BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    tract home expert witness Bennington Indiana townhome construction expert witness Bennington Indiana office building expert witness Bennington Indiana custom homes expert witness Bennington Indiana housing expert witness Bennington Indiana landscaping construction expert witness Bennington Indiana structural steel construction expert witness Bennington Indiana institutional building expert witness Bennington Indiana parking structure expert witness Bennington Indiana industrial building expert witness Bennington Indiana custom home expert witness Bennington Indiana condominium expert witness Bennington Indiana Medical building expert witness Bennington Indiana condominiums expert witness Bennington Indiana Subterranean parking expert witness Bennington Indiana production housing expert witness Bennington Indiana concrete tilt-up expert witness Bennington Indiana high-rise construction expert witness Bennington Indiana multi family housing expert witness Bennington Indiana low-income housing expert witness Bennington Indiana retail construction expert witness Bennington Indiana mid-rise construction expert witness Bennington Indiana
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Bennington, Indiana

    Indiana Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: According to SB45160, §IC 32-27-3-1&2 a claimant must provide written notice 60 days before filing an action. Within 21 days after service of the notice, the construction professional must serve a written response. Claimant must file list of known construction defects, description, and the construction professional responsible for each alleged defect (to the extent known).


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Bennington Indiana

    License required for plumbing. All other licensing is done at the local county level.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Lawrence County Chapter
    Local # 1535
    201 Main Street c/o Hoosier Door
    Oolitic, IN 47451


    Dearborn Co Home Builders Association
    Local # 1522
    PO Box 21
    Aurora, IN 47001


    River Valley Chapter of National Associated Home Builders
    Local # 1576
    PO Box 365
    Hanover, IN 47243


    Monroe County Building Association
    Local # 1508
    3901 E Hagan St Ste H
    Bloomington, IN 47401
    http://www.mcbaindiana.org

    Vincennes Area Chapter
    Local # 1563
    PO Box 531
    Vincennes, IN 47591


    Jackson-Jennings Builders Association
    Local # 1574
    11990 W Mt Healthy Rd
    Columbus, IN 47201
    http://www.jjba.org

    Builders Association of Dubois County
    Local # 1511
    1813 S A St
    Jasper, IN 47546
    http://www.dcbuilder.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Bennington Indiana

    Unpaid Subcontractor Walks Off the Job and Wins

    Architect Plans to 3D-Print a Two-Story House

    Las Vegas Harmon Hotel to be Demolished without Opening

    Water Bond Would Authorize $7.5 Billion for California Water Supply Infrastructure Projects

    Indemnity Provision Prevails Over "Other Insurance" Clause

    What You Need to Know About Notices of Completion, Cessation and Non-Responsibility

    Visual Construction Diaries – Interview with Jeff Sassinsky of Fovea Aero

    Feds Outline Workforce Rules for $39B in Chip Plant Funding

    Curtain Wall Suppliers Claim Rival Duplicated Unique System

    New Jersey’s Governor Puts Construction Firms on Formal Notice of His Focus on Misclassification of Workers as Independent Contractors

    Thank You for Year 19 of Legal Elite

    Plaza Construction Negotiating Pay Settlement for Florida Ritz-Carlton Renovation

    Relief Bill's Highway Funds Could Help Construction Projects

    Don’t Waive Your Right to Arbitrate (Unless You Want To!)

    Nevada Supreme Court Rejects Class Action Status, Reducing Homes from 1000 to 71

    De-escalating The Impact of Price Escalation

    Include Materials Price Escalation Clauses in Construction Clauses

    Brown and Caldwell Team with AECOM for Landmark Pure Water Southern California Program

    Home Building Up in Kansas City

    With VA Mechanic’s Liens Sometimes “Substantial Compliance” is Enough (but don’t count on it)

    Evaluating Construction Trends From 2023 and Forecasting For 2024

    Reminder: Just Being Incorporated Isn’t Enough

    Sinking S.F. Tower Prompts More Lawsuits

    Appeals Court Affirms Civil Engineer Owes No Duty of Care to General Contractor

    Coping With The New Cap And Trade Law

    California’s Fair Payment Act: What Every Owner, Developer, and Contractor Should Know About SB 440

    A Guide to Evaluating Snow & Ice Cases

    Segal McCambridge Recognized in 2026 Chambers USA Rankings

    Legal Risks of Green Building

    Damron Agreement Questioned in Colorado Casualty Insurance v Safety Control Company, et al.

    Homebuilders Are Fighting Green Building. Homeowners Will Pay.

    Behavioral Science Meets Construction: Insights from Whistle Rewards

    Arizona Is Smart About Water. It Should Stay That Way.

    White and Williams Announces Lawyer Promotions

    Appraisal Ordered After Carrier Finds Loss Even if Cause Disputed

    Jinx: Third Circuit Rules in Favor of Teamsters in Withdrawal Case

    BHA has a Nice Swing: Firm Supports CDCCF Charity at 2014 WCC Seminar

    Real Estate & Construction News Round-Up (08/24/22) – Local Law 97, Clean Energy, and IRA Tax Credits

    Legal 500 US Ranks Hunton’s Insurance Coverage Team Among Top Policyholder Practices in 2026 Guide

    Chinese Millionaire Roils Brokers Over Shrinking Mansion

    Lewis Brisbois Partner and National Trial Team Member Ian B. Lane Elected President of ABOTA’s Southern New York Chapter

    2021 California Construction Law Update

    Civil Engineers: Montana's Infrastructure Grade Declines to a 'C-'

    Termination of Construction Contracts

    Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s Ruling On Certificates Of Merit And “Gist Of Action” May Make It More Difficult For An Architect Or Engineer To Seek An Early Dismissal

    New York Restaurant and Bar Fire Caused by Electric Defect

    Waiver Of Arbitration by Not Submitting Claim to Initial Decision Maker…Really!

    Toll Brothers Report End of Year Results

    Construction Termination Issues for the Architect and Engineer: Part 1– Introduction to the Series

    A Year After Fatal Genoa Viaduct Collapse, Replacement Takes Shape
    Corporate Profile

    BENNINGTON INDIANA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    With over 4500 construction, architectural, and engineering related expert designations, the Bennington, Indiana Construction Expert Directory delivers a superior construction and design expert support solution to attorneys and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction related litigation support and expert witness services to the building industry's most recognizable companies, insurers, risk managers, and a variety of municipalities. In connection with regional assets which comprise construction cost and scheduling experts, registered design professionals, forensic engineers, certified professional estimators, the firm brings a wealth of experience and local capabilities to Bennington and the surrounding areas.

    Bennington Indiana building envelope expert witnessBennington Indiana expert witness structural engineerBennington Indiana construction expert witness consultantBennington Indiana soil failure expert witnessBennington Indiana expert witness commercial buildingsBennington Indiana structural concrete expertBennington Indiana architecture expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Bennington, Indiana

    David Samani Joins BHBA Podcast on Mediation Best Practices

    May 05, 2026 —
    Los Angeles Partner David Samani recently joined a Beverly Hills Bar Association (BHBA) podcast titled, “Mediation 360: Preparation from the Defense, Plaintiff, and Mediator Perspectives,” during which he shared his insights on various aspects of the mediation process. Mr. Samani, along with a plaintiff’s attorney and a mediator, presented their thoughts on topics including how to determine whether a case is appropriate for mediation, preparing to mediate a case, communicating with clients, and handling the mediation itself. Mr. Samani explained that early communication with clients is critical so that attorneys may learn what a client’s objectives are and develop an assessment of the case. He described that “from an early stage,” attorneys should determine the cost of litigation and ensure that the client understands “what an aggressive defense might entail.” As the matter progresses, attorneys and clients should “continue the dialogue” regarding costs as well as the strengths and weaknesses of the case, “making sure the client is apprised of the various alternatives that exist.” In addition, Mr. Samani discussed factors to consider when choosing a mediator, noting, “All mediators have their own styles and backgrounds.” He explained that some cases may call for a mediator with specialized knowledge in a particular area such as bankruptcy or securities, while other mediations may benefit from a mediator who understands the realities of private practice. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC Recognized by Best Lawyers 2027

    September 28, 2026 —
    Continuing the trend from last year, Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC is excited to announce that thirteen members of our firm have received recognition from Best Lawyers® in America for 2027. The Best Lawyers in America® has been an annual publication since 1983 and focuses on the top legal talent across the United States and the globe. Through its rankings, Best Lawyers® provides a comprehensive guide to legal representation for individuals and businesses alike. Over time, Best Lawyers® has been recognized as one of the leading publications for attorney achievements and references. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC

    GRSM Ranked Among Texas’ 50 Largest Law Firms by Texas Lawyer

    August 03, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani has been recognized byTexas Lawyer in its 2026 Texas 100 ranking, earning the No. 49 spot among the state’s largest law firms by attorney headcount. The annual report spotlights the continued strength of Texas’ legal market, with firms across the state collectively increasing lawyer headcount by 2% in 2025. “Texas continues to be one of the country’s most thriving legal and business markets, and we are proud to be recognized among the state’s largest law firms,” said Laura De Santos, Regional Oversight Partner for Texas. “Our continued growth shows the confidence our clients place in us, the exceptional talent of our attorneys, and our commitment to delivering seamless, high-quality legal services throughout Texas and across our 50-state platform.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Practice Earns Prestigious Band One Ranking in the Chambers USA 2026 Guide

    June 22, 2026 —
    White and Williams LLP's Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Practice Group is pleased to share that it has received a Band One ranking in the Chambers USA 2026 Guide for Insurance, Pennsylvania. Additionally, Patricia B. Santelle, Chair Emeritus, Randy Maniloff, Partner, and Robert Walsh, Partner have all been individually ranked on the Chambers USA 2026 Guide in Insurance in Pennsylvania. The Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Practice's consistent focus on their clients and handling of complex claims were just two of the attributes contributing to their elite Band One ranking, after 11 years on the Chambers USA list. When asked about their experience working with White and Williams’ Pennsylvania Insurance Practice, one client stated, “What distinguishes White and Williams is the high level of service and accountability. The team is responsive, organized and reliable, which allows our internal teams to move quickly and make informed decisions with confidence.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of White and Williams LLP

    Consider The Limited Warranty from Your Homebuilder

    July 06, 2026 —
    When purchasing a home from a homebuilder, there is an important consideration when it comes to the limited warranty you receive around the time you close on the home. That limited warranty likely includes an arbitration provision requiring you to arbitrate your disputes, such as construction defect claims, against the homebuilder. That arbitration provision will most likely include all claims, including statutory claims (such as a statutory violation of a building code claim), requiring you to arbitrate, as opposed to litigate, your disputes against the homebuilder. This is an important consideration. If the arbitration provision does not allow you to arbitrate all of your claims, and eliminates your rights to legitimate statutory claims, the arbitration provision could be unenforceable. By way of example, in a residential construction defect dispute, Anderson v. Taylor Morrison of Florida, Inc., 223 So.3d 1088 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017), the appeal turned on whether the arbitration provision in the homebuilder’s limited warranty was valid. The homeowners took possession of their home in 2009. In 2015, the homeowners served a Florida Statutes Chapter 558 notice of construction defects that included a statutory violation of a building code claim under Florida Statute §553.84. The limited warranty included an arbitration provision that specified it was the “exclusive remedy” for all disputes arising out of or related to the warranty or issues with the home and property. When read together with the warranty’s disclaimer that precluded claims not covered by the warranty “whether in contract, tort, or otherwise,” the statutory building code violation claim could not be remedied through arbitration because it fell outside the warranty’s coverage. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    $356 Million Judgement Against Developer for Defective Construction of DC Condominium

    August 16, 2026 —
    On July 31, 2026, the Superior Court of the District of Columbia entered a $356,085,513.00 judgment against developers JBG Smith for defective construction and renovation of the Wardman Tower Residential Condominium in Washington, D.C. The case is Wardman Tower Residential Condominium Unit Owners Association v. JBG Smith Properties, et al., No. 2020 CA 004807 B (D.C. Super. Ct.). In a 148-page Trial Order, the D.C. Superior Court awarded $118,695,171.00 in damages in favor of the condominium association and against the condominium developers, including JBG Smith. The Court trebled those damages pursuant to the District of Columbia Consumer Protection Procedures Act (“CPPA”) to reach an ultimate judgment of $356,085,513.00. See Cowie Law Group: DC Condominium Construction Defects: Recovering Attorney’s Fees, Litigation Expenses & Treble Damages Under the Consumer Protection Procedures Act. Cowie Law Group, P.C. filed the lawsuit on behalf of the Association in 2020. The firm represented the Association throughout years of pretrial discovery and ultimately served as trial counsel with Williams & Connolly LLP during a lengthy bench trial before the Honorable Yvonne Williams. The Cowie Law Group team included attorneys, George A. Bealefeld, III, Albert G. McCarraher, Stanford L. Kimmel, III and Nicholas D. Cowie. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Nicholas D. Cowie, Cowie Law Group
    Mr. Cowie may be contacted at ndc@cowielawgroup.com

    PJM’s Reliability Backstop Procurement Proposal—Fast-Track Capacity to Meet Rising Large-Load Demand

    May 12, 2026 —
    In January, we discussed the Statement of Principles jointly signed by the National Energy Dominance Council and governors across the mid-Atlantic region—framing accelerating demand (especially from large-scale data centers) as an emergency reliability issue for PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM), the nation’s largest power grid operator. That policy signal is now becoming a near-term, accelerated procurement and contracting exercise. On April 8, 2026, PJM notified stakeholders of a critical issue fast path reliability backstop procurement process. PJM subsequently released a request for information (RFI) with respect to a proposed Reliability Backstop Procurement (RBP)—a one-time mechanism intended to attract significant new capacity to address projected reliability shortfalls driven by large-load growth. RBP compresses what is often a multiyear market and regulatory conversation into a fast-moving set of commercial choices. Developers, large loads, utilities and capital providers should be preparing now for (i) an accelerated bilateral contracting window and (ii) a standardized PJM-led backstop procurement if bilateral deals do not clear enough capacity. Reprinted courtesy of Stephen J. Humes, Pillsbury, Alicia M. McKnight, Pillsbury, Jason Drogin Atwood, Pillsbury and Andrew H. Jacobs, Pillsbury Mr. Humes may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com Ms. McKnight may be contacted at alicia.mcknight@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Atwood may be contacted at jason.atwood@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Jacobs may be contacted at andrew.jacobs@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Construction Robotics Works Where Variation Ends

    August 11, 2026 —
    BuiltWorlds published its 2026 Robotics Top 50 this summer, and the list is genuinely wide. Fifty solutions across nine categories, from 3D printing and prefabricated component manufacturing to earthmoving, demolition, material transport, layout, installation, inspection, and drilling. The honorees come from sixteen countries. It looks like robotics has finally spread across the whole project lifecycle. However, having vendors in nine categories does not mean that contractors are robotizing their work en masse. Zacua Ventures, in its 2026 construction robotics report, estimates that on-site robotics accounted for less than 0.03% of global construction spending in 2025. Zacua says: “That is not a failed market. It is a market at the beginning of an adoption S-curve”, while warning that its estimates rest on private vendor data and may be high if vendors overstate how widely their machines are deployed. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi