BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    institutional building expert witness Lowman Idaho townhome construction expert witness Lowman Idaho high-rise construction expert witness Lowman Idaho tract home expert witness Lowman Idaho custom homes expert witness Lowman Idaho Subterranean parking expert witness Lowman Idaho retail construction expert witness Lowman Idaho Medical building expert witness Lowman Idaho low-income housing expert witness Lowman Idaho condominium expert witness Lowman Idaho parking structure expert witness Lowman Idaho industrial building expert witness Lowman Idaho multi family housing expert witness Lowman Idaho concrete tilt-up expert witness Lowman Idaho housing expert witness Lowman Idaho custom home expert witness Lowman Idaho hospital construction expert witness Lowman Idaho mid-rise construction expert witness Lowman Idaho condominiums expert witness Lowman Idaho production housing expert witness Lowman Idaho landscaping construction expert witness Lowman Idaho office building expert witness Lowman Idaho
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Lowman, Idaho

    Idaho Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB133; title 6 increases builder liability by creating responsibility for attorney fees if the homeowner/HOA prevails; places stringent demands on builder to comply with statutes and repair/compromise/settle; compliance protects against liability for resultant personal property damage; NOR is triggered by any construction defect in a new or substantially remodeled dwelling; Owner must notice "professional"; pro must respond within 21 days; claimant must accept/reject within 30 days; or if the pro inspects, he must provide offer or statement within 14 days and claimant must accept/reject within 30 days; law appears, by definition, to impose same timelines on builder pro in cross-complaining


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Lowman Idaho

    License required for electrical, plumbing, pesticide, manufactured housing, landscape architecture, and asbestos removal. No state license for general contracting.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Upper Valley Building Contractors Association
    Local # 1335
    310 North 2nd East Ste 143
    Rexburg, ID 83440
    http://www.uvbca.com

    Building Contractors Association of SW Idaho
    Local # 1325
    6206 N Discovery Way Ste A
    Boise, ID 83713
    http://www.bcaswi.org

    Idaho State Home Builders Association
    Local # 1300
    6206 N Discovery Way Ste A
    Boise, ID 83713
    http://www.ibca.org

    Building Contractors Association of Wood River Valley
    Local # 1395
    PO Box 2721
    Hailey, ID 83333


    Snake River Valley Building Contractors Association
    Local # 1375
    1123 12 Ave S
    Nampa, ID 83651
    http://www.srvbca.com

    Eastern Idaho Builders Association
    Local # 1340
    PO Box 1782
    Idaho Falls, ID 83403
    http://www.eihba.org

    Salmon River Builders Association
    Local # 1350
    PO Box 25
    Carmen, ID 83462
    http://www.salmonbuilders.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Lowman Idaho

    Wilke Fleury Attorneys Featured in “The Best Lawyers in America” & “Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch” 2025 Editions

    Schools Remain Top Priority in Carolinas as Cleanup From Storms Continues

    Proposition 65: OEHHA to Consider Adding and Delisting Certain Chemicals of Concern

    Hamptons Home Up for Foreclosure That May Set Record

    Not All Work is Covered Under the Federal Miller Act

    Thoughts on New Pay if Paid Legislation

    Four Kahana Feld Attorneys Selected to 2026 Southern California Super Lawyers List

    Insured’s Counsel Sanctioned for Filing Pleading with No Legal or Factual Justification

    Don’t Ignore Prejudgment Interest

    SNC-Lavalin’s Former Head of Construction Pleads Guilty to Bribery, Money Laundering

    OPINION: Stop Requiring Exhibit Lists!

    U.S. Judge Says Wal-Mart Must Face Mexican-Bribe Claims

    Recommendations for Property Owners After A Hurricane: Submit a Claim

    Connecticut Crumbling Concrete Cases Not Covered Under "Collapse" Provision in Homeowner's Policy

    Creative Avenue for Judgment Creditor to Collect a Judgment

    Public Contract Code 9204 – A New Mandatory Claims Process for Contractors and Subcontractors – and a Possible Trap for the Unwary

    Construction Contract Terms Matter. Be Careful When You Draft Them.

    CGL Insurer’s Duty To Defend Broader Than Duty To Indemnify And Based On Allegations In Underlying Complaint

    Kahana Feld Opens New Office in Sacramento, Adding Key Litigator and Expanding Northern California Footprint

    Home Construction Slows in Las Vegas

    ASCE Statement on House Passage of the Water Resources Development Act of 2024

    Expert Excluded After Never Viewing Damaged Property

    Oregon Duty to Defend Triggered by Potential Timing of Damage

    Nevada Judge says Class Analysis Not Needed in Construction Defect Case

    Poor Record Keeping = Going to the Poor House (or, why project documentation matters)

    The “Colorado American Dream Act:” H.B. 25-1272’s Construction Defect Reforms

    Western Specialty Contractors Branches in San Francisco and Cleveland Take Home Top Industry Honors

    Maryland Enacts Climate-Cost Study Over Veto, New Jersey Advances Climate Superfund Proposal as Earlier State Laws Face Ongoing Court Challenges

    Coverage Found For Cleanup of Superfund Site Despite Pollution Exclusion

    No Coverage for Additional Insured After Completion of Operations

    Water Alone is Not Property Damage under a CGL policy in Connecticut

    Ohio Court of Appeals Affirms Judgment in Landis v. Fannin Builders

    New York Appellate Court Holds Insurers May Suffer Consequences of Delayed Payment of Energy Company Property and Business Interruption Claims

    Top 10 Lessons Learned from a Construction Attorney

    Haight’s San Diego Office is Growing with the Addition of New Attorneys

    Miorelli Doctrine’s Sovereign Immunity in Public Construction Contracts — Not the Be-All and End-All

    Little Known Florida Venue Statue Benefitting Resident Contractors

    Sales of Existing U.S. Homes Decrease on Fewer Investors

    Ex-Construction Firm That Bought a $75m Michelangelo to Delist

    Allegations in Insured’s Complaint Sufficient to Survive Motion to Dismiss

    Buyer Alleges Condo Full of Mold and Mice

    NYC Design Firm Executives Plead Guilty in Pay-to-Play Scheme

    Defend Now, Allocate Later? An Unresolved Tension in Colorado Construction Law

    Virginia Chinese Drywall “property damage” caused by an “occurrence” and number of “occurrences”

    Stay of Coverage Case Appropriate While Court Determines Arbitrability of Dispute

    Effectively Managing Project Closeout: It Ends Where It Begins

    COVID-19 Business Interruption Lawsuits Begin: Iconic Oceana Grill in New Orleans Files Insurance Coverage Lawsuit

    Homebuilding on the Rise in Nation’s Capitol

    More on the VCPA and Construction

    Proving & Defending Lost Profit Damages
    Corporate Profile

    LOWMAN IDAHO CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    With over four thousand construction defect and claims related expert designations, the Lowman, Idaho Construction Expert Directory provides a single point of reference for construction defect and claims related support to attorneys and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction claims evaluation, testimony, and support services to the industry's most recognized construction attorneys, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing in house resources which include building envelope experts, forensic architects, professional engineers, credentialed construction standard of care consultants, the firm brings regional experience and flexible capabilities to the Lowman construction industry.

    Lowman Idaho slope failure expert witnessLowman Idaho expert witness concrete failureLowman Idaho construction expert witnessesLowman Idaho expert witness commercial buildingsLowman Idaho testifying construction expert witnessLowman Idaho construction expertsLowman Idaho construction code expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Lowman, Idaho

    Hidden Risks Behind Today’s Stadium Construction Boom

    July 20, 2026 —
    After a decade-plus lull, professional sports leagues, universities and municipalities are once again spending heavily on new stadiums and major renovations. In the NFL alone, multiple marquee projects are underway or planned, representing more than $10 billion in facilities and mixed-use entertainment districts, rivaling or exceeding the scale of development during the last stadium-build cycle of the early 2000s. Beneath the excitement of architectural ambition and civic pride lies a risk landscape that has fundamentally changed since the last wave of stadium construction. Teams, cities and contractors that rely on outdated assumptions may find themselves exposed to cost overruns, schedule delays and liabilities that are far more difficult to unwind once construction is underway. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Los Angeles Times Ranks Lewis Brisbois Third Largest Firm in LA County, Largest for Litigation

    June 08, 2026 —
    The Los Angeles Times has ranked Lewis Brisbois the third largest firm in LA County by attorney headcount, and first for number of litigation attorneys. Lewis Brisbois, whose Los Angeles office is led by Co-Managing Partners Jana I. Lubert and Kathleen Walker, has 273 attorneys working in LA County, including 167 partners. The firm ranked No. 1 for Litigation in the county, with 206 attorneys under the leadership of Partner Craig Holden. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    We Won’t Permit That Excuse!

