BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    concrete tilt-up expert witness Atlanta Indiana production housing expert witness Atlanta Indiana condominium expert witness Atlanta Indiana office building expert witness Atlanta Indiana tract home expert witness Atlanta Indiana mid-rise construction expert witness Atlanta Indiana townhome construction expert witness Atlanta Indiana retail construction expert witness Atlanta Indiana casino resort expert witness Atlanta Indiana condominiums expert witness Atlanta Indiana landscaping construction expert witness Atlanta Indiana multi family housing expert witness Atlanta Indiana custom home expert witness Atlanta Indiana hospital construction expert witness Atlanta Indiana Subterranean parking expert witness Atlanta Indiana low-income housing expert witness Atlanta Indiana Medical building expert witness Atlanta Indiana parking structure expert witness Atlanta Indiana structural steel construction expert witness Atlanta Indiana high-rise construction expert witness Atlanta Indiana institutional building expert witness Atlanta Indiana custom homes expert witness Atlanta Indiana
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Atlanta, Indiana

    Indiana Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: According to SB45160, §IC 32-27-3-1&2 a claimant must provide written notice 60 days before filing an action. Within 21 days after service of the notice, the construction professional must serve a written response. Claimant must file list of known construction defects, description, and the construction professional responsible for each alleged defect (to the extent known).


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Atlanta Indiana

    License required for plumbing. All other licensing is done at the local county level.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    East Central Indiana Builders Association Inc
    Local # 1556
    PO Box 1072
    Muncie, IN 47308


    Builders Association of Greater Lafayette
    Local # 1548
    PO Box 5795
    Lafayette, IN 47903
    http://www.bagl.info

    Henry County Chapter
    Local # 1598
    PO Box 925
    New Castle, IN 47362


    Home Builders Association of Howard County Inc
    Local # 1532
    PO Box 1187
    Kokomo, IN 46903
    http://www.hbahowardco.com

    Wayne County Builders Association
    Local # 1570
    PO Box 1591
    Richmond, IN 47375
    http://www.wcbaonline.com

    Indiana Builders Association
    Local # 1500
    101 W Ohio St Ste 1111
    Indianapolis, IN 46204
    http://www.buildindiana.org

    Builders Association of Greater Indianapolis
    Local # 1544
    PO Box 44670
    Indianapolis, IN 46244
    http://www.bagi.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Atlanta Indiana

    Oregon to Add 258,000 Jobs by 2022, State Data Shows

    ¡AI Caramba!

    Home Sales Going to Investors in Daytona Beach Area

    Coping with Labor & Install Issues in Green Building

    Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC Recognized Among The Top 50 Construction Law FirmsTM of 2023 by Construction Executive

    Newmeyer & Dillion Welcomes Three Associates to Newport Beach Office

    Changes to Comprehensive Insurance Disclosure Act in New York Introduced

    As Natural Gas Expands in Gulf, Residents Fear Rising Damage

    Chambers USA 2025 Recognizes Four Partners and Three Practices at Lewis Brisbois

    General Contractors Have Expansive Common Law and Statutory Duties To Provide a Safe Workplace

    Narrow House Has Wide Opposition

    In South Carolina, Insurer's Denial of Liability Does Not Waive Attorney-Client Privilege for Bad Faith Claim

    California Supreme Court Raises the Bar on Dangerous Conditions on Public Property Claims

    Peckar & Abramson Once Again Recognized Among Construction Executive’s “Top 50 Construction Law Firms™”

    Ball Janik LLP Elevates Construction Litigation Attorneys Keegan A. Berry and Nicholas B. Vargo to Partner

    2019’s Biggest Labor and Employment Moves Affecting Construction

    Sacramento Water Works Recognized as a Historic Civil Engineering Landmark

    Mexico’s Construction Industry Posts First Expansion Since 2012

    Lessee Deemed Statutory Employer, Immune from Tort Liability by Pennsylvania Court

    ASCE Statement on Devastating Impacts of Hurricane Helene

    Cold Weather Causes Power Blackouts, Disruptions on Jobsites

    Blackstone to Buy Cosmopolitan Resort for $1.73 Billion

    Connecticut Gets Medieval All Over Construction Defects

    How Machine Learning Can Help with Urban Development

    Extreme Flooding Overwhelms New York Roadways, Killing 1 Person

    Risk Transfer: The Souffle of Construction Litigation

    Anchoring Abuse: Evolution & Eradication

    Foreclosing Junior Lienholders and Recording A Lis Pendens

    Newmeyer Dillion Announces Partner John Van Vlear Named to Board Of Groundwater Resources Association Of California

    Benchmark Litigation Recognizes Multiple Snell & Wilmer Offices and Attorneys in 2026 Rankings

    Quick Note: Discretion in Determining Prevailing Party for Purposes of Attorney’s Fees

    Insurer’s Attempt to Shift Cost of Defense to Another Insurer Found Void as to Public Policy

    LA Blazes Bolster Case for Wildfire-Tech Investment, VC Clerico Says

    Coverage Denied for Faulty Blasting and Improper Fill

    Motion to Strike Insurer's Expert Opinion Granted

    Insurer Not Required to Show Prejudice from an Insured’s Late Notice When the Parties Contract for a Specific Reporting Period

    Always Keep Your Time Limits in Mind—to Know When You Can Sue, and When You Can No Longer Be Sued (Law Note)

    Want to Stay Up on Your Mechanic’s Lien Deadlines? Write a Letter or Two

    How to Protect the High-Tech Home

    Insurer Must Cover Construction Defects Claims under Actual Injury Rule

    Harmon Tower Case Settled Prior to Start of Trial

    Health Officials Concerned About Lead-Tainted Dust Created by Detroit Home Demolitions

    WSHB Ranked 4th Most Diverse Law Firm in U.S.

    Bad Faith in the First Party Insurance Context

    Pre-Covid Construction Contracts Unworkable as Costs Surge, Webuild Says

    Three Firm Members Are Top 100 Super Lawyers & Ten Are Recognized As Super Lawyers Or Rising Stars In 2018

    Delay Leads to Problems with Construction Defects

    'You're Talking About Lives': The New Nissan Stadium

    Year in Review: Top Insurance Cases of 2024

    Cliff White Expands Insurance Litigation Team at Payne & Fears
    Corporate Profile

    ATLANTA INDIANA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through more than 4500 construction related expert witness designations, the Atlanta, Indiana Construction Expert Directory delivers a superior construction and design expert support solution to construction claims professionals seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides building related trial support and expert consulting services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, real estate investment trusts, risk managers, owners, as well as a variety of municipalities and government offices. In connection with regional assets which comprise construction delay claims experts, registered design professionals, professional engineers, and credentailed construction consultants, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Atlanta and the surrounding areas.

    Atlanta Indiana civil engineer expert witnessAtlanta Indiana building expertAtlanta Indiana window expert witnessAtlanta Indiana building code expert witnessAtlanta Indiana expert witness roofingAtlanta Indiana consulting architect expert witnessAtlanta Indiana construction expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Atlanta, Indiana

    California Poised for the Most Significant Residential Construction Defect Reforms in Decades

    September 01, 2026 —
    The California Legislature is considering legislation that would dramatically alter the landscape of residential construction defect litigation. Assembly Bill 1903, currently pending before the Senate Judiciary Committee, proposes extensive amendments to California's Right to Repair Act (Civil Code sections 895-945.5) that would substantially strengthen procedural protections for builders while narrowing the scope of recoverable construction defect claims. If enacted, the legislation would affect virtually every stage of a construction defect dispute- from the initial notice of claim through litigation and settlement- and would introduce an entirely new certification process for newly constructed condominium projects. This article details some of the most significant proposed changes. Higher Burden for Construction Defect Plaintiffs Perhaps the most consequential change is the bill's modification of the proof required to establish liability. current law generally requires a claimant to demonstrate the residence fails to satisfy one of the statutory performance standards established under the Right to Repair Act. AB1903 would instead require claimants to establish three separate elements:
    • A violation of an applicable statutory performance standard;
    • The violation caused appreciable, present, non-speculative physical damage to another building component; and
    • The violation resulted from the original construction.
    Reprinted courtesy of Thomas D. Fama, Wood Smith Henning Berman and Andrew J. Mallon, Wood Smith Henning Berman Mr. Fama may be contacted at tfama@wshblaw.com Mr. Mallon may be contacted at amallon@wshblaw.com Read the full story...

    Samuel Alhadeff Represents LGI Homes in Acquisition and Re-Entitlement of Maravilla Estates

    July 06, 2026 —
    Temecula Partner Samuel Alhadeff recently represented LGI Homes in its acquisition and re-entitlement of Maravilla Estates, a 169-lot active adult community located in San Jacinto, California. The acquisition and re-entitlement of the project provide LGI Homes with the opportunity to deliver much-needed age-qualified housing in one of Riverside County's growing residential markets. The community includes a recorded final map and finished lots, as well as future development inventory and planned amenities, positioning the project for continued development and completion. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    GRSM Team Obtains Defense Verdict for Homeowners’ Association in Orange County Superior Court

    July 20, 2026 —
    A Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani multi-state team, including Partners Christine Barker, Sean Ferron, and Keith Cramer, obtained a defense verdict on behalf of a homeowners’ association (HOA) in an Orange County Superior Court bench trial spanning two months. The case began in 2022 when a homeowner sued after the Architectural Review Committee and HOA Board of Directors declined his teardown-and-rebuild plans due to view and aesthetic concerns. After a motion for summary judgment ruling in which the court found that the existing covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) did not protect views, the HOA held a special election to add explicit view protections to the CC&Rs. At the February 2025 trial call, the plaintiff sought leave to file a third amended complaint challenging the validity of that vote, drastically reframing the case from CC&R enforcement to one of election validity. A second plaintiff then filed a parallel action toward the end of the limitations period, and the two cases were consolidated. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Ahlers Cressman & Sleight leads in recognized Construction Litigation Attorneys

    September 01, 2026 —
    Ahlers Cressman & Sleight is pleased to announce its leading recognition in the 2026 Washington Super Lawyers magazine. With ten members named, ACS has more recognized Construction Litigation attorneys than any other firm on the 2026 Washington Super Lawyers list, compared to three at the next closest firm. Two ACS members were also recognized on the 2026 Washington Rising Stars list. Super Lawyers selects these recognized lawyers by using a patented multiphase selection process. First, lawyers enter the candidate pool by being nominated by their peers or by being identified by managing partner surveys, third-party feedback, or the Super Lawyersresearch team. Next, Super Lawyersconducts an independently researched evaluation using twelve indicators of professional achievement and peer recognition: verdicts/settlements, transactions, representative clients, experience, honors/awards, special licenses/certifications, position within a law firm, bar and/or professional activity, pro bono and community service, scholarly lectures/writings, education/employment background, and other outstanding achievements. Then, candidates with the highest point totals serve on a Blue Ribbon panel, evaluating other candidates within their primary practice area. Finally, only 5% of attorneys are selected for the Super Lawyers list, and 2.5% of attorneys are selected for the Rising Stars list. More information about the Super Lawyers Selection Process can be found here. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC

    Italian Court Convicts 32 in Morandi Bridge Collapse Case

    August 25, 2026 —
    Former Autostrade per l'Italia CEO Giovanni Castellucci was sentenced to 12 years in prison July 16 after an Italian court handed down the first criminal verdicts stemming from the 2018 Morandi Bridge collapse in Genoa that killed 43 people. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    Defend Now, Allocate Later? An Unresolved Tension in Colorado Construction Law

    August 16, 2026 —
    For decades, Colorado law has recognized an important distinction between the duty to defend and the duty to indemnify. The former ordinarily arises at the beginning of litigation; the latter generally cannot be determined until the underlying liability is known. That distinction makes intuitive sense. A defense that becomes due only after litigation concludes is not much of a defense. But Colorado’s construction anti-indemnity statute, C.R.S. § 13-21-111.5(6), raises an interesting question about how that familiar rule operates in construction disputes. The statute expressly regulates contractual obligations not only to indemnify, but also to insure and defend, and it reflects a legislative policy that construction businesses should bear financial responsibility for their own negligence. Those principles have developed along separate tracks. At some point, a Colorado appellate court may have to decide precisely how they fit together. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David McLain, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Mr. McLain may be contacted at mclain@hhmrlaw.com

    Voluntary Dismissal of an Indemnity Claim Does Not Make the Subcontractor a “Prevailing Party,” Washington Court of Appeals Holds

    September 21, 2026 —
    In King County v. Walsh Construction Company II, LLC, No. 86503-0-I (Wash. Ct. App. Aug. 4, 2025), an unpublished decision from Division I of the Washington Court of Appeals, the Court affirmed the denial of a subcontractor’s request for prevailing-party attorney fees under an indemnity clause after the general contractor voluntarily dismissed its indemnity claims. Because the indemnity claim was no longer live and no determination of fault had occurred, the Court held that the trial court did not err in denying the request. ACS represented Walsh, the general contractor, in securing the denial of the fee request at the trial court that the Court of Appeals affirmed. A Pass-Through Indemnity Claim That Ended Before Fault Was Decided The dispute arose out of a public works contract under which King County hired Walsh Construction Company II, LLC (“Walsh”) to construct and install a conveyance pipeline. After the pipeline broke, King County sued Walsh for breach of contract and warranty, expressly identifying both Walsh and its subcontractor, Mears Group Inc., (“Mears”) as responsible. Walsh tendered defense and indemnity to Mears under the subcontract. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Margarita Kutsin, Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC
    Ms. Kutsin may be contacted at margarita.kutsin@acslawyers.com

    Builders Risk/Construction All Risks and Delay in Start-Up Coverage for Large Energy Projects: Protecting Revenue Before Operations Begin

    September 21, 2026 —
    The Most Significant Loss May Be the Delay, Not the Damage Power and energy projects are uniquely vulnerable to losses during construction. Whether the project involves a utility-scale solar facility, battery storage installation, a wind farm, transmission project, LNG terminal, or conventional generation facility, loss events in this sector often have consequences far more impactful than the actual cost of repairing damaged property. Any number of construction losses can delay commercial operation of the facility by months, triggering lost revenues, financing impacts, contractual penalties, and investor concerns. In many cases, those delay-related losses significantly exceed the underlying repair costs. Construction All Risk (“CAR”) insurance and Delay in Start-Up (“DSU”) coverage are designed to respond to these exposures. However, recovering delay-related losses is far more complicated than many insureds anticipate, particularly when projects involve international stakeholders, global supply chains, and London market insurance placements. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Will Bennett, SDV Fenchurch
    Mr. Bennett may be contacted at will.bennett@sdvfenchurch.us