BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    condominium expert witness Hanamaulu Hawaii structural steel construction expert witness Hanamaulu Hawaii high-rise construction expert witness Hanamaulu Hawaii concrete tilt-up expert witness Hanamaulu Hawaii casino resort expert witness Hanamaulu Hawaii production housing expert witness Hanamaulu Hawaii condominiums expert witness Hanamaulu Hawaii industrial building expert witness Hanamaulu Hawaii office building expert witness Hanamaulu Hawaii mid-rise construction expert witness Hanamaulu Hawaii custom homes expert witness Hanamaulu Hawaii parking structure expert witness Hanamaulu Hawaii tract home expert witness Hanamaulu Hawaii custom home expert witness Hanamaulu Hawaii housing expert witness Hanamaulu Hawaii low-income housing expert witness Hanamaulu Hawaii Subterranean parking expert witness Hanamaulu Hawaii hospital construction expert witness Hanamaulu Hawaii retail construction expert witness Hanamaulu Hawaii institutional building expert witness Hanamaulu Hawaii multi family housing expert witness Hanamaulu Hawaii landscaping construction expert witness Hanamaulu Hawaii
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Hanamaulu, Hawaii

    Hawaii Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Contractor Repair Act 2004 SB2358 Notice to be provided by claimant no later than 90 days before filing action. Notice to be detailed and include results of any testing done. Contractor must also serve notice to subcontractors. Contractor to respond within 30 days with offer to settle without inspection or proposal to inspect. Within 30 days of inspection, claimant to provide access. Within 14 days after inspection and testing, contractor to serve written offer or rejection.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Hanamaulu Hawaii

    Contractors license required for general contracting and most specialty trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Contractors Association of Kauai
    Local # 1250
    4231 Ahukini Rd
    Lihue, HI 96766


    Building Industry Association of Hawaii
    Local # 1220
    P.O. Box 970967
    Waipahu, HI 96797
    http://www.biahawaii.org

    Maui CA Affil. W/National Associated Home Builders
    Local # 1240
    270 Hookahi St Ste 212
    Wailuku, HI 96793
    http://www.mca@maui.net


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Hanamaulu Hawaii

    Wood Wizardry in Oregon: Innovation Raises the Roof for PDX Terminal

    Round and Round: Inside the Las Vegas Sphere

    Course of Conduct Can Serve as Waiver or Modification of Parties’ Contract

    COVID-19 Response: Essential Business Operations: a High-Stakes Question Under Proliferating “Stay at Home” Orders

    Industry Practices Questioned After Girder Fractures at Salesforce Transit Center

    Brooklyn Atlantic Yards Yields Dueling Suits on Tower

    Seattle’s Tallest Tower Said Readying to Go On the Market

    You're Doing Construction in Russia, Now What?

    Construction Law Client Alert: Hirer Beware - When Exercising Control Over a Job Site’s Safety Conditions, You May be Held Directly Liable for an Independent Contractor’s Injury

    Addenda to Construction Contracts Can Be an Issue

    Judicial Panel Denies Nationwide Consolidation of COVID-19 Business Interruption Cases

    Pennsylvania Supreme Court Will Not Address Trigger for DEP Environmental Cleanup Action at This Time

    Blackstone Said in $1.7 Billion Deal to Buy Apartments

    Insurance Alert: Insurer Delay Extends Time to Repair or Replace Damaged Property

    Insured's Expert Qualified, Judgment for Coverage Affirmed

    Does Arbitration Apply to Contemporaneously Executed Contracts (When One of the Contracts Does Not Have an Arbitration Provision)?

    Ninth Circuit Affirms Dismissal Secured by Lewis Brisbois in Coverage Dispute Involving San Francisco 49ers’ Levi Stadium

    Ruling Dealing with Constructive Changes, Constructive Suspension, and the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing

    Ohio subcontractor work exception to the “your work” exclusion

    In Midst of Construction Defect Lawsuit, City Center Seeks Refinancing

    Louis "Dutch" Schotemeyer Returns to Newmeyer Dillion as Partner in Newport Beach Office

    Claim Against Broker Survives Motion to Dismiss

    Court Finds That Split in Underground Storage Tank is Not a Covered Collapse

    What Does It Mean When a House Sells for $50 Million?

    Kahana Feld Partner Noelle Natoli Named President of Women Lawyers Association of Los Angeles

    Jean Nouvel’s NYC ‘Vision Machine’ Sued Over Construction Defects

    Insured's Testimony On Expectation of Coverage Deemed Harmless

    Home Sales Topping $100 Million Smash U.S. Price Records

    IRMI Expert Commentary: Managing Insurance Coverage from Multiple Insurers

    General Release of Contractor Upheld Despite Knowledge of Construction Defects

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (4/10/24) – Hotels Integrate AI, Baby-Boomers Stay Put, and Insurance Affects Housing Market

    Court of Appeal Shines Light on Collusive Settlement Agreements

    Points on Negotiating Construction Claims

    Is Solar the Next Focus of Construction Defect Suits?

    Kahana Feld LLP Senior Attorney Rachael Marvin and Partner Dominic Donato Obtain Complete Dismissal of Plaintiff’s Labor Law Claims on Summary Judgment

    To Settle or Not Settle: Factors to Weigh and Practical Considerations

    North Carolina Weakened Its Building Codes in 2013

    Texas Enacts Landmark Restrictions on Foreign Land Ownership Under SB 17

    Sierra Pacific v. Bradbury Goes Unchallenged: Colorado’s Six-Year Statute of Repose Begins When a Subcontractor’s Scope of Work Ends

    Jury Instruction That Fails to Utilize Concurrent Cause for Property Loss is Erroneous

    Home Prices in 20 U.S. Cities Kept Climbing in January

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (06/06/23) – Housing Woes, EV Plants and the Debate over Public Financing

    Make Prudent Decisions regarding your Hurricane Irma Property Damage Claims

    Settlement Reached in Bridge Failure Lawsuit

    Construction Defects Survey Results Show that Warranty Laws Should be Strengthened for Homeowners & Condominium Associations

    Forget Fifth Graders - Are You Smarter Than a CEO?

    One Industry, One Goal: Construction Safety Week 2026

    Revisiting OSHA’s Controlling Employer Policy

    Wildfire Threats Make Utilities Uninsurable in US West

    Pollution Exclusion Found Ambiguous
    Corporate Profile

    HANAMAULU HAWAII CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through over four thousand construction, architectural, and engineering related expert designations, the Hanamaulu, Hawaii Construction Expert Directory delivers a streamlined multi-disciplinary expert retention and support solution to construction claims professionals concerned with construction defect, scheduling, and delay claims. BHA provides construction related trial support and expert consulting services to the industry's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, real estate investment trusts, risk managers, owners, as well as a variety of municipalities and government offices. Utilizing in house resources which comprise construction cost and scheduling experts, registered design professionals, forensic engineers, certified professional estimators, the firm brings regional experience and local capabilities to Hanamaulu and the surrounding areas.

    Hanamaulu Hawaii building envelope expert witnessHanamaulu Hawaii construction expert witnessHanamaulu Hawaii ada design expert witnessHanamaulu Hawaii construction cost estimating expert witnessHanamaulu Hawaii civil engineering expert witnessHanamaulu Hawaii expert witness roofingHanamaulu Hawaii roofing construction expert
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Hanamaulu, Hawaii

    Vacant Building Negates Coverage for Broken Pipe

    September 01, 2026 —
    The Michigan Court of Appeals found the insured was not covered for water damage because the commercial space was left vacant. Cherry Hill Recreation Center, Inc. v. Conifer Ins Co., 2026 Mich, App. LEXIS 5099 (Mich Ct. App. June 18, 2026). Alan Abbas purchased a bowling alley. Due to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and executive orders issued by the governor, Abbas was unable to operate the bowling center for several months. During the winter, Abbas allowed the thermostat to drop significantly, with the building expected to be around 43 degrees Fahrenheit. He later admitted the sprinkler system’s pipes were not protected against freezing. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Generic Complaint Alleging Bad Faith is Insufficient

    August 24, 2026 —
    The federal district court granted the insurer’s motion for judgment on the pleadings after determining that the insured’s claims for bad faith and unfair claims settlement practices were insufficiently pled. Navia v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111261 (W.D. N. C. May 20, 2026). The insured submitted a claim for damages to real property owned by the insured allegedly caused by Hurricane Helene. State Farm advised the insured that only some of the claimed damages were covered by the policy and payment for such damages were denied because the estimate for the covered damages did not exceed the policy’s deductible. The insured sued asserting claims for breach of contract, bad faith, and unfair claim settlement practices. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Two Important Points Regarding the Miller Act