    June 23, 2026 —
    A Texas appellate court recently ruled that a building permit wasn’t a condition precedent for a construction project. That caught our attention. Can you build a commercial project without a permit? But as we read the case, we see the court’s reasoning. And it reminds us of an important legal principle that should inform our contract drafting and negotiation. The case was a civil suit brought by the project owner against its tenant improvement contractor for work on a medical spa. The owner claimed that the contractor didn’t perform the work properly and didn’t finish construction. The contractor argued that delays and problems were caused by the owner, alleging numerous failures, including the owner’s failure to secure a building permit. Reprinted courtesy of Curt Martin, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Richard Eiszner, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Martin may be contacted at cmartin@pecklaw.com Mr. Eiszner may be contacted at reiszner@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (7/15/26) – The World Cup’s Effect on Commercial Real Estate, Megadeals Lift CRE Sales and Algorithmic Pricing Lawsuits Continue

    July 27, 2026 —
    In our latest roundup, DOT earmarks $1.73B in BUILD grants, federal housing bill becomes law, data center surge cools off, and more!
    • Data center planning cooled off month over month from “extraordinary levels” to start the summer, while other areas of construction finally picked up a little steam. (Sebastian Obando, Construction Dive)
    • The U.S. Department of Transportation announced $1.73 billion in 2026 BUILD grants covering 127 projects across 50 states, Washington, D.C., American Samoa, Guam and Puerto Rico. (Joe Bousquin, Construction Dive)
    • As algorithmic pricing lawsuits continue to play out around the country, more apartment owners and managers have settled. (Julie Strupp, Multifamily Dive)
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team

    Perennial Question, Perennial Answer? EPA and Army Corps Propose Year-Round Standard for WOTUS that Could Reshape Clean Water Act Jurisdiction

    October 12, 2026 —
    Federal Clean Water Act jurisdiction may be about to get considerably narrower. On September 4, 2026, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) announced a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking that would limit federal authority over streams and wetlands to those containing water year-round—a “perennial” standard that would go beyond even what the Supreme Court required in Sackett v. EPA, 598 U.S. 651 (2023). The supplemental notice offers two options for revising the definition of “waters of the United States” (WOTUS) under the Clean Water Act (CWA): One would define “relatively permanent” waters as perennial, and the other would require perennial surface water to establish a wetland’s continuous surface connection to a jurisdictional water. If adopted, either option would substantially reduce the number of streams, wetlands and other water features subject to federal permitting, with the sharpest effects in arid and semi-arid regions where rainfall patterns leave many waterways dry for portions of the year. Reprinted courtesy of Ashleigh K. Myers, Pillsbury and Jillian Marullo, Pillsbury Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Marullo may be contacted at jillian.marullo@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Lost in Translation: AEC Tech’s Missing Role

    May 12, 2026 —
    I once visited a construction site where the contractor’s headquarters had commissioned a tech company to build an on-site quality-inspection application. The developer had admitted to the site engineer that they had never set foot on a construction site before. The engineer showed me what he was actually using: his own phone camera and an Excel sheet. The new app did not map to how work actually happened on site. This is not an isolated story. The vendor builds something technically coherent but operationally disconnected. The client, somewhere up the chain, had fallen in love with the idea of the solution before anyone had built an honest business case for it. The result is a tool that gets demonstrated at a board meeting but isn’t used in the field. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    The Grenfell & Champlain Towers: Risk Management Considerations in the Wake of Catastrophic Loss — A UK/US Comparison

    June 02, 2026 —
    1. Introduction As part of the multinational collaborative relationship between Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. and Fenchurch Law, we continually find ourselves in conversations about the sometimes subtle but sometimes drastic differences between risk management and coverage considerations from one country to the next. These differences are often highlighted by the fallout from large catastrophic losses that are widely publicized and illuminate sometimes widespread risks and perils that many others may be facing in the coming years. The response of governments and their subdivisions to the needs of victims and/or commercial parties, and insurance markets’ evaluation of and reactions to catastrophic losses vary widely from country to country and jurisdiction. In this article, we discuss these responses and reactions in the cases of the Grenfell Tower Fire in London, England, and the Champlain Tower collapse in Surfside, Florida, within the United States. These two widely publicized losses involved different risk management and insurance considerations based on where they occurred. They also saw substantially different government responses and raised varied questions about what the next steps are for their respective commercial and insurance markets. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Eric M. Clarkson, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.
    Mr. Clarkson may be contacted at EClarkson@sdvlaw.com

    Snell & Wilmer’s Orange County Office Recognized as One of the “Best Places to Work” by the Orange County Business Journal

    August 16, 2026 —
    ORANGE COUNTY – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that its Orange County office has been selected as one of the 2026 “Best Places to Work in Orange County” by the Orange County Business Journal. This recognition honors outstanding employers that foster exceptional workplace cultures and demonstrate a strong commitment to employee engagement, professional development, and organizational excellence. The annual awards recognize Orange County employers that create positive workplace environments and set the standard for employee satisfaction and organizational success. Honorees are selected through a comprehensive evaluation process that includes confidential employee surveys and an independent assessment of company policies, practices, philosophy, systems, and demographics. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer