alternative dispute resolution process.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Union County Georgia

    No state license for general contracting required. License is required for Air Conditioning, Electrical, and Plumbing trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Northwest Georgia
    Local # 1176
    PO Box 340
    Ringgold, GA 30736


    Georgia Mountain Home Builders Association
    Local # 1181
    PO Box 626
    Clayton, GA 30525
    http://www.hbarc.org

    Fannin Co Home Builders Association
    Local # 1101
    PO Box 288
    Mineral Bluff, GA 30559


    The Home Builders Association of Dalton
    Local # 1156
    P.O. Box 1466
    Dalton, GA 30722


    Home Builders Association of Habersham County
    Local # 1126
    PO Box 459
    Clarkesville, GA 30523


    Gilmer County Home Builders Association
    Local # 1122
    PO Box 1781
    Ellijay, GA 30540
    http://www.gilmercountyhba.net

    Gordon Co Home Builders Association
    Local # 1115
    110 Garden Hill Dr
    Calhoun, GA 30701



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Union County Georgia

    2017 Legislative Changes Affecting the Construction Industry

    Corporate Formalities: A Necessary Part of Business

    Focusing on Design Elements of the 2014 World Cup Stadiums

    Collapse of Improperly Built Deck Not An Occurrence

    First Circuit: No Coverage, No Duty to Investigate Alleged Loss Prior to Policy Period

    U.S. Department of Justice Settles against Days Inn

    CC&Rs Not the Place for Arbitration Agreement, Court Rules

    Quick Note: October 1, 2023 Changes to Florida’s Construction Statutes

    Mediation in Construction Disputes: A Practical Guide

    Contractor Prevails in Part Against CalOSHA in Valley Fever Case

    Civility Is Key in Construction Defect Mediation

    Are You Satisfying WISHA Standards?

    A Closer Look at an HOA Board Member’s Duty to Homeowners

    Construction Job Opening Rise in October

    Chinese Billionaire Developer Convicted in UN Bribery Case

    Congratulations to Jonathan Kaplan on his Promotion to Partner!

    Late Notice Bars Insured’s Claim for Wind Damage

    Collapse of Breezeway Attached to Building Covered

    Understanding the Details: Suing Architects and Engineers Can Get Technical

    Chris Konzelmann Appointed to NASP Board of Directors

    Australian Developer Denies Building Problems Due to Construction Defects

    Automating Your Home? There’s an App for That

    Surety’s Several Liability Under Bonds

    Ten ACS Lawyers Recognized as Super Lawyers or Rising Stars

    EPA Will Soon Issue the Latest Revision to the Risk Management Program (RMP) Chemical Release Rules

    In the Eye of the Beholder: Court of Appeal Finds Duty of Care Owed by Owner and Contractors for Death of Minors Caused by Independent Truck Driver

    Denver Council Committee Approves Construction Defects Ordinance

    Following Mishaps, D.C. Metro Presses on With Repairs

    Wilke Fleury Attorneys Awarded Sacramento Business Journal’s Best of the Bar

    Award Doubled in Retrial of New Jersey Elevator Injury Case

    Keep it Simple with Nunn-Agreements in Colorado

    Hawaii Federal District Court Rejects Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment on Construction Defect Claims

    President Trump’s “Buy American, Hire American” Executive Order and the Construction Industry

    EPA Steps Back, Arizona Moves Forward

    Not Pandemic-Proof: The Ongoing Impact of COVID-19 on the Commercial Construction Industry

    Best Practices: Commercial Lockouts in Arizona

    Nevada Budget Remains at Impasse over Construction Defect Law

    Insurer's Attempt to Challenge Appraisal Award Rejected

    Commercial Real Estate Brokerages in an Uncertain Russian Market

    Augmented and Mixed Reality in Construction

    Diggin’ Ain’t Easy: Remember to Give Notice Before You Excavate in California

    'Taylor Swift Is an Economic Phenomenon': CE's Q1 2024 Economic Update and Forecast

    Where Standing, Mechanic’s Liens, and Bankruptcy Collide

    What Is the Best Way to Avoid Rezoning Disputes?

    Suspend the Work, but Don’t Get Fired

    Conversations with My Younger Self: 5 Things I Wish I Knew Then

    The Anatomy of a Construction Dispute- The Claim

    Experts Weigh In on Bilingual Best Practices for Jobsites

    Beyond the Storm: How Non-Hurricane Catastrophes Expose Florida’s Construction Defect Blind Spot

    With VA Mechanic’s Liens Sometimes “Substantial Compliance” is Enough (but don’t count on it) [UPDATE]
    Corporate Profile

    UNION COUNTY GEORGIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through over 4500 construction, architectural, and engineering related expert designations, the Union County, Georgia Construction Expert Directory provides a wide spectrum of trial support and consulting services to legal professionals and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides building claims and trial support services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, real estate investment trusts, risk managers, owners, as well as a variety of municipalities and government offices. Employing in house resources which include design experts, civil / structural engineers, ICC Certified Inspectors, ASPE certified professional estimators, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Union County and the surrounding areas.

    Union County Georgia architectural expert witnessUnion County Georgia expert witnesses fenestrationUnion County Georgia ada design expert witnessUnion County Georgia construction forensic expert witnessUnion County Georgia slope failure expert witnessUnion County Georgia concrete expert witnessUnion County Georgia engineering expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Union County, Georgia

    GRSM Team Obtains Defense Verdict for Homeowners’ Association in Orange County Superior Court

    July 20, 2026 —
    A Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani multi-state team, including Partners Christine Barker, Sean Ferron, and Keith Cramer, obtained a defense verdict on behalf of a homeowners’ association (HOA) in an Orange County Superior Court bench trial spanning two months. The case began in 2022 when a homeowner sued after the Architectural Review Committee and HOA Board of Directors declined his teardown-and-rebuild plans due to view and aesthetic concerns. After a motion for summary judgment ruling in which the court found that the existing covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) did not protect views, the HOA held a special election to add explicit view protections to the CC&Rs. At the February 2025 trial call, the plaintiff sought leave to file a third amended complaint challenging the validity of that vote, drastically reframing the case from CC&R enforcement to one of election validity. A second plaintiff then filed a parallel action toward the end of the limitations period, and the two cases were consolidated. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    NJ Public Works Contractors Beware – Pay Special Attention When Submitting Your Public Works Contractor Registration

    May 26, 2026 —
    While it is always important to be careful when making submissions to government agencies, recent activity by the New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development (“NJDOL”) reveals considerably increased scrutiny in connection with contractors renewing their New Jersey Public Works Registration. Extra care when completing the registration renewal process is warranted, because the consequences of a misstep can be significant and disruptive. The New Jersey Public Works Contractor Registration Act requires all contractors bidding on or engaging in construction-related public works projects to register with the NJDOL. This registration, which must be resubmitted every 1-2 years, requires contractors to make a number of detailed disclosures relating to, among other things, the entity’s ownership structure, prior state and federal labor law violations, details regarding interests in other businesses, unlawful acts by owners/officers, and participation in apprenticeship programs. Reprinted courtesy of Levi W. Barrett, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Aaron C. Schlesinger, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Barrett may be contacted at lbarrett@pecklaw.com Mr. Schlesinger may be contacted at aschlesinger@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Unable To Afford an Appellate Bond? You May Be “Indigent” And Qualify for a Discretionary Waiver or Reduction of the Bond Amount.

    October 26, 2026 —
    One of the most frequent questions asked when a client is considering taking an appeal from an adverse judgment or order is whether that judgment or order is stayed pending appeal. The answer, not surprisingly, is “it depends.” While the general rule is that perfecting an appeal stays proceedings in the trial court, including enforcement of the judgment or order, there are many, many, exceptions to that rule. One such exception is a judgment or order for “money or the payment of money.” (CCP § 917.1) In such cases, a bond or undertaking is typically required to stay enforcement. The costs of such security can be significant. If you are using an admitted surety insurer, the amount of security required is 1 1/2 times the amount of the judgment. Obtaining a bond through an admitted surety will require that you have sufficient collateral to secure the bond, and sufficient funds to pay the associated premiums, which generally run between 1% and 3% of the total bond amount, per year. So, if you are appealing from a $1 million judgment, you will likely need $1.5 million in assets as collateral, and up to $30,000 per year for the premium. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Suzanne M. Nicholson, Wilke Fleury
    Ms. Nicholson may be contacted at snicholson@wilkefleury.com

    $10.5M Settlement Ends George Washington Bridge Debris Liability Fight

    September 15, 2026 —
    A $10.5-million settlement that recently came to light has ended a six-year legal fight over whether a truck part that may have been lying on the George Washington Bridge roadway for more than 10 minutes was there long enough for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey to have found and removed it before it caused a catastrophic accident. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    Chambers USA Recognizes GRSM as 2026 Industry Leader

    June 29, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani has once again been recognized by Chambers USA, a prestigious directory of the country’s top law firms. In addition to the firm’s practice recognitions, eight partners, David Capell, Nancy Erfle, Matthew Foy, Ashlee Grant, Craig Heryford, Andrew Port, Todd Regan, and Angela Richie, were recognized among the nation’s top lawyers in their respective fields. Chambers USA recognized the firm in the following eight categories: USA – Nationwide – Insurance: Dispute Resolution: Insurer, Band 4 The firm is widely sought after by national insurance sector clients facing a wide array of coverage disputes as well as bad faith claims. The firm has additional capabilities in class actions and appellate litigation. Its broad base of experience includes professional liability, construction, and bankruptcy-related issues. This is the third year the firm has received this recognition. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    The Drawing Changed. Did You Catch It? A Hard Lesson for Contractors About Revised Plans

    November 09, 2026 —
    Every contractor has seen it. A revised drawing hits your inbox. You open the sheet, look for the clouds, figure out what changed, and move on. But what if something changed outside the cloud? That seemingly simple question became a very expensive problem in Young Contracting/SE, Inc. v. Pitt Excavating, LLC, (Oct. 30, 2026), a recent Tennessee Court of Appeals decision involving a general contractor and its excavation subcontractor. The subcontract required Pitt to perform its work in accordance with the project drawings and specifications, “as amended from time to time.” During the project, Young sent Pitt a revised drawing. Pitt’s owner testified that his practice was to look at the clouded areas because he understood those areas to identify what had changed. He explained that he presumed the rest of the drawing remained the same. Guess what? That assumption did not work out well. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Matthew J. Devries, Buchalter
    Mr. Devries may be contacted at mdevries@buchalter.com

    Insurer’s Motion to Dismiss Bad Faith Claim Denied

    November 02, 2026 —
    The court denied the insurer’s motion to dismiss the insured’s claim for breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, but granted the motion to dismiss the claim for declaratory judgment. Jimenez v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182079 (D. Conn. Aug. 15, 2026). The insured owned a two-family property which was insured by State Farm. After a fire damaged the property, the insured submitted a claim to State Farm. The policy provided for Fair Rental Value coverage “[w]hen a loss insured causes that part of the residence premises rented to others or held for rental by you to become uninhabitable.” Before the fire, the insured alleged that he rented part of the property under an oral lease agreement. In support of his claim for Fair Rental Value, the insured alleged that he provided State Farm with bank deposit receipts demonstrating that he collected rent in cash. The insured further alleged that his rental ledger was destroyed in the fire. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Sausage-Making Often Relies on the Good Sense of the Chef Rather than the Recipe

    June 23, 2026 —
    Even for lawyers, the rules governing litigation can get complex and convoluted. Does something need to be filed? What needs to be filed? When is the deadline for filing? Simple questions with not always with straightforward answers. This was the case in R & J Sheet Metal, Inc. v. W.E. O’Neil Construction Co. of California, 111 Cal.App.5th 878 (2025), which involved sheet metal panels lost when they fell into the Port of Long Beach harbor. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com