    September 15, 2026 —
    A recent Miller Act case, U.S. f/u/b/o Boundless Management Outsourcing Group, LLC v. Endurance Assurance Corp, 2026 WL 2241491 (D. Puerto Rico 2026), confirms two important points when it comes to the Miller Act. In this case, a subcontractor pursued a Miller Act payment bond lawsuit more than one year after its work was finished. The subcontractor also asserted a claim against the federal government. The lawsuit was dismissed. Below are two takeaway points to consider if you are dealing with a Miller Act payment bond lawsuit. First, as it relates the claim against the federal government, the federal district court followed authority that held that the Miller Act does NOT include a waiver of sovereign immunity against the federal government. “[T]he Court does not identify any clear language in the Miller Act expressly waiving the United States or its agencies’ sovereign immunity.” Endurance Assurance Corp., supra at *3. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Southwest Super Lawyers Recognizes 50 Snell & Wilmer Attorneys in 2026 Rankings

    June 15, 2026 —
    PHOENIX (April 22, 2026) – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that 50 attorneys in the Phoenix and Tucson offices have been selected for inclusion in the 2026 Southwest Super Lawyers publication. Of those 50, four were recognized for the first time and 24 were recognized as Southwest Rising Stars. Super Lawyers is a listing of lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement. The selection process is multi-phased and includes independent research, peer nominations, and peer evaluations. Super Lawyers was first published in 1991 by Law & Politics and was acquired by Thomson Reuters, Legal in February 2010. Thomson Reuters is a leading source of information for businesses and professionals. The below Snell & Wilmer attorneys have been selected for inclusion in the 2026 Southwest Super Lawyers rankings. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer

    GRSM Trial Team Holds Alameda County Asbestos Verdict to $900,000 Against $50 Million Demand

    July 27, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Partners John Katerndahl and Vincent Gunter recently obtained an outstanding trial result for a manufacturer of asbestos-containing electrical cable, holding a jury verdict to $900,000 against a $50 million demand following an eight-week trial in Alameda County Superior Court, which is among the most challenging asbestos venues in the country. The GRSM team also included Associate Brandon Sanchez, on-site trial Paralegal Laura Vitanova, and Paralegal Kerrie Lease. The plaintiffs, the surviving spouse and four children of a former painter who died of mesothelioma, alleged that the decedent was exposed to asbestos from the company’s electrical cable during construction of a California nuclear power facility. GRSM’s client was the sole remaining defendant at trial. The plaintiffs asked the jury for $50 million and called 15 witnesses across their case-in-chief and rebuttal. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Oracle's $16B Michigan Data Center Secures Financing as Power Contracts Face Appeals

    June 08, 2026 —
    A $16 billion hyperscale data center under construction outside Ann Arbor, Mich., has secured financing backed by Blackstone and other institutional investors, even as the project's power supply agreements now face a legal challenge before the Michigan Court of Appeals. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    Nevada’s Mandatory Nonbinding Arbitration Law for Civil Cases is Going Through Changes

    May 14, 2026 —
    Nevada currently operates an expedited litigation program designed to resolve civil disputes with a value up to $50,000 without incurring the “usual” expense of litigating these disputes. Over time, however, the number of civil cases that have been “exempted” from this program based on the claimed damages exceeding $50,000 has grown dramatically. In response, the Nevada Legislature recently enacted a number of rule changes designed to streamline Nevada’s arbitration process and include more cases. Among these changes are increasing the arbitration “cap” from $50,000 to $100,000. By way of background, the Nevada’s Court Annexed Arbitration program is a mandatory, non-binding program for civil cases in judicial districts that have county populations of 100,000 or more [1]. Nevada’s Court Annexed Arbitration was born out of NRS 38.250, which was enacted in 1991 and went into effect in the summer of 1992. The newly enacted NRS 38.250 was regarded as a way to address the problem of increased court caseloads while promoting judicial economy and efficiency in civil cases having a probable jury award of less than $25,000 [2]. Initially, cases that were automatically exempt from the program included class actions, medical malpractice disputes, divorce proceedings, and other domestic relations matters [3]. Reprinted courtesy of Brandon Wright, Lewis Brisbois and Manuel Gurule, Lewis Brisbois Mr. Wright may be contacted at Brandon.Wright@lewisbrisbois.com Mr. Gurule may be contacted at Manuel.Gurule@lewisbrisbois.com Read the full story...

    21 Snell & Wilmer Attorneys Named Lawyers of the Year by Best Lawyers® for 2027

    October 12, 2026 —
    PHOENIX – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that 21 of the firm’s attorneys, located across eight offices, have been named 2027 Lawyers of the Year by Best Lawyers®. In conjunction with selection to the 2027 edition of The Best Lawyers in America® guide, the “Lawyer of the Year” recognition is awarded to individual lawyers with the highest overall peer-feedback for a specific practice area and geographic region. Only one lawyer is recognized for each practice area and location. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer