BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    high-rise construction expert witness Kilauea Hawaii mid-rise construction expert witness Kilauea Hawaii casino resort expert witness Kilauea Hawaii condominiums expert witness Kilauea Hawaii industrial building expert witness Kilauea Hawaii institutional building expert witness Kilauea Hawaii multi family housing expert witness Kilauea Hawaii production housing expert witness Kilauea Hawaii retail construction expert witness Kilauea Hawaii custom homes expert witness Kilauea Hawaii parking structure expert witness Kilauea Hawaii Subterranean parking expert witness Kilauea Hawaii housing expert witness Kilauea Hawaii landscaping construction expert witness Kilauea Hawaii custom home expert witness Kilauea Hawaii concrete tilt-up expert witness Kilauea Hawaii low-income housing expert witness Kilauea Hawaii office building expert witness Kilauea Hawaii Medical building expert witness Kilauea Hawaii condominium expert witness Kilauea Hawaii townhome construction expert witness Kilauea Hawaii structural steel construction expert witness Kilauea Hawaii
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Kilauea, Hawaii

    Hawaii Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Contractor Repair Act 2004 SB2358 Notice to be provided by claimant no later than 90 days before filing action. Notice to be detailed and include results of any testing done. Contractor must also serve notice to subcontractors. Contractor to respond within 30 days with offer to settle without inspection or proposal to inspect. Within 30 days of inspection, claimant to provide access. Within 14 days after inspection and testing, contractor to serve written offer or rejection.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Kilauea Hawaii

    Contractors license required for general contracting and most specialty trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Contractors Association of Kauai
    Local # 1250
    4231 Ahukini Rd
    Lihue, HI 96766


    Building Industry Association of Hawaii
    Local # 1220
    P.O. Box 970967
    Waipahu, HI 96797
    http://www.biahawaii.org

    Maui CA Affil. W/National Associated Home Builders
    Local # 1240
    270 Hookahi St Ste 212
    Wailuku, HI 96793
    http://www.mca@maui.net


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Kilauea Hawaii

    Florida trigger

    New Case Alert: Oregon Supreme Court Prohibits Insurer’s Attempt to Relitigate Insured’s Liability

    Iconic Seattle Center Arena Roof the Only Piece to Stay in $900-Million Rebuild

    Understand and Define Key Substantive Contract Provisions

    ASCE Statement On House Passage Of The Precip Act

    Alabama Supreme Court States Faulty Workmanship can be an Occurrence

    Remand of Bad Faith Claim Evidences Split Among Florida District Courts

    Firm Pays $8.4M to Settle Hurricane Restoration Contract Case

    Privileged Communications With a Testifying Client/Expert

    Contractors and Owners Will Have an Easier Time Identifying Regulated Wetlands Following Recent U.S. Supreme Court Opinion

    Tetra Tech-U.S. Cleanup Dispute in San Francisco Grows

    Quick Note: If You Want to Recover Attorney’s Fees In a Contractual Dispute, Include a Prevailing Party Attorney’s Fees Provision

    Construction Estimation: From Manual Takeoff to the AI Future

    Contractual “Pay if Paid” and “Pay when Paid” Clauses? What is a California Construction Subcontractor to Do?

    One More Mechanic’s Lien Number- the Number 30

    Japan Quake Triggers Landslides, Knocks Power Plant Offline

    Investigators Eye Fiber Optic Work in Deadly Wisconsin Explosion

    You Can Now Build a Multi-Million Dollar Home via Your iPad

    California’s Skilled and Trained Workforce Requirements: Public Works and AB 3018, What You Need to Know

    Economist Predicts Housing Starts to Rise in 2014

    White and Williams Announces Lawyer Promotions

    Let the 90-Day Countdown Begin

    Increasing Use of Construction Job Cameras

    Homeowner's Mold Claim Denied Due to Spoilation

    Investigation of Orange County Landslide

    URGENT: 'Catching Some Hell': Hurricane Michael Slams Into Florida

    Not All Warranty E-Mails Are Notices of Claim

    Contractual Waiver of Consequential Damages

    Nevada’s Construction Defect Law

    Pillsbury Insights – Navigating the Real Estate Market During COVID-19

    California Attempts to Tackle Housing Affordability Crisis

    Real Estate & Construction News Round-Up (12/07/22) – Home Sales, EV Charging Infrastructure, and Office Occupancy

    Hilti Partners with Canvas, a Construction Robotics Company

    Business Interruption Claim Granted in Part, Denied in Part

    A Primer on Suspension and Debarment for Federal Construction Projects

    Six-Month Prison Term for Role in HOA Scam

    Construction Injuries Under the Privette Doctrine. An Electrifying, but Perhaps Not Particularly Shocking, Story . . .

    Biden’s Buy American Policy & What it Means for Contractors

    Official Tried to Influence Judge against Shortchanged Subcontractor

    White and Williams Defeats Policyholder’s Attempt to Invalidate Asbestos Exclusions

    Insurer Ordered to Participate in Appraisal

    Wildfire Is Efficient Proximate Cause of Moisture Reaching Expansive Soils Under Residence

    Why 8 Out of 9 Californians Don't Buy Earthquake Insurance

    Athens, Ohio, Sues to Recover Nearly $722,000 After Cyber Attack

    Insurer's Attempt to Limit Additional Insured Status Fails

    Be Wary of Construction Defects when Joining a Community Association

    Caltrans Reviewing Airspace Program in Aftermath of I-10 Fire

    Safer Schools Rendered Unsafe Due to Construction Defects

    Bay Area Counties Issue Less Restrictive “Shelter in Place” Orders, Including for Construction

    Tax Increase Pumps $52 Billion Into California Construction
    Corporate Profile

    KILAUEA HAWAII CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Drawing from more than 4500 construction related expert witness designations, the Kilauea, Hawaii Construction Expert Directory delivers a wide range of trial support and consulting services to builders and construction claims professionals concerned with construction defect, scheduling, and delay matters. BHA provides building related trial support and expert services to the building industry's most recognized companies, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, risk managers, and a variety of municipalities. Utilizing in house assets which comprise building envelope experts, forensic architects, professional engineers, credentialed construction standard of care consultants, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Kilauea and the surrounding areas.

    Kilauea Hawaii expert witness roofingKilauea Hawaii structural engineering expert witnessesKilauea Hawaii expert witnesses fenestrationKilauea Hawaii construction project management expert witnessKilauea Hawaii expert witness structural engineerKilauea Hawaii construction safety expertKilauea Hawaii building code expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Kilauea, Hawaii

    World's Longest Immersed Tunnel Passes Milestone, But Faces Delays

    August 03, 2026 —
    Work on the $8-billion Fehmarnbelt Tunnel, which is planned to link Germany and Denmark as the world’s longest immersed tunnel, is progressing as crews achieved a milestone last month with the successful immersion of its first precast concrete element. But Danish state-owned project owner Femern A/S says the plan is now running at least two years behind schedule and the tunnel’s road and rail portions will open in two separate stages. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of James Leggate, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Leggate may be contacted at leggatej@enr.com

    GRSM Trial Team Holds Alameda County Asbestos Verdict to $900,000 Against $50 Million Demand

    July 27, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Partners John Katerndahl and Vincent Gunter recently obtained an outstanding trial result for a manufacturer of asbestos-containing electrical cable, holding a jury verdict to $900,000 against a $50 million demand following an eight-week trial in Alameda County Superior Court, which is among the most challenging asbestos venues in the country. The GRSM team also included Associate Brandon Sanchez, on-site trial Paralegal Laura Vitanova, and Paralegal Kerrie Lease. The plaintiffs, the surviving spouse and four children of a former painter who died of mesothelioma, alleged that the decedent was exposed to asbestos from the company’s electrical cable during construction of a California nuclear power facility. GRSM’s client was the sole remaining defendant at trial. The plaintiffs asked the jury for $50 million and called 15 witnesses across their case-in-chief and rebuttal. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    FERC Issues Show-Cause Orders: Impacts on California and Other Regional Power Markets

