BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    townhome construction expert witness Honolulu Hawaii parking structure expert witness Honolulu Hawaii high-rise construction expert witness Honolulu Hawaii Medical building expert witness Honolulu Hawaii Subterranean parking expert witness Honolulu Hawaii institutional building expert witness Honolulu Hawaii office building expert witness Honolulu Hawaii housing expert witness Honolulu Hawaii retail construction expert witness Honolulu Hawaii condominium expert witness Honolulu Hawaii custom home expert witness Honolulu Hawaii tract home expert witness Honolulu Hawaii low-income housing expert witness Honolulu Hawaii hospital construction expert witness Honolulu Hawaii production housing expert witness Honolulu Hawaii concrete tilt-up expert witness Honolulu Hawaii landscaping construction expert witness Honolulu Hawaii multi family housing expert witness Honolulu Hawaii mid-rise construction expert witness Honolulu Hawaii structural steel construction expert witness Honolulu Hawaii custom homes expert witness Honolulu Hawaii condominiums expert witness Honolulu Hawaii
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Honolulu, Hawaii

    Hawaii Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Contractor Repair Act 2004 SB2358 Notice to be provided by claimant no later than 90 days before filing action. Notice to be detailed and include results of any testing done. Contractor must also serve notice to subcontractors. Contractor to respond within 30 days with offer to settle without inspection or proposal to inspect. Within 30 days of inspection, claimant to provide access. Within 14 days after inspection and testing, contractor to serve written offer or rejection.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Honolulu Hawaii

    Contractors license required for general contracting and most specialty trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Building Industry Association of Hawaii
    Local # 1220
    P.O. Box 970967
    Waipahu, HI 96797
    http://www.biahawaii.org

    Maui CA Affil. W/National Associated Home Builders
    Local # 1240
    270 Hookahi St Ste 212
    Wailuku, HI 96793
    http://www.mca@maui.net

    Contractors Association of Kauai
    Local # 1250
    4231 Ahukini Rd
    Lihue, HI 96766



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Honolulu Hawaii

    Construction Contract Basics: No Damages for Delay

    Injury to Employees Endorsement Eliminates Coverage for Insured Employer

    Contract Change #8: Direct Communications between Owners and Contractors (law note)

    COVID-19 Response: Key Legal Considerations for Event Cancellations

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Just Hanging Around”

    Mendocino Hospital Nearing Completion

    Quick Tip: Don’t Indemnify for Breach of Contract

    Cooperation and Collaboration With Government May Be on the Horizon

    The Living Makes Buildings Better with Computational Design

    Wildfire Risk Harms California Home Values, San Francisco Fed Study Finds

    17 Snell & Wilmer Attorneys Ranked In The 2019 Legal Elite Edition Of Nevada Business Magazine

    11 Payne & Fears Attorneys Honored by Best Lawyers

    Robots on Construction Sites Are Raising Legal Questions

    Corps of Engineers to Prepare EIS for Permit to Construct Power Lines Over Historic James River

    Emerging Issues in Construction CGL Insurance Part 2: The Separation of Insureds and Additional Insured Interests

    Best Construction Technology Podcasts in 2025

    New York Court Grants Insured's Motion to Dismiss Construction Defect Case and Awards Fees to Insured

    Texas Case Exposes Cracks in the Government Contractor Immunity Shield

    Is There Direct Physical Loss Under A Property Policy When COVID-19 is Present?

    Spearin Doctrine 100 Years Old and Still Thriving in the Design-Build Delivery World

    From Fantasy to Fact: Cristina Andersson on Our Robotic Future

    Earth Movement Exclusion Bars Coverage

    New York State Trial Court Addresses “Trigger of Coverage” for Asbestos Claims and Other Coverage Issues

    ASCE Statement on House Failure to Pass the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act

    English v. RKK- There is Even More to the Story

    Millennium’s Englander Buys $71.3 Million Manhattan Co-Op

    Texas Supreme Court Rules That Subsequent Purchaser of Home Is Bound by Original Homeowner’s Arbitration Agreement With Builder

    Fannie-Freddie Propose Liquidity Rules for Mortgage Insurers

    Wildfire Insurance Coverage Series, Part 7: How to Successfully Prepare, Submit and Negotiate the Claim

    Eleventh Circuit Finds No Coverage for Faulty Workmanship Claims

    Newmeyer & Dillion Welcomes Three Associates to Newport Beach Office

    Plans Go High Tech

    Insurer Motion to Intervene in Underlying Case Denied

    Unfinished Building Projects Litter Miami

    Colorado Supreme Court Rules that Developers Retain Perpetual Control over Construction Defect Covenants

    Top 10 Insurance Cases of 2020

    JAMS Announces Updated Construction Rules

    Insurer Granted Summary Judgment After Insured Fails to Establish Claim is Covered

    Risk Management for Condominium Conversions

    A Landlord’s Guide to California’s New Statewide Rent Control Laws

    The Most Expensive Travel Construction Flops

    New York Court Rejects Owner’s Bid for Additional Insured Coverage

    CSLB Joint Venture Licenses – Providing Contractors With The Means To Expand Their Businesses

    COVID-19 Pandemic Preference Amendments to Bankruptcy Code Benefiting Vendors, Customers, Commercial Landlords and Tenants

    Hawaii Supreme Court Finds Climate Change Lawsuit Barred by “Pollution Exclusion”

    BWB&O is Recognized in the 2024 Edition of Best Law Firms®!

    Electronic Signatures On Contracts: Are They Truly Compliant?

    The Pandemic, Proposed Federal Privacy Regulation and the CCPA

    What is Toxic Mold Litigation?

    Nevada Budget Remains at Impasse over Construction Defect Law
    Corporate Profile

    HONOLULU HAWAII CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through more than 4500 building and claims related expert witness designations, the Honolulu, Hawaii Construction Expert Directory delivers a streamlined multi-disciplinary expert retention and support solution to legal professionals and construction practice groups seeking meaningful resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction related trial support and expert consulting services to the industry's most recognized construction attorneys, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. In connection with regional assets which comprise registered architects, professional engineers, licensed general and specialty contractors, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Honolulu region.

    Honolulu Hawaii fenestration expert witnessHonolulu Hawaii construction expertsHonolulu Hawaii engineering consultantHonolulu Hawaii consulting general contractorHonolulu Hawaii civil engineering expert witnessHonolulu Hawaii architectural engineering expert witnessHonolulu Hawaii multi family design expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Honolulu, Hawaii

    Benchmark Litigation Recognizes Andrea DeField Among Nation’s Top Young Litigators

    September 08, 2026 —
    Hunton’s insurance coverage team is proud to celebrate the recognition of Andrea DeField on Benchmark Litigation’s 2026 40 & Under List, an annual ranking that highlights the nation’s leading litigators age 40 and under. Andrea was one of only six Hunton lawyers selected and was recognized in the South region. Benchmark Litigation’s 40 & Under List honors attorneys who have distinguished themselves through significant case work, client feedback, and peer review. This honor reflects Andrea’s reputation as one of the country’s leading policyholder-side insurance recovery litigators and her standing as a trusted advisor to companies facing some of today’s most complex insurance and risk management challenges. As head of Hunton’s cyber insurance practice, Andrea has built her career helping companies manage risk and maximize insurance recovery. Her practice spans the full spectrum of insurance-related issues, from advising clients on contractual risk transfer and insurance program design to representing policyholders in high-stakes coverage and bad faith disputes. She has guided clients through some of the most complex and widely publicized losses in recent years and helps companies recover under a broad range of insurance products, including D&O, professional liability, crime, property, cyber, and general liability policies. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP

    PJM’s Reliability Backstop Procurement Proposal—Fast-Track Capacity to Meet Rising Large-Load Demand

    May 12, 2026 —
    In January, we discussed the Statement of Principles jointly signed by the National Energy Dominance Council and governors across the mid-Atlantic region—framing accelerating demand (especially from large-scale data centers) as an emergency reliability issue for PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM), the nation’s largest power grid operator. That policy signal is now becoming a near-term, accelerated procurement and contracting exercise. On April 8, 2026, PJM notified stakeholders of a critical issue fast path reliability backstop procurement process. PJM subsequently released a request for information (RFI) with respect to a proposed Reliability Backstop Procurement (RBP)—a one-time mechanism intended to attract significant new capacity to address projected reliability shortfalls driven by large-load growth. RBP compresses what is often a multiyear market and regulatory conversation into a fast-moving set of commercial choices. Developers, large loads, utilities and capital providers should be preparing now for (i) an accelerated bilateral contracting window and (ii) a standardized PJM-led backstop procurement if bilateral deals do not clear enough capacity. Reprinted courtesy of Stephen J. Humes, Pillsbury, Alicia M. McKnight, Pillsbury, Jason Drogin Atwood, Pillsbury and Andrew H. Jacobs, Pillsbury Mr. Humes may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com Ms. McKnight may be contacted at alicia.mcknight@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Atwood may be contacted at jason.atwood@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Jacobs may be contacted at andrew.jacobs@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    GRSM Attorneys Recognized in The Best Lawyers in America® 2027

    August 24, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani is pleased to announce that 183 of its attorneys were listed in The Best Lawyers in America© 2027 Edition, six of whom received “Lawyer of the Year” recognitions. Additionally, 49 GRSM attorneys were recognized in Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch 2027. Best Lawyers lists are compiled based on peer-review evaluations. For the 2027 edition of The Best Lawyers in America®, results were determined using millions of confidential attorney evaluations. Ones to Watch adopts the same peer-review methodology. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    $10.5M Settlement Ends George Washington Bridge Debris Liability Fight

    September 15, 2026 —
    A $10.5-million settlement that recently came to light has ended a six-year legal fight over whether a truck part that may have been lying on the George Washington Bridge roadway for more than 10 minutes was there long enough for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey to have found and removed it before it caused a catastrophic accident. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    Voluntary Dismissal of an Indemnity Claim Does Not Make the Subcontractor a “Prevailing Party,” Washington Court of Appeals Holds

    September 21, 2026 —
    In King County v. Walsh Construction Company II, LLC, No. 86503-0-I (Wash. Ct. App. Aug. 4, 2025), an unpublished decision from Division I of the Washington Court of Appeals, the Court affirmed the denial of a subcontractor’s request for prevailing-party attorney fees under an indemnity clause after the general contractor voluntarily dismissed its indemnity claims. Because the indemnity claim was no longer live and no determination of fault had occurred, the Court held that the trial court did not err in denying the request. ACS represented Walsh, the general contractor, in securing the denial of the fee request at the trial court that the Court of Appeals affirmed. A Pass-Through Indemnity Claim That Ended Before Fault Was Decided The dispute arose out of a public works contract under which King County hired Walsh Construction Company II, LLC (“Walsh”) to construct and install a conveyance pipeline. After the pipeline broke, King County sued Walsh for breach of contract and warranty, expressly identifying both Walsh and its subcontractor, Mears Group Inc., (“Mears”) as responsible. Walsh tendered defense and indemnity to Mears under the subcontract. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Margarita Kutsin, Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC
    Ms. Kutsin may be contacted at margarita.kutsin@acslawyers.com

    AI Data Centers Become City-Scale Infrastructure, Prompting New Industry Playbook

    August 11, 2026 —
    AI data centers are no longer just buildings. They are increasingly reaching power-demand levels more commonly associated with municipalities, prompting industry groups to launch a new framework they say is needed to keep pace with rapidly changing power, cooling and reliability requirements. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    Safeguarding Your Privileged Construction Information With a Clawback Agreement

    June 08, 2026 —
    For contractors and construction executives, a dispute that escalates to litigation brings risks that go well beyond the jobsite. When a dispute escalates to litigation, the attorney-client privilege is a critical protection to safeguard your interests. Disclosing privileged material can undermine your litigation position and, in some cases, negatively impact your business. In the construction context, this often includes sensitive communications about project delays, defect investigations, safety incidents or payment disputes—materials that can significantly impact both liability and reputation. During litigation, the discovery process requires the exchange of documents and data with your adversary. If privileged materials are disclosed to your adversary during discovery you risk the waiver of your privilege, which in plain terms means you lose the protection of the privilege and make the privileged information, and in some cases all other information related to the same subject matter, available to your adversary. It is critical that your attorney take steps to protect against the unintentional disclosure of privileged materials during discovery to avoid a waiver. Reprinted courtesy of Laura Fraher, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...
    Ms. Fraher may be contacted at lfraher@barclaydamon.com

    Two Important Points Regarding the Miller Act

    September 15, 2026 —
    A recent Miller Act case, U.S. f/u/b/o Boundless Management Outsourcing Group, LLC v. Endurance Assurance Corp, 2026 WL 2241491 (D. Puerto Rico 2026), confirms two important points when it comes to the Miller Act. In this case, a subcontractor pursued a Miller Act payment bond lawsuit more than one year after its work was finished. The subcontractor also asserted a claim against the federal government. The lawsuit was dismissed. Below are two takeaway points to consider if you are dealing with a Miller Act payment bond lawsuit. First, as it relates the claim against the federal government, the federal district court followed authority that held that the Miller Act does NOT include a waiver of sovereign immunity against the federal government. “[T]he Court does not identify any clear language in the Miller Act expressly waiving the United States or its agencies’ sovereign immunity.” Endurance Assurance Corp., supra at *3. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com