BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    hospital construction expert witness Greenwood Indiana casino resort expert witness Greenwood Indiana retail construction expert witness Greenwood Indiana Subterranean parking expert witness Greenwood Indiana production housing expert witness Greenwood Indiana industrial building expert witness Greenwood Indiana custom homes expert witness Greenwood Indiana condominium expert witness Greenwood Indiana tract home expert witness Greenwood Indiana multi family housing expert witness Greenwood Indiana structural steel construction expert witness Greenwood Indiana low-income housing expert witness Greenwood Indiana condominiums expert witness Greenwood Indiana Medical building expert witness Greenwood Indiana landscaping construction expert witness Greenwood Indiana townhome construction expert witness Greenwood Indiana custom home expert witness Greenwood Indiana concrete tilt-up expert witness Greenwood Indiana institutional building expert witness Greenwood Indiana mid-rise construction expert witness Greenwood Indiana high-rise construction expert witness Greenwood Indiana parking structure expert witness Greenwood Indiana
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Greenwood, Indiana

    Indiana Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: According to SB45160, §IC 32-27-3-1&2 a claimant must provide written notice 60 days before filing an action. Within 21 days after service of the notice, the construction professional must serve a written response. Claimant must file list of known construction defects, description, and the construction professional responsible for each alleged defect (to the extent known).


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Greenwood Indiana

    License required for plumbing. All other licensing is done at the local county level.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Madison County Chapter
    Local # 1504
    853 E. Southern Avenue
    Indianapolis, IN 46203


    Builders Association of Greater Indianapolis
    Local # 1544
    PO Box 44670
    Indianapolis, IN 46244
    http://www.bagi.com

    Indiana Builders Association
    Local # 1500
    101 W Ohio St Ste 1111
    Indianapolis, IN 46204
    http://www.buildindiana.org

    Wayne County Builders Association
    Local # 1570
    PO Box 1591
    Richmond, IN 47375
    http://www.wcbaonline.com

    Home Builders Association of Gtr Terre Haute
    Local # 1582
    2747 Sidenbender Rd
    Terre Haute, IN 47802
    http://www.hbaterrehaute.com

    Southeastern Indiana chapter
    Local # 1536
    394 W County Road 400 N
    Greensburg, IN 47240


    Henry County Chapter
    Local # 1598
    PO Box 925
    New Castle, IN 47362



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Greenwood Indiana

    Governmental Immunity Waived for Independent Contractor - Lopez v. City of Grand Junction

    The 2023 Term of the Supreme Court: Administrative and Regulatory Law Rulings

    The Indemnification Limitation in Section 725.06 does not apply to Utility Horizontal-Type Projects

    MTA’S New Debarment Powers Pose an Existential Risk

    Wake County Justice Center- a LEED Silver Project done right!

    DoD Will Require New Cybersecurity Standards in 2020: Could Other Agencies Be Next?

    Construction Costs Must Be Reasonable

    Three lawyers from Haight were recognized in The Best Lawyers in America© 2020 Edition

    The Business of Engineering: An Interview with Matthew Loos

    Certificates as Evidence of Additional Insured Coverage Are All the Rage, But You Deserve Better

    Update: Supreme Court Issues Opinion in West Virginia v. EPA

    Contractors: Consult Your Insurance Broker Regarding Your CGL Policy

    A Couple of Mechanic’s Lien Bills in VA [UPDATED]

    Brenda Radmacher to Speak at Construction Super Conference 2024

    The Non-Imputation Affidavit in Real Estate Title Insurance

    Unpaid Subcontractor Walks Off the Job and Wins

    Oregon Duty to Defend Triggered by Potential Timing of Damage

    Wichita Condo Association Files Construction Defect Lawsuit

    2019 California Construction Law Update

    Florida District Court Finds That “Unrelated” Design Errors Sufficient to Trigger “Related Claims” Provision in Architects & Engineers Policy

    Some Insurers Dismissed, Others Are Not in Claims for Faulty Workmanship

    Your Construction Contract

    GRSM Named Among 2025 “Best Law Firms” by Best Lawyers

    Someone Who Hires an Independent Contractor May Still Be Liable, But Not in This Case

    Legislation Update: S-865 Public-Private Partnerships in New Jersey Passed by Both Houses-Awaiting Governor’s Signature

    China Construction Bank Sued in US Over Reinsurance Fraud Losses

    Court Narrowly Interprets “Faulty Workmanship” Provision

    Treble Damages Awarded After Insurer Denies Coverage for Collapse

    Bad Welds Doom Art Installation at Central Park

    NY Court Holds Excess Liability Coverage Could Never be Triggered Where Employers’ Liability Policy Provided Unlimited Insurance Coverage

    Giant Floating Solar Flowers Offer Hope for Coal-Addicted Korea

    Was Jury Right in Negligent Construction Case?