    July 13, 2026 —
    At an open meeting on June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued show-cause orders under Section 206 of the Federal Power Act to the six FERC-jurisdictional RTOs/ISOs—PJM Interconnection, ISO New England, Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Southwest Power Pool, New York Independent System Operator and California Independent System Operator—along with their transmission owners (TOs), directing each region and the TOs to justify or revise tariff provisions governing how data centers and other large loads connect to and receive transmission service from the grid. These show-cause orders will impact several power markets across the country, including California. Reprinted courtesy of Stephen J. Humes, Pillsbury, Alicia M. McKnight, Pillsbury and Jason Drogin Atwood, Pillsbury Mr. Humes may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com Ms. McKnight may be contacted at alicia.mcknight@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Atwood may be contacted at jason.atwood@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Risk Reset: Concerns Top of Mind for Top Construction Law Firms

    September 28, 2026 —
    In the summer of 2025, contractors were consumed by one major issue: tariffs. Owners, builders and suppliers were trying to understand how shifting trade policy would affect bid pricing and ongoing projects. While those concerns have eased after a Supreme Court ruling, some of the industry’s top legal experts—all of whom practice at some of CE’s Top 50 Construction Law Firms—point to a different set of worries that are keeping their clients up at night and keeping their offices busy. Inflation is not fading away, creating continued price challenges. Artificial intelligence is moving at a breakneck pace, offering potential time-saving benefits paired with major liability concerns. The federal government continues to make surprising policy changes, and contractors remain focused on managing financial risk across increasingly complex projects. Reprinted courtesy of David McMillin, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Are “Financial Hardship” Damages Recoverable?

    June 08, 2026 —
    In a case out of the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, F.O.G., LLC v. Department of the Interior, CBCA 8203, 2026 WL 1191881 (CBCA 2026) a contractor claimed damages that included “financial hardship” damages due to slow payments. The financial hardship damages included personal damages to the contractor’s president and his wife. Are these damages recoverable? Drumroll…The Board ruled that the contractor cannot recover such financial hardship damages. As it relates the personal financial hardship damages, the Board ruled, “Neither [the contractor’s] president nor his wife are a party to this contract, are in privity of contract with [the government], or are the beneficiaries under this contract. [The contractor], therefore, cannot recover for any losses that either one has suffered individually and that [the contractor] claimed in this appeal.” F.O.G., LLC, supra. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Defend Now, Allocate Later? An Unresolved Tension in Colorado Construction Law

    August 16, 2026 —
    For decades, Colorado law has recognized an important distinction between the duty to defend and the duty to indemnify. The former ordinarily arises at the beginning of litigation; the latter generally cannot be determined until the underlying liability is known. That distinction makes intuitive sense. A defense that becomes due only after litigation concludes is not much of a defense. But Colorado’s construction anti-indemnity statute, C.R.S. § 13-21-111.5(6), raises an interesting question about how that familiar rule operates in construction disputes. The statute expressly regulates contractual obligations not only to indemnify, but also to insure and defend, and it reflects a legislative policy that construction businesses should bear financial responsibility for their own negligence. Those principles have developed along separate tracks. At some point, a Colorado appellate court may have to decide precisely how they fit together. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David McLain, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Mr. McLain may be contacted at mclain@hhmrlaw.com

    OC Streetcar Project Mediation Sets $50M Payment to Walsh

    July 20, 2026 —
    Walsh Construction told a California state court judge last month that lawsuit mediation of its claims on an Orange County light-rail project—known as OC Streetcar—had produced a settlement of some claims under which the county agreed to pay the contractor almost an additional $50 million. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com

    Predict Risk, Not Incidents: A New Analytics Framework for Your Construction Safety Data

    August 03, 2026 —
    Behind every “zero-incidents” company report, hidden hazards may already be accumulating—risks that could become serious injuries tomorrow. The question every executive should be asking is not, “Did anything go wrong last month?” It is: “Where is risk building on my projects right now?” Most construction organizations cannot answer that question. Not because the data does not exist—it does. Every active project generates daily inspection findings, labor records, near-miss reports and audit results. The problem is that standard safety systems collect this data and then report it in ways that make it operationally useless for prevention. They describe the past. They predict nothing. The predictive safety analytics framework (PSAF) is a practical, deployable system developed from years of applying data science to large-scale construction portfolio operations that takes the safety data construction organizations already collect and transforms it into a forward-looking risk signal. The result? A single weekly score that tells executives where risk is concentrating across their portfolio before anyone gets hurt. Reprinted courtesy of Tabrez Zahoor, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...