    McGraw Hill to Sell off Construction-Data Unit

    Important Insurance Alert for Out-of-State Contractors Assisting in Florida Recovery Efforts!

    Chinese Lead $92 Billion of U.S. Home Sales to Foreigners

    Want More Transit (and Federal Funding)? Build Housing That Supports It

    Best Practices: Commercial Lockouts in Arizona

    The Final Frontier Opens Up New Business Opportunities for Private Contractors

    CDJ’s #4 Topic of the Year: KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc. v. The Superior Court of Los Angeles County

    Congratulations to Partner Madeline Arcellana on Her Selection as a Top Rank Attorney in Nevada!

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (1/16/24) – Algorithms Affect the Rental Market, Robots Aim to Lower Construction Costs, and Gen Z Struggle to Find Their Own Space

    10 Year Anniversary – Congratulations Greg Podolak

    “Based On”… What Exactly? NJ Appellate Division Examines Phrase and Estops Insurer From Disclaiming Coverage for 20-Month Delay

    Florida extends the Distressed Condominium Relief Act

    Just Decided – New Jersey Supreme Court: Insurers Can Look To Extrinsic Evidence To Deny a Defense

    Buy Clean California Act Takes Effect on July 1, 2022

    Insured's Jury Verdict Reversed After Improper Trial Tactics

    Minimum Wage on Federal Construction Projects is $10.10

    FAA Seeks Largest Fine Yet on Drones in Near-Miss Crackdown

    OSHA’s COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Standard Is in Flux
    Corporate Profile

    GREENWOOD INDIANA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    With over four thousand general contracting and design related expert designations, the Greenwood, Indiana Construction Expert Directory offers a wide range of trial support and construction consulting services to lawyers and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction claims investigation, testimony, and support services to the construction industry's leading builders and developers, legal professionals, and owners, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies. In connection with in house assets which include construction delay claims experts, registered design professionals, professional engineers, and credentailed construction consultants, the firm brings a wealth of experience and local capabilities to Greenwood and the surrounding areas.

    Greenwood Indiana fenestration expert witnessGreenwood Indiana construction safety expertGreenwood Indiana soil failure expert witnessGreenwood Indiana construction defect expert witnessGreenwood Indiana engineering expert witnessGreenwood Indiana consulting general contractorGreenwood Indiana construction expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Greenwood, Indiana

    The “Pay When Paid” Clause in California Construction—Strategies as the Battle Continues

    August 03, 2026 —
    It is well known in California Construction circles that the “Pay If Paid” clause is illegal in this state. There is a great distinction, though, between this clause and a similar clause, known as a “Pay When Paid” clause. A pay if paid clause allows a contractor to tell a subcontractor that if the contractor is unpaid for the subcontractor’s work, then the contractor has no legal obligation to pay the subcontractor, ever. For a great variety of reasons, the California Supreme Court, in the case of Wm. R. Clarke Corp v. Safeco Ins. Co. of America (1997) 15 Cal.4th 882, declared this type of clause illegal in California Construction. Although the pay if paid clause is illegal in California, the pay when paid clause is still perfectly legal and is found in many subcontracts that contractors issue to their subcontractors. The pay when paid clause allows a contractor to delay paying its subcontractors until the dispute between the contractor and the property owner over payment has been resolved and the contractor is paid by the property owner. Although seemingly reasonable (since it merely delays payment until the contractor is paid by the owner, thereby providing a funding source to pay subcontractors), significant problems still arise. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of William L. Porter, Porter Law Group
    Mr. Porter may be contacted at bporter@porterlaw.com

    Appeals Court Upholds Skanska, Granite Win in ‘I-4 Ultimate’ JV Dispute

    June 15, 2026 —
    A federal appeals court has upheld a lower court’s decision requiring The Lane Construction Corp. to pay roughly $79 million in damages, plus interest, to joint venture partners Skanska USA Civil Southeast and Granite Construction for work on Florida’s I-4 Ultimate highway megaproject in Orlando, which was completed in 2022. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    New Executive Order Prohibits Federal Contractors from Engaging in DEI Through Employment and Procurement Activities

    April 27, 2026 —
    On March 26, 2026, President Trump signed Executive Order 14398, entitled Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors, requiring federal agencies to add contractual language in all federal contracts prohibiting contractors and subcontractors from engaging in any racially discriminatory DEI activities, as defined by the Executive Order (EO). While this EO includes language similar to prior DEI-related orders, it introduces a significant expansion in enforcement by subjecting non-compliant contractors to liability under the False Claims Act (FCA), including exposure to whistleblower actions and qui tam litigation. A qui tam claim is a civil action by a private individual on behalf of the government alleging fraud against federal programs and seeking to recover damages. The new EO states that involvement in any racially discriminatory DEI activities is not only unethical and illegal, but also deemed fraudulent against federal programs because it is material to the government’s payment decisions. The definition of DEI activities here matters, as this EO expands a contractor’s obligations beyond the management of its employment policies and includes prohibitions against funding or expending time or resources on DEI activities and contracting with subcontractors, vendors, or suppliers utilizing DEI programs. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Laura De Santos, Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani
    Ms. De Santos may be contacted at ldesantos@grsm.com

    Construction Robotics Works Where Variation Ends

    August 11, 2026 —
    BuiltWorlds published its 2026 Robotics Top 50 this summer, and the list is genuinely wide. Fifty solutions across nine categories, from 3D printing and prefabricated component manufacturing to earthmoving, demolition, material transport, layout, installation, inspection, and drilling. The honorees come from sixteen countries. It looks like robotics has finally spread across the whole project lifecycle. However, having vendors in nine categories does not mean that contractors are robotizing their work en masse. Zacua Ventures, in its 2026 construction robotics report, estimates that on-site robotics accounted for less than 0.03% of global construction spending in 2025. Zacua says: “That is not a failed market. It is a market at the beginning of an adoption S-curve”, while warning that its estimates rest on private vendor data and may be high if vendors overstate how widely their machines are deployed. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    What Is the Independent Tort Doctrine? New Case Explains…

    August 24, 2026 —
    Florida’s Sixth District Court of Appeals in Atout v. HHM Land Trust Dated October 29, 2013, 51 Fla.L.Weekly D1569a (Fla. 6th DCA 2026) recently included an extensive discussion on Florida’s independent tort doctrine. The independent tort doctrine is an important legal doctrine, particularly when parties are in contractual privity. This doctrine stands for the proposition that tort claims must be independent of any breach of contract. See Atout, supra. The Sixth District’s extensive discussion analyzed the indicators to determine this “independence,” which may arise from the source of the duty, the asserted conduct, the damages sought, or even public policy: Unlike claims that rely on contractual relationships, an “independent” tort is often characterized by a duty imposed by law rather than by agreement. As to this consideration, United States District Court Judge Steven Merryday has explained that the independent tort doctrine honors the same divide as the economic loss rule, but rather than looking at the nature of the loss, it focuses on the source of the duty allegedly breached. “If a contract imposes a duty, and the defendant breaches that duty, the plaintiff must sue for breach of contract. If society imposes the duty, the plaintiff must sue in tort.” Following this reasoning, courts should consider whether the alleged breach of a duty in tort coincides or overlaps with a duty imposed by a contract. If the duty at issue is within the scope of a contract, and the relationship of the parties that led to the creation of that duty stems from a contract, then that duty’s source is from contract and any alleged tort claims based on a breach of those duties may not be “independent.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    ACEC Supports BUILD America 250 Act as Important First Step on Surface Reauthorization

    May 26, 2026 —
    WASHINGTON -- The American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC), the business voice of America’s engineering and design services industry released the following statement on the BUILD America 250 Act: "Chairman Graves and Ranking Member Larsen have taken an important bipartisan step toward reauthorizing the federal surface transportation programs that are critical to economic growth in every state. The BUILD America 250 Act provides five years of stability in funding road and transit projects, raises new revenues to address the solvency of the Highway Trust Fund, and includes meaningful provisions to strengthen project delivery, advance digital infrastructure, and improve the contracting framework that engineering firms rely on every day. ACEC will continue to advocate for investment levels that keep pace with the country's growing infrastructure needs, and we urge the Committee to keep this process moving forward." The American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC) is the business association of America’s engineering industry, representing more than 5,500 independent engineering firms and more than 650,000 professionals throughout the United States engaged in the development of America’s transportation, water, and energy infrastructure, along with environmental, industrial, and other public and private facilities. Founded in 1906 and headquartered in Washington, D.C., ACEC is a national federation of 51 state and regional organizations.

    How Engineers Will Determine Why NYC's Pfizer HQ Conversion Buckled

    July 13, 2026 —
    Construction crews have stabilized the former Pfizer headquarters redevelopment in Midtown Manhattan after two load-bearing structural columns buckled on the 21st floor July 7. The focus has now shifted from emergency response to determining what caused the office-to-residential conversion to suffer a major structural failure. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    Chambers USA Recognizes GRSM as 2026 Industry Leader

    June 29, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani has once again been recognized by Chambers USA, a prestigious directory of the country’s top law firms. In addition to the firm’s practice recognitions, eight partners, David Capell, Nancy Erfle, Matthew Foy, Ashlee Grant, Craig Heryford, Andrew Port, Todd Regan, and Angela Richie, were recognized among the nation’s top lawyers in their respective fields. Chambers USA recognized the firm in the following eight categories: USA – Nationwide – Insurance: Dispute Resolution: Insurer, Band 4 The firm is widely sought after by national insurance sector clients facing a wide array of coverage disputes as well as bad faith claims. The firm has additional capabilities in class actions and appellate litigation. Its broad base of experience includes professional liability, construction, and bankruptcy-related issues. This is the third year the firm has received this recognition. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani